search
Back to results

Proof of Concept Trial of Cannabis Derivatives in Neuropathic Pain

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
THC (Dronabinol)
CBD (Epidolex)
THC + CBD (Nabiximols)
Placebo
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to provide written consent
  • Veterans 21 years and older at the date of screening
  • Meet NEURODIAB criteria for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • Meet criteria for persistent, high-impact pain criteria.
  • Presence of allodynia confirmed by one of the screening dynamic brush tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary source of pain not related to diabetic neuropathy
  • Hypersensitivity to THC, CBD, or THC/CBD
  • Positive urine toxicology for THC-COOH on 2 consecutive visits before and including baseline assessment
  • Unwilling to refrain from using cannabis or cannabis-based products through the entire duration of the study
  • Diagnosis of DSM-5 Cannabis Use Disorder in the past 6 months
  • Current DSM-5 diagnosis of cannabis use disorder, substance use disorder or serious psychiatric disorders
  • Actual change or intent to change is greater than a 20% change (increase or decrease) in any other medication for pain or non-pharmacological treatment from 4 weeks before the screening appointment until completion of study (i.e., visit 13)
  • Opioid doses > 400 mg MME (morphine milligram equivalent)
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who intend to become pregnant in the 12 weeks from enrollment
  • Any current unstable or concerning medical condition that would place the patient at increased risk, including hepatic, respiratory, immunological, cardiovascular, endocrine, or renal disease
  • Need for immediate psychiatric hospitalization
  • Enrolled in a medical marijuana program
  • Federal employee

Sites / Locations

  • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CARecruiting
  • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CTRecruiting
  • Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RIRecruiting
  • South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TXRecruiting
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WARecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

THC (Dronabinol)

CBD (Epidolex)

THC + CBD (Nabiximols)

Placebo

Arm Description

Target dose of 10mg per day.

Target dose of 800 mg per day.

Target dose of 10.8 mg / 10 mg per day.

Identical in appearance to the three active comparators.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To compare the short-term efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo on Neuropathic Pain as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale of Pain
The mean change in the weekly average of daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) from baseline to week 6.

Secondary Outcome Measures

To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality (allodynia) as measured by the Quantitative Sensory Testing.
Allodynia measured by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain)
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Scale.
Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) total score; 7 different questions/sensations (for each individual item 0-10 scale; 0= not present/no pain, 10= most sensation). Individual scores analyzed separately for pain quality and mean score analyzed for overall neuropathic pain).
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Gait Speed Test
Distance walked (meters)/time (seconds) measured by Gait Speed Test (lower score = worse, higher score =better)
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 1-7 point ordinal scale assessed (1 = worse, 7 = better)
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the patient satisfaction visual analog scale.
Patient satisfaction with intervention on visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=no satisfaction, 100 = complete satisfaction).
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in quality of life measured by the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey
Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS) measured by Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12). VR-12 is an algorithmic score with ranges from 0-100 (0 indicates worse health-related quality of life and 100 represents better health-related quality of life).
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7.
Generalized anxiety symptomology is measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) total score. (total score ranges from 0-21; Score 0-4 = minimal anxiety, Score 5-9 = mild anxiety, Score 10-14 = moderate anxiety, Score 15-21 = severe anxiety)
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality as measured by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2).
Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) total score and four subscales (continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, affective). (0= no pain to 5= excruciating pain)
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in disability and function as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.
Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (BPI-DPN) pain intensity score (first four items 0-10; 10= pain as bad as can imagine) (remaining items 0% (no relief)-100% (complete relief)) and pain interference score (0-10, 10= completely intense).
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (severity of depression) as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Severity of depression is measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (0-27; 0=none, 27=worst).
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (PTSD symptoms) as measured by the PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5).
PTSD symptoms are assessed by PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5) total score symptom severity score (0-80; 0= not at all to 80= worst).

Full Information

First Posted
April 8, 2022
Last Updated
July 25, 2023
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05351801
Brief Title
Proof of Concept Trial of Cannabis Derivatives in Neuropathic Pain
Official Title
Proof of Concept Trial of Cannabis Derivatives in Neuropathic Pain.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 21, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Veterans with diabetes are more likely than diabetic civilians to develop disabling chronic diabetic neuropathic pain (CDNP). Research on frontline treatments for CDNP (enhanced glycemic control, exercise, pharmacological agents), shows inconsistent outcomes and dissatisfaction among Veterans. Veterans and clinicians have shown significant interest in cannabis derivatives (THC, CBD) for neuropathic pain control, but there are no well-controlled trials guiding expectations for benefit and adverse outcomes associated with cannabis for CDNP. Because Veterans are likely to present with pain and pain-related polymorbidity significantly differing from that of civilians, a well-structured clinical trial of cannabinoids for Veterans with CDNP is vital. The present phase II study will offer the first evidence describing the potential benefits and adverse effects of cannabinoids for CDNP in Veterans using a four-arm, double-blind, multisite randomized trial comparing THC, CBD, THC+CBD and placebo on neuropathic pain outcomes.
Detailed Description
Chronic pain is a significant burden to United States Veterans and is a particular concern for Veterans with diabetes. Diabetic Veterans have a higher risk of chronic diabetic neuropathic pain (CDNP) than civilians with diabetes, and CDNP is more disabling for Veterans than it is for civilians. Frontline treatment for CDNP, including enhanced glycemic control, exercise, and pharmacotherapies, show inconsistent outcomes for individuals with CDNP due to poor adherence and side effects. The ongoing opioid crisis has led to significant interest in safe and effective alternatives for pain control, and there is a significant need for research on desirable options for pain control that are likely to improve treatment adherence and outcomes. Veterans groups and Veterans Affairs clinicians have expressed significant interest in cannabis and its principal constituents (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, THC; cannabidiol, CBD) for pain management, but the extant research describing the potential risks and benefits of cannabis for pain is weak. This randomized trial was developed as a proof of concept study to determine if cannabis constituents (THC, CBD, and THC+CBD) are superior to placebo in reducing pain in Veterans with CDNP. The study is to recruit a sample of 320 adult Veterans who meet diagnostic criteria for high-impact CDNP, are on stable treatment(s) for CDNP, are not current cannabis users and who do not meet diagnostic criteria for Cannabis Use Disorder. This randomized phase II, 4-arm clinical trial aims to determine if cannabis constituents (THC, CBD) or their combination (THC+CBD) are superior to placebo in reducing pain in Veterans with CDNP. This trial will offer the first evidence describing the potential benefits and adverse effects of cannabinoids for CDNP in Veterans.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group Phase II study with randomization to one of the four treatment arms: 1) 10 mg mg THC , 2) 800 mg CBD , 3) 10.8 mg THC + 10 mg CBD , and 4) placebo. The 8-week treatment phase comprises a 2-week up-titration, 4 weeks maintenance on the target dose followed by 2 weeks down-titration, to minimize cannabis withdrawal syndrome. The two-weeks up titration phase is to minimize side effects and improve tolerability. Efficacy will be assessed by responses during the 4-week target dose phase.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
320 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
THC (Dronabinol)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Target dose of 10mg per day.
Arm Title
CBD (Epidolex)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Target dose of 800 mg per day.
Arm Title
THC + CBD (Nabiximols)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Target dose of 10.8 mg / 10 mg per day.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Identical in appearance to the three active comparators.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
THC (Dronabinol)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive a target dose of 10mg per day of THC (Dronabinol).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CBD (Epidolex)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive a target dose of 800 mg per day of CBD (Epidolex).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
THC + CBD (Nabiximols)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive a target dose of 10.8 mg / 10 mg per day of THC + CBD (Nabiximols).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To compare the short-term efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo on Neuropathic Pain as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale of Pain
Description
The mean change in the weekly average of daily Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain) from baseline to week 6.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality (allodynia) as measured by the Quantitative Sensory Testing.
Description
Allodynia measured by Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) (0-10 scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain)
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Neuropathic Pain Scale.
Description
Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) total score; 7 different questions/sensations (for each individual item 0-10 scale; 0= not present/no pain, 10= most sensation). Individual scores analyzed separately for pain quality and mean score analyzed for overall neuropathic pain).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in disability and function as measured by the Gait Speed Test
Description
Distance walked (meters)/time (seconds) measured by Gait Speed Test (lower score = worse, higher score =better)
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change
Description
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) 1-7 point ordinal scale assessed (1 = worse, 7 = better)
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in perceived improvement as measured by the patient satisfaction visual analog scale.
Description
Patient satisfaction with intervention on visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100, 0=no satisfaction, 100 = complete satisfaction).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in quality of life measured by the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey
Description
Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS) measured by Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12). VR-12 is an algorithmic score with ranges from 0-100 (0 indicates worse health-related quality of life and 100 represents better health-related quality of life).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in anxiety measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7.
Description
Generalized anxiety symptomology is measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) total score. (total score ranges from 0-21; Score 0-4 = minimal anxiety, Score 5-9 = mild anxiety, Score 10-14 = moderate anxiety, Score 15-21 = severe anxiety)
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in pain quality as measured by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2).
Description
Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) total score and four subscales (continuous pain, intermittent pain, predominantly neuropathic pain, affective). (0= no pain to 5= excruciating pain)
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in mean changes in disability and function as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.
Description
Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (BPI-DPN) pain intensity score (first four items 0-10; 10= pain as bad as can imagine) (remaining items 0% (no relief)-100% (complete relief)) and pain interference score (0-10, 10= completely intense).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (severity of depression) as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Description
Severity of depression is measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (0-27; 0=none, 27=worst).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8
Title
To assess the efficacy of THC, CBD, or THC+CBD vs Placebo in emotional functioning (PTSD symptoms) as measured by the PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5).
Description
PTSD symptoms are assessed by PTSD Checklist-DSM-5 (PCL-5) total score symptom severity score (0-80; 0= not at all to 80= worst).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5, Week 6, Week 7, Week 8

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Able to provide written consent Veterans 21 years and older at the date of screening Meet NEURODIAB criteria for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy Meet criteria for persistent, high-impact pain criteria. Presence of allodynia confirmed by one of the screening dynamic brush tests Exclusion Criteria: Primary source of pain not related to diabetic neuropathy Hypersensitivity to THC, CBD, or THC/CBD Positive urine toxicology for THC-COOH on 2 consecutive visits before and including baseline assessment Unwilling to refrain from using cannabis or cannabis-based products through the entire duration of the study Diagnosis of DSM-5 Cannabis Use Disorder in the past 6 months Current DSM-5 diagnosis of cannabis use disorder, substance use disorder or serious psychiatric disorders Actual change or intent to change is greater than a 20% change (increase or decrease) in any other medication for pain or non-pharmacological treatment from 4 weeks before the screening appointment until completion of study (i.e., visit 13) Opioid doses > 400 mg MME (morphine milligram equivalent) Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or who intend to become pregnant in the 12 weeks from enrollment Any current unstable or concerning medical condition that would place the patient at increased risk, including hepatic, respiratory, immunological, cardiovascular, endocrine, or renal disease Need for immediate psychiatric hospitalization Enrolled in a medical marijuana program Federal employee
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Courtney C DiCocco
Phone
(203) 932-5711
Email
Courtney.DiCocco@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mohini Ranganathan, MD
Phone
(203) 932-5711
Email
Mohini.Ranganathan@va.gov
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deepak D'Souza, MD MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donald McGeary, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92161-0002
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Albert Leung, MD
Phone
858-642-3029
Email
albert.leung@va.gov
Facility Name
VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
City
West Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06516-2770
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deepak D'Souza, MD MBBS
Phone
203-932-5711
Ext
2594
Email
Deepak.DSouza@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deepak D'Souza, MD MBBS
Facility Name
Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02908-4734
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jane Metrik, PhD
Phone
401-273-7100
Ext
3400
Email
jane.metrik@va.gov
Facility Name
South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio, TX
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229-4404
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Muhammad Baig, MD
Phone
210-617-5300
Ext
18244
Email
muhammad.baig@va.gov
Facility Name
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98108-1532
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elaine Peskind, PhD
Phone
206-277-3965
Email
elaine.peskind@va.gov

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Proof of Concept Trial of Cannabis Derivatives in Neuropathic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs