search
Back to results

Intradermal Suture Versus Stapling for Groin Skin Closure in Vascular Surgery (VASC-INF Trial)

Primary Purpose

Surgical Site Infection

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intradermal Suture
Metallic Staples
Sponsored by
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Surgical Site Infection focused on measuring Femoral approach, Intradermal suture, Metallic staples, Surgical Site Infection, Groin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with chronic lower limb ischemia or aortic, iliac, or femoral aneurysm
  • With a scheduled surgery for one of the following indications:
  • Femoropopliteal Bypass
  • Femorodistal Bypass
  • Aortobifemoral Bypass
  • Axillofemoral or Axillobifemoral Bypass
  • Femorofemoral Bypass
  • Femoral Endarterectomy
  • Femoral approach for exclusion of an aortic aneurysm
  • Surgical procedure with an incision perpendicular to the inguinal fold
  • Patients who undergo both unilateral and bilateral surgical approaches *

    *Note: We will consider one patient as one intervention (i.e., bilateral approaches will be quantified as one single inguinal surgical approach). In the case of bilateral procedures, the same closure technique will be used for both sides.

  • Patients who sign the written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Background of a previous surgical intervention in the groin area.
  • Femoral approach carried out in a surgical emergency setting
  • Femoral approach performed due to a femoral pseudoaneurysm
  • A surgical procedure performed with a transverse/oblique incision to the groin
  • A patient who withdraws consent for participating in the trial

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Universitari de BellvitgeRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intradermal Suture Group

Metallic Staples

Arm Description

Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with an intradermal suture using Monosyn® (Braun®) 4/0 absorbable monofilament.

Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with metallic stapling using Visistat® (Weck®) 35W skin stapler.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI* -(superficial and/or deep) up to 28 (±2) after surgery.
According to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Classification

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number (percentage) of patients with other surgical wound complications up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Complications include but are not limited to seroma, hematoma, lymphorrhagia.
Number (percentage) of patients who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery
Number (percentage) of patients with SSI who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Time of prophylactic antibiotic administration
Types of microorganisms isolated from skin microbiological culture, subcutaneous tissue sample culture, and SSI secretion culture up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Types of antibiotic therapy used in patients with SSI
Plasma albumin concentration
Body Mass Index
Surgical incision length
Length (in centimeters [cm]) of the cutaneous incision performed to gain access to the surgical site. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Total surgery duration
Duration (in minutes) of the surgical procedure. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Type of hemostatic material used during surgery
This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Number of days between hospital admission and the surgical intervention
The number of days gone by from hospital admission until the day the surgery is performed. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI (superficial and/or deep) up to 84 (±7) days after surgery
According to the NHSN classification

Full Information

First Posted
June 16, 2022
Last Updated
June 27, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05434182
Brief Title
Intradermal Suture Versus Stapling for Groin Skin Closure in Vascular Surgery (VASC-INF Trial)
Official Title
Groin Surgical Site Infection Incidence in Vascular Surgery With Intradermal Suture Versus Metallic Stapling Skin Closure: A Pragmatic Open-Label Parallel-Group Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 4, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent and fearsome complications in vascular surgery due to its high morbidity and mortality. In addition, SSI is one of the factors related to the development of prosthetic infection. Consequently, it represents a significant increase in hospital stay and healthcare costs. A 2021 meta-analysis on groin SSI prevention strategies in arterial surgeries reported that using intradermal sutures could be associated with a lower SSI rate. The published results from a single-center retrospective study comparing SSI rates before and after implementing an SSI prevention protocol also suggest better outcomes with intradermal suturing. This study aims to assess the SSI incidences of both skin closure techniques in vascular surgery patients undergoing femoral artery approach through a perpendicular groin skin incision.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Site Infection
Keywords
Femoral approach, Intradermal suture, Metallic staples, Surgical Site Infection, Groin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
224 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intradermal Suture Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with an intradermal suture using Monosyn® (Braun®) 4/0 absorbable monofilament.
Arm Title
Metallic Staples
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Vascular surgery patients undergoing a femoral approach surgery and randomized to this group will have their skin closed with metallic stapling using Visistat® (Weck®) 35W skin stapler.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Intradermal Suture
Intervention Description
Skin closure with an intradermal suture using Monosyn® (Braun®) 4/0 absorbable monofilament.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Metallic Staples
Intervention Description
Skin closure with metallic stapling using Visistat® (Weck®) 35W skin stapler.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI* -(superficial and/or deep) up to 28 (±2) after surgery.
Description
According to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Classification
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number (percentage) of patients with other surgical wound complications up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Description
Complications include but are not limited to seroma, hematoma, lymphorrhagia.
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Number (percentage) of patients who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Number (percentage) of patients with SSI who develop sepsis up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Time of prophylactic antibiotic administration
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Types of microorganisms isolated from skin microbiological culture, subcutaneous tissue sample culture, and SSI secretion culture up to 28 (±2) days after surgery.
Time Frame
28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Types of antibiotic therapy used in patients with SSI
Time Frame
84 (±7) days after surgery
Title
Plasma albumin concentration
Time Frame
Baseline visit to 28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Body Mass Index
Time Frame
Baseline visit to 28 (±2) days after surgery
Title
Surgical incision length
Description
Length (in centimeters [cm]) of the cutaneous incision performed to gain access to the surgical site. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Time Frame
On the day of performing the surgical procedure
Title
Total surgery duration
Description
Duration (in minutes) of the surgical procedure. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Time Frame
On the day of performing the surgical procedure
Title
Type of hemostatic material used during surgery
Description
This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Time Frame
On the day of performing the surgical procedure
Title
Number of days between hospital admission and the surgical intervention
Description
The number of days gone by from hospital admission until the day the surgery is performed. This information will be collected on the day of performing the surgery, once it is over.
Time Frame
From the day of hospital admission to the day of performing the surgical procedure
Title
Number (percentage) of patients who present a femoral approach SSI (superficial and/or deep) up to 84 (±7) days after surgery
Description
According to the NHSN classification
Time Frame
84 (±7) days after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosed with chronic lower limb ischemia or aortic, iliac, or femoral aneurysm With a scheduled surgery for one of the following indications: Femoropopliteal Bypass Femorodistal Bypass Aortobifemoral Bypass Axillofemoral or Axillobifemoral Bypass Femorofemoral Bypass Femoral Endarterectomy Femoral approach for exclusion of an aortic aneurysm Surgical procedure with an incision perpendicular to the inguinal fold Patients who undergo both unilateral and bilateral surgical approaches * *Note: We will consider one patient as one intervention (i.e., bilateral approaches will be quantified as one single inguinal surgical approach). In the case of bilateral procedures, the same closure technique will be used for both sides. Patients who sign the written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Background of a previous surgical intervention in the groin area. Femoral approach carried out in a surgical emergency setting Femoral approach performed due to a femoral pseudoaneurysm A surgical procedure performed with a transverse/oblique incision to the groin A patient who withdraws consent for participating in the trial
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Albert González-Sagredo, M.D.
Phone
+34932607221
Email
albertgonzalezsagredo@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Elena Iborra, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+34932607628
Email
eiborra@bellvitgehospital.cat
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elena Iborra, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge - Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
City
L'Hospitalet De Llobregat
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elena Iborra, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+34932607628
Email
eiborra@bellvitgehospital.cat
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Albert González-Sagrero, M.D.
Phone
+34932607221
Email
albertgonzalezsagredo@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The sponsor will oversee the dataset. Granting access to this information will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and upon reasonable request by the interested party.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12603990
Citation
Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE, Guadagnoli E, Meara E, Platt R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 Feb;9(2):196-203. doi: 10.3201/eid0902.020232.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32035742
Citation
Chakfe N, Diener H, Lejay A, Assadian O, Berard X, Caillon J, Fourneau I, Glaudemans AWJM, Koncar I, Lindholt J, Melissano G, Saleem BR, Senneville E, Slart RHJA, Szeberin Z, Venermo M, Vermassen F, Wyss TR, Esvs Guidelines Committee, de Borst GJ, Bastos Goncalves F, Kakkos SK, Kolh P, Tulamo R, Vega de Ceniga M, Document Reviewers, von Allmen RS, van den Berg JC, Debus ES, Koelemay MJW, Linares-Palomino JP, Moneta GL, Ricco JB, Wanhainen A. Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Mar;59(3):339-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016. Epub 2020 Feb 5. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Dec;60(6):958.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33236858
Citation
Groin wound Infection after Vascular Exposure (GIVE) Study Group. Groin wound infection after vascular exposure (GIVE) multicentre cohort study. Int Wound J. 2021 Apr;18(2):164-175. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13508. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10580621
Citation
Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, Wilkinson WE, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Nov;20(11):725-30. doi: 10.1086/501572.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33423912
Citation
Gwilym BL, Dovell G, Dattani N, Ambler GK, Shalhoub J, Forsythe RO, Benson RA, Nandhra S, Preece R, Onida S, Hitchman L, Coughlin P, Saratzis A, Bosanquet DC. Editor's Choice - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Adjuncts for the Prevention of Groin Wound Surgical Site Infection in Arterial Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;61(4):636-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.053. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30300081
Citation
Nikulainen V, Helmio P, Hurme S, Hakovirta H. Intra-Dermal Absorbable Suture in the Groin Incision Associated with Less Groin Surgical Site Infections than Trans-Dermal Sutures in Vascular Surgical Patients. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;20(1):45-48. doi: 10.1089/sur.2018.202. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28708024
Citation
Parizh D, Ascher E, Raza Rizvi SA, Hingorani A, Amaturo M, Johnson E. Quality improvement initiative: Preventative Surgical Site Infection Protocol in Vascular Surgery. Vascular. 2018 Feb;26(1):47-53. doi: 10.1177/1708538117719155. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16429897
Citation
Engin C, Posacioglu H, Ayik F, Apaydin AZ. Management of vascular infection in the groin. Tex Heart Inst J. 2005;32(4):529-34.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
637195
Citation
Yashar JJ, Weyman AK, Burnard RJ, Yashar J. Survival and limb salvage in patients with infected arterial prostheses. Am J Surg. 1978 Apr;135(4):499-504. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90027-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29068153
Citation
Pleger SP, Nink N, Elzien M, Kunold A, Koshty A, Boning A. Reduction of groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT): a prospective, randomised, single-institution study. Int Wound J. 2018 Feb;15(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12836. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16310254
Citation
Antonios VS, Noel AA, Steckelberg JM, Wilson WR, Mandrekar JN, Harmsen WS, Baddour LM. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: a risk factor analysis using a case-control study. J Infect. 2006 Jul;53(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11925745
Citation
Oderich GS, Panneton JM. Aortic graft infection. What have we learned during the last decades? Acta Chir Belg. 2002 Feb;102(1):7-13. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2002.11679254. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23312940
Citation
Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Chaikof EL, Pomposelli FB, Schermerhorn ML. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26143662
Citation
Wiseman JT, Fernandes-Taylor S, Barnes ML, Saunders RS, Saha S, Havlena J, Rathouz PJ, Kent KC. Predictors of surgical site infection after hospital discharge in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):1023-1031.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.453. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26926939
Citation
Leekha S, Lahr BD, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P, Duncan AA, Orenstein R. Preoperative risk prediction of surgical site infection requiring hospitalization or reoperation in patients undergoing vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.029. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16382265
Citation
Pounds LL, Montes-Walters M, Mayhall CG, Falk PS, Sanderson E, Hunter GC, Killewich LA. A changing pattern of infection after major vascular reconstructions. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(6):511-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24526375
Citation
Gurusamy KS, Toon CD, Allen VB, Davidson BR. Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Intradermal Suture Versus Stapling for Groin Skin Closure in Vascular Surgery (VASC-INF Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs