search
Back to results

Effectiveness of the Serious Game 'Broodles' for Siblings of Children With Visual Impairment and/or Intellectual Disability

Primary Purpose

Healthy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Serious game 'Broodles'
Sponsored by
VU University of Amsterdam
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Healthy focused on measuring siblings, visual impairment, intellectual disability, quality of life, well-being

Eligibility Criteria

6 Years - 9 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having a brother or sister with (strongly suspected) visual impairment and/or intellectual disability (0-17;11years old), with possibly other comorbid disabilities, disorders or illnesses.
  • The brother or sister with a disability lives in the same house (at least part of the time)
  • Living in the Netherlands or Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a disability, impairment or severe illness
  • Brother or sister with VI and/or ID lives in a residential care facility on a full-time basis
  • One or both parents have a disability, impairment or severe illness
  • Not speaking the Dutch language
  • No written consent from the participant and/or their legal representative
  • Another sibling in the household is already included in the study. Only one sibling per household can participate in the study. The parents will decide which sibling will participate.

Sites / Locations

  • VU University AmsterdamRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Playing serious game 'Broodles'

Waitlist control group

Arm Description

The participants allocated to this group will play the newly developed serious game 'Broodles' after pre-test assessment. Children will play the serious game without the parent or the help of a caregiver. Parents and children will make complementary worksheets together and parents will read an information brochure. Concomitant care as usual is allowed during the study. A parent-child pair is labelled as one participant.

The participants allocated to this group will play the serious game 'Broodles' after follow-up assessment. Concomitant care as usual is allowed during the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in quality of life as assessed by the Psychosocial Health Summary Score of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) - Acute Version -
The quality of life of the participating sibling is measured with both a child-report and parent-report version of the questionnaire Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) - Acute Version - Psychosocial Health Summary Score. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 60, with a higher score indicating more problems, and thus lower quality of life. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with a decreased score indicating improved quality of life.
Change in Sibling adjustment to and perceptions of their brother or sister's disability
Sibling adjustment to and perceptions of their brother or sister's disability is measured with both a child-report and parent-report version of the Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) - Negative Adjustment Scale. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 72, with a higher score indicating more negative adjustment to the disability of the brother or sister. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with a decreased score indicating improved adjustment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Self-esteem
The self-esteem of the sibling is measured with the child-report questionnaire Self-Perception Profile for Children simplified(SPPC-s) - Global Self-Worth subscale. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 12, with a higher score indicating higher self-esteem. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with an increased score indicating improved self-esteem.
Change in Perceived social support
The perceived social support of the participating sibling is measured with the child-report questionnaire Social Support Scale for Children (SSSC). The total score on this scale has a minimum of 24 and a maximum of 96, with a higher score indicating higher perceived social support. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with an increased score indicating improved perceived social support.
Change in sibling relationship (child-report)
Sibling relationship between the participating sibling and the sibling that has a disability is measured with the child-report drawing task Pictorial Assessment of Interpersonal Relationships (PAIR). This instrument has six separate scales. The scales Cohesion and Distancing have total score ranges from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating respectively higher interdependence and higher autonomy in the relationship. The scales Similarity and Value have total score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating respectively higher affinity and higher disparity between the siblings. The scales Emotion and Conflict have nominal and ordinal scores (1-4), with a higher score indicating respectively more similarity in emotional state and a amore disrupted relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured. In addition thematic analysis is executed, and changes in themes over time are measured.
Change in sibling relationship (parent-report)
Sibling relationship between the participating sibling and the sibling that has a disability is measured with the parent-report questionnaire Parental Expectations and Perceptions of Children's Sibling Relationships Questionnaire (PEP-SRQ). This scale has three separate subscales. These include the scales Warmth (total score ranges from 15 to 80), Agonism (total score ranges from 9 to 45), and Rivalry/Competition (total score ranges from 3 to 15). A higher score indicates respectively more warmth, more agonism, and more rivalry in the sibling relationship as perceived by the parent. The scale also has a question about the total quality of the sibling relationship, as perceived by the parent (range 1-7), with a higher score indicating higher quality of the relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured.
Change in coping skills
Copings skills of the participating sibling are measured with a 12-item version of the child-report questionnaire Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI).Two separate subscales are used: Engaged and Disengaged Coping. The total score on both scales have a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 30. A higher scored on the Engaged scale means higher use of engaged coping strategies. A higher score on the Disenganged scale means higher use of disengaged coping strategies. The baseline change in scores over time on this outcome is measured.
Change in parent-child relationship
The parent-child relationship between the participating sibling and the participating parent is measured with the parent-report questionnaire Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS) - Closeness scale, short version. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 35, with a higher score indicating a closer parent-child relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured.
Social validity of the intervention
The social validity of the intervention is measured with an adapted version of the child-report and parent-report questionnaire Social Validity Scale (SVS). The mean score on the scale, ranging from 1 to 5, will be used.
Subjective evaluation of the intervention
Participants (both parents and children) answer open-ended evaluation questions about the intervention at post-test assessment. This includes questions about what they think was good about the intervention, what they think could be better, and what they think they learned from the intervention.
Change in Sibling adjustment to their brother or sister's disability
Sibling adjustment to their brother or sister's disability is measured with self-developed open ended questions that are answered by the parent and the child. The questions include: (1) "Can you name up to five examples of what you/your child like(s)about your/their brother or sister?" (2) "Can you name up to five examples of what you/your child do(es)not like or find(s)difficult or unpleasant about having a brother or sister with a disability?" (3) "Can you explain what you/your child do(es)to deal with these examples?" The children are also asked to rate the examples named at question 1 and question 2 with smileys (5-point scale), indicating how much they like it or how hard they think it is. Thematic analysis is executed, and changes in themes over time are measured. Change over time in smileys is measured as well.

Full Information

First Posted
April 21, 2022
Last Updated
May 16, 2022
Sponsor
VU University of Amsterdam
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05376007
Brief Title
Effectiveness of the Serious Game 'Broodles' for Siblings of Children With Visual Impairment and/or Intellectual Disability
Official Title
The Effectiveness of the Serious Game 'Broodles' in Improving Psychosocial Well-being of Siblings (6-9 Years Old) of Children With Visual Impairment and/or Intellectual Disability: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 22, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
VU University of Amsterdam

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The support for siblings of children with disabilities is scarce and fragmented, even though studies have shown that these siblings can benefit from support. Although some interventions for siblings have been developed, these are costly and time-consuming and the effects have not been researched thoroughly with randomized controlled trials. This study will investigate the effectiveness of the newly developed serious game 'Broodles' in improving the quality of life and psychosocial well-being of healthy siblings (aged 6-9 years) of children with intellectual disability (ID) and/or visual impairment (VI). The effectiveness of the serious game will be examined in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a pre-test (T0), post-test (T1) and follow-up (T2). There will be two groups, namely an experimental group playing the serious game and a waitlist control group. Quantitative and qualitative measures will be used including questionnaires, drawings and open-ended questions. Both the sibling and one parent will complete the assessments. The serious game, named 'Broodles', is a psychological intervention that addresses how to handle thoughts and emotions concerning several important issues in the lives of siblings. The game has 8 levels that take approximately 20 minutes to play. In addition to the serious game, children make offline worksheets and parents receive tips and information on how to support their child. The primary study parameters are quality of life and sibling adjustment to and perceptions of the disability of the brother or sister. Secondary study parameters are different aspects of psychosocial well-being, including self-esteem, experienced social support, sibling relationship, coping skills, parent-child relationship, and social validity. It is expected that the participants in the experimental conditions will benefit from playing the game, namely their quality of life and psychosocial well-being is expected to improve.
Detailed Description
A detailed description can be found in the published protocol in Trials.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Healthy
Keywords
siblings, visual impairment, intellectual disability, quality of life, well-being

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants and investigators will be masked at pre-test assessment only
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
154 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Playing serious game 'Broodles'
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The participants allocated to this group will play the newly developed serious game 'Broodles' after pre-test assessment. Children will play the serious game without the parent or the help of a caregiver. Parents and children will make complementary worksheets together and parents will read an information brochure. Concomitant care as usual is allowed during the study. A parent-child pair is labelled as one participant.
Arm Title
Waitlist control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The participants allocated to this group will play the serious game 'Broodles' after follow-up assessment. Concomitant care as usual is allowed during the study.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Serious game 'Broodles'
Intervention Description
The serious game 'Broodles' is a newly developed web-based, educational game that can be played by siblings on a computer or tablet without support from an adult. The game discusses the nine domains of sibling quality of life (Moyson & Roeyers, 2012) in eight 20-minute levels. The main characters of the game are the Broodles, which are little monster creatures that experience things that siblings of children with ID and/or VI can also experience. The game includes animations, videos of siblings talking about their experiences, quizzes and mini-games. These elements are focussed on emotions, thoughts and difficult situations that siblings can experience. In addition to the game, siblings make offline worksheets and parents receive an information brochure. Siblings complete the game in four weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in quality of life as assessed by the Psychosocial Health Summary Score of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) - Acute Version -
Description
The quality of life of the participating sibling is measured with both a child-report and parent-report version of the questionnaire Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL 4.0) - Acute Version - Psychosocial Health Summary Score. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 60, with a higher score indicating more problems, and thus lower quality of life. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with a decreased score indicating improved quality of life.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in Sibling adjustment to and perceptions of their brother or sister's disability
Description
Sibling adjustment to and perceptions of their brother or sister's disability is measured with both a child-report and parent-report version of the Sibling Perception Questionnaire (SPQ) - Negative Adjustment Scale. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 18 and a maximum of 72, with a higher score indicating more negative adjustment to the disability of the brother or sister. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with a decreased score indicating improved adjustment.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Self-esteem
Description
The self-esteem of the sibling is measured with the child-report questionnaire Self-Perception Profile for Children simplified(SPPC-s) - Global Self-Worth subscale. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 12, with a higher score indicating higher self-esteem. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with an increased score indicating improved self-esteem.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in Perceived social support
Description
The perceived social support of the participating sibling is measured with the child-report questionnaire Social Support Scale for Children (SSSC). The total score on this scale has a minimum of 24 and a maximum of 96, with a higher score indicating higher perceived social support. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with an increased score indicating improved perceived social support.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in sibling relationship (child-report)
Description
Sibling relationship between the participating sibling and the sibling that has a disability is measured with the child-report drawing task Pictorial Assessment of Interpersonal Relationships (PAIR). This instrument has six separate scales. The scales Cohesion and Distancing have total score ranges from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating respectively higher interdependence and higher autonomy in the relationship. The scales Similarity and Value have total score ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating respectively higher affinity and higher disparity between the siblings. The scales Emotion and Conflict have nominal and ordinal scores (1-4), with a higher score indicating respectively more similarity in emotional state and a amore disrupted relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured. In addition thematic analysis is executed, and changes in themes over time are measured.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in sibling relationship (parent-report)
Description
Sibling relationship between the participating sibling and the sibling that has a disability is measured with the parent-report questionnaire Parental Expectations and Perceptions of Children's Sibling Relationships Questionnaire (PEP-SRQ). This scale has three separate subscales. These include the scales Warmth (total score ranges from 15 to 80), Agonism (total score ranges from 9 to 45), and Rivalry/Competition (total score ranges from 3 to 15). A higher score indicates respectively more warmth, more agonism, and more rivalry in the sibling relationship as perceived by the parent. The scale also has a question about the total quality of the sibling relationship, as perceived by the parent (range 1-7), with a higher score indicating higher quality of the relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in coping skills
Description
Copings skills of the participating sibling are measured with a 12-item version of the child-report questionnaire Coping Strategies Inventory (CSI).Two separate subscales are used: Engaged and Disengaged Coping. The total score on both scales have a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 30. A higher scored on the Engaged scale means higher use of engaged coping strategies. A higher score on the Disenganged scale means higher use of disengaged coping strategies. The baseline change in scores over time on this outcome is measured.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Change in parent-child relationship
Description
The parent-child relationship between the participating sibling and the participating parent is measured with the parent-report questionnaire Child-Parent Relationship Scale (CPRS) - Closeness scale, short version. The total score on this scale has a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 35, with a higher score indicating a closer parent-child relationship. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Title
Social validity of the intervention
Description
The social validity of the intervention is measured with an adapted version of the child-report and parent-report questionnaire Social Validity Scale (SVS). The mean score on the scale, ranging from 1 to 5, will be used.
Time Frame
post-test (T1, week 6; only group 1)
Title
Subjective evaluation of the intervention
Description
Participants (both parents and children) answer open-ended evaluation questions about the intervention at post-test assessment. This includes questions about what they think was good about the intervention, what they think could be better, and what they think they learned from the intervention.
Time Frame
post-test (T1, week 6; only group 1)
Title
Change in Sibling adjustment to their brother or sister's disability
Description
Sibling adjustment to their brother or sister's disability is measured with self-developed open ended questions that are answered by the parent and the child. The questions include: (1) "Can you name up to five examples of what you/your child like(s)about your/their brother or sister?" (2) "Can you name up to five examples of what you/your child do(es)not like or find(s)difficult or unpleasant about having a brother or sister with a disability?" (3) "Can you explain what you/your child do(es)to deal with these examples?" The children are also asked to rate the examples named at question 1 and question 2 with smileys (5-point scale), indicating how much they like it or how hard they think it is. Thematic analysis is executed, and changes in themes over time are measured. Change over time in smileys is measured as well.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in Parenting self-efficacy as assessed by a 3-item version of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC)
Description
The parenting self-efficacy of the participating parent is measured using a 3-item version of the parent-report questionnaire Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC). The total score on this scale has a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 15, with a higher score indicating higher parenting self-efficacy. The change in score over time on this outcome is measured, with an increased score indicating improved parenting self-efficacy.
Time Frame
pre-test (T0, week 1), post-test (T1, week 6), follow-up (T2, week 12-14)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
9 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Having a brother or sister with (strongly suspected) visual impairment and/or intellectual disability (0-17;11years old), with possibly other comorbid disabilities, disorders or illnesses. The brother or sister with a disability lives in the same house (at least part of the time) Living in the Netherlands or Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) Exclusion Criteria: Having a disability, impairment or severe illness Brother or sister with VI and/or ID lives in a residential care facility on a full-time basis One or both parents have a disability, impairment or severe illness Not speaking the Dutch language No written consent from the participant and/or their legal representative Another sibling in the household is already included in the study. Only one sibling per household can participate in the study. The parents will decide which sibling will participate.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Linda KM Messemaker-Veerman, MSc
Phone
+31205983025
Email
info@brussengame.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Paula S Sterkenburg, prof. dr.
Phone
+31205988890
Email
p.s.sterkenburg@vu.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paula S Sterkenburg, prof. dr.
Organizational Affiliation
VU University of Amsterdam
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VU University Amsterdam
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1081BT
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Linda KM Messemaker-Veerman, MSc
Phone
+31205983025
Email
linda.veerman@vu.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paula S Sterkenburg, prof. dr.
Phone
+31205988890
Email
p.s.sterkenburg@vu.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paula S Sterkenburg, prof. dr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Linda KM Messemaker-Veerman, MSc

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Anonymized quantitative IPD of the participants that gave additional consent, will be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request. This includes the scores on the following questionnaires: PedsQL, SPQ, SPPC, SSSC, CSI, CPRS and PSOC.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
The study protocol, including the statistical analysis plan, will be published in Trials (date unknown). The informed consent form, full study protocol and analytic code can be shared upon reasonable request.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
To be determined

Learn more about this trial

Effectiveness of the Serious Game 'Broodles' for Siblings of Children With Visual Impairment and/or Intellectual Disability

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs