Subscap Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Subscapularis Repair in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Multi-Center Randomized Single Blinded Superiority Study

The subscapularis is part of the rotator cuff and is release as part of a reverse shoulder replacement. The decision to repair this tendon is controversial. This research is being done to help determine if rotator cuff repair improves or hinders shoulder replacement. A worrisome but rare complication after shoulder replacement is dislocation. Rotator cuff repair may help reduce this risk. The repair may hinder some of the range of motion afterwards or could help with internal rotation strength. There is a chance that the repair doesn't matter at all. The goal of this study is to delineate outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with the respect to management of the subscapularis tendon. Further information about rotator cuff repair after reverse shoulder replacement can help define complications, potentially decrease OR time, and improve functional outcomes. A total of 148 patients will be enrolled and the duration of the study will be 5 years. All patients will be required to follow-up at 2¬-week, 6-week, 3-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year post-operative marks. Any time information is collected for a study there is a small risk of breach of confidentiality. There are no monetary costs or payments associated with this study. You may or may not benefit by taking part in this study. There is no guarantee that you will receive direct benefit from your participation in this study. To be clear, participation in this study is completely voluntary.

Change in Baltimore Orthopaedic Subscapularis Score (BOSS) over 2 years. The score asks enrolled patients a series of questions. The answer choices are the following: No difficulty, mild difficulty, severe difficulty, unable to perform.

Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score over 2 years postoperatively compared to preoperative. The score ranges from 0 to 10 with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain possible.

Blinded ultrasound evaluation of subscapularis integrity at 6 months. The "Sugaya classification" will be used to assess the subscapularis integrity. The score ranges from Type 1 to Type 5. Type 1: indicating sufficient thickness with homogeneously low intensity Type 2: sufficient thickness with partial high intensity Type 3: insufficient thickness without discontinuity Type 4: the presence of a minor discontinuity Type 5: the presence of a major discontinuity

Inclusion Criteria: 18 to 95 years old Undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for any indication including revision surgery Exclusion Criteria: Irreparable Subscapularis Tendon a. Reparability of Subscapularis will be determined based on MRI or CT scan obtained preoperatively and confirmed intraoperatively. Tendons must be intact with less than Grade I or II Fatty Infiltration as determined by the Goutallier classification. Any history of proximal humerus fracture Any revision with proximal humerus bone loss

Otto RJ, Clark RE, Frankle MA. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: 2- to 12-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.051. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

Friedman RJ, Flurin PH, Wright TW, Zuckerman JD, Roche CP. Comparison of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes with and without subscapularis repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):662-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Villacis D, Sivasundaram L, Pannell WC, Heckmann N, Omid R, Hatch GF 3rd. Complication rate and implant survival for reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus total shoulder arthroplasty: results during the initial 2 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jun;25(6):927-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.012. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Vourazeris JD, Wright TW, Struk AM, King JJ, Farmer KW. Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty outcomes in patients with subscapularis repair versus tenotomy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Kohan EM, Chalmers PN, Salazar D, Keener JD, Yamaguchi K, Chamberlain AM. Dislocation following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jul;26(7):1238-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.12.073. Epub 2017 Feb 3.

Pastor MF, Kraemer M, Wellmann M, Hurschler C, Smith T. Anterior stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty depending on implant configuration and rotator cuff condition. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Nov;136(11):1513-1519. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2560-3. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

Padegimas EM, Zmistowski BM, Restrepo C, Abboud JA, Lazarus MD, Ramsey ML, Williams GR, Namdari S. Instability After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Which Patients Dislocate? Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016 Nov/Dec;45(7):E444-E450.

Farrington CP, Manning G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Stat Med. 1990 Dec;9(12):1447-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091208.

Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.