Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT) (SITT-MAT)
Primary Purpose
Addiction, Opioid
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback (EMF)
NIATx/MAT Academy
NIATx-Internal Facilitation (NIATx-IF)
NIATx-External Facilitation (NIATx-EF)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional health services research trial for Addiction, Opioid focused on measuring Implementation strategies, Medications for opioid use disorder
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Addiction treatment programs in Washington State
- Residential (detoxification or rehabilitation) or outpatient (intensive outpatient or outpatient) levels of care
- Primary care clinics, including Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Community Health Centers (CHCs)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Opioid treatment programs
Sites / Locations
- Washington State Healthcare AuthorityRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm 5
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Path 1
Path 2
Path 3
Path 4
Path 5
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx External Facilitation
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx Internal Facilitation
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx Internal Facilitation + NIATx External Facilitation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Reach
The proportion of program patients with OUD and receiving MOUD (buprenorphine, naltrexone) within the index quarter.
Adoption
The number of integrated prescribers of buprenorphine and/or naltrexone, who are actively prescribing MOUD.
Effectiveness
Access: The proportion of patients prescribed MOUD who start the medication within 72 hours of diagnosis. For patients requiring detoxification for naltrexone, Access will be operationalized as the proportion of patients who start the medication within 72 hours of when it is safe or indicated by a physician. Retention: The proportion of patients who are retained in continuous care for at least 6-months from the start of medication, or if in time limited care situations (e.g., residential detoxification) for the entire treatment episode.
Implementation - Integrating Medications for Addiction Treatment (IMAT) Index
The IMAT integrates MOUD guidelines, expert consensus recommendations, the OUD care cascade, and best practice information into a team-assessment benchmark measure of current and future state MOUD capability and practice. The IMAT is composed of 45 items, rated on a 1 to 5 scale from: 1- Not Integrated, to 3- Partially integrated, to 5- Fully integrated. Intermediate ratings of 2 and 4, are ratings not at either a 3 or 5 level respectively. The benchmark items address policy, practice and workforce factors, and are clustered into seven dimensions of: 1) Infrastructure; 2) Clinic culture and environment; 3) Patient identification and initiating care; 4) Care delivery and treatment response monitoring; 5) Care coordination; 6) Workforce; and, 7) Staff training and development. The IMAT Total Score is a composite rating from 1 to 5 of overall MOUD care quality. It takes between 1 to 2 hours to complete.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05343793
First Posted
April 6, 2022
Last Updated
August 24, 2022
Sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Madison, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Washington State Health Care Authority
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05343793
Brief Title
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)
Acronym
SITT-MAT
Official Title
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 14, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Stanford University
Collaborators
University of Wisconsin, Madison, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Washington State Health Care Authority
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to expand access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in specialty addiction programs in Washington State. Sixty-four addiction treatment programs will participate in an adaptive implementation strategy trial that uses a stagewise implementation-to-target (stepped "care" type) approach whereby organizations engage in increasingly intensive implementation strategies as needed. Organizations are moved to a follow-up/sustainment arm once they have met the implementation targets described below. The design also includes an external comparator arm, which consists of 510 addiction treatment programs that are not participating in the study and will mimic as study controls.
The sequence of implementation strategies are:
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback
NIATx/MAT Academy
Randomization to either NIATx Internal Facilitation or NIATx External Facilitation
Assignment to NIATx External Facilitation if outcome targets are not achieved in the NIATx Internal Facilitation arm
Implementation targets are:
Reach - At least 75% of patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) receiving MOUD for three consecutive months
Adoption - At least 1 integrated MOUD prescriber actively prescribing MOUD
Implementation - a total score ≥ 4 on the Integrating Medications for Addiction Treatment (IMAT) Index.
Contextual moderators and mediators of performance on target outcomes as a function of the implementation strategy step will be examined, as will the costs associated with participation in the sequence of implementation strategies.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Addiction, Opioid
Keywords
Implementation strategies, Medications for opioid use disorder
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
64 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Path 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback
Arm Title
Path 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy
Arm Title
Path 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx External Facilitation
Arm Title
Path 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx Internal Facilitation
Arm Title
Path 5
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback + NIATx/MAT Academy + NIATx Internal Facilitation + NIATx External Facilitation
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback (EMF)
Intervention Description
Enhanced Monitoring and Feedback consists of performance data (reach, adoption, effectiveness, implementation) gathered and reported by the program on a quarterly basis. Data summaries for each program and in comparison to the entire sample, will be reflected back to participants, via dashboards, within one-month of data submission.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
NIATx/MAT Academy
Intervention Description
This two-day workshop will provide participating clinics with rationale, clinical practice and program integration with MOUD (Day 1), and an overview of NIATx principles and tools (Day 2).
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
NIATx-Internal Facilitation (NIATx-IF)
Intervention Description
Internal facilitators will receive training (in-person or online) on how to provide coaching within their organization. For 9-months, Internal Facilitators (IFs) will: a) support teams to harness resources toward systemic change and improvement; b) employ a range of concepts and tools to provide individualized support to teams; c) help teams to practice and hone their skills to optimize performance, and d) focus on team relationships and communications. IFs will participate in group coaching calls involving IFs from other NIATx-IF clinics and moderated by NIATx expert to discuss common change-related issues, progress, and successful tactics.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
NIATx-External Facilitation (NIATx-EF)
Intervention Description
For 9-months, organizations in the NIATx-EF study arm will work with one of 4 experienced consultant NIATx External Facilitators (EFs). The EF meets with clinic staff to plan change projects, review ongoing change efforts, discuss successes, and offer guidance on planning future change projects using PDSA cycles. The EF makes a 1-day site visit during the 1st quarter of the implementation period and leads monthly 1-hour phone calls.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reach
Description
The proportion of program patients with OUD and receiving MOUD (buprenorphine, naltrexone) within the index quarter.
Time Frame
Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46
Title
Adoption
Description
The number of integrated prescribers of buprenorphine and/or naltrexone, who are actively prescribing MOUD.
Time Frame
Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46
Title
Effectiveness
Description
Access: The proportion of patients prescribed MOUD who start the medication within 72 hours of diagnosis. For patients requiring detoxification for naltrexone, Access will be operationalized as the proportion of patients who start the medication within 72 hours of when it is safe or indicated by a physician. Retention: The proportion of patients who are retained in continuous care for at least 6-months from the start of medication, or if in time limited care situations (e.g., residential detoxification) for the entire treatment episode.
Time Frame
Quarterly ; Months 1 to 46
Title
Implementation - Integrating Medications for Addiction Treatment (IMAT) Index
Description
The IMAT integrates MOUD guidelines, expert consensus recommendations, the OUD care cascade, and best practice information into a team-assessment benchmark measure of current and future state MOUD capability and practice. The IMAT is composed of 45 items, rated on a 1 to 5 scale from: 1- Not Integrated, to 3- Partially integrated, to 5- Fully integrated. Intermediate ratings of 2 and 4, are ratings not at either a 3 or 5 level respectively. The benchmark items address policy, practice and workforce factors, and are clustered into seven dimensions of: 1) Infrastructure; 2) Clinic culture and environment; 3) Patient identification and initiating care; 4) Care delivery and treatment response monitoring; 5) Care coordination; 6) Workforce; and, 7) Staff training and development. The IMAT Total Score is a composite rating from 1 to 5 of overall MOUD care quality. It takes between 1 to 2 hours to complete.
Time Frame
Months 1,7,14,24,34,46
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Contextual determinants
Description
Contextual Determinant Index (CDI). The CDI evaluates contextual aspects at baseline and over time. This measure focuses on four dimensions (Outer Context, Inner Context, Perception of Intervention, Perception of Patient/Client Experience). The index items have been defined and operationalized on a Likert scale ranging from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. The CDI is a team-assessment measure completed by key staff in MOUD implementation. In addition to individual item scores, it generates a score for each of the four dimensions and in total.
Time Frame
Months 1,7,14,24,34,46
Title
Engagement in implementation
Description
Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC). The SIC is an 8-stage assessment tool designed to measure and compare implementation strategies for scaling up proven interventions. Stages range from Engagement (Stage 1) to achievement of program delivery with Competency (Stage 8). SIC data include a log of activities that operationalize the implementation process necessary to move toward successful program start-up and sustainment, and their completion dates. Two scores are calculated for each SIC stage. The Proportion score calculates the proportion of key activities completed within a stage. The Duration score is calculated by date of entry through date of final activity completed. The Duration Score can account for activities not completed sequentially and also for being in multiple stages at a given time. A third Final Stage score indicates the final stage achieved in the implementation process (Stage 1-8).
Time Frame
Monthly ; Months 1 to 46
Title
Cost of implementation
Description
Cost of Implementing New Strategies (COINS). Calculations of fees, expenses, and person hours necessary to complete each implementation stage.
Time Frame
Monthly ; Months 1 to 46
Title
Fidelity
Description
NIATx Fidelity. The NIATx Fidelity Scale is a 19-item observational measure of adherence to the NIATx model, rating activities on a 5-point scale from 1-No evidence to 5-Extensive evidence. Scoring reflects information obtained from IF and EF perspectives using a composite of interviews, review of walk-through results, change project forms, EF or IF notes and sustainability plans.
Time Frame
Months 7,14,24,34,46
Title
Implementation climate
Description
Implementation Climate Scale (ICS). Assesses the extent to which an organization prioritizes and values the implementation of an evidence based practice. Six subscales and 18 items scored on a 5-point scale from 0 - not at all, to 4 - very great extent
Time Frame
Months 1,7,14,24,34,46
Title
Implementation Leadership
Description
Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS). Assesses a leader's support for implementation of an evidence based practice. Four subscales and 12 items scored on a 5-point scale from 0 - not at all, to 4 - very great extent
Time Frame
Months 1,7,14,24,34,46
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Addiction treatment programs in Washington State
Residential (detoxification or rehabilitation) or outpatient (intensive outpatient or outpatient) levels of care
Primary care clinics, including Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and Community Health Centers (CHCs)
Exclusion Criteria:
Opioid treatment programs
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Helene Chokron Garneau, PhD, MPH
Phone
650-721-1317
Email
hchokgar@stanford.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hannah Cheng, MS
Phone
(334) 275-5149
Email
chenghh@stanford.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark McGovern, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James H Ford II, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington State Healthcare Authority
City
Olympia
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98501
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Harrison Fontaine
Phone
360-725-1165
Email
harrison.fontaine@hca.wa.gov
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36175963
Citation
Ford JH 2nd, Cheng H, Gassman M, Fontaine H, Garneau HC, Keith R, Michael E, McGovern MP. Stepped implementation-to-target: a study protocol of an adaptive trial to expand access to addiction medications. Implement Sci. 2022 Sep 29;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01239-y.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Stagewise Implementation-To-Target- Medications for Addiction Treatment (SITT-MAT)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs