Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Primary Purpose
Rotator Cuff Tears, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Bioinductive implant
Ultrasound Imaging
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rotator Cuff Tears focused on measuring Rotator Cuff Tear, Bioinductive, Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
- Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
- Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
- Ability to read and understand English.
- Age ≥18 years
- Patient failed ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment, which included structured, in-person physical therapy or documented home therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
- Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
- Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
- Small (<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
- Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon
- Acute and traumatic rotator cuff tears
- Active infection
- Cancer
- Autoimmune and rheumatologic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus
Sites / Locations
- Henry Ford HealthRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Control Group
Study Group
Arm Description
Surgical treatment alone, consisting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Identical surgical treatment as control group plus bio-inductive patch implant. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rotator cuff repair integrity
absence of full- or partial-thickness defect as demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Secondary Outcome Measures
PROMs scores for upper extremity function
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity function. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 0 - 100-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 0 representing the minimum, and 100 representing the maximum function.
PROMs scores for depression
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for depression. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher increased depression (worse).
PROMs scores for upper extremity pain interference
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity pain and how it interferes with the patients daily life. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher pain interference (worse).
Shoulder Range of Motion
Standard range of motion values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits
Shoulder Strength
Standard shoulder strength values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits. Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale will be used to measure the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale with 0 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum. Higher scores are better/normal.
Complications
Both intra- and postoperative complications will be collected.
Reoperation
Whether or not patients required another operation.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05439850
Brief Title
Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Official Title
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Augmented With Bioinductive Implant for Full-Thickness Tears: A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Henry Ford Health System
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this randomized-controlled study is to compare outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a Bioinductive Implant (study group) to standard arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (control group). The primary outcome of this study is rotator cuff repair integrity (absence of full- or partial-thickness defect) demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively. The investigators hypothesize that the study group will have higher rates of repair integrity demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Detailed Description
A bioinductive patch is an implant that may foster tendon regrowth and healing following surgery. Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: control and investigational. All surgical patients will have failed non-surgical/conservative options for 6 weeks. Patients in the "control group" will receive the standard surgery (arthroscopic rotator cuff repair) . Patients in the "experimental group" will receive the same surgical treatment, with the addition of the bioinductive patch. This patch will be implanted during surgery. Then, using a combination of ultrasound studies and other measures, the investigators will assess how well the patch works compared to surgery alone.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rotator Cuff Tears, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
Keywords
Rotator Cuff Tear, Bioinductive, Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients will be randomized into one of two groups. In the "control group," patients will receive the current surgical treatment for rotator cuff tears: debridement and repair. Patients in the "experimental group" will receive a bio-inductive patch following the same surgical treatment. Both groups of patients will participate in postoperative ultrasound imaging studies.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The study participant will not have knowledge of which treatment group he/she is randomized into for the duration of the study. Because the care provider/investigator will be required to implant the bioinductive patch, the physician will know into which treatment group each patient falls.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
78 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Surgical treatment alone, consisting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Arm Title
Study Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Identical surgical treatment as control group plus bio-inductive patch implant. Ultrasound postoperatively at 1 year.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Intervention Description
This procedure is the standard of care for rotator cuff tears who fail conservative treatment options.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Bioinductive implant
Other Intervention Name(s)
Bioinductive patch
Intervention Description
A bioinductive implant that is designed to promote healing of the torn rotator cuff tendon after surgery.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Ultrasound Imaging
Intervention Description
An ultrasound will be performed on each patient one year postoperatively.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rotator cuff repair integrity
Description
absence of full- or partial-thickness defect as demonstrated on ultrasound at 1-year postoperatively.
Time Frame
Preoperative to 1 year postoperative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PROMs scores for upper extremity function
Description
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity function. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 0 - 100-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 0 representing the minimum, and 100 representing the maximum function.
Time Frame
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
PROMs scores for depression
Description
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for depression. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher increased depression (worse).
Time Frame
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
PROMs scores for upper extremity pain interference
Description
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) scores for upper extremity pain and how it interferes with the patients daily life. A T-score is given with a standard deviation based on the patients answers to the computerized adaptive test. The metrics have been designed to conform to a 10 - 90-point scale, with a score of 50 representing the mean of the population at large, 10 representing the minimum, and 90 representing the maximum function. A higher T-score represents higher pain interference (worse).
Time Frame
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
Shoulder Range of Motion
Description
Standard range of motion values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits
Time Frame
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
Shoulder Strength
Description
Standard shoulder strength values collected by the surgeon during preoperative and followup visits. Medical Research Council Manual Muscle Testing scale will be used to measure the patient's strength on a 0 to 5 scale with 0 being the minimum and 5 being the maximum. Higher scores are better/normal.
Time Frame
Preoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
Complications
Description
Both intra- and postoperative complications will be collected.
Time Frame
Intraoperative to 2 years postoperative
Title
Reoperation
Description
Whether or not patients required another operation.
Time Frame
2 years postoperative
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Indicated and scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Full-thickness medium (1-3 cm), large (3-5 cm), and massive (>5 cm) rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons demonstrated on magnetic resonance or ultrasound imaging.
Chronic, degenerative rotator cuff tears.
Ability to read and understand English.
Age ≥18 years
Patient failed ≥6 weeks of conservative treatment, which included structured, in-person physical therapy or documented home therapy
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient scheduled for open or mini-open rotator cuff repair
Prior surgery of affected shoulder (except diagnostic arthroscopy)
Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears
Small (<1 cm) rotator cuff tears
Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon
Acute and traumatic rotator cuff tears
Active infection
Cancer
Autoimmune and rheumatologic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Johnny Kasto, MD
Phone
313-244-8078
Email
jkasto1@hfhs.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stephanie J Muh, MD
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephanie J Muh, MC
Organizational Affiliation
Henry Ford Health
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johnny Kasto, MD
Phone
313-244-8078
Email
jkasto1@hfhs.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephanie J Muh, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No IPD will be shared with other researchers.
Learn more about this trial
Bioinductive Patch for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs