search
Back to results

Test-Retest Reliability of an Experimental Model of Shoulder Muscle Pain

Primary Purpose

Musculoskeletal Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Argentina
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intervention: Short-wave diathermy
Sponsored by
University of Gran Rosario
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Musculoskeletal Pain focused on measuring Short-wave diathermy, Experimental pain model, Muscle pain, Generalized hypersensitivity, Shoulder pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Understanding of the content and scope of the experiment, and compliance with the experiment's instructions.
  • To have signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Previous history of neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or chronic pain.
  • Previous history of addictive behavior, defined as abuse of alcohol, cannabis, opioids or other drugs.
  • Previous history of thermosensitivity disorders.
  • Previous history of mental illness.
  • Presence of fever, tuberculosis, tumors, infectious processes, or acute inflammatory processes.
  • Implantation of peacemaker or metallic prosthesis.
  • Use of analgesics within 24 h prior to the experiment.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Gran Rosario

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Healthy Volunteers

Arm Description

Healthy volunteers that fulfill the inclusion criteria. Intervention: Short-wave diathermy (Radiation)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pressure pain threshold (PPT)
Change in the PPT (kPa) will be assessed bilaterally over the medial portion of the infraspinatus muscle using a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab AB, Sweden) with a 1-cm2 round tip. Pressure will be gradually increased from 0 kPa at a rate of approximately 50 kPa/s (maximal achievable pressure: 2,000 kPa). The volunteers will be asked to press the button when they perceive that the pressure changes to pain, stopping the estimation at this point. The assessment will be repeated 3 times for each sides, alternating sides between measurements. Each measure will be performed at 30-second intervals.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain distribution
Extension of the reported pain drawings. The results will be expressed as the percentage of the total body area.
Modified Likert scale
A modified self-report Likert scale was used to follow the temporal progression of muscle pain/soreness after SWD, with 0 defining a complete absence of soreness and 6 indicating severe soreness.
Myoelectrical activity (EMG)
Change in muscle activity will be assessed. Monopolar multichannel recording (6 channels) will be distributed spatially across the infraspinatus muscle, and monopolar channels will be recorded for the medial and posterior deltoid muscle. BIOAMP Biopotential amplifier will be used for recording the EMG signals, 8-channel (sample rate: 2 KHz) (UNER, Argentina) during execution of the motor tasks. EMG will be recorded before and 30 - 60 minutes after SWD application to assess redistribution of the muscle activity induced by the transient pain.
Isometric muscle strength
Change in the maximal isometric strength (kgf) for external rotation in dominant shoulder will be assessed using a Hand Held Dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, Model 01165, Lafayette, IN). The measures will be taken with the volunteers in the standing position, and the arm will be placed at the side of the body with the elbow flexed at 90º, and the forearm in neutral pronosupination. The examiner will be held the dynamometer at the dorsal aspect of the distal third of the forearm. Three 6-seconds measures will be taken with rest between them and the peak and mean value will be calculated.
Visual analog scale
A continuous visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no perception, 30 represents pain threshold (defined as the time to reach a painful sensation at the predefined stimulation intensity) and 100 represents the tolerance threshold (defined as the sensation of pain when becomes intolerable)

Full Information

First Posted
May 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 12, 2022
Sponsor
University of Gran Rosario
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05412316
Brief Title
Test-Retest Reliability of an Experimental Model of Shoulder Muscle Pain
Official Title
Test-Retest Reliability of an Experimental Model of Shoulder Muscle Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 8, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 12, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 12, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Gran Rosario

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
High frequency oscillations of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields range can heat deep tissues in a well-localized region. Recently, a new SWD-based model showed to be a promising tool for investigating muscle pain in humans. The main advantages of the model are its noninvasiveness, the ability to control stimulation parameters, and the convenience of the time frame in which pain and hyperalgesia are developed. This study assess the reliability of SWD pain model to induced transient and intensity-controlled muscle soreness on shoulder in healthy volunteers.
Detailed Description
This Test-Retest Reliability study comprises a sample of 31 healthy volunteers. Volunteers will be invited to participate in the study through social networks and e-mail. Experimental pain model assessment The radiofrequency electromagnetic fields can be produced in the range of 3 kHz to 300 GHz, but frequencies around 27 MHz (short-wave) are preferred to heat deep tissues. Deep tissue heating by means of RF is a safe and extensively used technique in palliative treatment of pain and as a healing agent in soft tissues. This study assess the reliability of SWD to induce soreness. The study will be conducted in two experimental sessions on different days, at least 48 to 72 hours apart each other in order to avoid carryover effects. In each experimental session, several measures will be performed to assess different physiological parameters, including: pressure pain thresholds (PPT), specific self-report questionnaire, isometric muscle strength, pain distribution and myoelectric activity. In the first session (Test), participants will be interviewed to collect anthropometric data and health history. Basic upper quadrant physical examination will be performed to check inclusion and exclusion criteria. Before and after the application of SWD, several assessments will be performed. Among the different assessment, myoelectric activity of infraspinatus and deltoid muscle will be recorded during isometric arm lifting task. The isometric task will consist in maintaining the arm in 90 degree elevation in the scapular plane (arm flexion) for 8 seconds. This task will be repeated 5 times with 15 seconds of rest between each trial. Finally, a fatiguing motor task will be performed, consisting of flexion and extension of the arm executed cyclically in a range of motion between 30 and 90 degree in the scapular plane. To ensure fatigue, volunteers will perform the task with an additional weight. The size of the weight will be calculated according to each volunteer body mass (1.25 kg in participants under 68 kg and 2.5 kg in participants over 68 kg). The arm flexion and extension speed will be guided using a 60 beats/s metronome. Same process will be repeated in the second session (Retest). Sample size considerations: All the reliability assessment methods used in this study are related to the within-subject standard deviation (SD_w). For a test-retest experiment, the SD_w can be calculated as〖 SD〗_w=(SD_diff)⁄√2, and the LoA can be reformulated as bias ± 1.96 〖SD〗_w √2. The precision to estimate SD_w depends on both the number of subjects, n, and the number of observations per subject. A sample size of 31 subjects is required considering a confidence interval of 25% at either side of the estimation of SD_w, and for m=2 observations per subject.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Musculoskeletal Pain
Keywords
Short-wave diathermy, Experimental pain model, Muscle pain, Generalized hypersensitivity, Shoulder pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The SWD will be applied using a CEC M-8 shortwave thermotherapy unit (CEC Electrónica S.R.L., Argentina) that emits RF at a frequency of 27.12 MHz. The device has two rectangular capacitive applicators (18 × 12 cm), which will be placed below and above the dominant shoulder. The coplanar application will be done using the continuous wave mode. The intensity of SWD will be gradually increased until the volunteer perceives a sensation of heat, and once familiar with this perception, the intensity will be increased until a sensation of constant but tolerable pain is evoked. This sensation will be maintained throughout the SWD application. Once the first application is completed, the volunteer will be allowed to rest for a period of 2-3 minutes and three repetitions will be performed. Healthy volunteers will be in a lateral supine position, and a cotton towel will be used to absorb perspiration and avoid unwanted heat effects.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
31 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Healthy Volunteers
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Healthy volunteers that fulfill the inclusion criteria. Intervention: Short-wave diathermy (Radiation)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Intervention: Short-wave diathermy
Intervention Description
The SWD will be applied using a CEC M-8 shortwave thermotherapy unit (CEC Electrónica S.R.L., Argentina) that emits RF at a frequency of 27.12 MHz. The device has two rectangular capacitive applicators (18 × 12 cm), which will be placed below and above the dominant shoulder. The coplanar application will be done using the continuous wave mode. The intensity of SWD will be gradually increased until the volunteer perceives a sensation of heat, and once familiar with this perception, the intensity will be increased until a sensation of constant but tolerable pain is evoked. This sensation will be maintained throughout the SWD application, and three repetitions will be performed. Healthy volunteers will be in a lateral supine position, and a cotton towel will be used to absorb perspiration and avoid unwanted heat effects.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pressure pain threshold (PPT)
Description
Change in the PPT (kPa) will be assessed bilaterally over the medial portion of the infraspinatus muscle using a digital algometer (Somedic SenseLab AB, Sweden) with a 1-cm2 round tip. Pressure will be gradually increased from 0 kPa at a rate of approximately 50 kPa/s (maximal achievable pressure: 2,000 kPa). The volunteers will be asked to press the button when they perceive that the pressure changes to pain, stopping the estimation at this point. The assessment will be repeated 3 times for each sides, alternating sides between measurements. Each measure will be performed at 30-second intervals.
Time Frame
At baseline and 30 - 60 minutes after of SWD.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain distribution
Description
Extension of the reported pain drawings. The results will be expressed as the percentage of the total body area.
Time Frame
At 30 - 60 minutes after the application of SWD.
Title
Modified Likert scale
Description
A modified self-report Likert scale was used to follow the temporal progression of muscle pain/soreness after SWD, with 0 defining a complete absence of soreness and 6 indicating severe soreness.
Time Frame
At 30 - 60 minutes after the application of SWD.
Title
Myoelectrical activity (EMG)
Description
Change in muscle activity will be assessed. Monopolar multichannel recording (6 channels) will be distributed spatially across the infraspinatus muscle, and monopolar channels will be recorded for the medial and posterior deltoid muscle. BIOAMP Biopotential amplifier will be used for recording the EMG signals, 8-channel (sample rate: 2 KHz) (UNER, Argentina) during execution of the motor tasks. EMG will be recorded before and 30 - 60 minutes after SWD application to assess redistribution of the muscle activity induced by the transient pain.
Time Frame
At 10 minutes before and 30 - 60 minutes after the application of SWD.
Title
Isometric muscle strength
Description
Change in the maximal isometric strength (kgf) for external rotation in dominant shoulder will be assessed using a Hand Held Dynamometer (Lafayette Manual Muscle Testing System, Model 01165, Lafayette, IN). The measures will be taken with the volunteers in the standing position, and the arm will be placed at the side of the body with the elbow flexed at 90º, and the forearm in neutral pronosupination. The examiner will be held the dynamometer at the dorsal aspect of the distal third of the forearm. Three 6-seconds measures will be taken with rest between them and the peak and mean value will be calculated.
Time Frame
At baseline and 30 - 60 minutes after the application of SWD.
Title
Visual analog scale
Description
A continuous visual analog scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 represents no perception, 30 represents pain threshold (defined as the time to reach a painful sensation at the predefined stimulation intensity) and 100 represents the tolerance threshold (defined as the sensation of pain when becomes intolerable)
Time Frame
During the application of SWD.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Understanding of the content and scope of the experiment, and compliance with the experiment's instructions. To have signed the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnancy. Previous history of neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or chronic pain. Previous history of addictive behavior, defined as abuse of alcohol, cannabis, opioids or other drugs. Previous history of thermosensitivity disorders. Previous history of mental illness. Presence of fever, tuberculosis, tumors, infectious processes, or acute inflammatory processes. Implantation of peacemaker or metallic prosthesis. Use of analgesics within 24 h prior to the experiment.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Gran Rosario
City
Rosario
State/Province
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Argentina

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24950186
Citation
Biurrun Manresa JA, Fritsche R, Vuilleumier PH, Oehler C, Morch CD, Arendt-Nielsen L, Andersen OK, Curatolo M. Is the conditioned pain modulation paradigm reliable? A test-retest assessment using the nociceptive withdrawal reflex. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 20;9(6):e100241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100241. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Test-Retest Reliability of an Experimental Model of Shoulder Muscle Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs