Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Neurophysiological evaluation
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Visually guided reaching
The participant must reach as quickly and accurately as possible 4 targets spread over a radius of 10 cm around the starting target, presented in a pseudo-random order (total of 32 reaching movements)
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Object hit
The participant must hit the balls with the hand of they choice, each successful contact generating haptic feedback.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Ball on bar
Four targets are successively presented to the participant, the objective of the task is to move the ball into each target as quickly and accurately as possible.
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Robotic evaluation - Arm-position matching
In this proprioception task the sense of upper limb position is evaluated
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Spontaneous use of both arms
The unilateral and bilateral functions will be quantified by summing the activities detected at the upper limbs with accelerometers, allowing to obtain use-ratio of each limb.
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold
Clinical evaluation -Two-point discrimination test (TPDT)
Sensitive test to determine tactile threshold.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function. 6 tasks. Sub-task score is the time to complete the task (a maximum of 120s is allowed per task) and the total score is the total time to perform the six tasks (maximum of 720s). Higher time means worse outcome.
Clinical evaluation - Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF)
Seven standardized tasks to evaluate the unimanual function
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Box and Blocks Test (BBT)
Measurement of manual dexterity of each hand. The participant must take one block at a time with one hand to transfer it to the other side of the box.
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)
This test consists of standardized tasks with toys during a semi-structured game session. The test is recorded, and the video is analyzed and scored later. Logit-based 0 to 100 AHA-unit scale (score 0-100; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Two-Arm Coordination Test (TACT)
Evaluation of the constrained bilateral use of both upper limbs with an electronic tracking device (eight tests; four clockwise and four counter-clockwise).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Clinical evaluation - Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Revised (MVPT-R)
Visual perception test that assesses consistency of form, spatial orientation, discrimination, memory and visual closure (Score: 0 - 40; better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
CHEQ is a 29 item child-completed questionnaire that examines how the weaker/affected limb is used in everyday activities. It presents a list of common daily activities that typically require use of two hands. The child then rates the time required, the efficacy of grasp, and how bothered they feel by their hand function on the task. Total score transformed by a Rasch analysis into a scale of 0-100 units (better score means better outcome).
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention.Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.
Self-assessments - Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
Prior to the intervention, children, parents and therapists will work together to set a therapy goal related to their hand or wrist function. The child will score their current performance/satisfaction on the identified activity and will re-score post-intervention. Performance: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome. Satisfaction: scale from 0 to 10, better the score is better is the outcome.