search
Back to results

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized vs Guideline-based Well Follow-up Strategies for Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
On-demand personalized follow-up care
Guideline-based follow-up care (standard of care)
Sponsored by
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Well Follow-up, Follow-up Interval

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being referred to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program (WBCP) for routine follow-up after completion of acute phase of treatment for invasive breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of prior invasive breast cancer, recurrent brest cancer or metastatic breast cancer
  • Currently receiving zoledronate, LHRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) or abemaciclib

Sites / Locations

  • The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

On-demand personalized follow-up care

Guideline-based follow-up care

Arm Description

On-demand personalized follow-up care (on-demand access to a Wellness Beyond Cancer Program (WBCP) nurse and an annual follow-up by telephone with WBCP nurse following the patient's annual mammogram). Both groups of participants will have yearly mammograms (current standard of care) organized by their healthcare provider.

Guideline-based follow-up care (i.e. current standard of care). Both groups will have yearly mammograms (current standard of care) organized by their healthcare provider.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Health-Related Quality of Life
Health-Related Quality of Life as determined by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of Health related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients: physical, social, emotional and functional well-being.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Fear of recurrence
Fear of recurrence will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fear of Recurrence (FACT-FRQ) questionnaire. It consists of 3 questions suggested by David Cella at FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), that were adapted from Vickberg's Concerns about Recurrence (CARS) questionnaire.
Anxiety levels
Anxiety levels as determined by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. The HADS questionnaire measures anxiety and depression, which commonly coexist. It is comprised of seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression.
Treatment related toxicity concerns
Treatment related toxicity concerns as assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) questionnaire. The FACT-ES questionnaire is a validated sub scale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system. FACT-ES consists of 46 items on a 5 point Likert type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). It is designed to measure five domains of health: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well being and endocrine symptom subscale.
Recurrence-free survival
Measured by the number of participants free of breast cancer recurrence after 24 months of follow-up.
Patient visits
Number of patient reported visits to different healthcare providers using a Patient Follow-up Questionnaire. The follow-up questionnaire consists of questions that assess the number of follow up visits a participant has had and also the type of healthcare provider the follow-up visits were with.
Cost-effectiveness
Incremental cost-effectiveness rations (cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

Full Information

First Posted
May 4, 2022
Last Updated
April 20, 2023
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05365230
Brief Title
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized vs Guideline-based Well Follow-up Strategies for Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer
Official Title
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized vs Guideline-based Well Follow-up Strategies for Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer (REaCT-Wellness)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 19, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
After breast cancer patients complete the acute phase of their treatment (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy), they are routinely followed in clinic every 3-6 months for several years. Multiple guideline recommendations exist with no consensus on the optimal follow-up schedule due to lack of randomized data to support any particular follow-up recommendation. Therefore the investigators propose a randomized trial evaluating personalized vs guideline-based well follow-up strategies for patients with early-stage breast cancer.
Detailed Description
After breast cancer patients complete the acute phase of their treatment (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy), they are routinely followed in clinic every 3-6 months for several years. Multiple guideline recommendations exist with no consensus on the optimal follow-up schedule due to lack of randomized data to support any particular follow-up recommendation. The frequency of follow-up varies between and within different institutions. To date, no de-escalation strategy has appropriately evaluated patient reported outcomes such as quality of life or perception of care. There has been a growing body of evidence that de-intensification of follow-up is safe, effective and reduces costs for both patients and the health care system. Therefore the investigators propose a randomized trial evaluating personalized vs guideline-based well follow-up strategies for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Well Follow-up, Follow-up Interval

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
264 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
On-demand personalized follow-up care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
On-demand personalized follow-up care (on-demand access to a Wellness Beyond Cancer Program (WBCP) nurse and an annual follow-up by telephone with WBCP nurse following the patient's annual mammogram). Both groups of participants will have yearly mammograms (current standard of care) organized by their healthcare provider.
Arm Title
Guideline-based follow-up care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Guideline-based follow-up care (i.e. current standard of care). Both groups will have yearly mammograms (current standard of care) organized by their healthcare provider.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
On-demand personalized follow-up care
Intervention Description
On-demand personalized follow-up care (on demand access to a WBCP nurse and an annual follow-up by telephone.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Guideline-based follow-up care (standard of care)
Intervention Description
Follow-up care based on current standard of care guidelines.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life
Description
Health-Related Quality of Life as determined by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of Health related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients: physical, social, emotional and functional well-being.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fear of recurrence
Description
Fear of recurrence will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Fear of Recurrence (FACT-FRQ) questionnaire. It consists of 3 questions suggested by David Cella at FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), that were adapted from Vickberg's Concerns about Recurrence (CARS) questionnaire.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Title
Anxiety levels
Description
Anxiety levels as determined by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. The HADS questionnaire measures anxiety and depression, which commonly coexist. It is comprised of seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Title
Treatment related toxicity concerns
Description
Treatment related toxicity concerns as assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES) questionnaire. The FACT-ES questionnaire is a validated sub scale of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) measurement system. FACT-ES consists of 46 items on a 5 point Likert type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). It is designed to measure five domains of health: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well being and endocrine symptom subscale.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Title
Recurrence-free survival
Description
Measured by the number of participants free of breast cancer recurrence after 24 months of follow-up.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Title
Patient visits
Description
Number of patient reported visits to different healthcare providers using a Patient Follow-up Questionnaire. The follow-up questionnaire consists of questions that assess the number of follow up visits a participant has had and also the type of healthcare provider the follow-up visits were with.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
Incremental cost-effectiveness rations (cost per one quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Time Frame
24 months after randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Being referred to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program (WBCP) for routine follow-up after completion of acute phase of treatment for invasive breast cancer Exclusion Criteria: History of prior invasive breast cancer, recurrent brest cancer or metastatic breast cancer Currently receiving zoledronate, LHRH (Gonadotropin-releasing hormone) or abemaciclib
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark Clemons, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Hilton, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H8M2
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Personalized vs Guideline-based Well Follow-up Strategies for Patients With Early-stage Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs