search
Back to results

Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal SSI Rate

Primary Purpose

Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, Surgical Site Infection, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ActiveMatrix
Sponsored by
Baylor College of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Spinal Stenosis Lumbar

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age to 100 years of age
  4. Have a clinical diagnosis of thoracic and or lumbosacral spinal disease indicated for decompression and/or fusion
  5. Have no contraindications or allergies to the treatment administered

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is involved with a worker's compensation, personal injury, or other legal matters related to their health
  2. Subject does not provide full consent
  3. Known history of allergy to allografts
  4. Pregnancy or lactation
  5. Minimally invasive spinal surgery
  6. Non-fusion instrumented cases requiring drains

There is no intended distribution or restriction of subjects by racial and ethnic origin. No vulnerable subjects are included in this protocol.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    No Intervention

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Standard treatment, no intervention

    Standard treatment, plus ActiveMatrix

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    90-day surgical site infection

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Fascial defects at 3-6 months for fusion cases
    Improvement in back and leg pain
    Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire/Index (0-100, higher scores indicate greater disability)

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 17, 2022
    Last Updated
    March 30, 2022
    Sponsor
    Baylor College of Medicine
    Collaborators
    Skye Biologics
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05297513
    Brief Title
    Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal SSI Rate
    Official Title
    Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Reduction: A Single-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    March 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    July 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    July 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Baylor College of Medicine
    Collaborators
    Skye Biologics

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This clinical trial seeks to provide high level of evidence on the efficacy of ActiveMatrix primarily on spinal surgical site infection rate.
    Detailed Description
    Postoperative spinal surgical site infections (SSI) have a significant effect on patient morbidity and mortality.1 Spinal SSI as well as other complications including pseudoarthrosis occur at a higher rate in patients with comorbidities including obesity, smoking history, diabetes, steroid use, older age, and higher modified frailty index.2 Patients of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers have higher number of comorbidities than non-VA patients, and are therefore at higher risk for postoperative spinal SSI and complications.3,4 Spinal SSI has been reported to be anywhere from <1% in decompressions to >10% after instrumented fusion.5 Anecdotal evidence has suggested SSI to be as high as 20% among our population. As spine surgeons for the largest VA in the country, our team sought a product that could reduce the rate of spinal SSI, and ideally result in improved patient outcomes, in our at-risk patient population. Skye Biologics offers placental tissue-based matrices in the form of both flowable and solid mediums. The flowable matrix has been shown in-vitro to contain significant amounts of collagen and growth factors, as well as molecules known to modulate immune response. The results of this have been in-vitro inhibition of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus proliferation, increase in migration of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), adherence to the ASCs in cultures.6 In translation of these results clinical application has been well received, with various subspecialties including ENT and orthopedics using the products. Based on both the positive in vitro and in vivo results, out team began using the flowable product with good initial subjective results, including improved wound healing and excellent patient satisfaction. The true clinical efficacy remains to be assessed, however. Our team sought to provide level 1 evidence on this product in thoracolumbosacaral posterior spinal decompression and/or fusion in our at-risk population via a single-blinded randomized control trial at high-volume institution (s).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Spinal Stenosis Lumbar, Surgical Site Infection, Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    275 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Standard treatment, no intervention
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Title
    Standard treatment, plus ActiveMatrix
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    ActiveMatrix
    Intervention Description
    All patients will receive weight based prophylactic antibiotics i.e. Ancef, vancomycin, or clindamycin. Drains will be used in fusion cases only. Intrawound vancomycin will be used for all instrumented cases.No negative pressure devices will be used. Anatomic layers will be closed in similar, standard fashion for all cases. For those randomized to the treatment group, the ActiveMatrix product will be administered on top of the dura mater and again on the closed fascia. Those in the control group, will forgo this step.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    90-day surgical site infection
    Time Frame
    90 days
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Fascial defects at 3-6 months for fusion cases
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Improvement in back and leg pain
    Description
    Oswestry Low Back Disability Questionnaire/Index (0-100, higher scores indicate greater disability)
    Time Frame
    6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    100 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Provision of signed and dated informed consent form Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study Male or female, ≥ 18 years of age to 100 years of age Have a clinical diagnosis of thoracic and or lumbosacral spinal disease indicated for decompression and/or fusion Have no contraindications or allergies to the treatment administered Exclusion Criteria: Subject is involved with a worker's compensation, personal injury, or other legal matters related to their health Subject does not provide full consent Known history of allergy to allografts Pregnancy or lactation Minimally invasive spinal surgery Non-fusion instrumented cases requiring drains There is no intended distribution or restriction of subjects by racial and ethnic origin. No vulnerable subjects are included in this protocol.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    28604484
    Citation
    Casper DS, Zmistowski B, Hollern DA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. The Effect of Postoperative Spinal Infections on Patient Mortality. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Feb 1;43(3):223-227. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002277.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32309669
    Citation
    Badiee RK, Mayer R, Pennicooke B, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Tan LA. Complications following posterior cervical decompression and fusion: a review of incidence, risk factors, and prevention strategies. J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):323-333. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.01.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29751746
    Citation
    Melzer AC, Pinsker EA, Clothier B, Noorbaloochi S, Burgess DJ, Danan ER, Fu SS. Validating the use of veterans affairs tobacco health factors for assessing change in smoking status: accuracy, availability, and approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 May 11;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0501-2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11088086
    Citation
    Agha Z, Lofgren RP, VanRuiswyk JV, Layde PM. Are patients at Veterans Affairs medical centers sicker? A comparative analysis of health status and medical resource use. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Nov 27;160(21):3252-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.21.3252.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19929344
    Citation
    O'Toole JE, Eichholz KM, Fessler RG. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):471-6. doi: 10.3171/2009.5.SPINE08633.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29437272
    Citation
    Irvin J, Danchik C, Rall J, Babcock A, Pine M, Barnaby D, Pathakamuri J, Kuebler D. Bioactivity and composition of a preserved connective tissue matrix derived from human placental tissue. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018 Nov;106(8):2731-2740. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34054. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy of ActiveMatrix on Spinal SSI Rate

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs