search
Back to results

Peer Navigation for the Support of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Genetic Evaluation

Primary Purpose

Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma, Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Early Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Patient Navigation
Genetic Counseling
Survey Administration
Best Practice
Genetic Counseling
Survey Administration
Sponsored by
Thomas Jefferson University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide signed and dated informed consent form
  • English speaking only
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study
  • Any individual >= 18 years old
  • African American men who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for testing will be offered participation. These criteria include any one of the following: (1) metastatic prostate cancer (PCA); (2) intraductal or ductal pathology; (3) T3a or higher; (4) grade group 4 or Gleason 8 or higher; (5) family history of breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, colorectal, or uterine cancers in 3 or more blood relatives particularly if diagnosed at age < 50. These criteria have been adapted from the NCCN Prostate Cancer (version 2.2021) and NCCN Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (version 2.2021) guideline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that do not meet the inclusion criteria and children under the age of 18 will be excluded
  • Anyone who has trouble understanding the consent or with significant anxiety detected during the consent process will also be excluded

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Arm I (peer navigation)

    Arm II (best practice)

    Arm Description

    Patients receive assistance from a peer navigator during genetic evaluation processes. Peer navigators help patients schedule counseling appointments, discuss questions and concerns about testing, assist in sample collection, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and do a results and recommendations debrief.

    Patients receive standard care during genetic evaluation processes. Patients receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and receive their genetic test results and recommendations per standard care.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Frequency of pretest genetic counseling engagement
    Compared between randomized study groups. Tested using a chi-square test. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Mean changes in decisional conflict for genetic testing
    Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual.
    Mean changes in knowledge of cancer genetics
    Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 2, 2022
    Last Updated
    October 26, 2022
    Sponsor
    Thomas Jefferson University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05487846
    Brief Title
    Peer Navigation for the Support of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Genetic Evaluation
    Official Title
    ADVANTAGE: Addressing Disparities for Veterans and African Americans Through Peer-Navigation for Testing and Genetic Evaluation
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 14, 2022 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 7, 2026 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    May 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Thomas Jefferson University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This clinical trial evaluates whether having a trained peer navigator helps African American men with prostate cancer that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) understand and navigate the genetic testing process better than not having a peer navigator. Genetic testing for men with prostate cancer is very important for making treatment and management decisions. However, understanding the risks, benefits, and steps of genetic counseling and testing can be very challenging for patients. African American men are especially less likely to participant in genetic testing due to lack of awareness or understanding, cultural beliefs, finances, or mistrust of the healthcare system. A peer navigator, someone who helps a patient through the information and the process, may be helpful to some men. This study evaluates whether having a peer navigator throughout the genetic evaluation process helps patients understand and engage in the process more.
    Detailed Description
    PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Develop a peer-based navigation program for African American (AA) men with prostate cancer (PCA). II. Conduct a pilot study of peer-navigated genetic evaluation vs. standard clinical care and assess feasibility of peer navigation. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. Evaluating the intervention effects on decisional conflict and PCA genetics knowledge. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE: I. Assessing trust of the healthcare system and satisfaction with the genetic evaluation process. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients receive assistance from a peer navigator during genetic evaluation processes. Peer navigators help patients schedule counseling appointments, discuss questions and concerns about testing, assist in saliva collection, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and do a results and recommendations debrief. ARM II: Patients receive standard care during genetic evaluation processes. Patients receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and receive their genetic test results and recommendations per standard care.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma, Stage III Prostate Cancer AJCC v8, Stage IV Prostate Cancer AJCC v8

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Supportive Care
    Study Phase
    Early Phase 1
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    120 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Arm I (peer navigation)
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients receive assistance from a peer navigator during genetic evaluation processes. Peer navigators help patients schedule counseling appointments, discuss questions and concerns about testing, assist in sample collection, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and do a results and recommendations debrief.
    Arm Title
    Arm II (best practice)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients receive standard care during genetic evaluation processes. Patients receive genetic counseling, undergo genetic testing, schedule a post-test disclosure visit, and receive their genetic test results and recommendations per standard care.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Patient Navigation
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Patient Navigator Program
    Intervention Description
    Receive peer navigation services
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genetic Counseling
    Intervention Description
    Receive genetic counseling
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Survey Administration
    Intervention Description
    Ancillary studies
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Best Practice
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    standard of care, standard therapy
    Intervention Description
    Receive standard care
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Genetic Counseling
    Intervention Description
    Receive genetic counseling
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Survey Administration
    Intervention Description
    Ancillary studies
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Frequency of pretest genetic counseling engagement
    Description
    Compared between randomized study groups. Tested using a chi-square test. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time.
    Time Frame
    Up to 4 years
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Mean changes in decisional conflict for genetic testing
    Description
    Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual.
    Time Frame
    Up to 4 years
    Title
    Mean changes in knowledge of cancer genetics
    Description
    Compared between study groups over time. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time. Evaluated using mixed effects models with fixed effects for group indicator, time, and group-by-time interaction and random intercept effects for individual.
    Time Frame
    Up to 4 years
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Healthcare system distrust
    Description
    Compared between two study arms. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time.
    Time Frame
    Up to 4 years
    Title
    Satisfaction with the genetic evaluation process
    Description
    Compared between two study arms. Summarized between study groups in tables with descriptive statistics (e.g.'s, means and standard deviations if continuous, frequencies and percentages if discrete) with 95% confidence intervals and also graphically in data plots at each time they are assessed along with changes in responses over time.
    Time Frame
    Up to 4 years

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Male
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Provide signed and dated informed consent form English speaking only Willing to comply with all study procedures and be available for the duration of the study Any individual >= 18 years old African American men who meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria for testing will be offered participation. These criteria include any one of the following: (1) metastatic prostate cancer (PCA); (2) intraductal or ductal pathology; (3) T3a or higher; (4) grade group 4 or Gleason 8 or higher; (5) family history of breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, colorectal, or uterine cancers in 3 or more blood relatives particularly if diagnosed at age < 50. These criteria have been adapted from the NCCN Prostate Cancer (version 2.2021) and NCCN Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic (version 2.2021) guideline Exclusion Criteria: Patients that do not meet the inclusion criteria and children under the age of 18 will be excluded Anyone who has trouble understanding the consent or with significant anxiety detected during the consent process will also be excluded
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Veda Giri, MD
    Phone
    215-503-5253
    Email
    veda.giri@jefferson.edu

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Peer Navigation for the Support of Metastatic Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Genetic Evaluation

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs