Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on Body Mass Index
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on Weight
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameter assessed as part of routine care:
Weight
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on HbA1C
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
HbA1C
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on Blood Pressure
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
blood pressure
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on Glucose Levels
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
random glucose level.
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on key physiologic parameters - BMI
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameter assessed as part of routine care:
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on key physiologic parameters - Weight
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
Weight
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on key physiologic parameters - HbA1C
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
HbA1C
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on key physiologic parameters - blood pressure
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
blood pressure
Effectiveness: 1a: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on key physiologic parameters - blood glucose levels
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
random glucose level.
Effectiveness: 1b: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on the development of diabetes.
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
1b: Initiation of any additional diabetes medication, and new diagnoses of diabetes. All new diagnoses of diabetes will be reviewed by the adjudication committee
Determine the number of additional diabetes medications initiated
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
Initiation of any additional diabetes medication
Determine the number of new diagnoses of diabetes
Metabolic response. Key metabolic parameters assessed as part of routine care:
New diagnoses of diabetes. All new diagnoses of diabetes will be reviewed by the adjudication committee
Effectiveness: Measure the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
All major adverse cardiac events will undergo chart review and categorized as major cardiac and limb events (MI, stroke, CV death, acute limb ischemia, major vascular amputation).
Effectiveness: Measure the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on rate of major adverse limb events (MALE).
All major adverse cardiac events will undergo chart review and categorized as major cardiac and limb events (MI, stroke, CV death, acute limb ischemia, major vascular amputation).
Effectiveness: Measure the effectiveness of metformin prescribed on a pragmatic trial in progression-free survival defined as doubling of PSA level or all-cause mortality.
PSA doubling as surrogate for progression, defined using a modified approach from the prostate cancer working group 3(PCWG 2016)1.. First all PSA values less than 1 ng/dL will be set to 1 ng/dL. If this PSA value is 1 ng/dL an event (i.e., PSA doubling or death) will be defined as the next PSA value that was greater than or equal to 2 ng/dL or death. Alternatively, if a patient's first PSA is greater than 1 ng/dL the nadir was identified. If the variability in PSA values prior to the nadir is low (i.e., there was less than a 5% difference between the nadir and previous PSA values) the first value prior to the nadir that is within 5% will be selected as the baseline PSA. An event will be defined as the next PSA value that was greater or equal to 2 times the baseline PSA or death. Patients that never experienced a PSA doubling or death will be censored at their last known PSA measurement.
Effectiveness: Measure the effectiveness of metformin prescribed on a pragmatic trial on PSA response of prostate cancer.
A modified PSA biochemical response: PSA response defined as a ≥50% decline in PSA from the baseline level at the start of the study. The study-associated provider will receive a clinical decision support query with any PSA response observed: "Is it likely that any other intervention such as additional medical or local therapy besides metformin may have caused the subjects recent PSA response?"
Effectiveness: Measure the effectiveness of metformin prescribed in a pragmatic trial on radiographic progression of prostate cancer.
Following every scan, the study associated provider will be asked "Does the subject have evidence of radiographic progression in your opinion"
Effectiveness: To determine the effectiveness of metformin prescribed on a pragmatic trial ion overall and prostate cancer specific survival.
Overall and prostate cancer specific mortality: The Colorado State Death Registry, which is integrated with Health Data Compass (HDC), will be used to determine the overall survival status. The subject's trial-associated provider will receive a clinical decision support query from the study regarding any subject who dies on the trial: "Did this subject die due to complications of prostate cancer?" (Investigator assessment). Every death will be chart reviewed.
Safety: To determine the safety, assessed by Adverse Events, of providing metformin via this pragmatic approach.
Safety endpoints via HDC (death, hospitalization, and metformin-associated lactate level elevation diagnosis codes frequency). Lab values, such as a lactate level, may also be utilized for specific diagnosis. The PI and steering committee will review these on a regular basis any notify the IRB with a notable difference between the arms. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis will specifically be an AE of interest.
Reach: To determine the proportion of patients approached who enroll and the characteristics and representativeness of those enrolled.
The number, proportion, and demographics of eligible patients: eligible patients include those deemed eligible to receive a consent in MHC/Epic through assessment of the demographic information. The proportion will be determined by dividing the number of patients who sign the second consent by those who received the first consent. The demographics of those who signed the second consent will be compared with those who signed the initial consent.
Implementation: To determine the accuracy of the Epic screening process to identify
Accuracy of Epic screening process: The charts of the first 50 patients identified by Epic will be reviewed manually by the PI and study team.
Implementation: To determine the effectiveness of different approaches to presenting the consent to patients in MHC/Epic.
The consent completion rate as determined by the electronic signature of the consent in MHC/Epic within one month of availability or posting and also at any timepoint thereafter (early versus late completion).
Implementation: To determine the time period required to identify and enroll 200 eligible patients
Study Enrollment: The number of patients who sign the second consent (consent #2 or #3) in MHC/Epic will be counted toward study accrual and the time it takes to enroll 200 will be assessed.
Implementation: To determine the accuracy of TriNetX in predicting the number of eligible patients identified each month.
Accuracy of TriNetX estimates of eligible patients, including filtering for appointments with participating providers, will be compared with the number of consents released in MHC/Epic monthly.
Adherence: To determine the number and proportion of patients who adhere to the assigned treatment plan.
The proportion of patients with active metformin prescription at one year after enrollment and then annually will be assessed. The number of patients in the non-metformin arm who start metformin and/or another anti-diabetes medication during the study period will be assessed.