Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Primary Purpose
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Autism Spectrum Disorder focused on measuring Autism, Early Intervention, Telehealth, Assessment
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All families of children between the ages of 16-30 months of age who scored ≥8 on the MCHAT-R and whose BCW provider refers the child to our clinic by 33 months of age will be a possible participant. Evaluations will be done by 36 months of age.
- Referring BCW provider must be one of the three targeted BCW districts participating in this pilot study.
- Parent/Guardian needs to have basic English proficiency
- Parent/Guardian needs to have internet access
- Child must have exposure to English either at home or in out-of-home care (e.g., childcare setting).
- Documentation of M-CHAT-R High-Risk failed score (≥ 8) must be documented in referral.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Families making self-referrals to the EAC or referrals outside of the targeted BCW districts will be excluded from recruitment for this study.
- Children above the age of 33 months at the time of the referral will be excluded as the current EDRM protocol has not been developed in this phase of piloting for individuals over this age.
- Non-English speakers will be excluded from participation due to the high correlation between verbal language abilities and social communication and social interaction (SCI) abilities as part of the DSM-5-TR autism criteria.
Sites / Locations
- Emory Autism CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Families with children with suspected diagnosis of autism
Arm Description
Families with children between 16-33 months will receive a link to complete the EAC Developmental History Survey on REDCap and a link to complete parent/caregiver questionnaires about developmental and/or adaptive information. Then, the family will be assigned to a clinician for the autism assessment and scheduled their assessment and feedback session (one week later).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of participants referred to the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Monthly numbers of high-risk referrals to the EDRM pilot project and total number of referrals made to the EDRM at the end of the study
Number of participants consented in the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Monthly number of families referred who consent to EDRM participation
Response rate in the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Response rate will be calculated at project end using the formula [# of families who consented / # of families referred to project] x 100 = response rate)
Number of participants that completed the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Quarterly numbers of participants that completed the EDRM assessment protocol and total number of participants who completed EDRM assessment protocol at study conclusion
Time from referral to completion of the program
Individual calculation of time from BCW referral to final summary report sent to family using the formula:
Date of Final Report sent to family - Date of referral from BCW =Time in EDRM pilot
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of high-risk referral assessments that completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol
Number of high-risk referral assessments that completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol.
Monthly, Quarterly, and Total numbers of participants who completed EDRM pilot assessment
Number of participants with additional information collected to make a final DSM-5 conclusion
Number of participants with additional information collected to make a final DSM-5 conclusion
Parent satisfaction of EDRM assessment survey
Administered at the end of individual EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 110.
BCW provider(s) Service Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM assessment survey
Administered at end of individual EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 110.
Parent satisfaction with access to treatment survey
Administered 3-months after completion of EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 15.
BCW provider(s) Early Intervention Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM pilot survey
Completed every 3 months (Quarterly). Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 55
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05419895
First Posted
June 9, 2022
Last Updated
July 18, 2023
Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
Georgia Department of Public Health
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05419895
Brief Title
Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Official Title
Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM): Evaluating an Early Screening to Evaluation Pilot Protocol for Children Identified as High Risk for Autism in 3 Pilot Early Intervention Health Districts
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
Georgia Department of Public Health
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Three districts of Babies Can't Wait (BCW) will be referring families with children seeking an autism spectrum disorder (autism) diagnosis at the Emory Autism Center's (EAC) Child Screening and Assessment Clinic.The objective of this study is to develop, pilot, and evaluate a diagnostic protocol for children identified at high risk for autism in the BCW early intervention program screening (part of a public health service). This program evaluation will be using pre- and post-data and data collected through the process to evaluate the effectiveness of the EDRM pilot.
Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to develop, pilot, and evaluate a diagnostic protocol to assess high-risk infants and children for autism diagnosis for families with young children enrolled in the Georgia BCW early intervention program. The Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) project will be addressing children who are identified at high risk for autism according to the BCW screening protocol, which is the M-CHAT-R. Currently, many children who are screening high-risk for autism in BCW districts are unable to access follow-up evaluations due to limited community resources and long wait times. It is hypothesized that the EDRM will be successful in increasing the number of BCW families that access an autism assessment using telehealth tools and testing protocols and that the families and clinicians involved will be satisfied with the streamlined process. The clinicians' conclusions from the EDRM assessment will be based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 5th edition, Text revision (DSM-5-TR; 2022) and are hypothesized to be able to provide families with the same access to services as an in-person assessment.
A secondary objective is to investigate how many high-risk referral assessments can be completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol and how many needed additional information collected to make a final DSM-5-TR conclusion. Results of this study will provide meaningful data on the validity of partnering with early intervention (EI) and using telehealth technology for families to receive a diagnosis of autism, and to diagnose and start EI services specifically aimed at autism symptoms when needed.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autism
Keywords
Autism, Early Intervention, Telehealth, Assessment
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Families with children with suspected diagnosis of autism
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Families with children between 16-33 months will receive a link to complete the EAC Developmental History Survey on REDCap and a link to complete parent/caregiver questionnaires about developmental and/or adaptive information. Then, the family will be assigned to a clinician for the autism assessment and scheduled their assessment and feedback session (one week later).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Intervention Description
Use of telehealth capabilities to capture and code information related to an autism diagnosis. This program evaluation will be using pre- and post-data and data collected through the process to evaluate the effectiveness of the EDRM pilot.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants referred to the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
Description
Monthly numbers of high-risk referrals to the EDRM pilot project and total number of referrals made to the EDRM at the end of the study
Time Frame
Until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Title
Number of participants consented in the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Description
Monthly number of families referred who consent to EDRM participation
Time Frame
Monthly until until the end of the study (approximately one year)
Title
Response rate in the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Description
Response rate will be calculated at project end using the formula [# of families who consented / # of families referred to project] x 100 = response rate)
Time Frame
Until end of the study (approximately one year)
Title
Number of participants that completed the Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM) study
Description
Quarterly numbers of participants that completed the EDRM assessment protocol and total number of participants who completed EDRM assessment protocol at study conclusion
Time Frame
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year)
Title
Time from referral to completion of the program
Description
Individual calculation of time from BCW referral to final summary report sent to family using the formula:
Date of Final Report sent to family - Date of referral from BCW =Time in EDRM pilot
Time Frame
Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of high-risk referral assessments that completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol
Description
Number of high-risk referral assessments that completed entirely via streamlined telehealth protocol.
Monthly, Quarterly, and Total numbers of participants who completed EDRM pilot assessment
Time Frame
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Title
Number of participants with additional information collected to make a final DSM-5 conclusion
Description
Number of participants with additional information collected to make a final DSM-5 conclusion
Time Frame
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks post-intervention
Title
Parent satisfaction of EDRM assessment survey
Description
Administered at the end of individual EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 110.
Time Frame
At completion of EDRM assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
Title
BCW provider(s) Service Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM assessment survey
Description
Administered at end of individual EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 110.
Time Frame
At completion of EDRM assessment (4 weeks post-intervention)
Title
Parent satisfaction with access to treatment survey
Description
Administered 3-months after completion of EDRM assessment. Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 15.
Time Frame
3 months after completion of EDRM assessment
Title
BCW provider(s) Early Intervention Coordinator satisfaction with EDRM pilot survey
Description
Completed every 3 months (Quarterly). Satisfaction surveys will use a Likert-scale of 1-5 with 1 being strongly disagree and 5 being strongly agree as well as 0 being not applicable/unknown. Higher scores indicate more satisfaction with specific aspect of EDRM project.
Total score: 0 to 55
Time Frame
Every 3 months (Quarterly) until end of study (approximately one year), Up to 12 weeks postintervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
36 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
All families of children between the ages of 16-30 months of age who scored ≥8 on the MCHAT-R and whose BCW provider refers the child to our clinic by 33 months of age will be a possible participant. Evaluations will be done by 36 months of age.
Referring BCW provider must be one of the three targeted BCW districts participating in this pilot study.
Parent/Guardian needs to have basic English proficiency
Parent/Guardian needs to have internet access
Child must have exposure to English either at home or in out-of-home care (e.g., childcare setting).
Documentation of M-CHAT-R High-Risk failed score (≥ 8) must be documented in referral.
Exclusion Criteria:
Families making self-referrals to the EAC or referrals outside of the targeted BCW districts will be excluded from recruitment for this study.
Children above the age of 33 months at the time of the referral will be excluded as the current EDRM protocol has not been developed in this phase of piloting for individuals over this age.
Non-English speakers will be excluded from participation due to the high correlation between verbal language abilities and social communication and social interaction (SCI) abilities as part of the DSM-5-TR autism criteria.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Michael Morrier, PhD
Phone
404-727-8350
Email
Michael.j.morrier@emory.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allison Schwartz, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Emory University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Emory Autism Center
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Morrier, PhD
Phone
404-727-8350
Email
Michael.j.morrier@emory.edu
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All individual participant data collected during the EDRM pilot will be shared, after de-identification process has been completed.
Proposals may be submitted to up to 3 years following article publication. After 3 years, data will be provided in Emory University's data warehouse but without investigator support other than deposited materials.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After completion of the EDRM pilot project; Beginning 3 months and ending within 3 years of published results through peer-review process.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal that has been approved by an IRB. To achieve aims in proposed activity and/or for meta-analysis of telehealth assessments
Learn more about this trial
Early Diagnostic Response Model (EDRM)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs