Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture in the Treatment of People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.
Primary Purpose
Low Back Pain
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Acupuncture
Laser acupuncture
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring Acupuncture, laser therapy, low back pain, acupuncture points
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years;
- Non-specific LBP for at least three months
- Pain intensity of at least 2 points measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy;
- Any contraindication to ACP or having undergone treatment in the previous six months
- Having undergone spinal surgery in the previous six months;
- Serious spinal pathology (e.g. metastasis, spinal fracture, inflammatory, and infective diseases, caudal equine syndrome, canal stenosis, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and lumbar radiculopathy);
- Currently in an acute inflammatory phase of known gastrointestinal or urinary diseases (such as cholecysticis, renal calculi, peritonitis, appendicitis);
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Acupuncture treatment (ACP)
Laser acupuncture treatment (LACP)
Arm Description
The experimental group will be treated with acupuncture
The active comparator group will be treated with laser acupuncture
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain intensity
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale will be used to determine the level of pain intensity perceived by the patient using an 11-point scale on which 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable.
Functional disability
The Oswestry Disability Index will be used to determine the functional disability of participants. Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at 5. Interpretation of Scores
0% to 20% - minimal disability
21%-40% - moderate disability
41%-60%- severe disability
61%-80%- crippled
81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain Catastrophizing
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain. 13 items rated on 5-point Likert scales, from (0) not at all to (4) all the time. Higher score indicates higher level of catastrophizing
Item scores are summed into a total score (PCS-T) and three subscale scores:
Rumination: Items 8, 9, 10, and 11 (response: 0-16 points)
Magnification: Items 6, 7, 13 (response: 0-12 points)
Helplessness: Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 (response: 0-24points) A total score above 30 indicates clinically relevant level of catastrophizing
Functional independence.
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale will be used to assess the participant's levels of functional independence. Patients are asked to rate (on an 11-point scale) the current level of difficulty associated with each activity. Following the intervention, patients are asked again to rate the activities previously identified (and are given the chance to nominate new problematic activities that might have arisen during that time).
"0" represents "unable to perform" and "10" represents "able to perform at prior level"
Mobility of spine and pelvis
The fingertip-to-floor test will be used to evaluate the mobility of both the whole spine and the pelvis in the overall motion of bending forward.
If the fingertip-to-floor test is "0"cm or the patient is able to place their palms to the floor with no pain, a different outcome measure should be considered.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05310214
First Posted
March 14, 2022
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Sponsor
University of Nove de Julho
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05310214
Brief Title
Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture in the Treatment of People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.
Official Title
Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture on Pain and Functional Capacity in People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: a Randomised Controlled, Blinded Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
April 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
June 10, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Nove de Julho
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this randomized clinical trial will be to compare the efficacy between acupuncture and laser acupuncture on pain and disability in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain .
Detailed Description
Forty-four patients with chronic cnLBP of more than three months duration will be randomly allocated to two groups: acupuncture group (ACP) (n = 22) and laser acupuncture group (LACP) (n = 22).Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks. The primary clinical outcomes will be pain intensity (11-point numeric pain rating scale) as measured and functional disability (Oswestry Disability Index).The secondary outcomes will be the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale and fingertip-to-floor test. Evaluations will be performed before and after the first session, after 5 weeks of treatment, and three months after randomization (follow-up). The findings will be analyzed statistically considering a 5% significance level (p ≤ 0.05).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain
Keywords
Acupuncture, laser therapy, low back pain, acupuncture points
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
randomised clinical trial
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
44 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Acupuncture treatment (ACP)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The experimental group will be treated with acupuncture
Arm Title
Laser acupuncture treatment (LACP)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The active comparator group will be treated with laser acupuncture
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Acupuncture
Intervention Description
Treatment with ACP will be performed by inserting sterile acupuncture needles 0.25 x 13 mm into the acupoints BL23 (Shenshu), BL25 (Dachangshu), BL40 (Weizhong), BL62 (Qixue), SI3 (Houxi) and Jiaji , for the treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks.
In order to increase the effectiveness of blinding for both groups, in this study the model was adopted: "combined simulated control". In this case, Sham acupuncture points will be used to simulate the treatment, as follows: i) Arms: 3 cm above the lateral epicondyle of the elbow, ii) Lumbar spine: Iliac crest on the same line as the greater trochanter of the femur. Thus, in the ACP group, the placebo LACP (without dosemetry) will be applied to these 4 points together with the real treatment.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Laser acupuncture
Intervention Description
The use of LACP (808 nm wavelength, 100 mW, energy 6 J per acp point), on acupoints BL23 (Shenshu), BL25 (Dachangshu), BL40 (Weizhong), BL62 (Qixue), SI3 (Houxi) and Jiaji will be used as a treatment for nonspecific chronic low back pain. Interventions will last one hour, and will happen twice a week for 5 weeks.
Sham acupuncture points will be used to simulate the treatment, as follows: i) Arms: 3 cm above the lateral epicondyle of the elbow, ii) Lumbar spine: Iliac crest on the same line as the greater trochanter of the femur. These sham points will be inserted superficially so that the depth is sufficient to keep them fixed during the experiment, without individuals reporting the "dequi".
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensity
Description
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale will be used to determine the level of pain intensity perceived by the patient using an 11-point scale on which 0 represents the absence of pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Functional disability
Description
The Oswestry Disability Index will be used to determine the functional disability of participants. Questionnaire examines perceived level of disability in 10 everyday activities of daily living. The 6 statements are scored from 0 to 5 with the first statement scoring 0 through to the last at 5. Interpretation of Scores
0% to 20% - minimal disability
21%-40% - moderate disability
41%-60%- severe disability
61%-80%- crippled
81%-100%: These patients are either bed-bound or exaggerating their symptoms.
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Catastrophizing
Description
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale will be used to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain. 13 items rated on 5-point Likert scales, from (0) not at all to (4) all the time. Higher score indicates higher level of catastrophizing
Item scores are summed into a total score (PCS-T) and three subscale scores:
Rumination: Items 8, 9, 10, and 11 (response: 0-16 points)
Magnification: Items 6, 7, 13 (response: 0-12 points)
Helplessness: Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 (response: 0-24points) A total score above 30 indicates clinically relevant level of catastrophizing
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Functional independence.
Description
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale will be used to assess the participant's levels of functional independence. Patients are asked to rate (on an 11-point scale) the current level of difficulty associated with each activity. Following the intervention, patients are asked again to rate the activities previously identified (and are given the chance to nominate new problematic activities that might have arisen during that time).
"0" represents "unable to perform" and "10" represents "able to perform at prior level"
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Mobility of spine and pelvis
Description
The fingertip-to-floor test will be used to evaluate the mobility of both the whole spine and the pelvis in the overall motion of bending forward.
If the fingertip-to-floor test is "0"cm or the patient is able to place their palms to the floor with no pain, a different outcome measure should be considered.
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-65 years;
Non-specific LBP for at least three months
Pain intensity of at least 2 points measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy;
Any contraindication to ACP or having undergone treatment in the previous six months
Having undergone spinal surgery in the previous six months;
Serious spinal pathology (e.g. metastasis, spinal fracture, inflammatory, and infective diseases, caudal equine syndrome, canal stenosis, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis and lumbar radiculopathy);
Currently in an acute inflammatory phase of known gastrointestinal or urinary diseases (such as cholecysticis, renal calculi, peritonitis, appendicitis);
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Effect of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture in the Treatment of People With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs