search
Back to results

Analgesic Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Sponsored by
Jakub Antczak
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Neuropathy focused on measuring Peripheral neuropathy, Neuropathic pain, rTMS, analgesic effect

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy
  • Neuropathic pain of constant severity since not less than a month and requiring use of analgesics more than once a week
  • Score of 30 millimeter or more on the 100 millimeter visual analog scale of pain intensity at inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe depression
  • Personality disorders and other psychiatric conditions, which could disturb the participation in the study
  • Cognitive deficits, which could disturb the participation in the study
  • Epilepsy
  • Presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field
  • Pregnancy
  • Likelihood to get pregnant
  • Intracranial electrodes

Sites / Locations

  • Jagiellonian University Medical CollegeRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Arm Description

10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the primary motor area. Therapy will include 6 sessions (three sessions in two consecutive days). In every sessions 1500 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.

Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity after rTMS
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity First Follow-up
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity Second Follow-up
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after four weeks after finishing rTMS.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Numeric Pain Severity Scale after rTMS
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Numeric Pain Severity Scale First Follow-up
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Numeric Pain Severity Scale Second Follow-up
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory after rTMS
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory First Follow-up
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory Second Follow-up
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Athens Insomnia Scale after rTMS
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Athens Insomnia Scale First Follow-up
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Athens Insomnia Scale Second Follow-up
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension after rTMS
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension First Follow-up
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension Second Follow-up
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.

Full Information

First Posted
March 7, 2022
Last Updated
November 4, 2022
Sponsor
Jakub Antczak
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05295498
Brief Title
Analgesic Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
Official Title
Analgesic Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Pain Related to Peripheral Neuropathy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 4, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jakub Antczak

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent condition, commonly associated with pain. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity and is regarded as one of alternative methods to alleviate pain associated with various kind of neuropathies. rTMS is usually performed once a day and the whole therapy of neuropathic pain lasts one week. In a number of recent clinical trials including patients with depression and some other disorders, rTMS was delivered several times a day, which reduced the time of the whole therapy. This approach was termed an accelerated rTMS. The purpose of this study is to investigate feasibility of accelerated rTMS in treatment of neuropathic pain.
Detailed Description
Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent condition, commonly associated with pain, which is often drug resistant. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity. In this method, series of magnetic stimuli are delivered to the cerebral cortex, where they turn to electric current and depolarize repetitively the targeted neurons. If the stimulation is repeated during subsequent days it is capable to modify the activity of targeted cortical area for weeks or even months and by this way to achieve therapeutic effect. rTMS is most commonly used to treat drug-resistant depression but a number of other psychiatric and neurologic conditions is increasingly being regarded as therapeutic indication for rTMS. In patients suffering from neuropathic pain rTMS is delivered with high frequency, over primary motor areas (PMA). Stimulation of PMA should result in modulation of thalamic activity, achieved by antidromic excitation of thalamocortical connections. rTMS is usually performed once a day and the whole therapy of neuropathic pain lasts one week. In a number of recent clinical trials including patients with depression and some other disorders, rTMS was delivered several times a day, which reduced the time of the whole therapy. This approach was termed an accelerated rTMS. The purpose of this study is to investigate feasibility of accelerated rTMS in treatment of neuropathic pain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Neuropathy
Keywords
Peripheral neuropathy, Neuropathic pain, rTMS, analgesic effect

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Parallel Assignment. Patients will be randomly assigned to active or to sham stimulation.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor). Sham stimulation will be provided by holding the stimulating coil perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as during active stimulation but prevents significant magnetic field to reach the brain tissue.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the primary motor area. Therapy will include 6 sessions (three sessions in two consecutive days). In every sessions 1500 magnetic pulses of 90% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.
Arm Title
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Intervention Description
High frequency rTMS over the primary motor area to induce the long term potentiation of primary motor areas for the muscles of upper extremity.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Intervention Description
Sham stimulation to mimic the high frequency rTMS over the primary motor area.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity after rTMS
Description
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Title
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity First Follow-up
Description
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, up to one day after finishing rTMS.
Title
Visual Analogue Scale of Pain Severity Second Follow-up
Description
An analog scale of the length of 100 millimeter. Total score of 100, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Visual Analogue Scale to the measurement taken after four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale after rTMS
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, up to one day after finishing rTMS.
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale First Follow-up
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Numeric Pain Severity Scale Second Follow-up
Description
Total score 10, with higher scores representing more severe pain. Change from baseline score in the Numeric Pain Severity Scale to the measurement taken after four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory after rTMS
Description
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, up to one day after finishing rTMS.
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory First Follow-up
Description
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory Second Follow-up
Description
Total score 120, with higher scores representing more severe pain and other symptoms of neuropathy. Change from baseline score in the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Athens Insomnia Scale after rTMS
Description
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, up to one day after finishing rTMS.
Title
Athens Insomnia Scale First Follow-up
Description
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Athens Insomnia Scale Second Follow-up
Description
Total score 24, with higher scores representing more severe insomnia. Change from baseline score in the Athens Insomnia Scale to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension after rTMS
Description
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, up to one day after finishing rTMS.
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension First Follow-up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS.
Title
Bilateral Dynamometric Assessment of the strength of the foot extension Second Follow-up
Description
Change from baseline strength of the foot extension to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.
Time Frame
Before rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy Neuropathic pain of constant severity since not less than a month and requiring use of analgesics more than once a week Score of 30 millimeter or more on the 100 millimeter visual analog scale of pain intensity at inclusion Exclusion Criteria: Severe depression Personality disorders and other psychiatric conditions, which could disturb the participation in the study Cognitive deficits, which could disturb the participation in the study Epilepsy Presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field Pregnancy Likelihood to get pregnant Intracranial electrodes
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jakub M Antczak, MD
Phone
+48 795 421 153
Email
jakub.antczak@uj.edu.pl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gabriela G Rusin, MD
Phone
+48 601 661 607
Email
gabriela.rusin@doctoral.uj.edu.pl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tomasz Klupa, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Jagiellonian University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Jagiellonian University Medical College
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Poland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakub Antczak, MD
Email
jakub.antczak@uj.edu.pl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After completing the study, the age and gender of participants as well as the scores and results of all outcome measurements made at baseline, after rTMS, at the first and at the second follow-up will be made available to other researchers on request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The data will become available after the study results will be published.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
On request sent by e-mail to jakub.antczak@uj.edu.pl

Learn more about this trial

Analgesic Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs