search
Back to results

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) HCC

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Radiofrequency Ablation
Sponsored by
Jonggi Choi
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patient age between 18 and 80 years old
  2. primary or recurrent HCC that is not suitable for surgery
  3. HCCs with a longest diameter of ≤3cm and ≤2 lesions
  4. no evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic residual disease except for target lesions
  5. Child-Pugh class A or B hepatic function
  6. no macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis
  7. written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 3 or 4
  2. uncontrolled ascites, variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy
  3. previous history of liver transplantation
  4. an active gastric or duodenal ulcer within 3 months before screening
  5. pregnant woman
  6. uncontrolled other malignancies except for HCC within 2 years before screening
  7. platelet count <50,000/µl
  8. Patients who are judged by the researcher to be difficult to conduct clinical research

Sites / Locations

  • Asan Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

RFA group

SBRT group

Arm Description

RFA are performed under local anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care with either a 15-gause or 17-gause internally cooled electrode, depending on the size of the tumor. RFA procedures are continued by modifying the output power based on the location and size of the tumor until the entire tumor and border area sizes of greater than 0.5 cm are included in the detected target lesion on ultrasound or CT.

A total dose of 45 Gy is presecribed using 15 Gy per fraction over 3 consecutive days.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Local progression-free survival rate, per-protocol (PP)
Local progression-free survival rate, PP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Overall survival rate, ITT
Overall survival rate, ITT
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Progression-free survival rate, ITT
progression-free survival rate, ITT
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Adverse reaction rate, ITT
adverse reaction rate, ITT
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2022
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Sponsor
Jonggi Choi
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05433701
Brief Title
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) HCC
Official Title
A Phase III Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial to Compare Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 29, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jonggi Choi

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality and the sixth most prevalent cancer in the world. Standard treatments for early-stage HCCs include resection, liver transplantation, and percutaneous ablation, with 5-year survival rates of over 50 percent. Less than one-third of patients, however, are candidates for hepatic resection, and the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may be significantly limited in cases with unfavorable tumor location and poor visibility on images, which increase the risk of technical failures and complications after RFA. Recent advancements in radiotherapy and imaging have made it possible to deliver optimal radiation doses on the tumor site while minimizing exposure to normal organs. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a method of high-precision radiation therapy that concentrates high-dose radiation to HCC in a short period of time to maximize the therapeutic effect on the tumor and minimize the side effects on normal tissues. Prospective and retrospective studies on SBRT for HCC have demonstrated its efficacy for local tumor control in small HCC. On the basis of these promising clinical results, a number of studies have compared the efficacy of RFA and SBRT. However, there is no strong evidence from randomized controlled trials comparing SBRT and RFA. In order to evaluate and compare the local efficacy and clinical outcomes of SBRT and RFA in patients with recurrent HCC, we conduct this non-inferiority trial.
Detailed Description
A total of 178 subjects are randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (89 patients in the body stereotactic radiotherapy group and 89 patients in the radiofrequency ablation group). If the assigned treatment method is technically infeasible, patients are allowed to be treated with the other method. RFA: When localization of the lesion is difficult under image guidance, when it is difficult to secure a safe needle path, when there is a risk of collateral thermal damage to adjacent organs, and when it is difficult to prevent it. SBRT: When irradiation with 45 Gy (daily dose of 15 Gy) is infeasible due to the maximum tolerance dose of normal organs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
178 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RFA group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
RFA are performed under local anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care with either a 15-gause or 17-gause internally cooled electrode, depending on the size of the tumor. RFA procedures are continued by modifying the output power based on the location and size of the tumor until the entire tumor and border area sizes of greater than 0.5 cm are included in the detected target lesion on ultrasound or CT.
Arm Title
SBRT group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A total dose of 45 Gy is presecribed using 15 Gy per fraction over 3 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Intervention Description
Verify the setup position and respiration of patients as in the simulation CT image. To precisely align the tumor prior to each treatment, cone-beam CT and gated fluoroscopy using the On-board Imager mounted on the linear accelerator are performed. The Real-time Position Management system is used to monitor the accuracy of breathing phase during treatment.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radiofrequency Ablation
Intervention Description
- RFA are performed under local anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care with either a 15-gause or 17-gause internally cooled electrode, depending on the size of the tumor.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Local progression-free survival rate, per-protocol (PP)
Description
Local progression-free survival rate, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Description
Progression-free survival rate, intention-to-treat (ITT)
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Overall survival rate, ITT
Description
Overall survival rate, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Description
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Description
Intrahepatic progression-free survival rate, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Description
Progression-free survival rate, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Progression-free survival rate, ITT
Description
progression-free survival rate, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Description
Adverse reaction rate, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Adverse reaction rate, ITT
Description
adverse reaction rate, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Description
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Description
Adverse reaction rate ≥ Gr 3, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Description
Change of Child-Pugh score , PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Description
Change of Child-Pugh score, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Description
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, PP
Time Frame
At year 2
Title
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT
Description
Local progression-free survival rate according to the tumor location, ITT
Time Frame
At year 2

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: patient over the age of 18 primary or recurrent HCC that is not suitable for surgery HCCs with a longest diameter of ≤3cm and ≤2 lesions no evidence of intrahepatic or extrahepatic residual disease except for target lesions Child-Pugh class A or B hepatic function no macroscopic vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 3 or 4 uncontrolled ascites, variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy previous history of liver transplantation an active gastric or duodenal ulcer within 3 months before screening pregnant woman uncontrolled other malignancies except for HCC within 2 years before screening platelet count <50,000/µl Patients who are judged by the researcher to be difficult to conduct clinical research
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonggi Choi, M.D, Ph D
Organizational Affiliation
Asan Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Asan Medical Center
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
05505
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32767693
Citation
Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313. doi: 10.3322/caac.21609. Epub 2020 Apr 6. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34801630
Citation
Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fabrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado A, Kelley RK, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Salem R, Sangro B, Singal AG, Vogel A, Fuster J, Ayuso C, Bruix J. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):681-693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17891443
Citation
Lau WY, Lai EC. Salvage surgery following downstaging of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma--a strategy to increase resectability. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;14(12):3301-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9549-7. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16495695
Citation
Chen MS, Li JQ, Zheng Y, Guo RP, Liang HH, Zhang YQ, Lin XJ, Lau WY. A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):321-8. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000201480.65519.b8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22634125
Citation
Feng K, Yan J, Li X, Xia F, Ma K, Wang S, Bie P, Dong J. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012 Oct;57(4):794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21107100
Citation
Huang J, Yan L, Cheng Z, Wu H, Du L, Wang J, Xu Y, Zeng Y. A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg. 2010 Dec;252(6):903-12. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181efc656.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25775062
Citation
Liu PH, Hsu CY, Hsia CY, Lee YH, Huang YH, Chiou YY, Lin HC, Huo TI. Surgical Resection Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma </= 2 cm in a Propensity Score Model. Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):538-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001178. Erratum In: Ann Surg. 2016 May;263(5):e77.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17869660
Citation
Taguchi H, Sakuhara Y, Hige S, Kitamura K, Osaka Y, Abo D, Uchida D, Sawada A, Kamiyama T, Shimizu T, Shirato H, Miyasaka K. Intercepting radiotherapy using a real-time tumor-tracking radiotherapy system for highly selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma unresectable with other modalities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Oct 1;69(2):376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.042.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18236114
Citation
Krishnan S, Dawson LA, Seong J, Akine Y, Beddar S, Briere TM, Crane CH, Mornex F. Radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Apr;15(4):1015-24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9729-5. Epub 2008 Jan 31. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18308583
Citation
Tse RV, Guha C, Dawson LA. Conformal radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Aug;67(2):113-23. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.01.005. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29653562
Citation
Jeong Y, Jung J, Cho B, Kwak J, Jeong C, Kim JH, Park JH, Kim SY, Shim JH, Kim KM, Lim YS, Lee HC, Yoon SM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy using a respiratory-gated volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique for small hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 13;18(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4340-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27062278
Citation
Takeda A, Sanuki N, Tsurugai Y, Iwabuchi S, Matsunaga K, Ebinuma H, Imajo K, Aoki Y, Saito H, Kunieda E. Phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiotherapy and optional transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to resection and radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):2041-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30008. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26799260
Citation
Su TS, Liang P, Lu HZ, Liang J, Gao YC, Zhou Y, Huang Y, Tang MY, Liang JN. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for small primary or recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in 132 Chinese patients. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;113(2):181-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.24128. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24849379
Citation
Kimura T, Aikata H, Takahashi S, Takahashi I, Nishibuchi I, Doi Y, Kenjo M, Murakami Y, Honda Y, Kakizawa H, Awai K, Chayama K, Nagata Y. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for resection or ablation therapies. Hepatol Res. 2015 Apr;45(4):378-86. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12359. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23927053
Citation
Takeda A, Sanuki N, Eriguchi T, Kobayashi T, Iwabutchi S, Matsunaga K, Mizuno T, Yashiro K, Nisimura S, Kunieda E. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for previously untreated solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;29(2):372-9. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12350.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24160910
Citation
Jung J, Yoon SM, Kim SY, Cho B, Park JH, Kim SS, Song SY, Lee SW, Ahn SD, Choi EK, Kim JH. Radiation-induced liver disease after stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical and dose-volumetric parameters. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Oct 27;8:249. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-249.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21645977
Citation
Andolino DL, Johnson CS, Maluccio M, Kwo P, Tector AJ, Zook J, Johnstone PA, Cardenes HR. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e447-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26628466
Citation
Wahl DR, Stenmark MH, Tao Y, Pollom EL, Caoili EM, Lawrence TS, Schipper MJ, Feng M. Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy or Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 10;34(5):452-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.4925. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33031846
Citation
Kim TH, Koh YH, Kim BH, Kim MJ, Lee JH, Park B, Park JW. Proton beam radiotherapy vs. radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29624699
Citation
Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Heimbach JK. Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018 Aug;68(2):723-750. doi: 10.1002/hep.29913. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12533647
Citation
Rhim H, Yoon KH, Lee JM, Cho Y, Cho JS, Kim SH, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Nam GJ, Han SS, Kim YH, Park CM, Kim PN, Byun JY. Major complications after radio-frequency thermal ablation of hepatic tumors: spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003 Jan-Feb;23(1):123-34; discussion 134-6. doi: 10.1148/rg.231025054.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23436859
Citation
Takaki H, Yamakado K, Nakatsuka A, Yamada T, Shiraki K, Takei Y, Takeda K. Frequency of and risk factors for complications after liver radiofrequency ablation under CT fluoroscopic guidance in 1500 sessions: single-center experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Mar;200(3):658-64. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8691.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable, Small (≤ 3 cm) HCC

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs