search
Back to results

Mismatched Related Donor Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biospecimen Collection
Bone Marrow Aspiration
Busulfan
Cyclophosphamide
Echocardiography
Fludarabine
Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Lapine T-Lymphocyte Immune Globulin
Lumbar Puncture
Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Melphalan
Methotrexate
Multigated Acquisition Scan
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Myeloablative Conditioning
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Questionnaire Administration
Rituximab
T-Cell Depletion Therapy
Tacrolimus
Thiotepa
Total-Body Irradiation
Sponsored by
Children's Oncology Group
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

6 Months - 21 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR ENROLLMENT:
  • 6 months to < 22 years at enrollment
  • Diagnosed with ALL, AML, or MDS for which an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is indicated. Complete Remission (CR) status will not be confirmed at the time of enrollment. CR as defined in these sections is required to proceed with the actual HCT treatment plan
  • Has not received a prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant
  • Does not have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor available for stem cell donation
  • Has an eligible haploidentical related family donor based on at least intermediate resolution HLA typing

    • Patients who also have an eligible 8/8 MUD adult donor based on confirmatory high resolution HLA typing are eligible for randomization to Arm A or Arm B.
    • Patients who do not have an eligible MUD donor are eligible for enrollment to Arm C
  • All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent
  • All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met
  • Co-Enrollment on other trials

    • Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if already enrolled on other protocols for treatment of high risk and/or relapsed ALL, AML and MDS. This is including, but not limited to, COG AAML1831, COG AALL1821, the EndRAD Trial, as well as local institutional trials. We will collect information on all co-enrollments
    • Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if receiving immunotherapy prior to transplant as a way to achieve remission and bridge to transplant. This includes chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and other immunotherapies
  • PATIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT:
  • Karnofsky Index or Lansky Play-Performance Scale >= 60 on pre-transplant evaluation. Karnofsky scores must be used for patients >= 16 years of age and Lansky scores for patients =< 16 years of age (within 4 weeks of starting therapy)
  • A serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows:

    6 months to < 1 year: 0.5 mg/dL (Male); 0.5 mg/dL (Female)

    1. to < 2 years 0.6 mg/dL (Male); 0.6 mg/dL (Female)
    2. to < 6 years 0.8 mg/dL (Male); 0.8 mg/dL (Female)

    6 to < 10 years: 1 mg/dL (Male); 1 mg/dL (Female) 10 to < 13 years: 1.2 mg/dL (Male); 1.2 mg/dL (Female) 13 to < 16 years: 1.5 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female) >= 16 years: 1.7 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female)

    • OR
  • A 24 hour urine Creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2

    • OR
  • A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. GFR must be performed using direct measurement with a nuclear blood sampling method OR direct small molecule clearance method (iothalamate or other molecule per institutional standard)

    • Note: Estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine, cystatin C or other estimates are not acceptable for determining eligibility
  • Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) aminotransferase [ALT] < 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age
  • Total bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL, unless attributable to Gilbert's Syndrome
  • Shortening fraction of >= 27% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA)

    • OR
  • Ejection fraction of >= 50% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA), choice of test according to local standard of care
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and corrected carbon monoxide diffusing capability (DLCO) must all be >= 50% of predicted by pulmonary function tests (PFTs).

    • For children who are unable to perform for PFTs (e.g., due to age or developmental delay), the criteria are: no evidence of dyspnea at rest, oxygen (O2) saturation (Sat) > 92% on room air by pulse oximetry, not on supplemental O2 at rest, and not on supplemental O2 at rest.
  • ALL high-risk in first complete remission (CR1) for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: induction failure, treatment failure as per minimal residual disease by flow cytometry > 0.01% after consolidation and not eligible for AALL1721 or AALL1721 not available/unwilling to enroll, hypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes) with MRD+ > 0.01% after induction, persistent or recurrent cytogenetic or molecular evidence of disease during therapy requiring additional therapy after induction to achieve remission (e.g. persistent molecular BCR-ABL positivity), T cell ALL with persistent MRD > 0.01% after consolidation.
  • ALL in second complete remission (CR2) for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: B-cell: early (=< 36 months from initiation of therapy) bone marrow (BM) relapse, late BM relapse (>= 36 months) with MRD >= 0.1% by flow cytometry after first re-induction therapy; T or B-cell: early (< 18 months) isolated extramedullary (IEM), late (>= 18 months) IEM, end-Block 1 MRD >= 0.1%; T-cell or Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+): BM relapse at any time
  • ALL in >= third complete remission (CR3)
  • Patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) cells for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: transplant for consolidation of CART, loss of CART persistence and/or B cell aplasia < 6 months from infusion or have other evidence (e.g., MRD+) that transplant is indicated to prevent relapse
  • AML in CR1 for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include those deemed high risk for relapse as described in AAML1831:

    • FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 without bZIP CEBPA, NPM1
    • FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 with concurrent bZIP CEBPA or NPM1 and with evidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction
    • Presence of RAM phenotype or unfavorable prognostic markers (other than FLT3/ITD) per cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next generation sequencing (NGS) results, regardless of favorable genetic markers, MRD status or FLT3/ITD mutation status
    • AML without favorable or unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular features but with evidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction
    • Presence of a non-ITD FLT3 activating mutation and positive MRD (>= 0.05%) at end of Induction 1 regardless of presence of favorable genetic markers.
  • AML in >= CR2
  • MDS with < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (if available) on the pre-transplant bone marrow evaluation
  • Complete remission (CR) is defined as < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (if available) on the pre-transplant bone marrow evaluation with minimum sustained absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 300 cells/microliter for 1 week or ANC > 500 cells/microliter. We will be collecting data from all approaches to MRD evaluation performed including NGS and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
  • DONOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:
  • Matched Unrelated Donors:

Unrelated donor candidates must be matched at high resolution at a minimum of 8/8 alleles (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1). One-antigen HLA mismatches are not permitted. HLA matching of additional alleles is recommended according to National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) guidelines,110 but will be at the discretion of local centers

  • Haploidentical Matched Family Members:

    • Minimum match level full haploidentical (at least 5/10; HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1 alleles). The following issues (in no particular order) should be considered in choosing a haploidentical donor:

      • Absent or low patient donor-specific antibodies (DSA)

        • Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any anti-donor HLA antibody by solid phase immunoassay should be < 2000. Donors with higher levels are not eligible.

          • If a screening assay against pooled HLA antigens is used, positive results must be followed with specificity testing using a single antigen assay. The MFI must be < 2000 unless the laboratory has validated higher threshold values for reactivity for HLA antigens (such as HLA-C, -DQ, and -DP), that may be enhanced in concentration on the single antigen assays. Donor anti- recipient antibodies are of unknown clinical significance and do not need to be sent or reported.
          • Consult with Study Chair for the clinical significance of any recipient anti-donor HLA antibody.
          • If centers are unable to perform this type of testing, please contact the Study Chair to make arrangements for testing.
      • If killer immunoglobulin testing (KIR) is performed: KIR status by mismatch, KIR-B, or KIR content criteria can be used according to institutional guidelines.
      • ABO compatibility (in order of priority):

        • Compatible or minor ABO incompatibility
        • Major ABO incompatibility
      • CMV serostatus:

        • For a CMV seronegative recipient: the priority is to use a CMV seronegative donor when feasible
        • For a CMV seropositive recipient: the priority is to use a CMV seropositive donor when feasible
      • Age: younger donors including siblings/half-siblings, and second degree relatives (aunts, uncles, cousins) are recommended, even if < 18 years
  • Size and vascular access appropriate by center standard for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection if needed
  • Haploidentical matched family members: screened by center health screens and found to be eligible
  • Unrelated donors: meet eligibility criteria as defined by the NMDP or other unrelated donor registries. If the donor does not meet the registry eligibility criteria but an acceptable eligibility waiver is completed and signed per registry guidelines, the donor will be considered eligible for this study
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative
  • MUD donors and post-transplant cyclophosphamide haplo donors should be asked to provide BM. If donors refuse and other donors are not available, PBSC is allowed. TCR-alpha beta/CD19 depleted haplo donors must agree to donate PBSC
  • Must give informed consent:

    • Haploidentical matched family members: Institution standard of care donor consent and Protocol-specific Donor Consent for Optional Studies
    • Unrelated donors: standard NMDP Unrelated Donor Consent
  • Not pregnant

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR ENROLLMENT:
  • Patients with genetic disorders (generally marrow failure syndromes) prone to secondary AML/ALL with known poor outcomes because of sensitivity to alkylator therapy and/or TBI are not eligible (Fanconi Anemia, Kostmann Syndrome, Dyskeratosis Congenita, etc). Patients with Downs syndrome because of increased toxicity with intensive conditioning regimens.
  • Patients with any obvious contraindication to myeloablative HCT at the time of enrollment
  • Female patients who are pregnant are ineligible as many of the medications used in this protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants
  • Sexually active patients of reproductive potential who have not agreed to use an effective contraceptive method for the duration of their study participation
  • PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT:
  • Patients with uncontrolled fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections are excluded. Patients with history of fungal disease during chemotherapy may proceed if they have a significant response to antifungal therapy with no or minimal evidence of disease remaining by computed tomography (CT) evaluation
  • Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia or any other active site of extramedullary disease at the time of initiation of the conditioning regimen are not permitted.

    • Note: Those with prior history of CNS or extramedullary disease, but with no active disease at the time of pre-transplant workup, are eligible
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding females are ineligible as many of the medications used in this protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants

Sites / Locations

  • Children's Hospital of AlabamaRecruiting
  • Arkansas Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital OaklandRecruiting
  • UCSF Medical Center-Mission BayRecruiting
  • Alfred I duPont Hospital for ChildrenRecruiting
  • University of Florida Health Science Center - GainesvilleRecruiting
  • Nemours Children's Clinic-JacksonvilleRecruiting
  • Nicklaus Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Riley Hospital for ChildrenRecruiting
  • University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Norton Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Children's Hospital New OrleansRecruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • C S Mott Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum HealthRecruiting
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
  • University of Mississippi Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals and ClinicsRecruiting
  • Washington University School of MedicineRecruiting
  • Hackensack University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruiting
  • The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New YorkRecruiting
  • University of RochesterRecruiting
  • New York Medical CollegeRecruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic FoundationRecruiting
  • The Children's Hospital at TriStar CentennialRecruiting
  • Vanderbilt University/Ingram Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Medical City Dallas HospitalRecruiting
  • Cook Children's Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting
  • Methodist Children's Hospital of South TexasRecruiting
  • Primary Children's HospitalRecruiting
  • CancerCare ManitobaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm A (halploHCT)

Arm B (MUD-HCT)

Arm C (haploHCT)

Arm Description

Patients receive a myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion at the discretion of the treating provider. Patients then undergo haploHCT on day 0. Patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy also receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 3-5. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.

Patients receive a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen between days -9 and -2 at the discretion of the treating provider, followed by MUD-HCT on day 0. Patients then receive GVHD prophylaxis regimen on days 1-11. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.

Patients who only have a haplo donor receive a myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion at the discretion of the treating provider. Patients then undergo haploHCT on day 0. Patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy also receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 3-5. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Severe GVHD (Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy)
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of severe GVHD at 1-year post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled and eligible patients randomly assigned to either HAPLO or MUD arms who actually undergo HTC.
Disease free survival (DFS) (defined using a composite endpoint, where an event is the occurrence of death from any cause, disease relapse, or imminent relapse)
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of DFS events up-to 5-years post HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among all enrolled and eligible patients randomly assigned to either HAPLO or MUD arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall survival (OS)
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality events up-to 5-years post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among all enrolled, eligible, randomized patients.
Summary score from the Generic Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (excluding School Functioning)
For enrolled, eligible patients who consent to optional QoL studies, we will estimate the mean PedsQL score (excluding School Functioning) among patients randomized to the Haplo arm, the MUD arm, and among patients who enroll to arm C. For each, we will also calculate a corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Summary score from the PedsQL Stem Cell Transplant module
For enrolled, eligible patients who consent to optional QoL studies, we will estimate the mean PedsQL Stem Cell Transplant module score among patients randomized to the Haplo arm and the MUD arm, and among patients who enroll to arm C. For each, we will calculate a corresponding 95% confidence interval.

Full Information

First Posted
July 11, 2022
Last Updated
May 20, 2023
Sponsor
Children's Oncology Group
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05457556
Brief Title
Mismatched Related Donor Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Official Title
A Multi-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Trial of Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD) Versus HLA-Haploidentical Related (Haplo) Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults (AYA) With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 21, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Oncology Group

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase III trial compares hematopoietic (stem) cell transplantation (HCT) using mismatched related donors (haploidentical [haplo]) versus matched unrelated donors (MUD) in treating children, adolescents, and young adults with acute leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). HCT is considered standard of care treatment for patients with high-risk acute leukemia and MDS. In HCT, patients are given very high doses of chemotherapy or radiation therapy, which is intended to kill cancer cells that may be resistant to more standard doses of chemotherapy; unfortunately, this also destroys the normal cells in the bone marrow, including stem cells. After the treatment, patients must have a healthy supply of stem cells reintroduced or transplanted. The transplanted cells then reestablish the blood cell production process in the bone marrow. The healthy stem cells may come from the blood or bone marrow of a related or unrelated donor. If patients do not have a matched related donor, doctors do not know what the next best donor choice is or if a haplo related donor or MUD is better. This trial may help researchers understand whether a haplo related donor or a MUD HCT for children with acute leukemia or MDS is better or if there is no difference at all.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To compare the 1-year cumulative incidence of severe Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) (from day of HCT) defined as grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) and/or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) that requires systemic immunosuppression and to compare the disease free survival (DFS) (from time of randomization) in children and young adults (AYA) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are randomly assigned to haploHCT or to an 8/8 adult MUD-HCT. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare overall survival (OS) between children and AYA with AML/ALL/MDS randomly assigned to haploHCT and MUD HCT. II. To compare differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between haploHCT and MUD HCT from baseline (pre-transplant), at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-transplant. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare the median time to engraftment and cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment at 30 and 100 days post transplant and platelet engraftment at 60 and 100 days post transplant, primary graft failure by 60 days, secondary graft failure at 1 year post transplant, Grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) requiring systemic immunosuppression at 100 days and 6 months, and cumulative incidences of transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse, and moderate and severe chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after haploHCT and MUD HCT. II. To estimate 1 year, 18-month and 2-year cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) with events defined as occurrence of any of the following from Day 0 of HCT: Grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. IIa. To compare "chronic GVHD" (GRFS) after haploHCT and MUD HCT using landmark definitions. IIb. To compare "current" GRFS is defined as the time to onset of any of the following events from Day 0 of HCT: Grade III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD that is STILL requiring systemic immunosuppressive treatment, disease relapse or progression, death from any cause at 18 months and 2 years. III. To evaluate the influence of key clinical variables: age (<13 years and 13-21.99 years), disease (ALL versus [vs.] AML/MDS), haploHCT approach (TCR alpha beta + T cell depletion vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide [PTCy]); donor age (by ten-year increments), donor sex (maternal vs. paternal for parental donation), pre-HCT minimal residual disease status (MRD + vs MRD -); pediatric disease risk index (low, intermediate, and high, impact on OS and DFS only), conditioning regimen (chemotherapy based versus total-body irradiation [TBI] based), immunosuppressive regimen (anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG] exposure according to the weight and absolute lymphocyte count [ALC] dependent dosing approach vs no ATG exposure) time to transplant (interval between diagnosis/relapse and date of stem cell infusion) graft cell dose, use of relapse prevention therapy (yes or no) and weight on engraftment, OS, DFS, GRFS, relapse, transplant related mortality (TRM), aGvHD and cGvHD at 1 and 2 years after haplo and MUD HCT by performing stratified and multivariate analyses. IV. To compare other important transplant related outcomes after haplo and MUD HCT, such as: IVa. Incidence of any significant fungal infections (defined as proven or probable fungal infection) through 1 year post HCT; IVb. Incidence of viremia with or without end organ disease (i.e. cytomegalovirus [CMV], adenovirus, Epstein-Barr virus [EBV], human herpesvirus 6 [HHV-6], BK) requiring hospitalization and/or systemic antiviral therapy and/or cell therapy through 1 year post HCT; IVc. Incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) through 100 days post HCT; IVd. As defined by the Cairo criteria; IVe. To compare the incidence and outcome of SOS when different criteria are used (European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT], Cairo, Baltimore, and modified Seattle criteria); IVf. Incidence of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) through 100 days post HCT. V. To compare immune recovery after haplo PTCy, haplo alpha-beta T cell depletion, and MUD HCT via: Va. Pace of reconstitution of T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells and immunoglobulins at 30 days, 60 days, 100 days, 180 days and 365 days after HCT; Vb. Response to vaccinations as determined by vaccination-specific antibody titers at 12-18 months post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT); Vc. Biobanking blood or marrow to analyze the impact of graft composition on GvHD, relapse and viremia; Vd. Biobanking whole blood and serum to compare immune recovery using extended immune phenotyping and immune functional assessments. VI. Biobanking whole blood or serum to measure rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) exposure when dosed according to weight and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) using established pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics assays (after last infusion, Day -4, Day 0, Day +7). VII. To compare resource utilization after haplo and MUD HCT. VIIa. Length of HCT hospital stay from Day 0 and readmissions within the first 100 days (number of readmissions, duration, and reason). VIIb. Inpatient costs within the first 100 days and at 2 years post HCT. VIII. To describe and compare outcomes (neutrophil and platelet engraftment, graft failure, OS, DFS, GRFS, NRM, relapse, GvHD and health-related quality of life [HRQOL] post HCT) by recipient race/ethnicity, area-based socioeconomic (SES) status, annual household income, primary spoken language and conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA). IX. To describe HRQoL outcomes in racial/ethnic minorities and compare HRQoL outcomes between White patients receiving haploHCT and racial/ethnic minority patients receiving haploHCT. OUTLINE: Patients who have both a MUD and haplo donor are randomized to Arm A or Arm B. Patients who only have a haplo donor are nonrandomly assigned to Arm C. ARM A: Patients receive a haplo HCT following a TBI- based or chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or alpha beta T cell depletion (center's choice). When PTCy is used, it Is administered on days 3 and 4 after HCT and additional immunsouppression is started on day 5 after SCT. ARM B: Patients receive a MUD HCT following a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen between days -9 and -2 Patients then receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 1-11. ARM C: Patients receive a haploHCT following a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion (center's choice). When PTCy is used, it Is administered on days 3 and 4 after HCT and additional immunsouppression is started on day 5 after SCT. Patients in all arms undergo standard HCT screening prior to transplant including disease evaluation (lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration), and organ function evaluation including but not limited to echocardiogram (ECHO)or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA), PFTS, and bloodwork.Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years from HCT.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndrome

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
435 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm A (halploHCT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive a myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion at the discretion of the treating provider. Patients then undergo haploHCT on day 0. Patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy also receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 3-5. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.
Arm Title
Arm B (MUD-HCT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive a TBI-based or chemotherapy-based myeloablative conditioning regimen between days -9 and -2 at the discretion of the treating provider, followed by MUD-HCT on day 0. Patients then receive GVHD prophylaxis regimen on days 1-11. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.
Arm Title
Arm C (haploHCT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who only have a haplo donor receive a myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy or T cell depletion at the discretion of the treating provider. Patients then undergo haploHCT on day 0. Patients undergoing myeloablative conditioning regimen with PTCy also receive GVHD prophylaxis on days 3-5. Patients undergo lumbar puncture, bone marrow aspiration, and ECHO or MUGA during screening. Patients also undergo collection of blood throughout the trial.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Biospecimen Collection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Intervention Description
Undergo collection of blood
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bone Marrow Aspiration
Intervention Description
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Busulfan
Other Intervention Name(s)
1, 4-Bis[methanesulfonoxy]butane, BUS, Bussulfam, Busulfanum, Busulfex, Busulphan, CB 2041, CB-2041, Glyzophrol, GT 41, GT-41, Joacamine, Methanesulfonic Acid Tetramethylene Ester, Methanesulfonic acid, tetramethylene ester, Mielucin, Misulban, Misulfan, Mitosan, Myeleukon, Myeloleukon, Myelosan, Mylecytan, Myleran, Sulfabutin, Tetramethylene Bis(methanesulfonate), Tetramethylene bis[methanesulfonate], WR-19508
Intervention Description
Given intravenously (IV)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cyclophosphamide
Other Intervention Name(s)
(-)-Cyclophosphamide, 2H-1,3,2-Oxazaphosphorine, 2-[bis(2-chloroethyl)amino]tetrahydro-, 2-oxide, monohydrate, Carloxan, Ciclofosfamida, Ciclofosfamide, Cicloxal, Clafen, Claphene, CP monohydrate, CTX, CYCLO-cell, Cycloblastin, Cycloblastine, Cyclophospham, Cyclophosphamid monohydrate, Cyclophosphamide Monohydrate, Cyclophosphamidum, Cyclophosphan, Cyclophosphane, Cyclophosphanum, Cyclostin, Cyclostine, Cytophosphan, Cytophosphane, Cytoxan, Fosfaseron, Genoxal, Genuxal, Ledoxina, Mitoxan, Neosar, Revimmune, Syklofosfamid, WR- 138719
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Echocardiography
Other Intervention Name(s)
EC
Intervention Description
Undergo ECHO
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fludarabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fluradosa
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation, HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Stem Cell Transplantation, Haploidentical
Intervention Description
Undergo haploHCT
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Lapine T-Lymphocyte Immune Globulin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Rabbit, Grafalon, Rabbit Anti-Human Thymocyte Globulin (RATG), Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin, Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin, Rabbit ATG, rATG, Thymoglobulin
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lumbar Puncture
Other Intervention Name(s)
LP, Spinal Tap
Intervention Description
Undergo lumbar puncture
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Matched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
MUD-HCT
Intervention Description
Undergo MUD-HCT
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Melphalan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Alanine Nitrogen Mustard, CB-3025, L-PAM, L-Phenylalanine Mustard, L-Sarcolysin, L-Sarcolysin Phenylalanine mustard, L-Sarcolysine, Melphalanum, Phenylalanine Mustard, Phenylalanine Nitrogen Mustard, Sarcoclorin, Sarkolysin, WR-19813
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Abitrexate, Alpha-Methopterin, Amethopterin, Brimexate, CL 14377, CL-14377, Emtexate, Emthexat, Emthexate, Farmitrexat, Fauldexato, Folex, Folex PFS, Lantarel, Ledertrexate, Lumexon, Maxtrex, Medsatrexate, Metex, Methoblastin, Methotrexate LPF, Methotrexate Methylaminopterin, Methotrexatum, Metotrexato, Metrotex, Mexate, Mexate-AQ, MTX, Novatrex, Rheumatrex, Texate, Tremetex, Trexeron, Trixilem, WR-19039
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Multigated Acquisition Scan
Other Intervention Name(s)
Blood Pool Scan, Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiography, Gated Blood Pool Imaging, MUGA, MUGA Scan, Multi-Gated Acquisition Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculogram Scan, Radionuclide Ventriculography, RNVG, SYMA Scanning, Synchronized Multigated Acquisition Scanning
Intervention Description
Undergo MUGA
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mycophenolate Mofetil
Other Intervention Name(s)
CellCept, MMF
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Myeloablative Conditioning
Other Intervention Name(s)
Myeloablation, Myeloablative, Myeloablative Cytoreduction
Intervention Description
Receive myeloablative conditioning regimen
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Rituximab
Other Intervention Name(s)
ABP 798, BI 695500, C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody, Chimeric Anti-CD20 Antibody, CT-P10, IDEC-102, IDEC-C2B8, IDEC-C2B8 Monoclonal Antibody, MabThera, Monoclonal Antibody IDEC-C2B8, PF-05280586, Riabni, Rituxan, Rituximab ABBS, Rituximab ARRX, Rituximab Biosimilar ABP 798, Rituximab Biosimilar BI 695500, Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10, Rituximab Biosimilar GB241, Rituximab Biosimilar IBI301, Rituximab Biosimilar JHL1101, Rituximab Biosimilar PF-05280586, Rituximab Biosimilar RTXM83, Rituximab Biosimilar SAIT101, Rituximab Biosimilar SIBP-02, rituximab biosimilar TQB2303, Rituximab PVVR, rituximab-abbs, Rituximab-arrx, Rituximab-pvvr, RTXM83, Ruxience, Truxima
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
T-Cell Depletion Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
T-Cell Depletion, T-Lymphocyte Depletion Therapy
Intervention Description
Undergo haploHCT with T cell depletion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tacrolimus
Other Intervention Name(s)
FK 506, Fujimycin, Hecoria, Prograf, Protopic
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Thiotepa
Other Intervention Name(s)
1,1',1''-Phosphinothioylidynetrisaziridine, Girostan, N,N', N''-Triethylenethiophosphoramide, Oncotiotepa, STEPA, Tepadina, TESPA, Tespamin, Tespamine, Thio-Tepa, Thiofosfamide, Thiofozil, Thiophosphamide, Thiophosphoramide, Thiotef, Tifosyl, TIO TEF, Tio-tef, Triethylene Thiophosphoramide, Triethylenethiophosphoramide, Tris(1-aziridinyl)phosphine sulfide, TSPA, WR 45312
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Total-Body Irradiation
Other Intervention Name(s)
SCT_TBI, TBI, Total Body Irradiation, Whole Body, Whole Body Irradiation, Whole-Body Irradiation
Intervention Description
Undergo TBI
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Severe GVHD (Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy)
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of severe GVHD at 1-year post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled and eligible patients randomly assigned to either HAPLO or MUD arms who actually undergo HTC.
Time Frame
Up-to 1-year post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
Title
Disease free survival (DFS) (defined using a composite endpoint, where an event is the occurrence of death from any cause, disease relapse, or imminent relapse)
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of DFS events up-to 5-years post HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among all enrolled and eligible patients randomly assigned to either HAPLO or MUD arms.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to up-to 5-years post-HCT
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival (OS)
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality events up-to 5-years post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among all enrolled, eligible, randomized patients.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to up-to 5-years post-HCT
Title
Summary score from the Generic Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) (excluding School Functioning)
Description
For enrolled, eligible patients who consent to optional QoL studies, we will estimate the mean PedsQL score (excluding School Functioning) among patients randomized to the Haplo arm, the MUD arm, and among patients who enroll to arm C. For each, we will also calculate a corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Time Frame
At 6-months, 1 year and 2 years post-HCT
Title
Summary score from the PedsQL Stem Cell Transplant module
Description
For enrolled, eligible patients who consent to optional QoL studies, we will estimate the mean PedsQL Stem Cell Transplant module score among patients randomized to the Haplo arm and the MUD arm, and among patients who enroll to arm C. For each, we will calculate a corresponding 95% confidence interval.
Time Frame
6-months, 1 year and 2 years post-HCT
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Neutrophil engraftment (defined as achieving a donor derived absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >= 500/uL for three consecutive measurements on different days)
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidences of neutrophil engraftment by Day 30 and Day 100 post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either the Haplo or MUD arm and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
Day 30 and Day 100 post-transplant
Title
Platelet engraftment (defined as the first day of a minimum of three consecutive measurements on different days such that the patient has achieved a platelet count > 20,000/μL and > 50,000/μL with no platelet transfusions in the preceding seven days)
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of platelet engraftment by Day 30 and Day 100 post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either the Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
Day 30 and Day 100 post-transplant
Title
Primary and secondary graft failure
Description
Primary (defined as lack of donor-derived neutrophil engraftment) and secondary graft failure (defined as initial donor-derived neutrophil engraftment followed by subsequent decline in ANC to < 500/μL with loss of donor chimerism to < 10% donor CD3 in peripheral blood or bone marrow). We will estimate cumulative incidences of primary and separately, secondary graft failure by Day 60 post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
60 days post transplant
Title
Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) Grades II-IV and III-IV
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of Grade II-IV aGVHD and separately, Grade III-IV aGVHD by Days 100 and 180 post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
Day 100 and Day 180 post-HCT
Title
Transplant related mortality (TRM)
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of transplant-related mortality by 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
6-months, 1, and 2-year post-HCT
Title
Relapse
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of relapse by 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms.
Time Frame
6-months, 1, and 2-years post-HCT
Title
Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (using the standard definition and two landmark definitions)
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of GRFS events using all three definitions by 1-year, 18-months, and 2-years post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
1-year, 18-months, and 2-years post-HCT
Title
Mild, moderate, and severe chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD)
Description
We will estimate cumulative incidences of mild, moderate, and severe cGvHD by 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years post-HCT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
6-months, 1, and 2-year post-HCT
Title
Significant fungal infections (defined as proven or probable fungal infection according to the De-Pauw definition)
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of significant fungal infections by 1-year post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms.
Time Frame
Up-to 1-year post-HCT
Title
Viremia (with or without end organ disease) requiring hospitalization and/or systemic antiviral therapy
Description
We will estimate the cumulative incidence of viremia by 1-year post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms.
Time Frame
Up to 1-year post-HCT
Title
Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) (defined by the Cairo criteria and, separately, the EBMT, Baltimore, and modified Seattle criteria)
Description
We will estimate the proportion of patients experiencing SOS under the separate definitions by 100-days post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms.
Time Frame
Up to 100-days post-HCT
Title
Transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA)
Description
We will estimate the proportion of TA-TMA events up-to 100-days post-HCT and the corresponding 95% confidence interval among enrolled, eligible patients randomized to either Haplo or MUD arms and who undergo HCT.
Time Frame
Up to 100-days post-HCT
Title
Reconstitution of T, B, and natural killer (NK) cells and immunoglobulins
Description
We will estimate the median of the distribution of T, B, NK cells, and immunoglobulins among patients given each of three HCT methods (Haplo PTCy, Haplo alpha-beta T-cell depletion, and MUD).
Time Frame
At 30-days, 60-days, 100-days, 180-days and 365-days after HCT
Title
Vaccination-specific antibody titers
Description
We will estimate theedian antibody titer among patients given each of three HCT methods (haplo PTCy, haplo alpha-beta T-cell depletion, and MUD).
Time Frame
12-18 months post-HSCT
Title
Resource utilization (defined using the length of HCT hospital stay including readmissions within 100-days post-HCT, and using costs (inpatient) within the first 100-days and 2-years post HCT using Public Health Information System)
Description
The average proportion of days spent hospitalized will be computed for patients randomized to the Haplo and MUD arms and corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be reported. The median inpatient PHIS adjusted costs by day 100 and 2-years post-HCT will be calculated for patients randomized to Haplo and MUD arms.
Time Frame
100-days and 2-years post-HCT

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PATIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA FOR ENROLLMENT: 6 months to < 22 years at enrollment Diagnosed with ALL, AML, or MDS for which an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is indicated. Complete Remission (CR) status will not be confirmed at the time of enrollment. CR as defined in these sections is required to proceed with the actual HCT treatment plan Has not received a prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant Does not have a suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor available for stem cell donation Has an eligible haploidentical related family donor based on at least intermediate resolution HLA typing Patients who also have an eligible 8/8 MUD adult donor based on confirmatory high resolution HLA typing are eligible for randomization to Arm A or Arm B. Patients who do not have an eligible MUD donor are eligible for enrollment to Arm C All patients and/or their parents or legal guardians must sign a written informed consent All institutional, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and National Cancer Institute (NCI) requirements for human studies must be met Co-Enrollment on other trials Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if already enrolled on other protocols for treatment of high risk and/or relapsed ALL, AML and MDS. This is including, but not limited to, COG AAML1831, COG AALL1821, the EndRAD Trial, as well as local institutional trials. We will collect information on all co-enrollments Patients will not be excluded from enrollment on this study if receiving immunotherapy prior to transplant as a way to achieve remission and bridge to transplant. This includes chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and other immunotherapies PATIENT INCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT: Karnofsky Index or Lansky Play-Performance Scale >= 60 on pre-transplant evaluation. Karnofsky scores must be used for patients >= 16 years of age and Lansky scores for patients =< 16 years of age (within 4 weeks of starting therapy) A serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows: 6 months to < 1 year: 0.5 mg/dL (Male); 0.5 mg/dL (Female) to < 2 years: 0.6 mg/dL (Male); 0.6 mg/dL (Female) to < 6 years: 0.8 mg/dL (Male); 0.8 mg/dL (Female) 6 to < 10 years: 1 mg/dL (Male); 1 mg/dL (Female) 10 to < 13 years: 1.2 mg/dL (Male); 1.2 mg/dL (Female) 13 to < 16 years: 1.5 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female) >= 16 years: 1.7 mg/dL (Male); 1.4 mg/dL (Female) OR A 24 hour urine Creatinine clearance >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 OR A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >= 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2. GFR must be performed using direct measurement with a nuclear blood sampling method OR direct small molecule clearance method (iothalamate or other molecule per institutional standard) Note: Estimated GFR (eGFR) from serum creatinine, cystatin C or other estimates are not acceptable for determining eligibility Serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) aminotransferase [ALT] < 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) for age Total bilirubin < 2.5 mg/dL, unless attributable to Gilbert's Syndrome Shortening fraction of >= 27% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA) OR Ejection fraction of >= 50% by echocardiogram or radionuclide scan (MUGA), choice of test according to local standard of care Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and corrected carbon monoxide diffusing capability (DLCO) must all be >= 50% of predicted by pulmonary function tests (PFTs). For children who are unable to perform for PFTs (e.g., due to age or developmental delay), the criteria are: no evidence of dyspnea at rest, oxygen (O2) saturation (Sat) > 92% on room air by pulse oximetry, not on supplemental O2 at rest, and not on supplemental O2 at rest ALL high-risk in first complete remission (CR1) for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: induction failure, treatment failure as per minimal residual disease by flow cytometry > 0.01% after consolidation and not eligible for AALL1721 or AALL1721 not available/unwilling to enroll, hypodiploidy (< 44 chromosomes) with MRD+ > 0.01% after induction, persistent or recurrent cytogenetic or molecular evidence of disease during therapy requiring additional therapy after induction to achieve remission (e.g. persistent molecular BCR-ABL positivity), T cell ALL with persistent MRD > 0.01% after consolidation. ALL in second complete remission (CR2) for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: B-cell: early (=< 36 months from initiation of therapy) bone marrow (BM) relapse, late BM relapse (>= 36 months) with MRD >= 0.1% by flow cytometry after first re-induction therapy; T or B-cell: early (< 18 months) isolated extramedullary (IEM), late (>= 18 months) IEM, end-Block 1 MRD >= 0.1%; T-cell or Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+): BM relapse at any time ALL in >= third complete remission (CR3) Patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) cells for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include: transplant for consolidation of CART, loss of CART persistence and/or B cell aplasia < 6 months from infusion or have other evidence (e.g., MRD+) that transplant is indicated to prevent relapse AML in CR1 for whom transplant is indicated. Examples include those deemed high risk for relapse as described in AAML1831: FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 without bZIP CEBPA, NPM1 FLT3/ITD+ with allelic ratio > 0.1 with concurrent bZIP CEBPA or NPM1 and with evidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction Presence of RAM phenotype or unfavorable prognostic markers (other than FLT3/ITD) per cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next generation sequencing (NGS) results, regardless of favorable genetic markers, MRD status or FLT3/ITD mutation status AML without favorable or unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular features but with evidence of residual AML (MRD >= 0.05%) at end of Induction Presence of a non-ITD FLT3 activating mutation and positive MRD (>= 0.05%) at end of Induction 1 regardless of presence of favorable genetic markers. AML in >= CR2 MDS with < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (if available) on the pre-transplant bone marrow evaluation Complete remission (CR) is defined as < 5% blasts by morphology and flow cytometry (if available) on the pre-transplant bone marrow evaluation with minimum sustained absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 300 cells/microliter for 1 week or ANC > 500 cells/microliter. We will be collecting data from all approaches to MRD evaluation performed including NGS and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) DONOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Matched Unrelated Donors: Unrelated donor candidates must be matched at high resolution at a minimum of 8/8 alleles (HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1). One-antigen HLA mismatches are not permitted. HLA matching of additional alleles is recommended according to National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) guidelines, but will be at the discretion of local centers Haploidentical Matched Family Members: Minimum match level full haploidentical (at least 5/10; HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, -DQB1 alleles). The following issues (in no particular order) should be considered in choosing a haploidentical donor: Absent or low patient donor-specific antibodies (DSA) Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of any anti-donor HLA antibody by solid phase immunoassay should be < 2000. Donors with higher levels are not eligible. If a screening assay against pooled HLA antigens is used, positive results must be followed with specificity testing using a single antigen assay. The MFI must be < 2000 unless the laboratory has validated higher threshold values for reactivity for HLA antigens (such as HLA-C, -DQ, and -DP), that may be enhanced in concentration on the single antigen assays. Donor anti- recipient antibodies are of unknown clinical significance and do not need to be sent or reported. Consult with Study Chair for the clinical significance of any recipient anti-donor HLA antibody. If centers are unable to perform this type of testing, please contact the Study Chair to make arrangements for testing. If killer immunoglobulin testing (KIR) is performed: KIR status by mismatch, KIR-B, or KIR content criteria can be used according to institutional guidelines. ABO compatibility (in order of priority): Compatible or minor ABO incompatibility Major ABO incompatibility CMV serostatus: For a CMV seronegative recipient: the priority is to use a CMV seronegative donor when feasible For a CMV seropositive recipient: the priority is to use a CMV seropositive donor when feasible Age: younger donors including siblings/half-siblings, and second degree relatives (aunts, uncles, cousins) are recommended, even if < 18 years Size and vascular access appropriate by center standard for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection if needed Haploidentical matched family members: screened by center health screens and found to be eligible Unrelated donors: meet eligibility criteria as defined by the NMDP or other unrelated donor registries. If the donor does not meet the registry eligibility criteria but an acceptable eligibility waiver is completed and signed per registry guidelines, the donor will be considered eligible for this study Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative Not pregnant MUD donors and post-transplant cyclophosphamide haplo donors should be asked to provide BM. If donors refuse and other donors are not available, PBSC is allowed. TCR-alpha beta/CD19 depleted haplo donors must agree to donate PBSC Must give informed consent: Haploidentical matched family members: Institution standard of care donor consent and Protocol-specific Donor Consent for Optional Studies Unrelated donors: standard NMDP Unrelated Donor Consent Exclusion Criteria: PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR ENROLLMENT: Patients with genetic disorders (generally marrow failure syndromes) prone to secondary AML/ALL with known poor outcomes because of sensitivity to alkylator therapy and/or TBI are not eligible (Fanconi Anemia, Kostmann Syndrome, Dyskeratosis Congenita, etc). Patients with Downs syndrome because of increased toxicity with intensive conditioning regimens. Patients with any obvious contraindication to myeloablative HCT at the time of enrollment Female patients who are pregnant are ineligible as many of the medications used in this protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants Sexually active patients of reproductive potential who have not agreed to use an effective contraceptive method for the duration of their study participation PATIENT EXCLUSION CRITERIA TO PROCEED TO HCT: Patients with uncontrolled fungal, bacterial, viral, or parasitic infections are excluded. Patients with history of fungal disease during chemotherapy may proceed if they have a significant response to antifungal therapy with no or minimal evidence of disease remaining by computed tomography (CT) evaluation Patients with active central nervous system (CNS) leukemia or any other active site of extramedullary disease at the time of initiation of the conditioning regimen are not permitted. Note: Those with prior history of CNS or extramedullary disease, but with no active disease at the time of pre-transplant workup, are eligible Pregnant or breastfeeding females are ineligible as many of the medications used in this protocol could be harmful to unborn children and infants
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather J Symons
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Oncology Group
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
205-638-9285
Email
oncologyresearch@peds.uab.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph H. Chewning
Facility Name
Arkansas Children's Hospital
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72202-3591
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
501-364-7373
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David L. Becton
Facility Name
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-826-4673
Email
becomingapatient@coh.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anna B. Pawlowska
Facility Name
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
City
Oakland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94609
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
510-428-3324
Email
Carla.Golden@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nahal R. Lalefar
Facility Name
UCSF Medical Center-Mission Bay
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94158
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
877-827-3222
Email
cancertrials@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lena Winestone
Facility Name
Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children
City
Wilmington
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19803
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
302-651-5572
Email
Allison.bruce@nemours.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emi H. Caywood
Facility Name
University of Florida Health Science Center - Gainesville
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
352-273-8010
Email
cancer-center@ufl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William B. Slayton
Facility Name
Nemours Children's Clinic-Jacksonville
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32207
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
302-651-5572
Email
Allison.bruce@nemours.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emi H. Caywood
Facility Name
Nicklaus Children's Hospital
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
888-624-2778
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorge R. Galvez Silva
Facility Name
Riley Hospital for Children
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-248-1199
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jodi L. Skiles
Facility Name
University of Iowa/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-237-1225
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rajat Sharma
Facility Name
Norton Children's Hospital
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
502-629-5500
Email
CancerResource@nortonhealthcare.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William T. Tse
Facility Name
Children's Hospital New Orleans
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70118
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Email
CHResearch@lcmchealth.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lolie C. Yu
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
410-955-8804
Email
jhcccro@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Heather J. Symons
Facility Name
C S Mott Children's Hospital
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-865-1125
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregory A. Yanik
Facility Name
Helen DeVos Children's Hospital at Spectrum Health
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49503
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
616-391-1230
Email
crcwm-regulatory@crcwm.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathleen J. Yost
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
855-776-0015
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mira Kohorst
Facility Name
University of Mississippi Medical Center
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
601-815-6700
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dereck Davis
Facility Name
Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64108
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
816-302-6808
Email
rryan@cmh.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ibrahim A. Ahmed
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-600-3606
Email
info@siteman.wustl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shalini Shenoy
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
201-996-2879
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christine Camacho-Bydume
Facility Name
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14263
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-767-9355
Email
askroswell@roswellpark.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clare J. Twist
Facility Name
The Steven and Alexandra Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York
City
New Hyde Park
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11040
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
718-470-3460
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen L. Bride
Facility Name
University of Rochester
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
585-275-5830
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey R. Andolina
Facility Name
New York Medical College
City
Valhalla
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10595
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
914-594-3794
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica C. Hochberg
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
866-223-8100
Email
TaussigResearch@ccf.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rabi Hanna
Facility Name
The Children's Hospital at TriStar Centennial
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
615-342-1919
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer A. Domm
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University/Ingram Cancer Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
800-811-8480
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carrie L. Kitko
Facility Name
Medical City Dallas Hospital
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
972-566-5588
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stanton C. Goldman
Facility Name
Cook Children's Medical Center
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
682-885-2103
Email
CookChildrensResearch@cookchildrens.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard P. Howrey
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine/Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
713-798-1354
Email
burton@bcm.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rayne H. Rouce
Facility Name
Methodist Children's Hospital of South Texas
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
210-575-6240
Email
Vinod.GidvaniDiaz@hcahealthcare.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jose M. Esquilin
Facility Name
Primary Children's Hospital
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84113
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
801-585-5270
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph G. Dolan
Facility Name
CancerCare Manitoba
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
ZIP/Postal Code
R3E 0V9
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Site Public Contact
Phone
866-561-1026
Email
ctu_web@cancercare.mb.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Issai M. Vanan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Mismatched Related Donor Versus Matched Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs