search
Back to results

Assessment of Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in the Evaluation and Management of Females With Chronic Bladder Pain and Cystitis-like Symptoms

Primary Purpose

Interstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Polymerase Chain Reaction and Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
Sponsored by
MicroGenDX
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Interstitial Cystitis focused on measuring BPS, IC, NGS, PCR

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Subjects may be included in the study if they have bladder and/or urethral pain and lower urinary tract storage symptoms and only if they meet all of the following criteria at screening/baseline.

  1. Subjects are capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in this protocol.
  2. Symptomatic subjects with BPS (NIH/NIDDK/MAPP definition) with perceived bladder pain +/- urinary storage symptoms) or symptomatic patients with CCS (chronic UTI definition based on modified ACSS with dysuria)
  3. Subjects with previous failure of standard urine culture directed therapy approach, eg. antibiotic treatment based on previous urine culture results (positive, sterile, or nebulous) failed to provide appreciable clinical benefit.
  4. Subjects who have experienced a minimum of 3 months of continuous symptoms
  5. Subjects who have a minimum average daily bladder pain score of ≥ 3 on a 0-10 NRS scale in the past 3 months
  6. Subjects with no antibiotic therapy for the previous 2 weeks
  7. Subjects with no UTI supplements including cranberry, d-mannose, high dose vitamin C and Lactobacillus probiotics for the previous 2 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria: Subjects will be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. Subjects with any of the following confounding conditions: bladder stones, lower ureteric stones, vaginal candidiasis, urethral diverticulum, urinary retention (≥ 300 mL), overactive bladder (ie, urinary urgency secondary to urinary incontinence), or any other condition/disease, which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise patient safety or confound the collection or interpretation of study results.
  2. Subjects who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study period
  3. Subjects with a history of previous urinary diversion procedure with or without bladder removal or bladder augmentation.
  4. Subjects with a history of bladder cystoscopy only within 1 month or cystoscopy with bladder biopsy, hydrodistension, fulguration or triamcinolone injection or treatment of Hunner ulcer performed within 3 months prior to Screening.
  5. Subjects with a medical history of carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the bladder, urethral cancer, or pelvic radiotherapy.
  6. Subjects with a neurogenic bladder (due to spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, or diabetic cystopathy).
  7. Subjects with genital herpes active within 3 months prior to screening.
  8. Subjects with a history of gross (visible) hematuria within 1 year prior to screening that has not been evaluated.
  9. Subjects who have had major surgery within the past 3 months or has surgery planned during the study period
  10. Subjects with a history of alcohol and/or drug abuse that in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the study evaluations or the patient's safety.
  11. Subjects catheterized in the past month
  12. Subjects that have received antibiotic treatment based on MicroGenDX's NGS results in the prior 12 months
  13. Subjects with indwelling ureteral stents
  14. Subjects that have received a bladder instillation within the last 4 weeks

Sites / Locations

  • UCLA Center for Women's Pelvic HealthRecruiting
  • The University of California San Diego HealthRecruiting
  • Cooper University Health CareRecruiting
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Urology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Single arm

Arm Description

All subject's samples will undergo the same diagnostic test utilizing Polymerase Chain Reaction and Next-Generation DNA Sequencing

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Effectiveness of PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy assessed by the Global Response Assessment (GRA)
GRA is a 7-point descriptive scale in which subjects self-report that degree that their symptoms improved or worsened compared to baseline. The answers available for the subject includes markedly improved, moderately improved, mildly improved, no change, mildly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse. A responder is a subject who reports that compared to baseline their symptoms are moderately or markedly improved. The primary analysis will determine the proportion of subjects who are responders at the efficacy visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Safety of PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy by measuring the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by the SAE questionnaire
Determine the safety of employing a PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy strategy in female subjects with BPS and CCS.
concordance
Evaluate concordance of culture results with PCR/NGS findings in this population of women.
Type of sample comparison
Compare the microbiome of midstream and catheterized urine specimens of symptomatic female subjects with BPS and CCS.
Stratification comparison
Compare urinary microbiome of symptomatic population of women stratified based on PCR/NGS positive and PCR/NGS negative subgroups, positive/negative cultures, and BPS and CCS.

Full Information

First Posted
November 4, 2021
Last Updated
March 13, 2023
Sponsor
MicroGenDX
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05276466
Brief Title
Assessment of Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in the Evaluation and Management of Females With Chronic Bladder Pain and Cystitis-like Symptoms
Official Title
Assessment of Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in the Evaluation and Management of Females With Chronic Bladder Pain and Cystitis-like Symptoms
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 15, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
MicroGenDX

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Real-world clinical practice multicenter study to determine the clinical implications of employing PCR/NGS technology to identify and treat potential urinary pathogens in female participants identified with bladder pain and/or cystitis-like symptoms.
Detailed Description
This is a real-world clinical practice multicenter study to determine the clinical implications of employing PCR/NGS technology to identify and treat potential urinary pathogens in female patients identified with BPS and/or CCS symptoms. Eligible subjects will undergo a baseline/screening visit at which time the following will be collected: demographics/history, physical examination, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain (average and maximum), Female Genito-Urinary Pain Index (F-GUPI), Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICSI/ICPI), Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS), and the Short Form -12.v2 Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-12). MSU and catheterized urine specimens will be collected for urinalysis (UA), standard culture, and PCR/NGS. Subjects will be stratified based on BPS (NIDDK MAPP criteria) or CCS (based on ACSS criteria) symptoms. Uropathogens detected on PCR/NGS catheterized specimens will be treated with 10 days of PCR/NGS directed antibiotic therapy which will be recommended by a centralized infectious disease consultant. If there are no uropathogenic bacteria in the catheter specimen, the MSU specimen will be used if positive. Prescribing physicians will adjust those recommendations (choice of antibiotic as well as duration of therapy) based on individual patient's history of antibiotic therapy and known allergies and sensitivities. Subjects with negative PCR/NGS findings for potential uropathogens will be treated with 10 days of empiric antibiotic therapy chosen by the investigator from this list b: 1. Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, 2. Macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin, 3. Fosfomycin, and 4. Investigator choice. More than one antibiotic may be prescribed if two or more uropathogens are identified. At the discretion of the treating physician with the consent and shared decision making with the patient, a decision may be made to continue antibiotic therapy beyond 10 days if the patient subjectively believes she is responding. In this study, all subjects will be offered antibiotic therapy, either NGS directed or empiric. Fourteen days after beginning antibiotics, the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), compliance and safety will be determined via phone call. A clinic visit will be scheduled for 14 days after finishing antibiotics for repeat evaluation of symptoms (NRS pain, F-GUPI, ICSI/ICPI, ACSS, SF-12, SGA) and safety. A MSU urine specimen will be collected from all subjects and submitted for PCR/NGS analysis. Subjects who were PCR/NGS negative and failed empiric therapy will be notified that they likely do not have an infection. Primary analyses will be based on the responder rate (SGA responder rate will be the primary efficacy parameter), symptom change based on the other questionnaires, and safety in BPS/CCS subjects treated with PCR/NGS as well as those treated with empiric therapy. A 40% SGA responder rate, where a responder is defined as markedly or moderately improved on the GRA 7-point scale, will be considered a clinically significant impact. A follow-up visit 4 weeks later will collect similar data as collected at the efficacy visit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Interstitial Cystitis, Bladder Pain Syndrome
Keywords
BPS, IC, NGS, PCR

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Single group assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Single arm
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All subject's samples will undergo the same diagnostic test utilizing Polymerase Chain Reaction and Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Polymerase Chain Reaction and Next-Generation DNA Sequencing
Intervention Description
The qPCR Rapid Screening Panel is a quantitative real-time PCR test for bacteria and fungi. Next-Generation DNA Sequencing is the Comprehensive Sequencing test will detect virtually all microbial organisms and fungal pathogens that may be present in patient specimens.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effectiveness of PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy assessed by the Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Description
GRA is a 7-point descriptive scale in which subjects self-report that degree that their symptoms improved or worsened compared to baseline. The answers available for the subject includes markedly improved, moderately improved, mildly improved, no change, mildly worse, moderately worse, markedly worse. A responder is a subject who reports that compared to baseline their symptoms are moderately or markedly improved. The primary analysis will determine the proportion of subjects who are responders at the efficacy visit.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety of PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy by measuring the incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events by the SAE questionnaire
Description
Determine the safety of employing a PCR/NGS directed antimicrobial therapy strategy in female subjects with BPS and CCS.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
concordance
Description
Evaluate concordance of culture results with PCR/NGS findings in this population of women.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Type of sample comparison
Description
Compare the microbiome of midstream and catheterized urine specimens of symptomatic female subjects with BPS and CCS.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Stratification comparison
Description
Compare urinary microbiome of symptomatic population of women stratified based on PCR/NGS positive and PCR/NGS negative subgroups, positive/negative cultures, and BPS and CCS.
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects may be included in the study if they have bladder and/or urethral pain and lower urinary tract storage symptoms and only if they meet all of the following criteria at screening/baseline. Subjects are capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in this protocol. Symptomatic subjects with BPS (NIH/NIDDK/MAPP definition) with perceived bladder pain +/- urinary storage symptoms) or symptomatic patients with CCS (chronic UTI definition based on modified ACSS with dysuria) Subjects with previous failure of standard urine culture directed therapy approach, eg. antibiotic treatment based on previous urine culture results (positive, sterile, or nebulous) failed to provide appreciable clinical benefit. Subjects who have experienced a minimum of 3 months of continuous symptoms Subjects who have a minimum average daily bladder pain score of ≥ 3 on a 0-10 NRS scale in the past 3 months Subjects with no antibiotic therapy for the previous 2 weeks Subjects with no UTI supplements including cranberry, d-mannose, high dose vitamin C and Lactobacillus probiotics for the previous 2 weeks. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects will be excluded from participating in this study if they meet any of the following criteria: Subjects with any of the following confounding conditions: bladder stones, lower ureteric stones, vaginal candidiasis, urethral diverticulum, urinary retention (≥ 300 mL), overactive bladder (ie, urinary urgency secondary to urinary incontinence), or any other condition/disease, which, in the opinion of the investigator, could compromise patient safety or confound the collection or interpretation of study results. Subjects who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy during the study period Subjects with a history of previous urinary diversion procedure with or without bladder removal or bladder augmentation. Subjects with a history of bladder cystoscopy only within 1 month or cystoscopy with bladder biopsy, hydrodistension, fulguration or triamcinolone injection or treatment of Hunner ulcer performed within 3 months prior to Screening. Subjects undergoing active treatment for cancer - urologic (eg bladder) or other - with surgery, radiation or chemotherapy within previous 8 weeks of screening. Subjects with a neurogenic bladder (due to spinal cord injury, stroke, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spina bifida, or diabetic cystopathy). Subjects with genital herpes active within 3 months prior to screening. Subjects with a history of gross (visible) hematuria within 1 year prior to screening that has not been evaluated. Subjects who have had major surgery within the past 3 months or has surgery planned during the study period Subjects with a history of alcohol and/or drug abuse that in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the study evaluations or the patient's safety. Subjects catheterized in the past month Subjects that have received antibiotic treatment based on MicroGenDX's NGS results in the prior 12 months Subjects with indwelling ureteral stents Subjects that have received a bladder instillation within the last 4 weeks
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCLA Center for Women's Pelvic Health
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Crystal Cisneros
Phone
833-825-2974
Email
CCisneros@mednet.ucla.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne L Ackerman, MD
Facility Name
The University of California San Diego Health
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Trisha Kanie
Phone
619-543-6544
Email
tkanie@health.ucsd.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Anger, MD
Facility Name
Cooper University Health Care
City
Camden
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08103
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bhaven Murji
Phone
856-968-7547
Email
murji-bhaven@cooperhealth.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lioudmila Lipetskaia, MD
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Urology
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Completed

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Currently no plan to share individual data to other researchers.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21497847
Citation
Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, Forrest JB, Gordon B, Gray M, Mayer RD, Newman D, Nyberg L Jr, Payne CK, Wesselmann U, Faraday MM; Interstitial Cystitis Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21920661
Citation
Giannantoni A, Bini V, Dmochowski R, Hanno P, Nickel JC, Proietti S, Wyndaele JJ. Contemporary management of the painful bladder: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):29-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.069. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30917614
Citation
Nickel JC, Stephens-Shields AJ, Landis JR, Mullins C, van Bokhoven A, Lucia MS, Henderson JP, Sen B, Krol JE, Ehrlich GD; MAPP Research Network. A Culture-Independent Analysis of the Microbiota of Female Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Participants in the MAPP Research Network. J Clin Med. 2019 Mar 26;8(3):415. doi: 10.3390/jcm8030415.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26410734
Citation
Nickel JC, Stephens A, Landis JR, Mullins C, van Bokhoven A, Lucia MS, Ehrlich GD; MAPP Research Network. Assessment of the Lower Urinary Tract Microbiota during Symptom Flare in Women with Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A MAPP Network Study. J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.075. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33352734
Citation
Alidjanov JF, Naber KG, Pilatz A, Wagenlehner FM. Validation of the American English Acute Cystitis Symptom Score. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 19;9(12):929. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120929.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9146003
Citation
O'Leary MP, Sant GR, Fowler FJ Jr, Whitmore KE, Spolarich-Kroll J. The interstitial cystitis symptom index and problem index. Urology. 1997 May;49(5A Suppl):58-63. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80333-1.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of Urinary Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in the Evaluation and Management of Females With Chronic Bladder Pain and Cystitis-like Symptoms

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs