Use of Muscle Relaxants in Parotidectomy Operation With Neuromonitoring
Primary Purpose
Intubation; Difficult or Failed, Muscle Relaxation, Anesthesia Intubation Complication
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Group A - Muscle Relaxants Used
Group B - No Muscle Relaxants
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional screening trial for Intubation; Difficult or Failed focused on measuring parotid surgery, muscle relaxants, airway management, neuromonitoring
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA 1-2
- Age between 18-65y
- Mallampati 1-2
- Patients who will undergo elective paratidectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of head and neck surgery
- Body mass index less than 19 or greater than 30
- Muscle relaxant allergy
- Lidocaine allergy
- IDS score >5
- Patients whose hunger is not suitable
- Uncontrolled hypertension, bronchial asthma, tracheal pathology
- undergoing emergency surgery
- Cases that cannot give informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Bezmialem Vakif University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Group A - Muscle Relaxants Used
Group B - No Muscle Relaxants
Arm Description
Muscle Relaxants Used
No Muscle Relaxants
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Difficulty of Intubation
The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) of patients will be used to determine the difficulty of intubation during laryngoscopy, and the Helbo-Hansen scoring system-Steyn Modification will be used to determine the quality of laryngoscopy.
Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score, which is a function of seven parameters, resulting in a progressive, quantitative determination of intubation complexity.
intubation difficulty may be defined as a measure of the degree of divergence from a predefined "ideal" intubation, i.e., one performed without effort, on the first attempt, practiced by one operator, using one technique, with full visualization of the laryngeal aperture and vocal cords abducted. Such an intubation is accorded an IDS value of 0. Each variation from this defined "ideal" intubation increases the degree of difficulty, the overall score being the sum of all variations from this definition. Impossible intubation is defined by infinity (IDS =[infinity]).
Difficulty of Laryngoscopy
The Helbo-Hansen scoring system-Steyn Modification will be used to determine the quality of laryngoscopy.
Helbo-Hensen et al. with Steyn modification includes five criteria; ease of laryngoscopy, degree of coughing, position of vocal cords, jaw relaxation, and limb movement and graded on a 4-point scale.Total score of 5 will considere to be excellent, 6-10 good, 11-15 poor, and 16-20 bad. Total scores will divide into clinically acceptable and not acceptable scores (total score ≤ 10 acceptable, >10 unacceptable).
Number of Intubation Attempts
The number of intubation attempts between both groups will be recorded. that patients are intubated will be confirmed by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Sore throat
Sore throat of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Dysphagia
Dysphagia of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Laryngospasm
Laryngospasm of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05432570
First Posted
June 19, 2022
Last Updated
March 13, 2023
Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05432570
Brief Title
Use of Muscle Relaxants in Parotidectomy Operation With Neuromonitoring
Official Title
Which is More Comfortable in Parotidectomy With Neuromonitoring: Using a Muscle Relaxants and Getting It Back? Not to Use it at All? Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 30, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bezmialem Vakif University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Neuromuscular blockers provide muscle relaxation by blocking the electrical conduction to motor nerves and facilitate endotracheal tube placement while relaxing the whole body for surgical comfort during general anesthesia. Parotid surgery is a procedure performed by ear, nose and throat physicians, and as a complication during this procedure, permanent facial paralysis may develop due to damage to the facial nerve. Intraoperative nerve monitoring is frequently used to avoid this complication. The application of local anesthetic to the vocal cords and into the trachea has been tried and found useful for induction of anesthesia without the use of neuromuscular blockers. In studies conducted with this technique, a standard local anesthetic dose was not specified and local anesthetics were generally administered alone and in high doses. It is expected that anesthesia induction and intubation without the use of muscle relaxants will not affect the comfort of the patient and the procedure, but will increase the surgical time and surgical satisfaction.
Detailed Description
A general anesthesia technique is required, which will not only facilitate tracheal intubation during anesthesia but also minimize complications that may develop during and after surgery and/or anesthesia without the neuromuscular blocker effect. For this purpose; Induction techniques can be used without the use of muscle relaxants, which will affect the hemodynamic response less. By applying muscle relaxants, its effect can be expected to disappear completely during surgery, or muscle relaxants such as succinylcholine, which are very short-acting, can be used. However, the use of succinylcholine has almost ceased to be used clinically due to anaphylaxis, severe post-operative muscle pain, increased serum potassium levels, rarely prolonged effects, and other cardiovascular side effects that may develop. Sugammadex, which has recently entered clinical use, can be used to reverse the effect of muscle relaxants. After induction, it is necessary to use high doses of sugammadex to immediately reverse the muscle relaxant effect. Waiting for the effects of muscle relaxants to pass, especially in surgical procedures that require neuromonitoring, prolongs the surgical time. This again leads to high costs. The application of local anesthetic to the vocal cords and into the trachea has been tried and found useful for induction of anesthesia without the use of neuromuscular blockers. In studies conducted with this technique, a standard local anesthetic dose was not specified and local anesthetics were generally administered alone and in high doses. Therefore, local anesthetic administered together with the inhalation agent during induction may provide better comfort during tracheal intubation. It is expected that anesthesia induction and intubation without the use of muscle relaxants will not affect the comfort of the patient and the procedure, but will increase the surgical time and surgical satisfaction.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intubation; Difficult or Failed, Muscle Relaxation, Anesthesia Intubation Complication, Airway Complication of Anesthesia
Keywords
parotid surgery, muscle relaxants, airway management, neuromonitoring
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Before the operation, the appropriate anesthesia approach will be selected for the randomized patient group and anesthesia management will be performed according to the selected group. The surgeon who will perform the operation will perform the operation without knowing which method is chosen.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Group A - Muscle Relaxants Used
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Muscle Relaxants Used
Arm Title
Group B - No Muscle Relaxants
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
No Muscle Relaxants
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Group A - Muscle Relaxants Used
Intervention Description
Induction will be achieved with 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2 μg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg propofol, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium stored at 4 degrees. After the induction, laryngoscopy will be performed with a Macintosh laryngoscope after 2 minutes of manual ventilation after muscle relaxant by an anesthesiologist with at least 4 years of experience. It will be intubated with a tube with an inner diameter of 8 mm for men and 7 mm for women. The cuff of the intubation tube will be connected to a manometer and inflated at a pressure of 20-30 mmHg until there is no air leak. Intubation will be confirmed by the appearance of end-tidal CO2.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Group B - No Muscle Relaxants
Intervention Description
Induction will be provided with 1 mg/kg lidocaine, 2 μg/kg fentanyl, 2 mg/kg propofol. After ventilation, vocal cords will be seen with a Macintosh laryngoscope, and 2cc of 2% lidocaine will be applied to the vocal cords as a spray with the help of a 5 ml injector. After ventilation, laryngoscopy will be performed with a Macintosh laryngoscope by an anesthesiologist with at least 4 years of experience. It will be intubated with a tube with an inner diameter of 8 mm for men and 7 mm for women. The cuff of the intubation tube will be connected to a manometer and inflated at a pressure of 20-30 mmHg until there is no air leak. Intubation will be confirmed by the appearance of end-tidal CO2.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difficulty of Intubation
Description
The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) of patients will be used to determine the difficulty of intubation during laryngoscopy, and the Helbo-Hansen scoring system-Steyn Modification will be used to determine the quality of laryngoscopy.
Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score, which is a function of seven parameters, resulting in a progressive, quantitative determination of intubation complexity.
intubation difficulty may be defined as a measure of the degree of divergence from a predefined "ideal" intubation, i.e., one performed without effort, on the first attempt, practiced by one operator, using one technique, with full visualization of the laryngeal aperture and vocal cords abducted. Such an intubation is accorded an IDS value of 0. Each variation from this defined "ideal" intubation increases the degree of difficulty, the overall score being the sum of all variations from this definition. Impossible intubation is defined by infinity (IDS =[infinity]).
Time Frame
during intubation after induction of anesthesia
Title
Difficulty of Laryngoscopy
Description
The Helbo-Hansen scoring system-Steyn Modification will be used to determine the quality of laryngoscopy.
Helbo-Hensen et al. with Steyn modification includes five criteria; ease of laryngoscopy, degree of coughing, position of vocal cords, jaw relaxation, and limb movement and graded on a 4-point scale.Total score of 5 will considere to be excellent, 6-10 good, 11-15 poor, and 16-20 bad. Total scores will divide into clinically acceptable and not acceptable scores (total score ≤ 10 acceptable, >10 unacceptable).
Time Frame
during intubation after induction of anesthesia
Title
Number of Intubation Attempts
Description
The number of intubation attempts between both groups will be recorded. that patients are intubated will be confirmed by the presence of end tidal carbon dioxide.
Time Frame
during intubation after induction of anesthesia]
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sore throat
Description
Sore throat of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Time Frame
up to 24 hours postoperative period
Title
Dysphagia
Description
Dysphagia of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Time Frame
up to 24 hours postoperative period
Title
Laryngospasm
Description
Laryngospasm of the patients was evaluated as present or absent at the postoperative 30th minute, 2,6 and 24 hours by the patient.
Time Frame
up to 24 hours postoperative period
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
ASA 1-2
Age between 18-65y
Mallampati 1-2
Patients who will undergo elective paratidectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
History of head and neck surgery
Body mass index less than 19 or greater than 30
Muscle relaxant allergy
Lidocaine allergy
IDS score >5
Patients whose hunger is not suitable
Uncontrolled hypertension, bronchial asthma, tracheal pathology
undergoing emergency surgery
Cases that cannot give informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ismail Sumer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Study Principal Investigator
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bezmialem Vakif University
City
Istanbul
Country
Turkey
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Use of Muscle Relaxants in Parotidectomy Operation With Neuromonitoring
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs