search
Back to results

Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players (DPL2)

Primary Purpose

Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Basketball Pre-injury Attack program
Sponsored by
University Rovira i Virgili
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Injury;Sports focused on measuring Basketball, Prevention

Eligibility Criteria

14 Years - 17 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 10 and 17 years old
  • Be an active player at the time of selection
  • Sign the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being diagnosed with a psychological and/or psychiatric illness.
  • Being diagnosed with an oncological disease.
  • Be injured at the time of selection.

Sites / Locations

  • Federación Catalana de Baloncesto

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Basketball pre-injury attack program

Control

Arm Description

The intervention group carried out a program for 24 weeks. The participant had to perform the program 3 days per week for 12-15' each day (training days with the team, prior to group activation).

The control group performed only the initial, follow-up (12 weeks) and final (24 weeks) evaluations.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ankle dorsiflexion under load
The Weight-bearing Lunge Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. Ankle dorsiflexion was recorded in centimeters.
Active hip, knee and ankle dorsiflexion
The Hurdle Step Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. A frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices so that the results could be analyzed later. Impairment was considered in those cases in which the subject was not able to step the foot over the rope during the hurdle step or if he/she performed adduction, internal or external rotation of the hip, and lost alignment between the hip, knee and ankle.
Ankle stability in monopodal loading
The Single Leg Squat Test was used and the criteria established by Perrot were used: it was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during the movement; and unstable if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during the movement or external rotation of the leg. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices.
Monopodal dynamic knee valgus
The Single Leg Squat Test was used. The evaluator recorded a frontal and sagittal view with two filming devices. The knee was considered to be aligned if the patella was over the second toe.
Lumbo-pelvic stability
It was evaluated qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test and the Hurdle Step Test. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices and the criteria established by Perrot were used. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes, the pelvic girdle was aligned and there was no evidence of excessive anteroposterior tilt and/or trunk rotation. It was considered unstable if these criteria were not met.
Dynamic postural stability
It was analyzed qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test. The test was recorded with two filming devices (frontal and sagittal) and the criteria established by Perrot and Crossley were used. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. It was considered stable if there was minimal translation of the center of mass, i.e., no lateral flexion/tilt, rotation or trunk flexion/extension.
Jumping/landing technique
It was analyzed with de Single Hop for distance Test. Ankle stability at landing, dynamic knee valgus, lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural stability were analyzed.
Symmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limb
From the distance obtained in the Single Hop for distance Test, the Symmetry Index was calculated using the formula: (Distance dominant limb/Distance non-dominant limb)*100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Age
Recorded in years.
Category
According to the age of the participant could compete in 3 categories: U14, U16 or U17.
Gender
Female or male.
Weight
Weight was recorded in kg.
Height
Height was recorded in cm.
Body Mass Index (BMI)
It was calculated from the following formula [weight (kg) / height2 (m)].
Wingspan
The horizontal wingspan was recorded in cm.

Full Information

First Posted
February 15, 2022
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Sponsor
University Rovira i Virgili
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05256186
Brief Title
Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players
Acronym
DPL2
Official Title
Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Rovira i Virgili

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Basketball is an impact, coordination-opposition sport with continuous contact among players and it is considered a sport of medium-high injury incidence. Players are force to have a physical condition appropriate to their practice and the demand to which they must respond due to the intensity of the efforts this sport requires. In order to achieve this, it is necessary to establish an evaluation protocol that allows the detection of functional deficiencies, to guide and conduct in a specific and early way every moment of players' health and growth. The purpose of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of the functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of youth basketball players (U14 - U17).
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to design, apply and analyze the effectiveness of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Pre-injury Attack) based on the approach of functional deficiencies detected by the Basketball Injury Defense, to reduce the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players. The specific objectives are: To improve the deficiencies detected in mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of basketball players in training categories (U14, U16 and U17). To structure and determine the contents of a specific and individualized therapeutic exercise program (Basketball Preinjury Attack) designed to improve the functional deficiencies of mobility, stability, symmetry and jumping/landing technique of training basketball players based on current scientific evidence. To analyze whether adherence to the program is achieved by raising players' awareness of the importance and benefits of performing the exercises with correct technique. To assess whether a decrease in the susceptibility to injury of training federated basketball players is achieved. For this purpose, an experimental study was conducted as a single-blind, randomized, cluster-controlled clinical trial during the months of June 2019 to February 2020 (9 months). For the development of the methodology of this study, the guidelines of the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement were followed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Injury;Sports, Biomechanical Lesions, Musculoskeletal Injury, Sports Physical Therapy
Keywords
Basketball, Prevention

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial
Masking
Investigator
Masking Description
The study was blinded to the investigators who performed both recruitment and assessments. In this way, detection bias could be controlled. It was not possible to perform a double-blind study, since it was a physical intervention and the player knew that he/she was undergoing an intervention program.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
212 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Basketball pre-injury attack program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group carried out a program for 24 weeks. The participant had to perform the program 3 days per week for 12-15' each day (training days with the team, prior to group activation).
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The control group performed only the initial, follow-up (12 weeks) and final (24 weeks) evaluations.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Basketball Pre-injury Attack program
Intervention Description
The intervention had a total duration of 24 weeks, with 3 sessions per week (before starting training) with a total duration of 12 to 15 minutes per session. Each session consisted of 8 exercises with a load of 2 to 3 series between 6 and 12 repetitions; and with a rest at the end of each series of <60 seconds.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ankle dorsiflexion under load
Description
The Weight-bearing Lunge Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. Ankle dorsiflexion was recorded in centimeters.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Active hip, knee and ankle dorsiflexion
Description
The Hurdle Step Test measured with the Leg Motion® system (Check Your Motion, Albacete) was used. A frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices so that the results could be analyzed later. Impairment was considered in those cases in which the subject was not able to step the foot over the rope during the hurdle step or if he/she performed adduction, internal or external rotation of the hip, and lost alignment between the hip, knee and ankle.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Ankle stability in monopodal loading
Description
The Single Leg Squat Test was used and the criteria established by Perrot were used: it was considered stable if the foot remained in neutral position during the movement; and unstable if excessive pronation of the foot was evident during the movement or external rotation of the leg. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Monopodal dynamic knee valgus
Description
The Single Leg Squat Test was used. The evaluator recorded a frontal and sagittal view with two filming devices. The knee was considered to be aligned if the patella was over the second toe.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Lumbo-pelvic stability
Description
It was evaluated qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test and the Hurdle Step Test. To analyze the results, a frontal and sagittal view was recorded with two filming devices and the criteria established by Perrot were used. It was considered stable if there was minimal movement in all three planes, the pelvic girdle was aligned and there was no evidence of excessive anteroposterior tilt and/or trunk rotation. It was considered unstable if these criteria were not met.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Dynamic postural stability
Description
It was analyzed qualitatively with the Single Leg Squat Test. The test was recorded with two filming devices (frontal and sagittal) and the criteria established by Perrot and Crossley were used. For this purpose, the deviation of the trunk with respect to the center of gravity was observed. It was considered stable if there was minimal translation of the center of mass, i.e., no lateral flexion/tilt, rotation or trunk flexion/extension.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Jumping/landing technique
Description
It was analyzed with de Single Hop for distance Test. Ankle stability at landing, dynamic knee valgus, lumbopelvic stability and dynamic postural stability were analyzed.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Symmetry between the dominant and non-dominant limb
Description
From the distance obtained in the Single Hop for distance Test, the Symmetry Index was calculated using the formula: (Distance dominant limb/Distance non-dominant limb)*100.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Age
Description
Recorded in years.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Category
Description
According to the age of the participant could compete in 3 categories: U14, U16 or U17.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Gender
Description
Female or male.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Weight
Description
Weight was recorded in kg.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Height
Description
Height was recorded in cm.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Description
It was calculated from the following formula [weight (kg) / height2 (m)].
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Wingspan
Description
The horizontal wingspan was recorded in cm.
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Be between 10 and 17 years old Be an active player at the time of selection Sign the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Being diagnosed with a psychological and/or psychiatric illness. Being diagnosed with an oncological disease. Be injured at the time of selection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cristina Adillón, MsC
Organizational Affiliation
University Rovira i Virgili
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Federación Catalana de Baloncesto
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08018
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28070457
Citation
Romero Morales C, Calvo Lobo C, Rodriguez Sanz D, Sanz Corbalan I, Ruiz Ruiz B, Lopez Lopez D. The concurrent validity and reliability of the Leg Motion system for measuring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in older adults. PeerJ. 2017 Jan 3;5:e2820. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2820. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24911356
Citation
Aerts I, Cumps E, Verhagen E, Wuyts B, Van De Gucht S, Meeusen R. The effect of a 3-month prevention program on the jump-landing technique in basketball: a randomized controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0099. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16282579
Citation
Myer GD, Ford KR, McLean SG, Hewett TE. The effects of plyometric versus dynamic stabilization and balance training on lower extremity biomechanics. Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):445-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281241. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12629423
Citation
Myklebust G, Engebretsen L, Braekken IH, Skjolberg A, Olsen OE, Bahr R. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female team handball players: a prospective intervention study over three seasons. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Mar;13(2):71-8. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00002.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Moody JA, Naclerio F, Green P, Lloyd RS. Motor skill development in youths. En: Lloyd R, Oliver JL. Strength and Conditioning for Young Athletes: Science and Application. 1ª edición. New York:Routledge;2014
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25144599
Citation
Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, Zinder SM, Padua DA. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing-lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014 Nov-Dec;49(6):723-32. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27418341
Citation
Baumbach SF, Braunstein M, Seeliger F, Borgmann L, Bocker W, Polzer H. Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Sep;136(9):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2513-x. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29181258
Citation
Gonzalo-Skok O, Serna J, Rhea MR, Marin PJ. AGE DIFFERENCES IN MEASURES OF FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT AND PERFORMANCE IN HIGHLY YOUTH BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Oct;12(5):812-821.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6734680
Citation
Branta C, Haubenstricker J, Seefeldt V. Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1984;12:467-520.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28149351
Citation
Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe A, Gual G, Romero-Rodriguez D, Unnitha V. Lower Limb Neuromuscular Asymmetry in Volleyball and Basketball Players. J Hum Kinet. 2016 Apr 13;50:135-143. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2015-0150. eCollection 2016 Apr 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24105612
Citation
Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):123-40. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18523566
Citation
McKeon PO, Hertel J. Systematic review of postural control and lateral ankle instability, part I: can deficits be detected with instrumented testing. J Athl Train. 2008 May-Jun;43(3):293-304. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.3.293.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22263111
Citation
Perrott MA, Pizzari T, Opar M, Cook J. Development of clinical rating criteria for tests of lumbopelvic stability. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:803637. doi: 10.1155/2012/803637. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24412892
Citation
Teyhen D, Bergeron MF, Deuster P, Baumgartner N, Beutler AI, de la Motte SJ, Jones BH, Lisman P, Padua DA, Pendergrass TL, Pyne SW, Schoomaker E, Sell TC, O'Connor F. Consortium for health and military performance and American College of Sports Medicine Summit: utility of functional movement assessment in identifying musculoskeletal injury risk. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000023.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15722287
Citation
Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Heidt RS Jr, Colosimo AJ, McLean SG, van den Bogert AJ, Paterno MV, Succop P. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):492-501. doi: 10.1177/0363546504269591. Epub 2005 Feb 8.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of Basketball Pre-injury Attack Program to Reduce the Susceptibility of Injury in Youth Basketball Players

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs