search
Back to results

Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in Adolescents With ASD

Primary Purpose

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, Electroencephalography

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hong Kong
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active-tDCS
Sham-tDCS
Cognitive training
Sponsored by
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation focused on measuring Autism, ASD, tDCS, Treatment outcome, EEG, E/I ratio, Booster effects, Cognitive function

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 21 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are confirmed by a clinical psychologist based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Ed (DSM-V) criteria of Autism spectrum disorder and structured interview with their parents or primary caregivers on their developmental history using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals without a confirmed diagnosis from the clinical psychologist, with a history of other neurological and psychiatric disorders and head trauma, or on psychiatric medication will be excluded from the study.

Sites / Locations

  • The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Active cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS condition

Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatment

Change in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups

Arm Description

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether active cathodal [inhibitory] tDCS over the left dlPRC will facilitate learning through stimulation and thus improve cognitive function in patients with ASD, the primary outcomes (SRS-2 scores) of the two groups at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4) will be compared.

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: active multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether booster treatment cycles of tDCS will prolong the cognitive benefits in individuals with ASD), the primary outcome, the total SRS-2 score, and the secondary outcomes, the E/I ratio and the cognitive composite score at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4), will be compared.

Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether enhanced neuronal network organization, as indicated by EEG E/I ratios, in patients with ASD will mediate the beneficial effects of tDCS in terms of improvements in cognitive function, measurements taken at baseline, 1-day and 1-month after tDCS treatment will be compared. The change in EEG E/I ratios in patients in the active tDCS and sham tDCS groups will be compared using E/I ratios averaged from channels Fp1, F3, and F7 to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the EEG data and to represent the left frontal E/I ratio.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in social responsiveness - Social Responsiveness Scale-2nd edition (SRS-2)
SRS-2 is a sensitive measure of social functioning in children that detects even subtle symptoms that are highly related to ASD. It uses a four-point scale and focuses on different aspects of socialization. The total score reflects the clinical effectiveness of tDCS, and higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. It has been shown that SRS-2 is sensitive to detect changes in social communication improvement related to improved cognitive functioning after treatment. SRS-2 assessments will be conducted before and immediately after tDCS treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

tDCS safety and clinical response in tDCS outcome
To assess tDCS safety, participants will be asked to complete an adverse effects questionnaire (AEQ) which charts the presence of uncomfortable sensations and changes emotions, cognition and perceptions. Based on the tDCS outcome recorded immediately after tDCS treatment, participants will be categorized into responders and non-responders based on the percentage of change in the total SRS score. Participants who show reductions of at least 10% in total SRS scores as compared to baseline scores will be considered responders. This percentage reduction benchmark was set with reference to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and calculated using the standard error measurement method from an ASD sample in a previous randomized controlled trial.
Change in neuropsychological measures - CANTAB® cognitive tests
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB®) includes computerized tests that are correlated to neural networks and have demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting changes in neuropsychological performance. The tests in this battery-the Reaction Time (RTI), Spatial Working Memory (SWM), and Multitasking Tests (MTT)-are well validated and are highly sensitive to the core domains impaired in patients with ASD, including to response/reaction time, working memory, attention, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility.
Change in EEG E/I ratio measurement
Each participant will be tested individually using the Starstim 32 hybrid EEG/tCS device (Neuroelectrics®) to collect EEG data. EEG measurements will be taken in the resting state before and immediately after the 10-session intervention program. Participants will be instructed to sit still and focus their attention on a "+" displayed on a computer monitor during eyes-open resting conditions for 5 minutes. Raw data will be processed with the EEGLAB Toolbox using MATLAB® R2019a (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Data from 19 electrode positions (Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fz, T3, T4, T5, T6, C3, C4, Cz, P3, P4, Pz, O1, and O2) will be used for analysis.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2022
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05492032
Brief Title
Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in Adolescents With ASD
Official Title
Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Cognitive and Social Impairments in Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a pervasive and lifelong developmental disorder that currently affects 1 in 54 children. Individuals with autism are often severely impaired in communication, social skills, and cognitive functions. Particularly detrimental characteristics typical of ASD include the inability to relate to people and the display of repetitive stereotyped behaviors and uncontrollable temper outbursts over trivial changes in the environment, which often cause emotional stress for the children, their families, schools and neighborhood communities. To date, there is no cure for ASD, and the disorder remains a highly disabling condition. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, has shown great promise as an effective and cost-effective tool for reducing core symptoms, such as anxiety, aggression, impulsivity, and poor social communication, in patients with autism. Although the empirical findings in patients with ASD are encouraging, it remains to be determined whether these experimental data can be translated into real-world benefits. An important next step is to better understand the factors affecting the long-term efficacy of tDCS treatment - in particular, the possible risk factors associated with relapse in patients with ASD and the role of booster session tDCS as an add-on treatment to induce long-lasting neuroplastic effects in ASD.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Autistic Spectrum Disorder, Electroencephalography, Booster Effects
Keywords
Autism, ASD, tDCS, Treatment outcome, EEG, E/I ratio, Booster effects, Cognitive function

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a one-year parallel design (triple-arm), double-blind RCT. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either (1) active daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by active bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and active monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52; (2) active daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by sham bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and sham monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52, or sham daily tDCS with computerized executive function training in weeks 0-2, followed by sham bimonthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 3-14, and sham monthly booster tDCS sessions in weeks 15-52.
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS vs. Sham-tDCS condition
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether active cathodal [inhibitory] tDCS over the left dlPRC will facilitate learning through stimulation and thus improve cognitive function in patients with ASD, the primary outcomes (SRS-2 scores) of the two groups at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4) will be compared.
Arm Title
Active booster tDCS treatment vs. Sham booster tDCS treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: active multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether booster treatment cycles of tDCS will prolong the cognitive benefits in individuals with ASD), the primary outcome, the total SRS-2 score, and the secondary outcomes, the E/I ratio and the cognitive composite score at the start (T0), 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2), 6-month (T3), and at the end of study i.e. 12-months (T4), will be compared.
Arm Title
Change in EEG E/I ratios in the active tDCS vs. sham tDCS groups
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental group: active multisession tDCS + active booster tDCS vs Active control group: sham multisession tDCS + sham booster tDCS To test whether enhanced neuronal network organization, as indicated by EEG E/I ratios, in patients with ASD will mediate the beneficial effects of tDCS in terms of improvements in cognitive function, measurements taken at baseline, 1-day and 1-month after tDCS treatment will be compared. The change in EEG E/I ratios in patients in the active tDCS and sham tDCS groups will be compared using E/I ratios averaged from channels Fp1, F3, and F7 to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of the EEG data and to represent the left frontal E/I ratio.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active-tDCS
Intervention Description
For active-tDCS condition, participants will receive stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with ramp up and ramp down mode for 10 seconds, eliciting a tingling sensation on the scalp that fades over seconds. Following that, a twenty-minute executive functional training task will be initiated five minutes subsequent to the stimulation mode, and the stimulation will be terminated when the training task ends.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham-tDCS
Intervention Description
For sham-tDCS condition, participants will receive initial stimulation with ramp up and ramp down mode for 30 seconds, eliciting a tingling sensation on the scalp then it will be discontinued. Participants will also receive the twenty-minute executive functional training task five minutes subsequent to the stimulation mode.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive training
Intervention Description
Participants will complete an online cognitive training program consisting of 10 consecutive daily weekday training sessions while they receive either the active or sham tDCS stimulation. Each training session will last for 20 minutes. The online cognitive training program will comprise five exercises assessing information processing speed and executive function capacities. Each exercise will take approximately 4 minutes to complete. Given many studies, across different neurological/neuropsychiatric diagnoses, especially for people with autism, it has long been established that social skills and functioning are closely related, and multiple studies have shown that executive function training can improve social functioning in autism or vice versa (i.e. social skills training improves executive functioning in autism), it is reasonable to include cognitive training in this tDCS protocol.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in social responsiveness - Social Responsiveness Scale-2nd edition (SRS-2)
Description
SRS-2 is a sensitive measure of social functioning in children that detects even subtle symptoms that are highly related to ASD. It uses a four-point scale and focuses on different aspects of socialization. The total score reflects the clinical effectiveness of tDCS, and higher scores indicate greater symptom severity. It has been shown that SRS-2 is sensitive to detect changes in social communication improvement related to improved cognitive functioning after treatment. SRS-2 assessments will be conducted before and immediately after tDCS treatment.
Time Frame
First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
tDCS safety and clinical response in tDCS outcome
Description
To assess tDCS safety, participants will be asked to complete an adverse effects questionnaire (AEQ) which charts the presence of uncomfortable sensations and changes emotions, cognition and perceptions. Based on the tDCS outcome recorded immediately after tDCS treatment, participants will be categorized into responders and non-responders based on the percentage of change in the total SRS score. Participants who show reductions of at least 10% in total SRS scores as compared to baseline scores will be considered responders. This percentage reduction benchmark was set with reference to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and calculated using the standard error measurement method from an ASD sample in a previous randomized controlled trial.
Time Frame
First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)
Title
Change in neuropsychological measures - CANTAB® cognitive tests
Description
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB®) includes computerized tests that are correlated to neural networks and have demonstrated high sensitivity in detecting changes in neuropsychological performance. The tests in this battery-the Reaction Time (RTI), Spatial Working Memory (SWM), and Multitasking Tests (MTT)-are well validated and are highly sensitive to the core domains impaired in patients with ASD, including to response/reaction time, working memory, attention, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility.
Time Frame
First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)
Title
Change in EEG E/I ratio measurement
Description
Each participant will be tested individually using the Starstim 32 hybrid EEG/tCS device (Neuroelectrics®) to collect EEG data. EEG measurements will be taken in the resting state before and immediately after the 10-session intervention program. Participants will be instructed to sit still and focus their attention on a "+" displayed on a computer monitor during eyes-open resting conditions for 5 minutes. Raw data will be processed with the EEGLAB Toolbox using MATLAB® R2019a (The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). Data from 19 electrode positions (Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, F7, F8, Fz, T3, T4, T5, T6, C3, C4, Cz, P3, P4, Pz, O1, and O2) will be used for analysis.
Time Frame
First day of intervention, 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-months after treatment (5 time points)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Individuals who are confirmed by a clinical psychologist based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5th Ed (DSM-V) criteria of Autism spectrum disorder and structured interview with their parents or primary caregivers on their developmental history using the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). Individuals with ASD who are comorbid with ADHD symptoms will be included if they were willing to abstain from the use of these medications at least 96 hours before the commencement, until the completion, of the treatment. In view of the fact that neuroadaptation to antipsychotics typically occurs within six months, potential participants who are prescribed antipsychotic medications will only be included if the dosage of the medication remained unchanged for six months or more before the experimental period. Exclusion Criteria: Individuals without a confirmed diagnosis from the clinical psychologist, with a history of other neurological and psychiatric disorders and head trauma, or on psychiatric medication will be excluded from the study. In view of the possibility of seizure induction by tDCS, potential ASD participants comorbid with epilepsy will be excluded. Potential participants comorbid with mood or anxiety disorders will also be excluded.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yvonne Han, PhD
Phone
+852 2766 7578
Email
yvonne.han@polyu.edu.hk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Melody Chan, PhD
Email
mei-yan-melody.chan@connect.polyu.hk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvonne Han, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
City
Hung Hom
State/Province
Kowloon
Country
Hong Kong
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yvonne Han, PhD
Phone
27667578
Email
yvonne.han@polyu.edu.hk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melody Chan, PhD
Email
mei-yan-melody.chan@connect.polyu.hk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Cumulative and Booster Effects of Multisession Prefrontal tDCS in Adolescents With ASD

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs