search
Back to results

Proactive Prescription-based Fluid Management vs Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy (Probe-Fluid)

Primary Purpose

Acute Kidney Injury, Kidney Replacement, Critical Illness

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Protocol-based fluid management
Usual care
Sponsored by
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Kidney Injury focused on measuring Fluid balance management, Ultrafiltration

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Admitted to the ICU
  3. AKI during current hospitalization defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria(1) as any of the following: Increase in serum creatinine by 27 µmol/L or more within any 48-hour window, or an increase in serum creatinine to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days, or a urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours.
  4. Planned initiation of KRT within the following 12 hours or the receipt of KRT for AKI for ≤48 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lack of commitment to maintain kidney, pharmacologic or respiratory support at the time of screening, or probable transition to comfort care within 48 hours according to the treating physician
  2. Probable discharge from the ICU within the next 48 hours according to treating physician
  3. Severe burn injury (>10% of body surface area)
  4. Severe abnormality in serum sodium (>155 or <120 mmol/L)
  5. Important ongoing fluid losses are present and/or are expected to require continued maintenance IV fluids uring the next 48 hours
  6. The clinical care team believes that the proposed intervention is inappropriate.

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de MontréalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Protocolized fluid removal

Usual care

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cumulative fluid balance
The difference between quantifiable fluid intake and output

Secondary Outcome Measures

Feasibility: Ability to successfully enroll
Target >30% of fully eligible patients
Feasibility: Protocol adherence
defined as >80% of participants adhering to the allocated treatment for 5 days after enrolment
Feasibility: Ability to achieve follow-up
Ability to achieve > 95% follow-up regarding all clinical outcomes
Clinical: Death
Death from any cause
Clinical: Vasoactive therapy-free days
A vasoactive-free day will be defined as ≥ 2 hours of receipt of any vasoactive therapy provided by continuous infusion within a 24 hour period. Vasoactive therapy include norepinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, epinephrine, dopamine >5mcg/kg/min, and angiotensin II.
Clinical: Mechanical ventilation-free days
A ventilator-free day will be defined as the receipt of ≥ 2 hours of mechanical ventilation within a 24-hour period.
Clinical: KRT-free days
An KRT-free day will be defined receiving any KRT modality for ≥ 2 hours within a 24 hours period.
Clinical: ICU-free days
An ICU-free day will be defined as admission to an ICU for ≥ 2 hours within a 24 hours period.
Clinical: Hospital-free days
Hospital-free days will be defined as a 24-hour period completely free of an inpatient hospitalization.
Dependence on KRT
KRT dependence will be defined by the receipt of any form of KRT
Resource use: cumulative time of continuous KRT
Total cumulative duration in hours
Resource use: cumulative time of intermittent KRT
Total cumulative duration in hours
Safety: Maximal vasopressor requirements
Maximal vasopressor requirements as per the vasoactive-inotropic score recorded during each 24-hour period.
Safety: Severity of illness
Total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score recorded during each 24-hour period.
Process measures: Target fluid balance as prescribed in the initial fluid balance prescription for the day
Process measures: Proportion of time in which a neutral fluid balance target is selected by the clinical care team
Process measures: Clinical elements used to assess fluid accumulation
Process measures: The difference between the original target and the fluid balance achieved at the end of each 24-hour period

Full Information

First Posted
July 15, 2022
Last Updated
April 3, 2023
Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05473143
Brief Title
Proactive Prescription-based Fluid Management vs Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy
Acronym
Probe-Fluid
Official Title
Proactive Prescription-based Fluid Management vs Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 3, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A pilot randomized clinical trial comparing a protocol-based fluid management strategy to usual care in critically ill patients receiving kidney replacement therapy. The fluid management protocol is intended to achieve neutral or negative daily fluid balance by both preventing and treating fluid accumulation.
Detailed Description
Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is almost uniformly complicated by fluid accumulation, thus making fluid removal a central component of the renal replacement therapy (KRT) prescription. Whereas the achievement and maintenance of euvolemia are critical objectives in the care of critically ill patients with severe AKI, there remain important knowledge gaps in our ability to effectively and safely deliver ultrafiltration. Multisystemic congestion resulting from fluid accumulation is believed to mediate adverse outcomes in this population and the timely use of mechanical fluid removal may improve prognosis. However, fluid removal may be associated with hemodynamic instability during KRT which may precipitate complications. The optimal fluid management strategy is currently unknown. The study is a pilot randomized clinical trial comparing a protocol-based fluid management strategy with usual care in critically ill patients receiving KRT. The fluid management protocol is intended to achieve neutral or negative daily fluid balance by both preventing and treating fluid accumulation. The protocol was designed to provide a standardized framework to prescribe fluid removal while allowing the attending care team to modify treatment targets according to their clinical evaluation. The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether the intervention results in a difference in cumulative fluid balance from randomization to 5 days. Feasibility will be documented including the ability to enroll the target population, protocol adherence, and the capacity to achieve follow-up through 90 days. Secondary outcomes will also include short-term patient outcomes, safety outcomes, and health resource utilization related to KRT delivery.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Kidney Injury, Kidney Replacement, Critical Illness
Keywords
Fluid balance management, Ultrafiltration

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Protocolized fluid removal
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Usual care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Protocol-based fluid management
Intervention Description
Fluid removal will be prescribed using a standardized template updated at least once per working day, before noon of each day, by the attending care team. This protocolized prescription will contain three components. Fluid removal will be prescribed using a standardized template updated at least once per working day, before noon of each day, by the attending care team. This protocolized prescription will contain three components. The first component of this prescription will be to define the 24h-fluid balance target either aiming for a negative fluid balance of 2 to 3% body weight (1.4-2.1 liters in a 70 Kg participant) (Option 1) or by aiming to avoid fluid accumulation by targeting a neutral fluid balance within 0.5% of body weight variation (-350 to +350 mL in a 70 Kg participant) (Option 2). The second component is to pre-specify a prescription for fluid removal using KRT. The third component is to prompt a daily re-evaluation of fluid intake by the attending care team.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual care
Intervention Description
The net fluid removal and the rate of net fluid removal will not be protocolized and will be prescribed and adjusted according to the attending care team without any specific guidance. The use of the documents provided for the intervention group will not be permitted in the control arm.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative fluid balance
Description
The difference between quantifiable fluid intake and output
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility: Ability to successfully enroll
Description
Target >30% of fully eligible patients
Time Frame
During screening and enrolment
Title
Feasibility: Protocol adherence
Description
defined as >80% of participants adhering to the allocated treatment for 5 days after enrolment
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Feasibility: Ability to achieve follow-up
Description
Ability to achieve > 95% follow-up regarding all clinical outcomes
Time Frame
From randomization through day 90.
Title
Clinical: Death
Description
Death from any cause
Time Frame
From randomization through day 90.
Title
Clinical: Vasoactive therapy-free days
Description
A vasoactive-free day will be defined as ≥ 2 hours of receipt of any vasoactive therapy provided by continuous infusion within a 24 hour period. Vasoactive therapy include norepinephrine, vasopressin, phenylephrine, epinephrine, dopamine >5mcg/kg/min, and angiotensin II.
Time Frame
From randomization through day 28.
Title
Clinical: Mechanical ventilation-free days
Description
A ventilator-free day will be defined as the receipt of ≥ 2 hours of mechanical ventilation within a 24-hour period.
Time Frame
From randomization through day 28.
Title
Clinical: KRT-free days
Description
An KRT-free day will be defined receiving any KRT modality for ≥ 2 hours within a 24 hours period.
Time Frame
From randomization through day 28.
Title
Clinical: ICU-free days
Description
An ICU-free day will be defined as admission to an ICU for ≥ 2 hours within a 24 hours period.
Time Frame
From randomization through day 90
Title
Clinical: Hospital-free days
Description
Hospital-free days will be defined as a 24-hour period completely free of an inpatient hospitalization.
Time Frame
From randomization through day 90
Title
Dependence on KRT
Description
KRT dependence will be defined by the receipt of any form of KRT
Time Frame
within +/- 7 days of the 90-day time point following randomization.
Title
Resource use: cumulative time of continuous KRT
Description
Total cumulative duration in hours
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Resource use: cumulative time of intermittent KRT
Description
Total cumulative duration in hours
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Safety: Maximal vasopressor requirements
Description
Maximal vasopressor requirements as per the vasoactive-inotropic score recorded during each 24-hour period.
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Safety: Severity of illness
Description
Total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score recorded during each 24-hour period.
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Process measures: Target fluid balance as prescribed in the initial fluid balance prescription for the day
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Process measures: Proportion of time in which a neutral fluid balance target is selected by the clinical care team
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Process measures: Clinical elements used to assess fluid accumulation
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5
Title
Process measures: The difference between the original target and the fluid balance achieved at the end of each 24-hour period
Time Frame
From randomization to the end of day 5

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Admitted to the ICU AKI during current hospitalization defined by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria(1) as any of the following: Increase in serum creatinine by 27 µmol/L or more within any 48-hour window, or an increase in serum creatinine to 1.5 times baseline or more within the last 7 days, or a urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours. Planned initiation of KRT within the following 12 hours or the receipt of KRT for AKI for ≤48 hours Exclusion Criteria: Lack of commitment to maintain kidney, pharmacologic or respiratory support at the time of screening, or probable transition to comfort care within 48 hours according to the treating physician Probable discharge from the ICU within the next 48 hours according to treating physician Severe burn injury (>10% of body surface area) Severe abnormality in serum sodium (>155 or <120 mmol/L) Important ongoing fluid losses are present and/or are expected to require continued maintenance IV fluids uring the next 48 hours The clinical care team believes that the proposed intervention is inappropriate.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marie-Line Caron, BSc
Phone
514-890-8000
Ext
36369
Email
marie-line.caron.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William Beaubien-Souligny, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
CHUM
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ron Wald, MDCM MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Unity Health Toronto
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sean Bagshaw, MD MSc
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alberta
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
City
Montréal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X0A9
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William Beaubien-Souligny, MD
Email
william.beaubien@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Proactive Prescription-based Fluid Management vs Usual Care in Critically Ill Patients on Kidney Replacement Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs