search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Chronic Pain Management Training Program

Primary Purpose

Nursing Caries, Chronic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
chronic pain management education program
No intervention
Sponsored by
Çankırı Karatekin University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Nursing Caries focused on measuring Chronic pain, Nursing student education, Web-Technology based education

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 35 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nursing Grade 4
  • with internet access
  • Students who volunteered to participate in the research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosed psychiatric disorder
  • Difficulty in understanding and speaking Turkish
  • Graduated from Health Vocational High School
  • Attending any training on pain and/or having a pain education certificate

Sites / Locations

  • Nefise Cevriye SUCU ÇAKMAK

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control group

Chronic pain education group

Arm Description

The students in the control group will be given a pre-test, and two weeks later, the post-test will be applied. After the chronic pain education group completes the research, the chronic pain education program will be opened to the students in the control group, too.

The pre-test will be opened to the students in the chronic pain education group simultaneously with the opening of the post-tests for the control group.After the students in the chronic pain education group completed the pre-test, the chronic pain management training program developed for nursing students will be applied for 2 weeks. Post test will be applied at the end of all training videos and evaluation questions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Introductory features form
It was prepared by the researcher in line with the literature knowledge. In the form of introductory characteristics of nursing students; There are 7 questions about the students' date of birth, gender, whether they have chronic pain, whether they have chronic pain from family members they live with, in which clinics they do internship, and whether they find themselves competent in the management of chronic pain of the patients they care for.
Scale of attitudes of students studying in the field of health towards patients with chronic pain
The Attitude Scale of Health Students towards Patients with Chronic Pain is a 5-point Likert scale and has 18 items. It consists of two factors: sensitivity orientation and error orientation. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients are 0.88 and 0.75 for the first and second factors, respectively. Each factor gets a separate score. Each item in the factors receives a score between "1" and "5". The scores are summed up and divided by the number of items, then a score between 1 and 5 is obtained, thus a standard evaluation of two factors can be done. There is no cut-off score in the scale. An increased score from the sensitivity and misconception orientation factors indicates that healthcare professionals' attitude towards patients with chronic pain is positively strong. On the other hand, a low score on these factors indicates a strong negative attitude.
Scale of attitudes of students studying in the field of health towards patients with chronic pain
The Attitude Scale of Health Students towards Patients with Chronic Pain is a 5-point Likert scale and has 18 items. It consists of two factors: sensitivity orientation and error orientation. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients are 0.88 and 0.75 for the first and second factors, respectively. Each factor gets a separate score. Each item in the factors receives a score between "1" and "5". The scores are summed up and divided by the number of items, then a score between 1 and 5 is obtained, thus a standard evaluation of two factors can be done. There is no cut-off score in the scale. An increased score from the sensitivity and misconception orientation factors indicates that healthcare professionals' attitude towards patients with chronic pain is positively strong. On the other hand, a low score on these factors indicates a strong negative attitude.
Chronic pain management knowledge test
The knowledge test on chronic pain management was created by the researchers in line with the literature. The knowledge test for chronic pain management includes 24 case-based five-choice multiple-choice questions. In this test, each correct answer is 1 point and a wrong answer is zero. The total score is obtained by adding the scores obtained from the test. The highest score that can be obtained from the test is 24, and the lowest score is zero. An increase in the score obtained from the test indicates that the participant's level of knowledge about chronic pain management increases, while a decrease in the score indicates a low level of knowledge.
Chronic pain management knowledge test
The knowledge test on chronic pain management was created by the researchers in line with the literature. The knowledge test for chronic pain management includes 24 case-based five-choice multiple-choice questions. In this test, each correct answer is 1 point and a wrong answer is zero. The total score is obtained by adding the scores obtained from the test. The highest score that can be obtained from the test is 24, and the lowest score is zero. An increase in the score obtained from the test indicates that the participant's level of knowledge about chronic pain management increases, while a decrease in the score indicates a low level of knowledge.
Chronic pain management training program evaluation form
Chronic pain management training program evaluation Form, Game-based virtual reality application evaluation form in Bıyık-Bayram and Çalışkan's (2017) The Effects of Game-Based Virtual Reality Application on Nursing Students' Learning Tracheostomy Care, was revised and revised to the chronic pain management training program. has been prepared. This form consists of two parts. The first part consists of two open-ended questions about the positive and negative thoughts of the students about the chronic pain management education program, and the second part consists of 16 questions that include 5-point Likert-type scoring in which the statements about the education program are evaluated. Each item in the form receives a score between "1" and "5". An increase in the score obtained from the form indicates that the participant evaluated the chronic pain management training program p vely.This form will be filled by the students in the experimental group at the end of the post-test.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 27, 2022
Last Updated
January 10, 2023
Sponsor
Çankırı Karatekin University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05371769
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Chronic Pain Management Training Program
Official Title
Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Chronic Pain Management Education Program Developed for Nursing Students
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 13, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 13, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Çankırı Karatekin University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The research will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the web-based chronic pain management training program developed for nursing students. It is planned in a randomized controlled triple-blind design with the final year nursing students of the Nursing Department of Çankırı Karatekin University in a pre-test-post-test order.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nursing Caries, Chronic Pain
Keywords
Chronic pain, Nursing student education, Web-Technology based education

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomization: After applying the exclusion criteria to a total of 94 students, the students who accepted to participate in the study was randomly selected into two groups (A and B) of 35 students by simple random sampling by creating a computer-assisted simple random numbers table (www.randomizer.org). Selected students was randomly assigned so that the general academic achievement grades of both groups were homogeneous. The groups was randomly assigned to the intervention or control group by the code "A" and "B" by the software specialist.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
It was explained to all students that training was given over the website https://www.agriegitimi.net and the starting time of the training was announced on the website. Students were told that they were be able to attend training and testing at the relevant time according to notifications. Students were not know that they were in the experimental or control group. In this way, students were blinded. Only the software specialist could know the students in the intervention and control groups. The data could sent to the statistician by the software specialist as group A and B data. This way the statistician could be blind. The researcher could not present at any stage of data collection. After the statistical analysis was done and the research report was written, the coding of the experimental and control groups were explained to the researcher by the software specialist.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
66 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The students in the control group will be given a pre-test, and two weeks later, the post-test will be applied. After the chronic pain education group completes the research, the chronic pain education program will be opened to the students in the control group, too.
Arm Title
Chronic pain education group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The pre-test will be opened to the students in the chronic pain education group simultaneously with the opening of the post-tests for the control group.After the students in the chronic pain education group completed the pre-test, the chronic pain management training program developed for nursing students will be applied for 2 weeks. Post test will be applied at the end of all training videos and evaluation questions.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
chronic pain management education program
Other Intervention Name(s)
Experimental group
Intervention Description
The chronic pain management training program will be applied for 2 weeks. The training consists of 15 videos about theory and practice topics in chronic pain management. There are evaluation questions at the end of each video.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
No intervention
Other Intervention Name(s)
Control group
Intervention Description
No intervention will be made.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Introductory features form
Description
It was prepared by the researcher in line with the literature knowledge. In the form of introductory characteristics of nursing students; There are 7 questions about the students' date of birth, gender, whether they have chronic pain, whether they have chronic pain from family members they live with, in which clinics they do internship, and whether they find themselves competent in the management of chronic pain of the patients they care for.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Scale of attitudes of students studying in the field of health towards patients with chronic pain
Description
The Attitude Scale of Health Students towards Patients with Chronic Pain is a 5-point Likert scale and has 18 items. It consists of two factors: sensitivity orientation and error orientation. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients are 0.88 and 0.75 for the first and second factors, respectively. Each factor gets a separate score. Each item in the factors receives a score between "1" and "5". The scores are summed up and divided by the number of items, then a score between 1 and 5 is obtained, thus a standard evaluation of two factors can be done. There is no cut-off score in the scale. An increased score from the sensitivity and misconception orientation factors indicates that healthcare professionals' attitude towards patients with chronic pain is positively strong. On the other hand, a low score on these factors indicates a strong negative attitude.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Scale of attitudes of students studying in the field of health towards patients with chronic pain
Description
The Attitude Scale of Health Students towards Patients with Chronic Pain is a 5-point Likert scale and has 18 items. It consists of two factors: sensitivity orientation and error orientation. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficients are 0.88 and 0.75 for the first and second factors, respectively. Each factor gets a separate score. Each item in the factors receives a score between "1" and "5". The scores are summed up and divided by the number of items, then a score between 1 and 5 is obtained, thus a standard evaluation of two factors can be done. There is no cut-off score in the scale. An increased score from the sensitivity and misconception orientation factors indicates that healthcare professionals' attitude towards patients with chronic pain is positively strong. On the other hand, a low score on these factors indicates a strong negative attitude.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Chronic pain management knowledge test
Description
The knowledge test on chronic pain management was created by the researchers in line with the literature. The knowledge test for chronic pain management includes 24 case-based five-choice multiple-choice questions. In this test, each correct answer is 1 point and a wrong answer is zero. The total score is obtained by adding the scores obtained from the test. The highest score that can be obtained from the test is 24, and the lowest score is zero. An increase in the score obtained from the test indicates that the participant's level of knowledge about chronic pain management increases, while a decrease in the score indicates a low level of knowledge.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Chronic pain management knowledge test
Description
The knowledge test on chronic pain management was created by the researchers in line with the literature. The knowledge test for chronic pain management includes 24 case-based five-choice multiple-choice questions. In this test, each correct answer is 1 point and a wrong answer is zero. The total score is obtained by adding the scores obtained from the test. The highest score that can be obtained from the test is 24, and the lowest score is zero. An increase in the score obtained from the test indicates that the participant's level of knowledge about chronic pain management increases, while a decrease in the score indicates a low level of knowledge.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention
Title
Chronic pain management training program evaluation form
Description
Chronic pain management training program evaluation Form, Game-based virtual reality application evaluation form in Bıyık-Bayram and Çalışkan's (2017) The Effects of Game-Based Virtual Reality Application on Nursing Students' Learning Tracheostomy Care, was revised and revised to the chronic pain management training program. has been prepared. This form consists of two parts. The first part consists of two open-ended questions about the positive and negative thoughts of the students about the chronic pain management education program, and the second part consists of 16 questions that include 5-point Likert-type scoring in which the statements about the education program are evaluated. Each item in the form receives a score between "1" and "5". An increase in the score obtained from the form indicates that the participant evaluated the chronic pain management training program p vely.This form will be filled by the students in the experimental group at the end of the post-test.
Time Frame
immediately after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Nursing Grade 4 with internet access Students who volunteered to participate in the research Exclusion Criteria: Having a diagnosed psychiatric disorder Difficulty in understanding and speaking Turkish Graduated from Health Vocational High School Attending any training on pain and/or having a pain education certificate
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nefise Cevriye SUCU ÇAKMAK
City
Çankırı
ZIP/Postal Code
18700
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Chronic Pain Management Training Program

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs