search
Back to results

Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis (NOR-Flare)

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Conventional follow-up
Remote monitoring
Sponsored by
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring remote care

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or non-pregnant, non-nursing female ≥18 years of age at screening
  • Patients with a diagnosis of RA who fulfil the 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria24 (see Appendix 5, 10.4)
  • Medical treatment with cs/ts/bDMARDs (incl. prednisolone) considered stable by the healthcare provider the last 6 months
  • Low disease activity or remission (CDAI<10 / DAS28<3.2) at inclusion
  • <2 swollen joints
  • Not deemed inappropriate for remote monitoring by the healthcare provider
  • Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent form
  • Access to a smartphone or tablet
  • Able to speak and understand Norwegian language

Exclusion Criteria:

Medical conditions:

  • Major co-morbidities, such as severe malignancies, severe diabetes mellitus, severe infections, uncontrollable hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA class III or IV), severe respiratory diseases, and/or cirrhosis.
  • Indications of active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Treated with intravenous DMARD (e.g., rituximab and infliximab)

Diagnostic assessments:

  • Abnormal renal function, defined as serum creatinine >142 µmol/L in female and >168 µmol/L in male, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Abnormal liver function (defined as Aspartate Transaminate (AST)/Alanine Transaminase (ALT) >3 x upper normal limit), active or recent hepatitis
  • Leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia

Other:

  • Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding (current at screening or planned within the duration of the study)
  • Severe psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol impossible.
  • Deemed unsuitable for remote monitoring by medical doctor

Sites / Locations

  • Diakonhjemmet HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Conventional follow-up

Remote monitoring

Arm Description

Conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests and face-to-face visits at the hospital every 6 months

Monthly remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes and triage of patients using an algorithm will guide healthcare providers in scheduling patients for a video consultation or face-to-face hospital visits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion maintaining comprehensive disease control
Comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up. Structural: Radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score, with a total range of 0-448. Maintenance of structural treatment target is defined as change in total score <1 unit/year (<2 units from inclusion to 2-year follow-up). Functional: Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) measured on a scale from 0.00 to 3.00, where a change of 0.25 is considered clinical important. Maintenance of functional treatment target is defined as a worsening <0.25 from inclusion to 2-year follow-up. Clinical: DAS28, categorized into remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.6 to ≤3.2), moderate disease activity (3.2 to ≤5.1) and high disease activity (>5.1). Maintenance of clinical treatment target is defined disease activity category at 2-year follow-up ≤ baseline category.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in joint damage progression
Joint damage progression from inclusion to 2-year follow-up assessed with radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score (subscores for erosions (0-280) and joint space narrowing (0-168)), with a total range of 0-448. Measured as a continuous variable.
Self-reported disease activity (intervention group)
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Self-reported disease activity (control group)
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Health-related quality of life
Measured with EQ5D-5L, 5 questions used to calculate an utility score (0-1, 1= best health), assessed as a total score across all timepoints
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (CDAI)
Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity). Remission/low disease activity defined as CDAI <10.
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (DAS28)
Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints). Remission/low disease activity defined as DAS28 <3.2.
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (DAS28)
Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints). DAS28 score: <2.6= remission; 2.6-<3.2=low disease activity; 3.2 -5.1= moderate disease activity; >5.2= high disease activity
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (CDAI)
Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity). CDAI score: <=2.8 = remission; >2.8 - <=10 = low disease activity; >10 - <=22 = moderate disease activity; >22 = high disease activity
Health care utilization
Costs related to self-reported healthcare use in primary and secondary health care. Patients will be asked if they have been seeking healthcare (yes/no), if yes, they will be asked to specify type of healthcare use and time used. This information will also be collected from national register data.
Patient-reported disease flares (intervention group)
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
Patient-reported disease flares (control group)
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
Adverse events
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events.
Number of consultations/contacts at the hospital
Reported by research nurse or study doctor when in contact with a patient.
Activity impairment (intervention group)
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Activity impairment (control group)
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Costs related to hospital visits
Self-reported travel distance (km and time) and way of transport (walking, bicycle, privat car, public transportation, taxi, airplane, other) in conjunction with consultation at the hospital
The need to take time off for hospital visits or video consultation
If in paid work, the need to take time off from work is indicated as yes or no.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (control group)
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Blood test measured at home in a subgroup among the intervention group
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ)
8 question concerning physical function, scored from 0 (no problems) to 3 (impossible to perform)
PROMIS Physical function
4 questions concerning physical function measured on a 5 point Likert scale
Pain (intervention group)
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Pain (control group)
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Joint pain (intervention group)
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Joint pain (control group)
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Sleep impairment
1 item from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported sleep impairment in last month due to pain with 4 response categories ranging "Not during the past month" to "Three or more times a week" ; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Medication use
Medication, contomitant medication and any change in medication during the study period
Swollen joint count
Physician count of swollen joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Tender joint count
Physician count of tender joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Extra visits, telephone and video consultations
Number of extra visits to the hospital or video consultations with a healthcare provider
Withdrawals/early discontinuation
Number of withdrawals/early discontinuation
Physical activity
3 questions assessing frequency, intensity and duration of physical activity last week
Fatigue
Fatigue last week measured on an 11-point NRS (0=no fatigue, 10=worst possible fatigue)
Patient acceptable symptom state
one question assessing the patient acceptable symptom state last week, 5 response options from very good to very bad.
eHealth literacy
eHEALS questionnaire, 9 items measured on a 5 point Likert scale, with higher score indicating better health literacy
Patient-reported self-efficacy for using different digital devices, secure login and digital health services
Self-efficacy/confidence in using smartphone, tablet, computer, app's, secure login and digital health services. 6 items with Likert scale response categories: Never used, Very bad, Bad, Neither good nor bad, Good, Very good. Score range 1-5; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Patient satisfaction with care
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring
Telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ) 21 items scored from 1-7, higher score indicate higher satisfaction with telehealth

Full Information

First Posted
August 4, 2022
Last Updated
November 3, 2022
Sponsor
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05496855
Brief Title
Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Acronym
NOR-Flare
Official Title
Can Machine Learning and Patient-reported Outcomes be Used in Remote Care in People With Rheumatic Diseases
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 29, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 14, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Diakonhjemmet Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a 24-months, non-inferiority randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms to determine if a new follow-up strategy for patients with RA is non-inferior in maintaining comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up compared to the conventional follow-up regimen with regular hospital visits.
Detailed Description
The study will include Norwegian adult males and females with rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible patients that consent to participation will be randomized to two groups: Control group: conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and pre-scheduled visits at the hospital every 6th month. Remote monitoring: monthly remote monitoring of PROs and triage of patients using an algorithm will guide healthcare providers in scheduling patients for a video consultation or face-to-face hospital visits. Participants will be followed for 24 months. Primary outcome is proportionn maintaining comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up1. Structural: Assessed with radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score (subscores for erosions (0-280) and joint space narrowing (0-168)), with a total range of 0-448. Maintenance of structural treatment target is defined as change in total score <1 unit/year (<2 units from inclusion to 2-year follow-up). Functional: Measured by Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) measured on a scale from 0.00 to 3.00, where a change of 0.25 is considered clinical important3. Maintenance of functional treatment target is defined as a worsening <0.25 from inclusion to 2-year follow-up. Clinical: Measured by DAS28, categorized into remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.6 to ≤3.2), moderate disease activity (3.2 to ≤5.1) and high disease activity (>5.1). Maintenance of clinical treatment target is defined disease activity category at 2-year follow-up ≤ baseline category. We will use a 15% non-inferiority margin. The study will comprise an internal pilot study the first 6 months for all participants in the intervention group. The study will also include qualitative research including semi-structured interviews and observations of patients in the intervention group and health professionals involved in the study. The interviews will explore experiences with remote monitoring and video consultations.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
remote care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
228 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Conventional follow-up
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional follow-up strategy with blood tests and face-to-face visits at the hospital every 6 months
Arm Title
Remote monitoring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Monthly remote monitoring of patient-reported outcomes and triage of patients using an algorithm will guide healthcare providers in scheduling patients for a video consultation or face-to-face hospital visits.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional follow-up
Other Intervention Name(s)
Control group
Intervention Description
Patients in the conventional/usual care arm will be treated according to current conventional follow-up regimen with PROs, blood tests, and face-to-face visits with an experienced nurse or a rheumatologist every 6 months. They can contact the hospital if they are experience worsening of their disease.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Remote monitoring
Other Intervention Name(s)
Intervention group
Intervention Description
The patients in the remote monitoring arm will use a web-app (Youwell) for self-reporting patient reported outcomes (PROs) and CRP/ESR, displaying results for PROs over time, and for synchronous (video) or asynchronous (chat) communication with healthcare providers. The patients will receive a SMS reminder for "tasks" (e.g., self-reporting PROs or registering results from blood tests) every month. A study coordinator/nurse will monitor the PROs and blood test (CRP/ESR) results, and respond to chat messages. Based on the algorithm, a triaging functionality in the Youwell platform will aid healthcare providers in highlighting which patients needs attention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion maintaining comprehensive disease control
Description
Comprehensive disease control measured as simultaneous maintenance of structural, functional and clinical treatment target at 2-year follow-up. Structural: Radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score, with a total range of 0-448. Maintenance of structural treatment target is defined as change in total score <1 unit/year (<2 units from inclusion to 2-year follow-up). Functional: Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ) measured on a scale from 0.00 to 3.00, where a change of 0.25 is considered clinical important. Maintenance of functional treatment target is defined as a worsening <0.25 from inclusion to 2-year follow-up. Clinical: DAS28, categorized into remission (<2.6), low disease activity (2.6 to ≤3.2), moderate disease activity (3.2 to ≤5.1) and high disease activity (>5.1). Maintenance of clinical treatment target is defined disease activity category at 2-year follow-up ≤ baseline category.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in joint damage progression
Description
Joint damage progression from inclusion to 2-year follow-up assessed with radiographs of hands and feet according to the van der Heijde modified Sharpe score (subscores for erosions (0-280) and joint space narrowing (0-168)), with a total range of 0-448. Measured as a continuous variable.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 years
Title
Self-reported disease activity (intervention group)
Description
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Time Frame
Monthly until 2 years
Title
Self-reported disease activity (control group)
Description
Measured with patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale, 0=no disease activity), estimated as change across all timepoints
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Title
Health-related quality of life
Description
Measured with EQ5D-5L, 5 questions used to calculate an utility score (0-1, 1= best health), assessed as a total score across all timepoints
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Title
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (CDAI)
Description
Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity). Remission/low disease activity defined as CDAI <10.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 years
Title
Proportion in remission/low disease activity (DAS28)
Description
Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints). Remission/low disease activity defined as DAS28 <3.2.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 years
Title
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (DAS28)
Description
Measured with DAS28 (patient global assessment of disease activity, CRP/ESR, number of tender and swollen joints). DAS28 score: <2.6= remission; 2.6-<3.2=low disease activity; 3.2 -5.1= moderate disease activity; >5.2= high disease activity
Time Frame
Any consultation from baseline to 2 years
Title
Disease activity in conjunction with consultation (CDAI)
Description
Measured with CDAI (patient global assessment of disease activity, number of tender and swollen joints, physician assessment of disease activity). CDAI score: <=2.8 = remission; >2.8 - <=10 = low disease activity; >10 - <=22 = moderate disease activity; >22 = high disease activity
Time Frame
Any consultation from baseline to 2 years
Title
Health care utilization
Description
Costs related to self-reported healthcare use in primary and secondary health care. Patients will be asked if they have been seeking healthcare (yes/no), if yes, they will be asked to specify type of healthcare use and time used. This information will also be collected from national register data.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Patient-reported disease flares (intervention group)
Description
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
Time Frame
Every month until 2 years
Title
Patient-reported disease flares (control group)
Description
Patient-reported experience of a significant worsening of symptoms (reflecting a flare in disease activity), response options: no, yes, uncertain. If yes or uncertain, they will be asked which date the flare occurred and the number of days it lasted.
Time Frame
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Adverse events
Description
Number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and withdrawals because of adverse events.
Time Frame
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Title
Number of consultations/contacts at the hospital
Description
Reported by research nurse or study doctor when in contact with a patient.
Time Frame
From baseline to 2 years
Title
Activity impairment (intervention group)
Description
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Title
Activity impairment (control group)
Description
Item no.6 from Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): self-reported activity impairment on a NRS 0-10; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Costs related to hospital visits
Description
Self-reported travel distance (km and time) and way of transport (walking, bicycle, privat car, public transportation, taxi, airplane, other) in conjunction with consultation at the hospital
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
The need to take time off for hospital visits or video consultation
Description
If in paid work, the need to take time off from work is indicated as yes or no.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Description
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 months and 2 years
Title
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (control group)
Description
Blood test at hospital or general practitioner
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and 2 years
Title
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (intervention group)
Description
Blood test measured at home in a subgroup among the intervention group
Time Frame
Monthly until 2 years
Title
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ)
Description
8 question concerning physical function, scored from 0 (no problems) to 3 (impossible to perform)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
PROMIS Physical function
Description
4 questions concerning physical function measured on a 5 point Likert scale
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Pain (intervention group)
Description
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Time Frame
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Title
Pain (control group)
Description
Self-reported pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no pain; 10=worst possible pain)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Joint pain (intervention group)
Description
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Time Frame
Baseline and monthly until 2 years
Title
Joint pain (control group)
Description
Self-reported joint pain measured on a 11-point NRS (0=no joint pain; 10=worst possible joint pain)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Sleep impairment
Description
1 item from Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, self-reported sleep impairment in last month due to pain with 4 response categories ranging "Not during the past month" to "Three or more times a week" ; higher value indicate worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Medication use
Description
Medication, contomitant medication and any change in medication during the study period
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Swollen joint count
Description
Physician count of swollen joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Time Frame
Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Title
Tender joint count
Description
Physician count of tender joints; MCP 1-5, PIP 1-5, wrist, elbows, shoulders, ankles, MTP 1-5, at regular visits, extra visits, withdrawls, early discontinuation
Time Frame
Baseline, any hospital visits, 2 years
Title
Extra visits, telephone and video consultations
Description
Number of extra visits to the hospital or video consultations with a healthcare provider
Time Frame
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Title
Withdrawals/early discontinuation
Description
Number of withdrawals/early discontinuation
Time Frame
Through study completion, maximum 2 years
Title
Physical activity
Description
3 questions assessing frequency, intensity and duration of physical activity last week
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Fatigue
Description
Fatigue last week measured on an 11-point NRS (0=no fatigue, 10=worst possible fatigue)
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
Patient acceptable symptom state
Description
one question assessing the patient acceptable symptom state last week, 5 response options from very good to very bad.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 years
Title
eHealth literacy
Description
eHEALS questionnaire, 9 items measured on a 5 point Likert scale, with higher score indicating better health literacy
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Patient-reported self-efficacy for using different digital devices, secure login and digital health services
Description
Self-efficacy/confidence in using smartphone, tablet, computer, app's, secure login and digital health services. 6 items with Likert scale response categories: Never used, Very bad, Bad, Neither good nor bad, Good, Very good. Score range 1-5; higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Patient satisfaction with care
Description
1 item with five point response options ranging from "Very satisfied" to "Very dissatisfied", higher value indicate better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 2 year
Title
Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring
Description
Telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ) 21 items scored from 1-7, higher score indicate higher satisfaction with telehealth
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or non-pregnant, non-nursing female ≥18 years of age at screening Patients with a diagnosis of RA who fulfil the 2010 ACR/EULAR diagnostic criteria24 (see Appendix 5, 10.4) Medical treatment with cs/ts/bDMARDs (incl. prednisolone) considered stable by the healthcare provider the last 6 months Low disease activity or remission (CDAI<10 / DAS28<3.2) at inclusion <2 swollen joints Not deemed inappropriate for remote monitoring by the healthcare provider Capable of understanding and signing an informed consent form Access to a smartphone or tablet Able to speak and understand Norwegian language Exclusion Criteria: Medical conditions: Major co-morbidities, such as severe malignancies, severe diabetes mellitus, severe infections, uncontrollable hypertension, severe cardiovascular disease (NYHA class III or IV), severe respiratory diseases, and/or cirrhosis. Indications of active tuberculosis (TB) Treated with intravenous DMARD (e.g., rituximab and infliximab) Diagnostic assessments: Abnormal renal function, defined as serum creatinine >142 µmol/L in female and >168 µmol/L in male, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 Abnormal liver function (defined as Aspartate Transaminate (AST)/Alanine Transaminase (ALT) >3 x upper normal limit), active or recent hepatitis Leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia Other: Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding (current at screening or planned within the duration of the study) Severe psychiatric or mental disorders, alcohol abuse or other substance abuse, language barriers or other factors which makes adherence to the study protocol impossible. Deemed unsuitable for remote monitoring by medical doctor
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anne Therese Tveter, PhD
Phone
91115550
Email
AnneTherese.Tveter@diakonsyk.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tuva Moseng, PhD
Phone
47306697
Email
Tuva.Moseng@diakonsyk.no
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Therese Tveter, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0319
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Therese Tveter, PhD
Phone
91115550
Email
a.t.tveter@medisin.uio.no

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data sharing of anonymous data may be possible upon reasonable request sent to the principal investigator.

Learn more about this trial

Remote Care in People With Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs