search
Back to results

Quality of Life Evaluation After Cataract Surgery Using 4 Types of Intraocular Lens Implant Combinations (ELVIRA4)

Primary Purpose

Cataract, Intraocular Lens Implant

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Zeiss CT Asphina / Zeiss CT Asphina
Zeiss AT Lara/ Zeiss AT Lisa Tri
Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara
Zeiss AT Lara / Zeiss AT Lara
Sponsored by
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Cataract

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient suffering from bilateral cataract and undergoing cataract surgery
  • Patient with preoperative visual acuity ≤6/10th Monoyer (≥+ 0.2 logMar) in each eye
  • Patient with nuclear color (NC), cortical (C) or posterior capsule opacity (P) cataract of normal to severe density in the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCSIII)
  • Patient with cortical cataracts classified C1 to C5
  • Patient with cataracts classified as nuclear opalescence (NO)1 to NO4 and nuclear color (NC)1 to NC4
  • Patient with posterior capsule opacity cataracts classified as grade 5 (P1-P5)
  • Patient affiliated to a social security scheme
  • Patient having given written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with biometrics < 16 Diopters (D) and > 28D
  • Patient with a history (ATCD) of refractive surgery
  • Patient with ATCD intraocular surgery
  • Patient with ATCD strabismus
  • Patient with amblyopia
  • Patient with monophthalmos
  • Patient with age-related macular degeneration (AMD)
  • Patient with glaucoma
  • Patient with diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy
  • Patient with progressive or old ocular inflammatory disease
  • Patient presenting with a very dense nuclear cataract (Stage NO5-6, NC5-6 on the LOCSIII classification), sources of preoperative complication
  • Patient with keratoconus
  • Patient with pseudoexfoliative syndrome
  • Patient with pigment dispersion
  • Patient with traumatic cataract
  • Patient with astigmatism conforming to the rule > 1.5 Diopters (D) or inverse to the rule > 1 Diopter (D)
  • Patient with abnormal ocular morphology
  • Patient with abnormal keratometry
  • Insulin-dependent diabetics and/or diabetics with retinal complications
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curators, safeguard of justice)
  • Person deprived of liberty
  • Patient wishing to see near or far exclusively

Sites / Locations

  • CHR Metz-Thionville/Hopital de MercyRecruiting
  • CHR Metz-Thionville_Hopital Bel Air

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Zeiss CT Asphina / Zeiss CT Asphina

Zeiss AT Lara/ Zeiss AT Lisa Tri

Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara

Zeiss AT Lara / Zeiss AT Lara

Arm Description

Monovision with refractive target of -1.50 Diopters (D) on the dominated eye

Zeiss AT Lara (dominant eye) / Zeiss AT Lisa Tri (non-dominant eye)

Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara (non-dominant eye)

Micro-monovision with refractive target of -0.75 Diopters (D) on the non-dominant eye

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) questionnaire score before cataract surgery
Quality of life score is obtained using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VQF-25) questionnaire score and measured before intervention. NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire measures the dimensions of self-reported vision-targeted health status that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. The Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points (100 is the best score), respectively.
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) questionnaire score 3 months after surgery
Quality of life score is obtained using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VQF-25) questionnaire score and measured 3 months after intervention. NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire measures the dimensions of self-reported vision-targeted health status that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. The Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points (100 is the best score), respectively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured before intervention
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for distance vision is measured before intervention using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured before intervention
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured before intervention using Parinaud scale for intermediate vision. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured before intervention
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured before intervention using Parinaud scale for near vision. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 4 days postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision is measured 4 days postoperatively using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 4 days postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision is measured 4 days postoperatively using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 3 months after surgery using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision is measured 3 months after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision is measured 3 months after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Sunglasses wear frequency 3 months after surgery for far and near visions
Frequency of wearing sunglasses in patients undergoing IOL implant surgery : permanently (yes/no) or occasionally (yes/no) for far and near visions
Eye tonicity before surgery
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) before intervention
Eye tonicity 4 days postoperatively
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 4 days postoperatively
Eye tonicity 1 month postoperatively
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 1 month postoperatively
Eye tonicity 3 months postoperatively
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 3 months postoperatively
Slit lamp and Macular Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination before surgery
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No) Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 4 days postoperatively
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No) Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 1 month postoperatively
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No); Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 3 months postoperatively
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No); Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)

Full Information

First Posted
March 28, 2022
Last Updated
June 8, 2023
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05376917
Brief Title
Quality of Life Evaluation After Cataract Surgery Using 4 Types of Intraocular Lens Implant Combinations
Acronym
ELVIRA4
Official Title
Quality of Life and Uncorrected Binocular Visual Acuity (UBVA) Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery Using 4 Different Types of Lens Implant Combinations: a Multicenter, Prospective, Comparative and Randomized Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 30, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 30, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is multicenter, prospective, comparative and randomized study focusing on the evolution of the quality of Life and Uncorrected Binocular Visual Acuity (UBVA) evaluation at 3 months after cataract surgery in patients who underwent 4 different types of intraocular lens Implant (IOL) combinations.
Detailed Description
Cataract, linked to the loss of transparency of the lens, is the leading cause of blindness in the world. It requires exclusively surgical treatment. Cataract surgery by ultrasonic phacoemulsification is the most common surgical procedure in France (800,000/year). The lens is removed and replaced with an artificial intraocular lens. There are different types of implants that can be used. The simplest is the monofocal implant which is implanted in such a way as to correct "only far or near vision". For near vision or vice versa, it is therefore necessary to wear corrective lenses after the operation. A technique that eliminates the need for distance and near correction is based on monovision. This is a presbyopia compensation technique that aims to induce a slight myopization of one eye for near vision (usually the dominated eye) the other eye being intended for distance vision (dominant eye). There is therefore a difference in correction and perception of the images. Depending on the fixed distance, one eye will see sharp, the other less clear, even blurry. This difference can lead to a reduction in the perception of relief. Other methods of compensating for presbyopia include the use of so-called multifocal or extended depth of field implants; they are also not devoid of sometimes annoying side effects (in particular possible halos around light sources at night) which can lead in rare cases to the removal of the intraocular lens. However, patient requirements in terms of comfort of vision and independence from glasses are increasingly high and patients themselves are increasingly informed of the existence of multifocal implants. The choice of the intraocular implant to use is therefore a real challenge, especially since patients are often still active on a professional level. Moreover, there is a lack of scientific consensus related to the choice of implants, during a surgical treatment of cataract lenses by phakoexeresis, for otherwise healthy eyes and in a subject wishing to no longer wear glasses postoperatively. . Different studies have emerged comparing the bilateral implantation of different types of multifocal implants with each other, but there is little work concerning mixed batches of "mix - match" implants.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cataract, Intraocular Lens Implant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Zeiss CT Asphina / Zeiss CT Asphina
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Monovision with refractive target of -1.50 Diopters (D) on the dominated eye
Arm Title
Zeiss AT Lara/ Zeiss AT Lisa Tri
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Zeiss AT Lara (dominant eye) / Zeiss AT Lisa Tri (non-dominant eye)
Arm Title
Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara (non-dominant eye)
Arm Title
Zeiss AT Lara / Zeiss AT Lara
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Micro-monovision with refractive target of -0.75 Diopters (D) on the non-dominant eye
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Zeiss CT Asphina / Zeiss CT Asphina
Intervention Description
Monovision with refractive target of -1.50D on the dominated eye
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Zeiss AT Lara/ Zeiss AT Lisa Tri
Intervention Description
Zeiss AT Lara (dominant eye) / Zeiss AT Lisa Tri (non-dominant eye)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara
Intervention Description
Zeiss CT Asphina/ Zeiss AT Lara (non-dominant eye)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Zeiss AT Lara / Zeiss AT Lara
Intervention Description
Micromonovision with refractive target of -0.75D on the non-dominant eye
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) questionnaire score before cataract surgery
Description
Quality of life score is obtained using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VQF-25) questionnaire score and measured before intervention. NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire measures the dimensions of self-reported vision-targeted health status that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. The Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points (100 is the best score), respectively.
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) questionnaire score 3 months after surgery
Description
Quality of life score is obtained using the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VQF-25) questionnaire score and measured 3 months after intervention. NEI VFQ-25 questionnaire measures the dimensions of self-reported vision-targeted health status that are most important for persons who have chronic eye diseases. The Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 11 vision-related constructs, plus an additional single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points (100 is the best score), respectively.
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured before intervention
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for distance vision is measured before intervention using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured before intervention
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured before intervention using Parinaud scale for intermediate vision. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured before intervention
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured before intervention using Parinaud scale for near vision. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 4 days postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision is measured 4 days postoperatively using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Time Frame
4 days after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 4 days postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision is measured 4 days postoperatively using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
4 days after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured 1 month postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 1 month after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for far vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity is measured 3 months after surgery using Monoyer scale for far vision, scores ranging from 1 to 10, higher scores mean a better outcome; score 10 is the best.
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for intermediate vision is measured 3 months after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision measured 3 months postoperatively
Description
Uncorrected binocular visual acuity for near vision is measured 3 months after surgery using Parinaud scale. The Parinaud scale ranges from Parinaud 14 (P 14) (lowest score) to Parinaud 1.5 (P 1.5) (best score).
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Sunglasses wear frequency 3 months after surgery for far and near visions
Description
Frequency of wearing sunglasses in patients undergoing IOL implant surgery : permanently (yes/no) or occasionally (yes/no) for far and near visions
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Eye tonicity before surgery
Description
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) before intervention
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
Eye tonicity 4 days postoperatively
Description
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 4 days postoperatively
Time Frame
4 days after surgery
Title
Eye tonicity 1 month postoperatively
Description
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 1 month postoperatively
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Eye tonicity 3 months postoperatively
Description
Eye pressure measurement millimeters of mercury (mmHg) 3 months postoperatively
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Title
Slit lamp and Macular Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination before surgery
Description
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No) Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Time Frame
Few days before surgery
Title
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 4 days postoperatively
Description
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No) Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Time Frame
4 days after surgery
Title
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 1 month postoperatively
Description
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No); Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Time Frame
1 month after surgery
Title
Slit lamp and Macular OCT examination 3 months postoperatively
Description
Presence of postoperative complications: Persistent lens mass (Yes/No); Tyndall effect (Yes/No); Hyphema (Yes/No); Irian hernia (Yes/No); Endophthalmitis (Yes/No); Implant dislocation (Yes/No)
Time Frame
3 months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient suffering from bilateral cataract and undergoing cataract surgery Patient with preoperative visual acuity ≤ 8/10th Monoyer (≥+ 0.1 logMar) in each eye Patient with nuclear color (NC), cortical (C) or posterior capsule opacity (P) cataract of normal to severe density in the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCSIII) Patient with cortical cataracts classified C1 to C5 Patient with cataracts classified as nuclear opalescence (NO)1 to NO4 and nuclear color (NC)1 to NC4 Patient with posterior capsule opacity cataracts classified as grade 5 (P1-P5) Patient affiliated to a social security scheme Patient having given written consent Exclusion Criteria: Patient with biometrics ≤ 17 Diopters (D) and ≥ 28D Patient with a history (ATCD) of refractive surgery Patient with ATCD intraocular surgery Patient with ATCD strabismus Patient with amblyopia Patient with monophthalmos Patient with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) Patient with glaucoma Patient with diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy Patient with progressive or old ocular inflammatory disease Patient presenting with a very dense nuclear cataract (Stage NO5-6, NC5-6 on the LOCSIII classification), sources of preoperative complication Patient with keratoconus Patient with pseudoexfoliative syndrome Patient with pigment dispersion Patient with traumatic cataract Patient with astigmatism conforming to the rule > 1.5 Diopters (D) or inverse to the rule > 1 Diopter (D) Patient with abnormal ocular morphology Patient with abnormal keratometry Insulin-dependent diabetics and/or diabetics with retinal complications Pregnant or breastfeeding women Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curators, safeguard of justice) Person deprived of liberty Patient wishing to see near or far exclusively
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jean-Marc PERONE, MD
Phone
387557777
Ext
0033
Email
jm.perone@chr-metz-thionville.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Arpiné EL NAR, PhD
Phone
387557766
Ext
0033
Email
a.elnar@chr-metz-thionville.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Marc PERONE, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mercy Hospital CHR Metz Thionville
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CHR Metz-Thionville/Hopital de Mercy
City
Metz
ZIP/Postal Code
57085
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arpiné EL NAR, PhD
Phone
0033387557766
Email
a.elnar@chr-metz-thionville.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Marc PERONE, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alice NESSELER, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie FRANCOIS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dimitri CHAUSSARD, MD
Facility Name
CHR Metz-Thionville_Hopital Bel Air
City
Metz
ZIP/Postal Code
57085
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arpiné EL NAR, PhD
Email
a.elnar@chr-metz-thionville.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Florian BLOCH, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie FRANCOIS, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dimitri CHAUSSARD, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Quality of Life Evaluation After Cataract Surgery Using 4 Types of Intraocular Lens Implant Combinations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs