search
Back to results

Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study

Primary Purpose

Psychotic Disorders, Family Members, Anosognosia

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness Group
Sponsored by
University of Alberta
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Psychotic Disorders focused on measuring Young Adult, Psychosis, Family Psychoeducation, Family Burden, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, LEAP

Eligibility Criteria

17 Years - 27 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Young adult service user is aged 17-27 at time of recruitment
  • Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not proficient in English
  • Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months

Sites / Locations

  • Royal Alexandra HospitalRecruiting
  • Alberta Hospital EdmontonRecruiting
  • University of Alberta HospitalRecruiting
  • Grey Nuns Community HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Family Psychoeducation Intervention Arm

Arm Description

These participants will receive the psychoeducation intervention and outcome measures will be taken from them and their young adult service user. The intervention includes psychoeducation on stages of a family's journey, the biopsychosocial basis of psychosis, and skills for coping (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Caregivers) and communicating (LEAP).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Family Burden Interview Schedule
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Family Burden Interview Schedule
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Family Burden Interview Schedule
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Family Burden Interview Schedule
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Inpatient Readmission Rate
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Inpatient Readmission Rate
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Inpatient Readmission Rate
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Community Appointment Frequency
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Community Appointment Frequency
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Community Appointment Frequency
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Crisis Service Frequency
Frequency of crisis calls and visits
Crisis Service Frequency
Frequency of crisis calls and visits
Crisis Service Frequency
Frequency of crisis calls and visits

Full Information

First Posted
August 9, 2022
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Sponsor
University of Alberta
Collaborators
Alberta Health services, Families Supporting Adults with Mental Illness-Alberta
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05500001
Brief Title
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study
Official Title
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Alberta
Collaborators
Alberta Health services, Families Supporting Adults with Mental Illness-Alberta

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Although family support groups exist, few groups offer evidence-based, skills-focused, psychoeducation taught by certified professionals and provided on a public-health level. By equipping families with skills and knowledge, public healthcare harnesses a powerful ally to maintain community stabilization. Aims: The primary study goal is to implement a psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting young adults with psychosis to reduce family burden and foster community stabilization of service users. Methods: A longitudinal pre-post design will be used to assess the long-term effectiveness of the psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting a young adult with psychosis on service utilization and functional indexes. Nine expert-reviewed, and family peer-informed psychoeducation modules are administered in 2-hour sessions over 9 weeks to family carers. Conclusion: Presenting the novel approach of an expert-reviewed, peer-informed psychoeducation intervention for family carers, with a focus on knowledge and skill development, the researchers contribute to literature and best practice in patient and family-centered care.
Detailed Description
Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Often family carers are excluded from the discharge planning process or are unaware of how to support of their loved one in community. Although best practice documents champion family involvement the implementation of these guidelines is challenge and families are often excluded from care.There is evidence of the disparity between best practice documents and true practice in the literature. Family inclusion also addresses the impact of psychotic disease on the family's functioning and mental health. Psychotic illness (e.g., anosognosia, paranoia) can interfere with relational health and the natural maturation of family relationships over time. Families face extreme challenges when supporting a young adult with psychotic illness including social isolation, likely because their typical social supports are unable to relate to their situation, prompting them to seek support with those who share their situation (i.e., family support groups). Family carers, even in the face of these hardships, work with great tenacity toward improving service user stability in community. There is a lack of high-quality effectiveness research showing longitudinal evidence for treatment effects on the carer and the young person in family psychoeducation groups. For example, one study provided a family intervention that was primarily knowledge- and support-based. These researchers used a pre-post design to assess the mental health knowledge, but did not assess long-term effectiveness of the group, overall family functioning, and functioning of the service user. The intent for this longitudinal pre-post study is to evaluate the effect of skills-based educational programming for family carers supporting young adults admitted to or discharged from hospital with psychosis of any etiology on 6-month and 24-month service user readmission rates and service user/family functional indexes. The investigators hypothesize that system integration of a program which delivers early support for the family carers by way of an educational intervention beginning prior to or shortly after hospital discharge may reduce family burden as well as improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. To the investigators' knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate effectiveness of a family carer skills-based education intervention within a public healthcare system. The investigators will use a longitudinal pretest-posttest design with a non-equivalent control group to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of this family psychoeducation intervention. While a control group can be used for comparison of the service utilization data for young adults with psychosis using archival data from health records, gathering long-term control group data from families not participating in the trial is unethical in that denial of an intervention for up to two years is potentially harmful to both the families and the young adult they support. Likewise, control group data gathered directly from young adult service users presents the same ethical problem. Using archival health utilization data, however, allows us to exclude any service users' whose families have elected to access the psychoeducation program within the 2-year timeframe of the study. This allows us to find control data for health service utilization while not withholding the psychoeducation intervention from those who seek it. The investigators acknowledge that the control group is non-equivalent because families and service users who chose not to engage in the study may vary systematically from those who did. Each measure will be taken pre-intervention (i.e., baseline), post-intervention, then again at 6- and 24-months post-intervention. A gift card incentive ($25.00 per data collection meeting) will be provided to family and young adult participants as a token of appreciation for their participation. Service utilization data will be collected for 12-months pre-intervention to be compared to 12-months post-intervention and 12-24 months post-intervention. Recruitment: Study information will be disseminated by clinical teams and through community organizations, and family carers meeting eligibility criteria will self-identify for participation. Once recruited, and with family consent, young adult service users of participating family carers will be contacted for recruitment into the study. Measures: A variety of measures will be used to collect functional index data for the family members and the young adult service users. Health utilization data will be mined for 12-months pre-intervention, and up to 24-months post-intervention to assess long term service user outcomes. See Outcome Measures section for details. Secondary Data Control Group: While randomization into treatment and control groups was not feasible for this study, non-equivalent control group data can be mined from health records for young adults whose family did not participate in the study. Intervention: The educational modules are developed by experts in the areas of interest and are evidence based, family peer-informed and expert peer-reviewed. The curriculum consists of 9 modules delivered weekly over 9 weeks. Evidence-based content includes the Listen-Empathize-Agree-Partner (LEAP) communication Program, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The family psychoeducation classes are to take place at a designated AHS location. Limitations and Conclusion: The described protocol is one of the first attempts in the literature to evaluate an evidence-based intervention for carers of young adults with psychotic illness. The current study builds on others by incorporating psychoeducational elements, modules specific to the LEAP approach, and modules specific to ACT. Furthermore, the design of the study intends to gather longitudinal 24-month post-intervention data from carers and service users, including health service utilization data. Several limitations must be considered with regards to this protocol. First, using a pre-post design the investigators cannot draw causal conclusions regarding the effect of the intervention. To address this limitation the investigators will use secondary data from health records as a non-equivalent control group for health utilization data. A second limitation is that participants self-select for the study, and may differ systematically from those who choose not to participate. For example, the sample will likely be biased towards families who are already supportive and involved in their young adults' care. The sample of young adults participating will be additionally biased because those who are especially unwell may be unable to participate. By comparing the health utilization data of the participants to the nonequivalent control group in a longitudinal design the investigators will gain some evidence to rule out history effects. Even with these limitations, the described design builds on existing knowledge of effective family psychoeducation groups and their long term effects on young adults experiencing psychosis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psychotic Disorders, Family Members, Anosognosia, Paranoia
Keywords
Young Adult, Psychosis, Family Psychoeducation, Family Burden, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, LEAP

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
A longitudinal pre-post study design will be used. A non-equivalent comparison group will be available for some measures.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Family Psychoeducation Intervention Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
These participants will receive the psychoeducation intervention and outcome measures will be taken from them and their young adult service user. The intervention includes psychoeducation on stages of a family's journey, the biopsychosocial basis of psychosis, and skills for coping (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Caregivers) and communicating (LEAP).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness Group
Intervention Description
Psychoeducation for families supporting young adults with psychosis.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Family Burden Interview Schedule
Description
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Time Frame
Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Title
Family Burden Interview Schedule
Description
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Time Frame
9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Family Burden Interview Schedule
Description
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Time Frame
6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Family Burden Interview Schedule
Description
assesses overall burden of the family related to supporting a loved one with addiction and mental health concerns, including the following domains: financial, routines and activities, leisure, relationships, physical health, mental health
Time Frame
24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
Description
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Time Frame
Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Title
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
Description
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Time Frame
9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
Description
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Time Frame
6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Positive and Negative Symptom Schedule
Description
assesses overall symptom severity of service users, including 7 positive symptoms (e.g., hallucinations, grandiosity, etc.), 7 negative symptoms (e.g., blunted affect, emotional withdrawal) and general symptoms (e.g., anxiety, lack of judgement/insight, poor impulse control)
Time Frame
24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
Description
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Time Frame
Baseline-Day 0 (Pre-intervention)
Title
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
Description
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Time Frame
9-Week Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
Description
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Time Frame
6-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Title
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life
Description
assessing service user quality of life on a scale of 1 (couldn't be worse) to 7 (couldn't be better) and "yes/no" for select items.
Time Frame
24-Month Follow-Up (Post-Intervention)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Inpatient Readmission Rate
Description
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Time Frame
12-24 months post-intervention
Title
Inpatient Readmission Rate
Description
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Time Frame
12-months pre-intervention
Title
Inpatient Readmission Rate
Description
Readmission rate for mental health diagnosis within 30 days of an inpatient discharge
Time Frame
12-months post-intervention
Title
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Description
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Time Frame
12-months pre-intervention
Title
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Description
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Time Frame
12-months post-intervention
Title
Inpatient Admission Frequency
Description
Frequency of hospital admissions for mental health diagnosis
Time Frame
12-24 months post-intervention
Title
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Description
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Time Frame
12-months pre-intervention
Title
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Description
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Time Frame
12-months post-intervention
Title
Emergency Department Visit Frequency
Description
Frequency of emergency departments visits within 30 days of last emergency presentation
Time Frame
12-24 months post-intervention
Title
Community Appointment Frequency
Description
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Time Frame
12-months pre-intervention
Title
Community Appointment Frequency
Description
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Time Frame
12-months post-intervention
Title
Community Appointment Frequency
Description
Appointment frequency for community-based services
Time Frame
12-24 months post-intervention
Title
Crisis Service Frequency
Description
Frequency of crisis calls and visits
Time Frame
12-months pre-intervention
Title
Crisis Service Frequency
Description
Frequency of crisis calls and visits
Time Frame
12-months post-intervention
Title
Crisis Service Frequency
Description
Frequency of crisis calls and visits
Time Frame
12-24 months post-intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
27 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Young adult service user is aged 17-27 at time of recruitment Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months Exclusion Criteria: Not proficient in English Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Melanie Robles, MD
Phone
(780) 983-9773
Email
maduples@ualberta.ca
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal Alexandra Hospital
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5H 3V9
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melanie Robles, MD
Phone
(780) 983-9773
Email
maduples@ualberta.ca
Facility Name
Alberta Hospital Edmonton
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5J 2J7
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melanie Robles, MD
Phone
(780) 983-9773
Email
maduples@ualberta.ca
Facility Name
University of Alberta Hospital
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 2B7
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melanie Robles, MD
Phone
(780) 983-9773
Email
maduples@ualberta.ca
Facility Name
Grey Nuns Community Hospital
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6L 5X8
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melanie Robles, MD
Phone
maduples@ualberta.ca
Email
maduples@ualberta.ca

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All IPD datasets that will be collected and analyzed for this study will be available by request from the corresponding author. Given the small study population, narrow geographic region of recruitment, and Alberta Health Services' data sharing policies, potentially identifying demographic data will not be available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be made available to requesting individuals/organizations through the corresponding author for a timeframe appropriate to the requesting party's needs.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The purpose and timeframe of the requesting individuals/organizations dataset access will be reviewed on a case by case basis by the research team and is subject to approval by Alberta Health Services based on data sharing policies.
Citations:
Citation
Alberta Health Services. (2018). Patient and Family Centered Care Resource Kit: How to Improve the Patient Experience. Quality and Healthcare Improvement, Engagement and Patient Experience Department.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Amador X. (2020).I Am Not Sick, I Don't Need Help! How To Help Someone Accept Treatment. New York: Vida Press
Results Reference
background
Citation
American Psychological Association [APA]. (2011). Family Interventions. Retrieved on August 9, 2022 from https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/intervention/family
Results Reference
background
Citation
Day, K., & Petrakis, M. (2017). Family interventions in early psychosis service delivery: A systematized review. Social Work in Mental Health, 15(6): 632-650. doi:10.1080/15332985.2016.1271381
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28537124
Citation
Day K, Starbuck R, Petrakis M. Family group interventions in an early psychosis program: A re-evaluation of practice after 10 years of service delivery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;63(5):433-438. doi: 10.1177/0020764017710301. Epub 2017 May 24.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Early Psychosis Guidelines Writing Group and EPPIC National Support Program (2016). Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis, 2nd edition update, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31145025
Citation
Ewertzon M, Hanson E. Support Interventions for Family Members of Adults with Mental Illness: A Narrative Literature Review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;40(9):768-780. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1591547. Epub 2019 May 30.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (1999)Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32944971
Citation
Jolley S, Johns LC, O'Donoghue E, Oliver J, Khondoker M, Byrne M, Butler L, De Rosa C, Leal D, McGovern J, Rasiukeviciute B, Sim F, Morris E. Group acceptance and commitment therapy for patients and caregivers in psychosis services: Feasibility of training and a preliminary randomized controlled evaluation. Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;59(4):524-551. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12265. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19955388
Citation
Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB; Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2009. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):94-103. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp130. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Results Reference
background
Citation
MacCourt, P. (2013). Family Caregivers Advisory Committee, Mental Health Commission of Canada. National Guidelines for a Comprehensive Service System to Support Family Caregivers of Adults with Mental Health Problems and Illnesses. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12728780
Citation
McFarlane WR, Dixon L, Lukens E, Lucksted A. Family psychoeducation and schizophrenia: a review of the literature. J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Apr;29(2):223-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01202.x.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Poon, A.W.C., Curtis, J., Howard, A., Ward, P.B., & Lappin, J.M. (2019). Health of Carers of Young People with Early Psychosis: A Biopsychosocial Approach. Australian Social Work, 72(3): 260-273, DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2018.1530269
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34132930
Citation
Rachamim L, Nacasch N, Sinay I. Complicated Grief, Depression, Health and Attachment Style in First Degree Relatives of Individuals with a Chronic Psychotic Disorders. Community Ment Health J. 2022 Apr;58(3):526-535. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00848-z. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Rosas-Santiago, F.J., Genchi, J.J., Heredia, I.S., & Zamora, V.E.R. (2022). Psychoeducation and group acceptance and commitment therapy as psychological support strategies for informal caregivers of patients with a first psychotic episode: An experimental study. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches.[Preprint]. doi:10.1080/17522439.2022.2061041.
Results Reference
background
Citation
World Health Organization. (2013). Mental health action plan 2013-2020. World Health Organization Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs