Comparison of Fluoxetine Versus Citalopram Therapy to Control Postmenopausal Vasomotor Syndrome
Primary Purpose
Postmenopause, Hot Flashes
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fluoxetine 20 MG
Citalopram 20mg
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Postmenopause focused on measuring Postmenopause, Fluoxetine, Menopause Rating Scale, Vasomotor syndrome, Urogenital syndrome, Citalopram, Non hormonal therapy, Non-hormonal therapies, Serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants who attended the climacteric consultation for the first time, without prior treatment of menopausal symptoms, and who met postmenopausal criteria.
- Participants who met the criteria for vasomotor syndrome and score greater than 17 points in total MRS.
- Participants without psychiatric pathology (psychiatric illnesses such as major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, among others).
- Participants who agreed to participate and gave their written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who had contraindications to receive serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
- Participants who were receiving prior treatment for the postmenopausal or vasomotor syndrome.
- Participants who did not agree to participate or sign the informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Fluoxetine group
Citalopram group
Arm Description
Participants received fluoxetine, 20 mg tablets, once a day for six months.
Participants received citalopram, 20 mg tablets, once a day for six months.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. It considers the score of the somatic, urogenital, and psychological domains. A score of 0-4 was considered minimal severity, 5-8 mild, 9-16 moderate, and greater than 17 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 6 months
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. It considers the score of the somatic, urogenital, and psychological domains. A score of 0-4 was considered minimal severity, 5-8 mild, 9-16 moderate, and greater than 17 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) somatic domain score at 3 months
It considers the score obtained from the somatic dimension, which includes hot flashes, heart problems, sleep problems, and muscle and joint pain. A score of 0-2 was considered minimal severity, 3-4 mild, 5-8 moderate, and greater than 9 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) somatic domain score at 6 months
It considers the score obtained from the somatic dimension, which includes hot flashes, heart problems, sleep problems, and muscle and joint pain. A score of 0-2 was considered minimal severity, 3-4 mild, 5-8 moderate, and greater than 9 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) urogenital domain score at 3 months
It considers the score obtained from the urogenital dimension, which includes sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness. A score of 0 was considered minimal severity, 1 mild, 2-3 moderate, and greater than 4 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) urogenital domain score at 6 months
It considers the score obtained from the urogenital dimension, which includes sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness. A score of 0 was considered minimal severity, 1 mild, 2-3 moderate, and greater than 4 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) psychological domain score at 3 months
It considers the score obtained from the psychological dimension, which includes depression, irritability, anxiety and tiredness. A score of 0-1 was considered minimal severity, 2-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and greater than 7 severe.
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) psychological domain score at 6 months
It considers the score obtained from the psychological dimension, which includes depression, irritability, anxiety and tiredness. A score of 0-1 was considered minimal severity, 2-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and greater than 7 severe.
Change from baseline score in Item 1 of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 3 months
Item 1 considers the score obtained from hot flashes on the MRS scale. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Change from baseline score in Item 1 of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 6 months
Item 1 considers the score obtained from hot flashes on the MRS scale. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change from the severity of individual Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) items at 6 months
It considers the obtained score from individual MRS items. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05346445
First Posted
April 14, 2022
Last Updated
July 25, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05346445
Brief Title
Comparison of Fluoxetine Versus Citalopram Therapy to Control Postmenopausal Vasomotor Syndrome
Official Title
Citalopram Improves Vasomotor and Urogenital Syndromes in Mexican Patients With Post-menopause
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 20, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 20, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study determined the efficacy of non-hormonal therapy with citalopram compared to fluoxetine, for the treatment of menopausal symptoms in Mexican women with vasomotor syndrome (VMS) and urogenital syndrome.
Detailed Description
Women's reproductive life goes through a senescence process called transition to menopause, which generates an imbalance in estrogenic hormonal regulation that is more evident between the fifth and sixth decades of life. This condition allows the passage from an active reproductive stage to an inactive one, which triggers an adaptative physiological response to the reduction of estrogens. However, the progressive depletion of estrogen levels causes clinical signs and symptoms in the central nervous system, metabolism, musculoskeletal apparatus, urogenital system, and skin. These symptoms lead to disability, work absenteeism, and health costs, affecting the quality of life of women in this stage. Vasomotor symptoms are the main clinical manifestation for which women seek treatment. Vasomotor syndrome (VMS) occurs in 75 to 80% of all women. The first-line management of menopausal symptoms is hormone replacement therapy (HRT). However, some patients present adverse effects or contraindications for using it.
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the citalopram for treating menopausal symptoms in Mexican women with vasomotor syndrome (VMS) and urogenital syndrome.
This study was a prospective randomized clinical trial, where 91 post-menopausal participants with severe baseline scores on the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) were randomly selected and treated with citalopram (n=49) or fluoxetine (n=42). Changes from baseline MRS score at three and six months of treatment were evaluated.
Participants were randomly assigned to groups before each consult. Randomization was done using RAND and RANK functions from Excel-Word to generate unique random numbers for every participant´s ID. Fluoxetine is the Gold Standard treatment in Mexico, whereby it was used as the control medication. Loading doses of citalopram 20 mg orally or fluoxetine 20 mg orally were administrated.
Statical analysis was performed using PAST 3.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. software. Some statical parameters, such as arithmetic median (µ), standard deviation (S.D.), and Hazard ratio, were calculated using Excel-Word. Graphics were constructed with GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. Tables and Forest plots were done in Excel-Word. Odds ratio (OR), Relative Risk (RR), and chi-squared were calculated with PAST 3.0 software. The assigned α value for this study was <0.05.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Postmenopause, Hot Flashes
Keywords
Postmenopause, Fluoxetine, Menopause Rating Scale, Vasomotor syndrome, Urogenital syndrome, Citalopram, Non hormonal therapy, Non-hormonal therapies, Serotonin reuptake inhibitors
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study was a prospective randomized clinical trial made in Mexican women diagnosed with postmenopause from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital "1ro de Octubre-Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales para los Trabajadores del Estado (ISSSTE)". Eligible participants were randomly selected in each consult to receive citalopram 20 mg/d or fluoxetine 20 mg/d for six months. The evaluation of the MRS score was done at the first consult and three and six months after medication. The institutional ethical committee of the hospital approved the study on May 20th, 2021, with registration number CONBIOETICA-09-CEI-012-20170421 and the internal registration number 122.2021. All participants provided written informed consent.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Fluoxetine group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received fluoxetine, 20 mg tablets, once a day for six months.
Arm Title
Citalopram group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received citalopram, 20 mg tablets, once a day for six months.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fluoxetine 20 MG
Other Intervention Name(s)
Generic PISA®
Intervention Description
Participants received non-hormonal treatment with fluoxetine.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Citalopram 20mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
PREPRAM®
Intervention Description
Participants received non-hormonal treatment with citalopram.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months
Description
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. It considers the score of the somatic, urogenital, and psychological domains. A score of 0-4 was considered minimal severity, 5-8 mild, 9-16 moderate, and greater than 17 severe.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 6 months
Description
Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. It considers the score of the somatic, urogenital, and psychological domains. A score of 0-4 was considered minimal severity, 5-8 mild, 9-16 moderate, and greater than 17 severe.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) somatic domain score at 3 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the somatic dimension, which includes hot flashes, heart problems, sleep problems, and muscle and joint pain. A score of 0-2 was considered minimal severity, 3-4 mild, 5-8 moderate, and greater than 9 severe.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) somatic domain score at 6 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the somatic dimension, which includes hot flashes, heart problems, sleep problems, and muscle and joint pain. A score of 0-2 was considered minimal severity, 3-4 mild, 5-8 moderate, and greater than 9 severe.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) urogenital domain score at 3 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the urogenital dimension, which includes sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness. A score of 0 was considered minimal severity, 1 mild, 2-3 moderate, and greater than 4 severe.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) urogenital domain score at 6 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the urogenital dimension, which includes sexual problems, bladder problems and vaginal dryness. A score of 0 was considered minimal severity, 1 mild, 2-3 moderate, and greater than 4 severe.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) psychological domain score at 3 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the psychological dimension, which includes depression, irritability, anxiety and tiredness. A score of 0-1 was considered minimal severity, 2-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and greater than 7 severe.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change from baseline Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) psychological domain score at 6 months
Description
It considers the score obtained from the psychological dimension, which includes depression, irritability, anxiety and tiredness. A score of 0-1 was considered minimal severity, 2-3 mild, 4-6 moderate, and greater than 7 severe.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change from baseline score in Item 1 of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 3 months
Description
Item 1 considers the score obtained from hot flashes on the MRS scale. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change from baseline score in Item 1 of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 6 months
Description
Item 1 considers the score obtained from hot flashes on the MRS scale. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from the severity of individual Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) items at 6 months
Description
It considers the obtained score from individual MRS items. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants who attended the climacteric consultation for the first time, without prior treatment of menopausal symptoms, and who met postmenopausal criteria.
Participants who met the criteria for vasomotor syndrome and score greater than 17 points in total MRS.
Participants without psychiatric pathology (psychiatric illnesses such as major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, among others).
Participants who agreed to participate and gave their written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants who had contraindications to receive serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).
Participants who were receiving prior treatment for the postmenopausal or vasomotor syndrome.
Participants who did not agree to participate or sign the informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan M Ocampo-Godinez, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Tissue Bioengineering Laboratory, National Autonomous University of Mexico [UNAM]
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patricia Loranca-Moreno, M.D., M.Sc.
Organizational Affiliation
Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alan Rios-Espinosa, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
07300
Country
Mexico
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24465026
Citation
El Khoudary SR, McClure CK, VoPham T, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Sternfeld B, Cauley JA, Khalil N, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Longitudinal assessment of the menopausal transition, endogenous sex hormones, and perception of physical functioning: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Aug;69(8):1011-7. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glt285. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25471682
Citation
Jones CM, Boelaert K. The Endocrinology of Ageing: A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2015;61(4):291-300. doi: 10.1159/000367692. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23998690
Citation
Blumel JE, Lavin P, Vallejo MS, Sarra S. Menopause or climacteric, just a semantic discussion or has it clinical implications? Climacteric. 2014 Jun;17(3):235-41. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2013.838948. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29393299
Citation
Monteleone P, Mascagni G, Giannini A, Genazzani AR, Simoncini T. Symptoms of menopause - global prevalence, physiology and implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;14(4):199-215. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.180. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29462162
Citation
Kim MJ, Yim G, Park HY. Vasomotor and physical menopausal symptoms are associated with sleep quality. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 20;13(2):e0192934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192934. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25714236
Citation
Sarrel P, Portman D, Lefebvre P, Lafeuille MH, Grittner AM, Fortier J, Gravel J, Duh MS, Aupperle PM. Incremental direct and indirect costs of untreated vasomotor symptoms. Menopause. 2015 Mar;22(3):260-6. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000320.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30401547
Citation
Avis NE, Crawford SL, Green R. Vasomotor Symptoms Across the Menopause Transition: Differences Among Women. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;45(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33403881
Citation
Langer RD, Hodis HN, Lobo RA, Allison MA. Hormone replacement therapy - where are we now? Climacteric. 2021 Feb;24(1):3-10. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1851183. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18074100
Citation
Deecher DC, Dorries K. Understanding the pathophysiology of vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes and night sweats) that occur in perimenopause, menopause, and postmenopause life stages. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007;10(6):247-57. doi: 10.1007/s00737-007-0209-5. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17572422
Citation
De Franciscis P, Cobellis L, Fornaro F, Sepe E, Torella M, Colacurci N. Low-dose hormone therapy in the perimenopause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28649145
Citation
Stubbs C, Mattingly L, Crawford SA, Wickersham EA, Brockhaus JL, McCarthy LH. Do SSRIs and SNRIs reduce the frequency and/or severity of hot flashes in menopausal women. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2017 May;110(5):272-274.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33110038
Citation
Kapoor E, Faubion S, Hurt RT, Fischer K, Schroeder D, Fokken S, Croghan IT. A selective serotonin receptor agonist for weight loss and management of menopausal vasomotor symptoms in overweight midlife women: a pilot study. Menopause. 2020 Nov;27(11):1228-1235. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001599. Erratum In: Menopause. 2021 Feb 1;28(2):229.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22433978
Citation
Ensrud KE, Joffe H, Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Reed SD, Newton KM, Sternfeld B, Lacroix AZ, Landis CA, Woods NF, Freeman EW. Effect of escitalopram on insomnia symptoms and subjective sleep quality in healthy perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 2012 Aug;19(8):848-55. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3182476099.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16855452
Citation
Wroolie TE, Williams KE, Keller J, Zappert LN, Shelton SD, Kenna HA, Reynolds MF, Rasgon NL. Mood and neuropsychological changes in women with midlife depression treated with escitalopram. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;26(4):361-6. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000227699.26375.f8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23888328
Citation
Shams T, Firwana B, Habib F, Alshahrani A, Alnouh B, Murad MH, Ferwana M. SSRIs for hot flashes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):204-13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2535-9. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16894334
Citation
Soares CN, Arsenio H, Joffe H, Bankier B, Cassano P, Petrillo LF, Cohen LS. Escitalopram versus ethinyl estradiol and norethindrone acetate for symptomatic peri- and postmenopausal women: impact on depression, vasomotor symptoms, sleep, and quality of life. Menopause. 2006 Sep-Oct;13(5):780-6. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000240633.46300.fa.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15668596
Citation
Suvanto-Luukkonen E, Koivunen R, Sundstrom H, Bloigu R, Karjalainen E, Haiva-Mallinen L, Tapanainen JS. Citalopram and fluoxetine in the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms: a prospective, randomized, 9-month, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Menopause. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):18-26. doi: 10.1097/00042192-200512010-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20498389
Citation
Barton DL, LaVasseur BI, Sloan JA, Stawis AN, Flynn KA, Dyar M, Johnson DB, Atherton PJ, Diekmann B, Loprinzi CL. Phase III, placebo-controlled trial of three doses of citalopram for the treatment of hot flashes: NCCTG trial N05C9. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3278-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.6379. Epub 2010 May 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12716252
Citation
Soares CN, Poitras JR, Prouty J, Alexander AB, Shifren JL, Cohen LS. Efficacy of citalopram as a monotherapy or as an adjunctive treatment to estrogen therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with depression and vasomotor symptoms. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;64(4):473-9. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0419.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30081962
Citation
Rathnayake N, Lenora J, Alwis G, Lekamwasam S. Cross cultural adaptation and analysis of psychometric properties of Sinhala version of Menopause Rating Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Aug 6;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0977-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32787824
Citation
Jahangiry L, Parviz R, Mirghafourvand M, Khazaee-Pool M, Ponnet K. The psychometric properties of the Persian menopause rating scale. BMC Womens Health. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01027-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34035574
Citation
Ajani K, Nimavat D, Vidja M, Moradiya A, Panchasara D, Bhalodiya S, Miyatra K, Tank KD. Translation, Reliability, and Validity Test of Gujarati Version of Menopause Rating Scale in Postmenopausal Women for Menopause-Related Symptoms. Indian J Community Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;46(1):40-44. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_163_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32209279
Citation
Anagnostis P, Bitzer J, Cano A, Ceausu I, Chedraui P, Durmusoglu F, Erkkola R, Goulis DG, Hirschberg AL, Kiesel L, Lopes P, Pines A, van Trotsenburg M, Lambrinoudaki I, Rees M. Menopause symptom management in women with dyslipidemias: An EMAS clinical guide. Maturitas. 2020 May;135:82-88. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29165623
Citation
Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Ensrud KE, Anderson GL, Carpenter JS, Freeman EW, Joffe H, LaCroix AZ, Manson JE, Morin CM, Newton KM, Otte J, Reed SD, McCurry SM. Effects of Pharmacologic and Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Insomnia Symptoms and Self-reported Sleep Quality in Women With Hot Flashes: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From Four MsFLASH Trials. Sleep. 2018 Jan 1;41(1):zsx190. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsx190.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24930413
Citation
Belso N, Kiss K, Rihmer Z, Tuzko N, Toth SJ, Paulin F. Major depressive disorder and response to citalopram treatment in women attending menopause clinic. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2003;7(4):269-72. doi: 10.1080/13651500310003183.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16999641
Citation
Freeman MP, Hill R, Brumbach BH. Escitalopram for perimenopausal depression: an open-label pilot study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):857-61. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.857. Erratum In: J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Oct;15(8):988.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20539246
Citation
Soares CN, Thase ME, Clayton A, Guico-Pabia CJ, Focht K, Jiang Q, Kornstein SG, Ninan P, Kane CP, Cohen LS. Desvenlafaxine and escitalopram for the treatment of postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder. Menopause. 2010 Jul;17(4):700-11. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181d88962.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15352642
Citation
Barton DL, Loprinzi CL, Novotny P, Shanafelt T, Sloan J, Wahner-Roedler D, Rummans TA, Christensen B, Dakhill SR, Martin LS. Pilot evaluation of citalopram for the relief of hot flashes. J Support Oncol. 2003 May-Jun;1(1):47-51.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19439155
Citation
Defronzo Dobkin R, Menza M, Allen LA, Marin H, Bienfait KL, Tiu J, Howarth J. Escitalopram reduces hot flashes in nondepressed menopausal women: A pilot study. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):70-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21540755
Citation
Freedman RR, Kruger ML, Tancer ME. Escitalopram treatment of menopausal hot flashes. Menopause. 2011 Aug;18(8):893-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31820ccae9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23031421
Citation
LaCroix AZ, Freeman EW, Larson J, Carpenter JS, Joffe H, Reed SD, Newton KM, Seguin RA, Sternfeld B, Cohen L, Ensrud KE. Effects of escitalopram on menopause-specific quality of life and pain in healthy menopausal women with hot flashes: a randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. 2012 Dec;73(4):361-8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22480818
Citation
Carpenter JS, Guthrie KA, Larson JC, Freeman EW, Joffe H, Reed SD, Ensrud KE, LaCroix AZ. Effect of escitalopram on hot flash interference: a randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2012 Jun;97(6):1399-404.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23435022
Citation
Joffe H, Guthrie KA, Larson J, Cohen LS, Carpenter JS, Lacroix AZ, Freeman EW. Relapse of vasomotor symptoms after discontinuation of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram: results from the menopause strategies: finding lasting answers for symptoms and health research network. Menopause. 2013 Mar;20(3):261-8. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e31826d3108.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32701665
Citation
Diem SJ, LaCroix AZ, Reed SD, Larson JC, Newton KM, Ensrud KE, Woods NF, Guthrie KA. Effects of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions on menopause-related quality of life: a pooled analysis of individual participant data from four MsFLASH trials. Menopause. 2020 Oct;27(10):1126-1136. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001597.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21245182
Citation
Freeman EW, Guthrie KA, Caan B, Sternfeld B, Cohen LS, Joffe H, Carpenter JS, Anderson GL, Larson JC, Ensrud KE, Reed SD, Newton KM, Sherman S, Sammel MD, LaCroix AZ. Efficacy of escitalopram for hot flashes in healthy menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011 Jan 19;305(3):267-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26437957
Citation
Davari-Tanha F, Soleymani-Farsani M, Asadi M, Shariat M, Shirazi M, Hadizadeh H. Comparison of citalopram and venlafaxine's role in treating sleep disturbances in menopausal women, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 May;293(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3900-1. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33465795
Citation
Shirazi M, Jalalian MN, Abed M, Ghaemi M. The Effectiveness of Melissa Officinalis L. versus Citalopram on Quality of Life of Menopausal Women with Sleep Disorder: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;43(2):126-130. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721857. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30129806
Citation
Molaie M, Darvishi B, Jafari Azar Z, Shirazi M, Amin G, Afshar S. Effects of a combination of Nigella sativa and Vitex agnus-castus with citalopram on healthy menopausal women with hot flashes: results from a subpopulation analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jan;35(1):58-61. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1499086. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29257042
Citation
Valdes-Sustaita B, Lopez-Rubalcava C, Gonzalez-Trujano ME, Garcia-Viguera C, Estrada-Camarena E. Aqueous Extract of Pomegranate Alone or in Combination with Citalopram Produces Antidepressant-Like Effects in an Animal Model of Menopause: Participation of Estrogen Receptors. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;18(12):2643. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122643.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34011310
Citation
Zhou J, Wang X, Feng L, Xiao L, Yang R, Zhu X, Shi H, Hu Y, Chen R, Boyce P, Wang G. Venlafaxine vs. fluoxetine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder: an 8-week, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 19;21(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03253-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35997971
Citation
Rios-Espinosa A, Cruz-Luna M, Garmendia-Gallardo C, Hernandez-Castanon MY, Hernandez-Hernandez VY, Sanchez-Tinoco PM, Bajonero-Dominguez A, Vergara Lope-Nunez JA, Alvarez-Perez MA, Gonzalez-Quiroz JL, Loranca-Moreno P, Ocampo-Godinez JM. Citalopram improves vasomotor syndrome and urogenital syndrome of menopause in Mexican women: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Dec;306(6):2035-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06732-9. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Fluoxetine Versus Citalopram Therapy to Control Postmenopausal Vasomotor Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs