search
Back to results

Personalized Estimates of Response and Severity Outcomes in Newly-diagnosed JIA (PERSON-JIA)

Primary Purpose

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Shared Decision Making (SDM)
Sponsored by
University of British Columbia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis focused on measuring Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Arthritis, Juvenile, Arthritis, Shared decision making, Clinical outcomes, Canada, PERSON-JIA, PERSON JIA

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Physicians (Inclusion):

  1. Licensed to practice pediatric rheumatology in Canada;
  2. Providing care for children with JIA at least once a month;
  3. Consent to be randomized and to implement the SDM intervention for the duration of the trial, if randomized to the intervention arm;
  4. Commit to propose enrollment in the Registry to all their newly diagnosed patients with JIA during the trial.

Physicians (Exclusion):

  1. Fellows-in-training;
  2. Physicians planning to retire within 2 years.

Patient (Inclusion):

  1. Consent to include their information in the CAPRI JIA Registry;
  2. Consent to the PERSON-JIA trial and answering additional questionnaires to assess decision making;
  3. Allow recording of their medical encounter (if selected at random);
  4. JIA fulfilling ILAR criteria;
  5. Newly diagnosed (within the last month);
  6. Diagnosed by a pediatric rheumatologist participating in the PERSON-JIA study;
  7. Not yet receiving treatment, or received only NSAIDS or joint injections;

Patient (Exclusion):

  1. Systemic arthritis category of JIA (it requires a different treatment approach);
  2. Family is unable to complete study forms in English or French;
  3. Patients who have already started systemic corticosteroid or any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD).

Sites / Locations

  • BC Children's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Current Best Practice

Shared Decision Making (SDM)

Arm Description

Physicians randomized to this arm will provide current care and treatment decisions with patients will be made in accordance with current best practices. Will not engage in structured shared decision making (SDM) discussion and will not have access to PERSON-JIA Reports. Patients will be consented to enroll in the CAPRI Registry at the clinic visit when they are diagnosed. Registry enrollment will allow collection and input of clinical data into the Registry. Clinic visit and discussion will remain unchanged for physicians, patients and their families. Questionnaires will be collected at enrollment, at the second visit and a 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits.

Physicians will use the PERSON-JIA Report to guide discussions with the newly diagnosed patient and family. The intervention will not dictate the use of specific medications or treatment strategies, only facilitate better informed treatment choices according to patient circumstances. The intervention is a structured SDM discussion between physician and family, occurring at the time of the child's JIA diagnosis. Discussion is guided by the PERSON-JIA Report, which is generated in real time, on the physician's smartphone. Patients newly-diagnosed with JIA will be consented to both enrollment in the CAPRI Registry and enrollment in the PERSON-JIA trial. Clinic visit and discussion between the physician, patient and family will be facilitated by the PERSON-JIA report to support a shared decision making process. Questionnaires will be collected at enrollment, at the second visit and at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of children with Inactive or Minimally Active Disease at 6 months.
Proportion of patients attaining inactive or minimally active disease within 6 months of study enrollment, defined as a cJADAS (Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10) of 2.5 or less for patients with >4 joints involved and 1.5 or less for patients with 1-4 joints involved. The cJADAS10 is the sum of the number of active joints (to a maximum of 10), the Physician Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA 0 to 10), and the Parent Global Assessment of well-being (0-10).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of children with Inactive or Minimally Active Disease at 12 months.
Proportion of patients attaining inactive or minimally active disease within 12 months of study enrollment, defined as a cJADAS (Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10) of 2.5 or less for patients with >4 joints involved and 1.5 or less for patients with 1-4 joints involved. The cJADAS10 is the sum of the number of active joints (to a maximum of 10), the Physician Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA 0 to 10), and the Parent Global Assessment of well-being (0-10). The comparison at 6 months and at 12 months will be done using a mixed-effects logistic regression model that accounts for the clustering of patients by physician, the paired randomization to intervention or control, the JIA category and the three cJADAS10 components.
Change in Parent-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life
Mean change in parent-reported health-related quality of life (QoL), assessed according to the Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ). JAQQ scores go from 1=best to 7=worst.
Change in Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life
Mean change in patient-reported health-related quality of life (QoL), assessed according to the Quality of my Life Scale, unless parents state the patient is too young to answer the questionnaire. Scores go from 0=worst to 10=best.
Change in cJADAS10 score
Mean change on the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with 10 joints (cJADAS10) and its components. Scores go from 0=best 30=worst.
Change in functional impairment
Mean change in functional impairment, assessed according to the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ). Scores go from 0= no disability to 3.0= severe disability.
Change in Health Utilities
Mean change in health utilities, assessed according to the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale for Youth (EQ-5D-Y). Score goes from 0=dead to 1.0=perfect health
Parent assessment of decision making
Parents assessment of how much decision were shared according to the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9). Scores go from 0=no shared decision making to 100=maximal sharing of decisions.
Parent assessment of decisional conflict
Parent's decision-related knowledge, value-alignment, uncertainty and satisfaction, measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) at Visit 2. From 0= no decisional conflict to 100=maximum decisional conflict.
Doctor assessment of decision making
Physicians will answer the physician version the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-DOC), at the first follow-up visit after patient enrollment (Visit 2). Scores go from 0=no shared decision making to 100=maximal sharing of decisions.
Proportion of children receiving recommended treatment
The proportion of children receiving the recommended treatment by visit 2. The treatment plans are noted in the Registry at Visit 1 as 'Changes Recommended Today.' Listed medications will be compared to the medications the patient is actually taking at Visit 2. If the lists coincide, the patient will be counted as treatment implemented.
Intervention Fidelity
Fidelity of the intervention will be assessed by thematic analysis of a sample of audio recordings of medical encounters, and the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) scale.

Full Information

First Posted
November 29, 2021
Last Updated
October 31, 2022
Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), The Arthritis Society, Canada
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05310799
Brief Title
Personalized Estimates of Response and Severity Outcomes in Newly-diagnosed JIA
Acronym
PERSON-JIA
Official Title
Treating Children With Arthritis According to Their Individual Probability of Outcomes and Response to Treatments
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
February 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
February 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of British Columbia
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), The Arthritis Society, Canada

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The PERSON-JIA Trial is a cluster-randomized trial testing the use of Shared Decision Making (SDM) with families for treatment of children with arthritis. The intervention is a discussion between physicians and families at the time of diagnosis that uses computer-generated personalized outcome reports generated by previously developed prediction algorithms. By using information provided by thousands of families, the investigators have developed a way of providing answers to common questions asked by patients and their families at diagnosis. We will test whether a structured discussion and shared decision between families and doctors (guided by the patient's personal report) will improve the tailoring of treatment to the child and control of their disease. The personal report is called the PERSON-JIA report and presents the child's expected disease severity, the likelihood the child will be arthritis free by age 18 and the chance treatments will be effective and/or have side effects. This way, answers to these questions can be shared by physicians and families to weigh potential benefits and harms according to family values and preferences. The investigators expect that using the personalized report in a frank and thoughtful discussion will help physicians and families make better decisions about managing the child's disease. This in turn will result in better disease control, greater family engagement and satisfaction with care and better-tailored treatment. If so, this will be a ground-breaking way of using information provided by families and doctors to improve the care provided to and the outcomes of children with arthritis in Canada.
Detailed Description
The PERSON-JIA (Personalized Estimates of Response and Severity Outcomes in Newly-diagnosed Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis) trial, will test an innovative shared decision making (SDM) intervention - a structured discussion, between physician and family, of the likely outcomes/response to treatments, as predicted by Personalized Prediction Algorithms (PPA), presented in a graphical summary. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is chronic arthritis of unknown cause starting before the 16th birthday. At present, evidence does not suggest that any single treatment approach for treating JIA is clearly superior, and current practice guidelines recommend Shared Decision Making (SDM) with families to select treatment. SDM requires a realistic appreciation of disease severity along with the likely benefits vs. harms associated with treatment options, and to then weigh these factors according to the family's values and preferences. To facilitate SDM, the investigators have built and validated PPA using data from previous Canadian JIA cohorts. As compared to treatment algorithms/flowcharts that tell physicians what to do, PPA are mathematical models that calculate the probability of outcomes for a child, based on their clinical presentation. The investigators have also established a Canadian Alliance of Pediatric Rheumatology Investigators (CAPRI) JIA Registry, which supports point of care data entry using smartphones/tablets. After data is entered in the registry for a newly diagnosed patient, PPA produce a graphical report depicting that child's probability of severe disease, remission in adulthood, and response and side effects with different treatments. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) will test the impact on JIA outcome of a SDM intervention that uses this graphical report to better tailor treatment to the child and family. The investigators hypothesize that compared to current standard care, use of this SDM intervention will lead to improved JIA disease control at 6 months via increased family engagement, greater satisfaction with treatment decisions, optimal tailoring of treatment to the child, and consistent adherence to the treatment plan. PERSON-JIA is a registry-based, pragmatic, cluster-randomized (by physician) adaptive trial. Pediatric rheumatologists from all pediatric rheumatology sites in Canada who agree to participate will be matched with another rheumatologist (by practice size, province and years in practice). There will be a one to one randomization of physicians to the intervention group or control group. Patients will be placed into the intervention or control group dependent on which group their pediatric rheumatologist has been randomized to. Control pediatric rheumatologists will practice standard care without the PPA or shared decision making discussion, but will still enroll all their new JIA patients into the CAPRI JIA Registry. Pediatric rheumatologists in the intervention group will have structured SDM discussions with the patient and family using the graphical PERSON-JIA report generated by PPA, at the time of diagnosis. The intervention will occur once, at the time of initial treatment decision making. Patients in the intervention arm of the study may have slightly longer clinic visits to account for a tailored, shared decision making discussion regarding their disease course and treatment options. The primary outcome will be inactive or minimally active disease 6 months after enrolment, defined using the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10 (cJADAS10). CJADAS10 scores go from 0=best to 30=worst. Inactive or minimally active disease is 2.5 or less for patients with >4 joints involved and 1.5 or less for patients with 1-4 joints. Secondary outcomes include inactive or minimally active disease 12 months after enrolment; quality of life and function; implementation of treatment plan; parent and doctor assessments of how much decisions were shared; parent's knowledge, value alignment, uncertainty and satisfaction with the decision; and intervention fidelity (analysis of medical encounter audio recordings). The primary statistic will be the odds ratio of patients achieving inactive or minimally active disease at 6mos, adjusted for clustering effects and baseline cJADAS10 scores.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
Keywords
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, Arthritis, Juvenile, Arthritis, Shared decision making, Clinical outcomes, Canada, PERSON-JIA, PERSON JIA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
842 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Current Best Practice
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Physicians randomized to this arm will provide current care and treatment decisions with patients will be made in accordance with current best practices. Will not engage in structured shared decision making (SDM) discussion and will not have access to PERSON-JIA Reports. Patients will be consented to enroll in the CAPRI Registry at the clinic visit when they are diagnosed. Registry enrollment will allow collection and input of clinical data into the Registry. Clinic visit and discussion will remain unchanged for physicians, patients and their families. Questionnaires will be collected at enrollment, at the second visit and a 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits.
Arm Title
Shared Decision Making (SDM)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Physicians will use the PERSON-JIA Report to guide discussions with the newly diagnosed patient and family. The intervention will not dictate the use of specific medications or treatment strategies, only facilitate better informed treatment choices according to patient circumstances. The intervention is a structured SDM discussion between physician and family, occurring at the time of the child's JIA diagnosis. Discussion is guided by the PERSON-JIA Report, which is generated in real time, on the physician's smartphone. Patients newly-diagnosed with JIA will be consented to both enrollment in the CAPRI Registry and enrollment in the PERSON-JIA trial. Clinic visit and discussion between the physician, patient and family will be facilitated by the PERSON-JIA report to support a shared decision making process. Questionnaires will be collected at enrollment, at the second visit and at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Shared Decision Making (SDM)
Intervention Description
The intervention is a structured SDM discussion between physician and family, occurring at the time of the child's JIA diagnosis and clinic visit. Discussion will be guided by a discussion guide and the PERSON-JIA Report, which is generated in real time on the physician's smartphone.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of children with Inactive or Minimally Active Disease at 6 months.
Description
Proportion of patients attaining inactive or minimally active disease within 6 months of study enrollment, defined as a cJADAS (Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10) of 2.5 or less for patients with >4 joints involved and 1.5 or less for patients with 1-4 joints involved. The cJADAS10 is the sum of the number of active joints (to a maximum of 10), the Physician Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA 0 to 10), and the Parent Global Assessment of well-being (0-10).
Time Frame
6 months after enrollment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of children with Inactive or Minimally Active Disease at 12 months.
Description
Proportion of patients attaining inactive or minimally active disease within 12 months of study enrollment, defined as a cJADAS (Clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score 10) of 2.5 or less for patients with >4 joints involved and 1.5 or less for patients with 1-4 joints involved. The cJADAS10 is the sum of the number of active joints (to a maximum of 10), the Physician Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA 0 to 10), and the Parent Global Assessment of well-being (0-10). The comparison at 6 months and at 12 months will be done using a mixed-effects logistic regression model that accounts for the clustering of patients by physician, the paired randomization to intervention or control, the JIA category and the three cJADAS10 components.
Time Frame
12 months after enrollment
Title
Change in Parent-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life
Description
Mean change in parent-reported health-related quality of life (QoL), assessed according to the Juvenile Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (JAQQ). JAQQ scores go from 1=best to 7=worst.
Time Frame
From enrollment to 6 and 12 months
Title
Change in Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life
Description
Mean change in patient-reported health-related quality of life (QoL), assessed according to the Quality of my Life Scale, unless parents state the patient is too young to answer the questionnaire. Scores go from 0=worst to 10=best.
Time Frame
From enrollment to 6 and 12 months
Title
Change in cJADAS10 score
Description
Mean change on the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score with 10 joints (cJADAS10) and its components. Scores go from 0=best 30=worst.
Time Frame
From enrollment to 6 and 12 months
Title
Change in functional impairment
Description
Mean change in functional impairment, assessed according to the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (CHAQ). Scores go from 0= no disability to 3.0= severe disability.
Time Frame
From enrollment to 6 and 12 months
Title
Change in Health Utilities
Description
Mean change in health utilities, assessed according to the European Quality of Life 5 Dimension Scale for Youth (EQ-5D-Y). Score goes from 0=dead to 1.0=perfect health
Time Frame
From enrollment to 6 and 12 months
Title
Parent assessment of decision making
Description
Parents assessment of how much decision were shared according to the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9). Scores go from 0=no shared decision making to 100=maximal sharing of decisions.
Time Frame
1-3 months
Title
Parent assessment of decisional conflict
Description
Parent's decision-related knowledge, value-alignment, uncertainty and satisfaction, measured with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) at Visit 2. From 0= no decisional conflict to 100=maximum decisional conflict.
Time Frame
1-3 months
Title
Doctor assessment of decision making
Description
Physicians will answer the physician version the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-DOC), at the first follow-up visit after patient enrollment (Visit 2). Scores go from 0=no shared decision making to 100=maximal sharing of decisions.
Time Frame
1-3 months
Title
Proportion of children receiving recommended treatment
Description
The proportion of children receiving the recommended treatment by visit 2. The treatment plans are noted in the Registry at Visit 1 as 'Changes Recommended Today.' Listed medications will be compared to the medications the patient is actually taking at Visit 2. If the lists coincide, the patient will be counted as treatment implemented.
Time Frame
1-3 months
Title
Intervention Fidelity
Description
Fidelity of the intervention will be assessed by thematic analysis of a sample of audio recordings of medical encounters, and the Observing Patient Involvement (OPTION) scale.
Time Frame
The first patient enrolled and another selected at random within the next 24 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Physicians (Inclusion): Licensed to practice pediatric rheumatology in Canada; Providing care for children with JIA at least once a month; Consent to be randomized and to implement the SDM intervention for the duration of the trial, if randomized to the intervention arm; Commit to propose enrollment in the Registry to all their newly diagnosed patients with JIA during the trial. Physicians (Exclusion): Fellows-in-training; Physicians planning to retire within 2 years. Patient (Inclusion): Consent to include their information in the CAPRI JIA Registry; Consent to the PERSON-JIA trial and answering additional questionnaires to assess decision making; Allow recording of their medical encounter (if selected at random); JIA fulfilling ILAR criteria; Newly diagnosed (within the last month); Diagnosed by a pediatric rheumatologist participating in the PERSON-JIA study; Not yet receiving treatment, or received only NSAIDS or joint injections; Patient (Exclusion): Systemic arthritis category of JIA (it requires a different treatment approach); Family is unable to complete study forms in English or French; Patients who have already started systemic corticosteroid or any Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Steffanie Fisher
Phone
604 875 2000
Ext
4839
Email
steffanie.fisher@cw.bc.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lori B Tucker, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of British Columbia Department of Pediatrics
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
BC Children's Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6H 3N1
Country
Canada
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaime Guzman, MD, FRCPC

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Personalized Estimates of Response and Severity Outcomes in Newly-diagnosed JIA

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs