search
Back to results

Pilot Study of Single-port Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

Primary Purpose

Nipple-sparing Mastectomy, Prophylactic Mastectomy, Breast Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
da Vinci SPⓇ Single-port System
Sponsored by
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy focused on measuring robotic mastectomy, robot-assisted mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, breast cancer surgery, breast reconstruction, prophylactic mastectomy, single-port systems

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with unilateral or bilateral breast cancer, including invasive and noninvasive carcinoma, eligible for unilateral or bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either for therapeutic or prophylactic purpose, followed by immediate breast reconstruction.

    1. Meet at least one of the following indications of NSM for breast cancer:

      1. Preoperative clinical tumor sizes less than 5 cm, with adequate tumor-skin distance of at least 3mm and above, and without nipple-areolar involvement in at least 1cm around the nipple by image
      2. Breast cancer up to stage IIIa (T3, N1-2) as the initial clinical stage showing adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy and meet criteria a.
      3. Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1 or 2 mutation carriers (actionable mutations including pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations) with breast cancer diagnosis or requiring unilateral or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy as a risk reduction procedure
    2. Age equal to or above 20 years
    3. ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score 0-1
    4. ASA anesthesia risk class 1~2, and with adequate organ functions
    5. Understanding of the method, benefit and risk and willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Extensive breast skin or nipple involvement by cancer including 1) Paget's disease, 2) nipple discharge associated with malignancy, 3) image findings suggesting involvement of the nipple and subareolar tissues 4) inflammatory breast cancer or skin ulceration caused by cancer invasion
  2. Stage III (up to T3, N1-2) breast cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment
  3. Previous radiotherapy on the surgical site of breast
  4. Patients with severe systemic disease reaching ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification equal or greater than 3
  5. Patients with bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
  6. Patients with BMI 35.0 or higher
  7. Patients with habitual smoking
  8. Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Chang Gung Memeorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Robotic mastectomy

Arm Description

Patients receive unilateral or bilateral robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Surgical performance
Ability in percentage to complete nipple-sparing mastectomy with da Vinci SP system (no conversion to conventional laparoscopic, multiport da Vinci surgery or open surgery; addition of access port to complete the procedure would not be considered as conversion) in per protocol population

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Acute Complications
Rate of incidence of surgery-related acute complications including hemorrhage, infection, skin ischemia, nipple ischemia, flap ischemia, and requirement for debridement or re-operation within 30 days
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Mortality and Morbidity
Morbidity and mortality rate resulting from surgery among per protocol population

Full Information

First Posted
June 18, 2022
Last Updated
April 23, 2023
Sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Collaborators
Intuitive Surgical
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05448963
Brief Title
Pilot Study of Single-port Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy
Official Title
A Pilot Study of Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction Using da Vinci SP ® Single-port System
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 30, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Collaborators
Intuitive Surgical

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is indicated for breast cancer requiring total mastectomy and without nipple involvement by cancer. Robot-assisted mastectomy enables removal of the whole breast tissue with well-preserved breast skin envelope through a single longitudinal incision in the anterior axillary line at the nipple areolar level. The next-generation robot, da Vinci SP system, is single-armed, equipped with multiple flexible instruments and camera, which is likely to improve the efficacy of robotic mastectomy. The investigator's scope of this study is to establish the feasibility and safety of SP-applied NSM through this single-armed pilot trial. Participants with breast cancer indicated for nipple-sparing mastectomy or candidates of prophylactic mastectomy carrying germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations are recruited to receive SP-assisted unilateral or bilateral NSMs. Immediate breast reconstruction is followed according to the mode of the plastic surgeon's clinical decision. The primary endpoint is technical feasibility, and the secondary endpoint is safety and patient-reported outcome.
Detailed Description
About 49% of breast cancer surgery is managed by total mastectomy, and half of the patients undergo breast reconstruction. Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is indicated for breast cancer requiring total mastectomy and without nipple involvement by cancer. The local recurrence rate is not increased and the cosmetic result much improved. Robot-assisted mastectomy utilizes surgeon-controlled robotic arms with delicate, multi-jointed instruments and 3-dimentional high-definition camera in place of conventional instruments under bare eye vision. Through a single longitudinal incision in the anterior axillary line at the nipple areolar level, the lesion and the whole breast tissue can be totally removed with negative resection margins and well-preserved breast skin envelope. Breast reconstruction can be successfully performed through the same incision and results in a scarless front view. Currently, this surgery is effectively carried out with da Vinci Xi system. However, the small incision may result in the collision of robotic arms outside the torso and hence decreases the range of instrument motion. The next-generation robot, da Vinci SP system, is single-armed, equipped with multiple flexible instruments and camera, which are devoid of outside collision and allows work in a larger surgical field through the same small incision. The SP system reduces blind areas in the surgical field and the blockade of camera vision by the detached space-taking specimens, and, therefore, will hopefully reduce the surgical time. The investigator's scope of this study is to establish the feasibility and safety of SP-applied NSM through this single-armed pilot trial. The investigators recruit breast cancer women indicated for nipple-sparing mastectomy or candidates of prophylactic mastectomy carrying germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations to receive SP-assisted unilateral or bilateral NSMs. Immediate breast reconstruction is followed according to the mode of the plastic surgeon's clinical decision. The primary endpoint is technical feasibility (conversion rate, surgical time), and the secondary endpoint is safety and patient-reported outcome.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Nipple-sparing Mastectomy, Prophylactic Mastectomy, Breast Cancer, BRCA1 Mutation, BRCA2 Mutation
Keywords
robotic mastectomy, robot-assisted mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, breast cancer surgery, breast reconstruction, prophylactic mastectomy, single-port systems

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
single arm surgical intervention
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Robotic mastectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive unilateral or bilateral robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
da Vinci SPⓇ Single-port System
Intervention Description
Nipple-sparing mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection using da Vinci SP single-port system
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical performance
Description
Ability in percentage to complete nipple-sparing mastectomy with da Vinci SP system (no conversion to conventional laparoscopic, multiport da Vinci surgery or open surgery; addition of access port to complete the procedure would not be considered as conversion) in per protocol population
Time Frame
Day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Acute Complications
Description
Rate of incidence of surgery-related acute complications including hemorrhage, infection, skin ischemia, nipple ischemia, flap ischemia, and requirement for debridement or re-operation within 30 days
Time Frame
Day 1-Day 30
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Mortality and Morbidity
Description
Morbidity and mortality rate resulting from surgery among per protocol population
Time Frame
Day 1-Day 30
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Blood loss
Description
Blood loss in milliliters resulting from SP robotic mastectomy, and breast reconstruction respectively
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Surgical time
Description
Time in minutes consumed by robotic mastectomy and robotic operation: total surgical time, docking time, console operation time, mastectomy time, lymph node dissection time, reconstruction time
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Body mass index
Description
Patient weight and height to report BMI in kg/m^2
Time Frame
Day 0-1
Title
Specimen weight
Description
Mastectomy specimen weight in miligrams
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Mastectomy incision
Description
Location and length in centimeters of robotic mastectomy incision
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Oncological safety
Description
The ability to achieve margin-free resection for cancer cases: 1) Resection margin positive rate, 2) Nipple margin positive rate, 3)Nipple areolar complex excision rate (pre-planned, or based on nipple margin status, 4)Axillary surgery type (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection)
Time Frame
Day 1-Day 30
Title
Reconstructive surgery
Description
Type and status of concomitant breast reconstruction: 1) Type of reconstructive surgery (implant or autologous) 2) Impact reconstruction (if applicable): implant location, implant size/shape, brand/surface texture, or tissue expander location 3) Autologous reconstruction (if applicable): type of autologous tissue used, microsurgery detail, nipple neurotization detail
Time Frame
Day 1-Day 2
Title
Drain output
Description
Daily drain output in milliliters
Time Frame
Day 2-15
Title
Duration of admission
Description
Total duration of admission in days for robotic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction
Time Frame
Day 0-60
Title
Long term complications
Description
Rate of complications resulting from robotic mastectomy and concomitant reconstruction more than 3 months after surgery
Time Frame
Day 90~
Title
Patient-reported esthetic outcome
Description
Serially evaluated patient-reported scores from Breast Q questionnaire
Time Frame
Day0, Day30, Day90, Day180, and Day360
Title
Patient-reported quality of life outcome for breast cancer cases
Description
Serially evaluated patient-reported scores from EORTC-QLQ-C30 including functional and symptomatic scales comprising 30 items. The raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale, where higher function scores reflect more interfered function and higher symptom scores present a higher level of symptoms.
Time Frame
Day0, Day30, Day90, Day180, and Day360
Title
Patient-reported breast-specific quality of life outcome for breast cancer cases
Description
Serially evaluated patient-reported scores from EORTC-QLQ-B23 including functional and symptomatic scales comprising 23 items. The raw scores are linearly converted to a 0-100 scale, where higher function scores reflect more interfered function and higher symptom scores present a higher level of symptoms.
Time Frame
Day0, Day30, Day90, Day180, and Day360
Title
Postoperative pain
Description
Serially evaluated intensity of pain by Numerical Rating Scale (Visual Analog Score) for pain, with scales ranging from 0-10. The intensity of pain increases with higher numerical scores (eg.,no pain(0), moderate pain (5), worst pain (10)).
Time Frame
Day2, Day4, Day6, Day8, Day15
Title
Physician-evaluated outcomes
Description
Questionnaires about post-reconstructive breast cosmesis evaluated by independent plastic surgeon through a Likert 5-point scale after reviewing pre-and post-operative pictures, where higher scale indicating higher cosmetic satisfaction.
Time Frame
Picture taken on Day0, Day30, Day90, Day180, and Day360

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women with unilateral or bilateral breast cancer, including invasive and noninvasive carcinoma, eligible for unilateral or bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either for therapeutic or prophylactic purpose, followed by immediate breast reconstruction. Meet at least one of the following indications of NSM for breast cancer: Preoperative clinical tumor sizes less than 5 cm, with adequate tumor-skin distance of at least 3mm and above, and without nipple-areolar involvement in at least 1cm around the nipple by image Breast cancer up to stage IIIa (T3, N1-2) as the initial clinical stage showing adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy and meet criteria a. Germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic BRCA1 or 2 mutation carriers (actionable mutations including pathogenic and likely pathogenic mutations) with breast cancer diagnosis or requiring unilateral or bilateral prophylactic mastectomy as a risk reduction procedure Age equal to or above 20 years ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance score 0-1 ASA anesthesia risk class 1~2, and with adequate organ functions Understanding of the method, benefit and risk and willing to receive immediate breast reconstruction Exclusion Criteria: Extensive breast skin or nipple involvement by cancer including 1) Paget's disease, 2) nipple discharge associated with malignancy, 3) image findings suggesting involvement of the nipple and subareolar tissues 4) inflammatory breast cancer or skin ulceration caused by cancer invasion Stage III (up to T3, N1-2) breast cancer without response to neoadjuvant treatment Previous radiotherapy on the surgical site of breast Patients with severe systemic disease reaching ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification equal or greater than 3 Patients with bleeding disorder or coagulopathy Patients with BMI 35.0 or higher Patients with habitual smoking Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wen-Ling Kuo, MD. PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Breast Cancer Center, Chang Gone Memorial Hospital , Linkou Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Chang Gung Memeorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center
City
Taoyuan
ZIP/Postal Code
333
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD are to be shared upon request to the principle investigator. The content of data sharing depend on research relevance and cooperative detail.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33133886
Citation
Sarfati B, Toesca A, Roulot A, Invento A. Transumbilical Single-port Robotically Assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy: A Cadaveric Study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 May 27;8(5):e2778. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002778. eCollection 2020 May.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32140275
Citation
Park HS, Lee J, Lee H, Lee K, Song SY, Toesca A. Development of Robotic Mastectomy Using a Single-Port Surgical Robot System. J Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;23(1):107-112. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2020.23.e3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19496781
Citation
Garcia-Etienne CA, Cody Iii HS 3rd, Disa JJ, Cordeiro P, Sacchini V. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: initial experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a comprehensive review of literature. Breast J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):440-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00758.x. Epub 2009 May 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28673535
Citation
Galimberti V, Vicini E, Corso G, Morigi C, Fontana S, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications. Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26464007
Citation
Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S, Yoshie R, Tsuchiya K, Uejima T, Kojima Y, Shimo A, Hayami R, Nishikawa T, Yabuki Y, Kawamoto H, Sudo A, Fukuda M, Kanemaki Y, Maeda I. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer. 2016 Nov;23(6):851-860. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30204677
Citation
Frey JD, Salibian AA, Levine JP, Karp NS, Choi M. Incision Choices in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Outcomes and Evolution of a Clinical Algorithm. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):826e-835e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004969.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30789474
Citation
Daar DA, Abdou SA, Rosario L, Rifkin WJ, Santos PJ, Wirth GA, Lane KT. Is There a Preferred Incision Location for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):906e-919e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005502.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28692558
Citation
Toesca A, Peradze N, Galimberti V, Manconi A, Intra M, Gentilini O, Sances D, Negri D, Veronesi G, Rietjens M, Zurrida S, Luini A, Veronesi U, Veronesi P. Robotic Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction With Implant: First Report of Surgical Technique. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001397. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30421063
Citation
Selber JC. Robotic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: The Next Step in the Evolution of Minimally Invasive Breast Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jan;26(1):10-11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6936-1. Epub 2018 Nov 12. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27810700
Citation
Toesca A, Peradze N, Manconi A, Galimberti V, Intra M, Colleoni M, Bonanni B, Curigliano G, Rietjens M, Viale G, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. Robotic nipple-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer: Feasibility and safety study. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30360987
Citation
Lai HW, Wang CC, Lai YC, Chen CJ, Lin SL, Chen ST, Lin YJ, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. The learning curve of robotic nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: An analysis of consecutive 39 procedures with cumulative sum plot. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019 Feb;45(2):125-133. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.09.021. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29484564
Citation
Lai HW, Lin SL, Chen ST, Kuok KM, Chen SL, Lin YL, Chen DR, Kuo SJ. Single-Axillary-Incision Endoscopic-Assisted Hybrid Technique for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Technique, Preliminary Results, and Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome from Preliminary 50 Procedures. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1340-1349. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6383-z. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31977514
Citation
Lai HW, Toesca A, Sarfati B, Park HS, Houvenaeghel G, Selber JC, Cheng FT, Kuo WL, Peradze N, Song SY, Mok CW. Consensus Statement on Robotic Mastectomy-Expert Panel From International Endoscopic and Robotic Breast Surgery Symposium (IERBS) 2019. Ann Surg. 2020 Jun;271(6):1005-1012. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003789.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31780382
Citation
Kuo WL, Huang JJ, Huang YT, Chueh LF, Lee JT, Tsai HP, Chen SC. Robot-assisted Mastectomy Followed by Immediate Autologous Microsurgical Free Flap Reconstruction: Techniques and Feasibility in Three Different Breast Cancer Surgical Scenarios. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.06.018. Epub 2019 Sep 4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34597010
Citation
Toesca A, Sangalli C, Maisonneuve P, Massari G, Girardi A, Baker JL, Lissidini G, Invento A, Farante G, Corso G, Rietjens M, Peradze N, Gottardi A, Magnoni F, Bottiglieri L, Lazzeroni M, Montagna E, Labo P, Orecchia R, Galimberti V, Intra M, Sacchini V, Veronesi P. A Randomized Trial of Robotic Mastectomy Versus Open Surgery in Women With Breast Cancer or BrCA Mutation. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004969. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25634782
Citation
Lemaine V, Hoskin TL, Farley DR, Grant CS, Boughey JC, Torstenson TA, Jacobson SR, Jakub JW, Degnim AC. Introducing the SKIN score: a validated scoring system to assess severity of mastectomy skin flap necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2925-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4409-3. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33765738
Citation
Joo OY, Song SY, Park HS, Roh TS. Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the da Vinci SP Surgical System: first clinical report. Arch Plast Surg. 2021 Mar;48(2):194-198. doi: 10.5999/aps.2020.01557. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32783194
Citation
Lee J, Park HS, Lee H, Lee K, Han DH, Lee DW. Axillary lymph node dissection using a robotic surgical system: Initial experience. J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;122(6):1252-1256. doi: 10.1002/jso.26141. Epub 2020 Aug 11. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34666195
Citation
Huang JJ, Chuang EY, Cheong DC, Kim BS, Chang FC, Kuo WL. Robotic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical free flap reconstruction: Feasibility and aesthetic results - Case series. Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106143. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106143. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Pilot Study of Single-port Robot-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs