search
Back to results

The Performance of Dexcom G6 Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients

Primary Purpose

Blood Glucose, Humans, Critical Care

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor
Sponsored by
Region Stockholm
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Blood Glucose

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Admitted to ICU at the Karolinska University Hospital Solna
  • Indwelling arterial catheter in situ or expected to be inserted in the next 2 hours
  • Six hours or less since intravenous insulin infusion was commenced or intravenous insulin infusion expected to commence within the next 2 hours
  • Vasopressor infusion ongoing or expected to commence within the next 2 hours
  • Mechanical ventilation ongoing or expected to commence within the next 2 hours
  • Patient expected to stay in the ICU until the day after tomorrow

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Unable to get consent from patient or next-of-kin
  • Patients in whom death is considered imminent (within 24 hours)

Sites / Locations

  • Karolinska University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Critically ill adults requiring insulin

Arm Description

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose within target range

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean absolute relative difference (MARD)
MARD in percent between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean absolute difference (MAD)
MAD between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values
Numerical accuracy according to ISO criteria
Numerical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria from 2013 (ISO 15197:2013)
Numerical accuracy according to CLSI standard
Numerical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Point of Care Testing 12-A3 (POCT12-A3) standard
Clinical accuracy determined by Clarke error grid analysis
Clinical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined by Clarke error grid analysis
Clinical accuracy determined by surveillance error grid analysis
Clinical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined by surveillance error grid analysis
Correlation
Correlation between arterial blood glucose levels and subcutaneous sensor glucose values

Full Information

First Posted
January 26, 2022
Last Updated
April 4, 2023
Sponsor
Region Stockholm
Collaborators
DexCom, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05255783
Brief Title
The Performance of Dexcom G6 Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Official Title
The Performance of Dexcom G6 Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 19, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Region Stockholm
Collaborators
DexCom, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is an investigator-initiated, prospective, observational accuracy-study. The aim of the study is to test the feasibility, safety, and accuracy of a subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring system (the Dexcom G6 glucose monitoring system) in critically ill patients. A total of 40 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring intravenous insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose within target range will be enrolled. Subcutaneous glucose readings will be compared with routine arterial blood glucose measurements to determine accuracy.
Detailed Description
The primary endpoint of the study is the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) in percent between CGM and arterial glucose values. Calculations show that 40 patients are required for a 95% confidence interval for the mean to have a range of ±1.7%, meaning that MARD can be estimated with high precision. Calculations of confidence intervals were done using normal approximation, assuming an SD of 5.5 percentage units. The following variables will be collected from the electronic medical record (Take Care), from the ICU-specific patient data management system (Clinisoft) and/or from the handheld Dexcom G6 monitor: Patient-related variables: Age, sex, height and weight Comorbidities (including diabetes status) Chronic medications Clinical variables: Date and time of ICU admission and discharge Reason for ICU admission Admission source (e.g. emergency department, other hospital, ward) Illness severity scores (e.g. SAPS [Simplified Acute Physiology Score], SOFA [Sequential Organ Failure Assessment]) Hemodynamic variables (e.g. heart rate, blood pressure) Blood gas results (including blood glucose concentration) Other routine laboratory results (e.g. serum creatinine, serum albumin, haematocrit) ICU mortality Treatment variables: Insulin doses (including continuous intravenous infusion rates, intravenous and subcutaneous insulin boluses) and times Doses and administration time for other medications given in the ICU (e.g. Vasopressors, paracetamol) Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)-related variables: Date and time of sensor insertion Sensor insertion site Number and duration of disconnection episodes Reason for disconnection Date and time of sensor calibrations Sensor glucose values with date and time stamps Date and time of sensor removal Reason for sensor removal Complications at sensor insertion site (redness, swelling, infection, bruising) Exact date and time of sensor insertion will be manually recorded in a case report form at the bedside. Every time an arterial blood gas is obtained, the arterial blood glucose value and the corresponding CGM glucose value will be manually recorded along with date and time in the case report form. At the end of the study period, after removing the CGM sensor, CGM-data will be downloaded from the handheld Dexcom G6 monitor.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Blood Glucose, Humans, Critical Care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Critically ill adults requiring insulin
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients admitted to the intensive care unit requiring insulin infusion to maintain blood glucose within target range
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
subcutaneous continuous glucose sensor
Intervention Description
Dexcom G6 continuous glucose monitoring system
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean absolute relative difference (MARD)
Description
MARD in percent between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean absolute difference (MAD)
Description
MAD between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Numerical accuracy according to ISO criteria
Description
Numerical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria from 2013 (ISO 15197:2013)
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Numerical accuracy according to CLSI standard
Description
Numerical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Point of Care Testing 12-A3 (POCT12-A3) standard
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Clinical accuracy determined by Clarke error grid analysis
Description
Clinical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined by Clarke error grid analysis
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Clinical accuracy determined by surveillance error grid analysis
Description
Clinical accuracy between subcutaneous sensor glucose values and arterial blood glucose values determined by surveillance error grid analysis
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Correlation
Description
Correlation between arterial blood glucose levels and subcutaneous sensor glucose values
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of interrupted sensor readings (Feasibility outcome)
Description
Number of interrupted sensor readings
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Duration of interrupted sensor readings (Feasibility outcome)
Description
Duration of interrupted sensor readings (hours)
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days
Title
Adverse events (safety and tolerability)
Description
Local reactions (e.g. allergic skin reactions, bruising) related to sensor insertion/sensor adhesives
Time Frame
From date of sensor insertion until date of ICU discharge, date of removal of the arterial line, or date of death, whichever came first, assessed up to 10 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥18 years Admitted to ICU at the Karolinska University Hospital Solna Indwelling arterial catheter in situ or expected to be inserted in the next 2 hours Six hours or less since intravenous insulin infusion was commenced or intravenous insulin infusion expected to commence within the next 2 hours Vasopressor infusion ongoing or expected to commence within the next 2 hours Mechanical ventilation ongoing or expected to commence within the next 2 hours Patient expected to stay in the ICU until the day after tomorrow Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy Unable to get consent from patient or next-of-kin Patients in whom death is considered imminent (within 24 hours)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Johan Mårtensson, MD, PhD
Phone
+46 (0)8-12394821
Email
johan.martensson@regionstockholm.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ola Friman, RN
Phone
+46 (0)8-51775830
Email
ola.friman@regionstockholm.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johan Mårtensson, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
17176
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johan Mårtensson, MD, PhD
Phone
+46 (0)8-12394821
Email
johan.martensson@regionstockholm.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ola Friman, RN
Phone
+46 (0)8-51775830
Email
ola.friman@regionstockholm.se

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25233297
Citation
Matuleviciene V, Joseph JI, Andelin M, Hirsch IB, Attvall S, Pivodic A, Dahlqvist S, Klonoff D, Haraldsson B, Lind M. A clinical trial of the accuracy and treatment experience of the Dexcom G4 sensor (Dexcom G4 system) and Enlite sensor (guardian REAL-time system) tested simultaneously in ambulatory patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Nov;16(11):759-67. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0238. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Performance of Dexcom G6 Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs