Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Language Comprehension

First, in a recording-only self-paced reading experiment, patients with epilepsy undergoing intracranial monitoring for clinical purposes will read or listen to sentences presented to them one word at time while the investigators simultaneously record neural activity through intracranial electrodes that are implanted for clinical purposes (see subject populations). At the end of the sentence, the subjects have to indicate how they comprehended the sentence by selecting which of several pictures matches the sentence they just read. Behavioral measures that the investigators record and analyze are their response times to advance to each next word in the sentence, and which picture they chose for each sentence. These behavioral measures are compared against the neural activity simultaneously recorded as they are made. Then, in a later session, the same participants will participate in a task-related stimulation experiment. This follows the exact same design as the recording-only reading experiment, the only difference is that on some trials, at controlled moments during the sentence presentation intracranial electrical stimulation is delivered through adjacent intracranial electrode contacts. The investigators will examine the effect of this stimulation on the subjects comprehension of the sentences measured by their behavior, and on the simultaneously recorded neural activity.

All experiments and recordings will take place in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU). All electrodes being used to gather data are in place through standard of care to treat the patient's epilepsy by monitoring neural activity to guide an upcoming respective surgery. In all experiments, neural activity will be recorded from the standard of care electrodes using either a high-fidelity, FDA-approved Neuralynx Atlas amplifier system (Bozeman, MT) or a standard-of-care recording system (Natus Quantum Recording System, Pleasanton, CA) that is used normally to monitor seizure activity for clinical purposes during the patient's hospital stay. In the task-related stimulation experiment, stimulation will be delivered with a standard of care electrically isolated stimulator (Nicolet Cortical Stimulator, Natus, Pleasanton, CA). Recording-only word-by-word task. Participants are asked to read and comprehend sentences presented one word at a time. Participants advance through the sentence at their own pace by pressing a button to advance to each next word of the sentence. At the end of each sentence, participants are presented with 4 pictures, and their task is to choose which of the 4 pictures corresponds to the sentence they just read. Three sentence types are presented: Object relative sentences (e.g. "The cat that the dog chased was brown"), Subject relative sentences ("The cat that chased the dog was brown") and control sentences ("The brown cat chased the dog"). The 4 pictures simultaneously probe patient/agent assignment (i.e. "who chased whom?") and complement-noun assignment ("was the cat or the dog brown?"). 1 of the 4 pictures is correct, 1 picture reflects a patient-agent error, 1 reflects a complement-noun error, and 1 reflects both errors simultaneously. Stimulation task. Subjects will perform a word-by-word sentence-reading task as before, only for this task on some object relative sentence trials intracranial stimulation is applied at the phrase boundary in the middle of the sentence. For example, this would be the word "chased" in the object relative sentence "The cat that the dog chased was brown". Stimulation parameters. Intracranial stimulation is delivered at 50 Hz for 1 second. This stimulation parameters are designed to interrupt local processing when delivered to areas outside of primary motor and sensory cortices. The investigators will choose which electrodes to stimulate based on the anatomical locations of recording sites for that patient and based on preliminary analyses of recorded activity in recording-only sessions before the stimulation session. Intracranial stimulation will be performed with simultaneous intracranial recording. Stimulation sessions need to be minimized in length to avoid patient fatigue and other effects from too much stimulation. In our preliminary data the investigators have found that the investigators can acquire 8 stimulation trials in 2 different stimulation locations for a given patient. The investigators ideally will choose one left Inferior Frontal Gyrus (IFG) and one left Superior Temporal Sulcus (STS) electrode to stimulate to the extent that one or both are available for a subject. The investigators stimulate the most difficult sentences, object-relative sentences, to maximize the chances of observing an effect. The investigators will pair this with an equal number (8) of non-stimulated object-relative sentences. When possible, the investigators will include 8 subject-relative and 8 control sentences, both without stimulation to include variety in the types of sentences given in the stimulation session. The stimulation task will be performed either with a constant rate of word presentation (500 ms per word) through-out all of the sentences, or performed in a "self-paced" manner as described above for the recording-only word-by-word task. All participants will complete the same procedures. Participants will perform any recording only tasks first, which will occur when they are able and willing to after they have recovered from the surgery, typically 2 days after the implantation surgery. Participants will perform the stimulation task in co-ordination with the epileptologists at the EMU in the same sessions when stimulation mapping occurs for clinical purposes. This typically occurs at the end of the patient's stay in the EMU when the patients are on full doses of anti-seizure medication.

All participants with epilepsy undergoing intracranial monitoring for clinical purposes will be approached to participate in an experiment that is recording-only and an experiment that involves stimulation with simultaneous recording.

Subjects read different types of sentences (object-relative, subject -relative and control sentences) to observe how that sentence affects their intracranially recorded neural activity.

On some trials the investigators will apply intracranial electrical current through the electrodes implanted in the participants and observe the effect this has on their behavior (which picture they choose at the end of the trial) and the effect this has on their neural activity that the investigators record simultaneously through-out the experiment.

The investigators will observe which picture the participant chooses at the end of each trial. The participant's choice will be measured by a touch screen that the patient touches to make their choice. The unit of measurement is the percentage of trials per condition studied in which participants choose the correct picture, versus the percentage of trials per condition studied in which participants choose the picture that reflects a patient-agent error (which reflects incorrect assignment of the patient versus agent roles of the nouns in the sentence), versus the percentage of trials per condition studied in which participants choose the picture that reflects a complement error (which reflects that the subjects mistakenly applied an adjective to the wrong noun in the sentence), versus the percentage of trials per condition studied in which participants choose the picture that reflects both a patient-agent and a complement error.

Behavioral Response - Self-paced word response time for words presented before electrical stimulation

While subjects perform self-paced reading experiments, this is the amount of time they spend on each word of the sentence before moving on to the next word of the sentence.

Behavioral Response - Self-paced word response time for words presented concomitant with electrical stimulation

While subjects perform self-paced reading experiments, this is the amount of time they spend on each word of the sentence before moving on to the next word of the sentence.

While subjects perform self-paced reading experiments, this is the amount of time they spend on each word of the sentence before moving on to the next word of the sentence, for words presented after electrical stimulation

With the electrodes implanted in the patient as a standard of care, the investigators will measure the neural activation at each electrode as assessed by the high gamma power present in that recorded channel

With the electrodes implanted in the patient as a standard of care, the investigators will measure the neural activation at each electrode as assessed by the high gamma power present in that recorded channel

With the electrodes implanted in the patient as a standard of care, the investigators will measure the neural activation at each electrode as assessed by the high gamma power present in that recorded channel

Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 and older Undergoing standard of care stereo Electro Encephalogram (sEEG) or Electro-Corticogram (ECoG) monitoring Able to competently perform control trials of the task Exclusion Criteria: Age less than 18 years Unable to competently perform control trials of the task

After publication of the main results, limited access datasets that are free of identifying information will be made available to the scientific community per NIH guidelines in accordance with UAB policies and state and federal regulations. The final dataset will be stripped of identifying information before sharing.

All researchers who seek data will be asked to commit to protect privacy and confidentiality, secure the data using appropriate computer technology, refrain from redistributing data to third parties, and destroy or return the data after completion of analyses. The PI will review data sharing requests. Researchers requesting data may be asked to submit in writing a signed statement affirming their commitment to protect privacy and confidentiality.

Nelson MJ, El Karoui I, Giber K, Yang X, Cohen L, Koopman H, Cash SS, Naccache L, Hale JT, Pallier C, Dehaene S. Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 2;114(18):E3669-E3678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1701590114. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

Fedorenko E, Scott TL, Brunner P, Coon WG, Pritchett B, Schalk G, Kanwisher N. Neural correlate of the construction of sentence meaning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 11;113(41):E6256-E6262. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612132113. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

Manning JR, Jacobs J, Fried I, Kahana MJ. Broadband shifts in local field potential power spectra are correlated with single-neuron spiking in humans. J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 28;29(43):13613-20. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2041-09.2009.

King JR, Dehaene S. Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Mar 2.

De Ridder D, Perera S, Vanneste S. State of the Art: Novel Applications for Cortical Stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):206-214. doi: 10.1111/ner.12593. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

Pallier C, Devauchelle AD, Dehaene S. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 8;108(6):2522-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018711108. Epub 2011 Jan 11.

Miller KJ, Sorensen LB, Ojemann JG, den Nijs M. Power-law scaling in the brain surface electric potential. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000609. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Ray S, Maunsell JH. Different origins of gamma rhythm and high-gamma activity in macaque visual cortex. PLoS Biol. 2011 Apr;9(4):e1000610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000610. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

Mesulam MM, Wieneke C, Hurley R, Rademaker A, Thompson CK, Weintraub S, Rogalski EJ. Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia. Brain. 2013 Feb;136(Pt 2):601-18. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws336. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

Keller CJ, Honey CJ, Megevand P, Entz L, Ulbert I, Mehta AD. Mapping human brain networks with cortico-cortical evoked potentials. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 5;369(1653):20130528. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0528.

Cuello Oderiz C, von Ellenrieder N, Dubeau F, Eisenberg A, Gotman J, Hall J, Hincapie AS, Hoffmann D, Job AS, Khoo HM, Minotti L, Olivier A, Kahane P, Frauscher B. Association of Cortical Stimulation-Induced Seizure With Surgical Outcome in Patients With Focal Drug-Resistant Epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1070-1078. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1464.

Goldstein HE, Smith EH, Gross RE, Jobst BC, Lega BC, Sperling MR, Worrell GA, Zaghloul KA, Wanda PA, Kahana MJ, Rizzuto DS, Schevon CA, McKhann GM, Sheth SA. Risk of seizures induced by intracranial research stimulation: analysis of 770 stimulation sessions. J Neural Eng. 2019 Nov 11;16(6):066039. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab4365.

Uncommon Understanding (Classic Edition): Development and disorders of language comprehension in children

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/data-analysis-using-regression-and-multilevelhierarchical-models/32A29531C7FD730C3A68951A17C9D983