search
Back to results

Relationship Checkups to Reduce Veteran Suicide Risk (BRC RCT)

Primary Purpose

Relationship Distress, Mental Health

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)
Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC)
Sponsored by
VA Office of Research and Development
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Relationship Distress focused on measuring Randomized Controlled Trial, Couple therapy, Primary Care, Partner Communication

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. BOTH PARTNERS must be age 18 or over
  2. BOTH PARTNERS must demonstrate sufficient knowledge of English and cognitive capacity to understand the study through comprehension of consent questions
  3. BOTH PARTNERS must self-identify as "in a committed relationship" with their partner for at least 6-months.
  4. AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must report at least mild relationship distress on a relationship satisfaction screen (CSI-4).
  5. AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must be a VHA-enrolled Veteran who screens positive on a VA Primary Care Mental Health Screen for ONE OR MORE of the following conditions: Depressed Mood, Unsafe drinking, Posttraumatic stress, or Suicidal Ideation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. EITHER PARTNER reports that they are already engaged in ongoing couple or family therapy.
  2. EITHER PARTNER reports severe intimate partner violence in the last year.
  3. EITHER PARTNER reports ongoing or upcoming legal conflicts between one another (e.g., custody dispute; restraining order; divorce proceedings)
  4. EITHER PARTNER reports experiencing suicidal intent requiring hospitalization.
  5. EITHER PARTNER experiences past-month psychosis or mania.

Sites / Locations

  • Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Canandaigua, NYRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)

Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC)

Arm Description

Couples in the experimental condition will participate in three joint sessions of the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC; Cordova 2014; Cigrang et al., 2016). This program has been tested in Air Force Primary Care but has not been explored in Veterans with ongoing mental health issues and has not been compared to an active treatment.

The comparison condition will be three sessions of Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC) offered to the Screened Veteran only. This reflects the current standard of care in VA Primary Care Mental Health.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Relationship Functioning
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI). The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed." The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies. Analyses will compare relationship functioning across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3). Treatment efficacy is defined as the gains in satisfaction being significantly greater in one arm than the other (p<.05).
Relationship Functioning
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI). The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed." The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies. Analyses will compare relationship functioning across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80. The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/caring. Analyses will compare responsiveness across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3). Treatment efficacy is defined as the gains in intimacy being significantly greater in one arm than the other (p<.05).
Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80. The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/caring. Analyses will compare responsiveness across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3).
Treatment Engagement in Mental Health Services
Treatment engagement in mental health services will be assessed through a review of the electronic medical record over each of the following windows: 1) 180-day period prior to baseline session; 2) during the treatment period from baseline to post-treatment, 3) the 180-day period after the post-treatment assessment. Over each window, staff will review appointments (e.g., individual, group, assessments), consults placed (e.g., General Mental Health; MST coordinator); and new prescriptions. Analyses will compare treatment engagement using 2-level multilevel models with assessment periods (Level 1) nested within Screened Veterans (Level 2). Their partners may or may not have VA electronic medical records, but available partner data will be used as a covariate. Treatment efficacy is defined as the Screened Veterans' treatment engagement being significantly greater in one arm than the other after accounting for treatment utilization prior to baseline (p<.05).

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2022
Last Updated
January 12, 2023
Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05525676
Brief Title
Relationship Checkups to Reduce Veteran Suicide Risk
Acronym
BRC RCT
Official Title
Supporting Relationships to Reduce Suicide Risk: A Randomized Control Trial of the Brief Relationship Checkup
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 3, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study compares two approaches to working with Veterans that have a mix of mental health and relationship concerns in primary care. One approach is a 3-session couple-based program called the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC). BRC has shown promise improving relationship health in Air Force primary care (including some mental health symptoms related to relationship functioning) but has never been tested for individuals with significant mental health concerns. The other approach is a high-quality delivery of three sessions of Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC) with the Screened Veteran only. This program is the current standard of care for Veterans reporting mental health concerns in primary care (including mental health concerns related to their relationship) but has never been tested for individuals struggling with relationship concerns. The goal is to compare the benefits of the couples-based program vs. the individual-based program when it comes to reducing suicide risk factors at the relationship level and the individual level.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND: Romantic relationship distress is a common area of concern for Veterans struggling with depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), alcohol misuse, and suicide ideation. In a study of Veterans who screened positive for the above concerns in primary care, 58% of partnered Veterans reported romantic relationship problems. Relationship problems are also a prominent risk factor for suicide, preceding 24% of Veteran suicide deaths and 50% for Veterans 18-35. Conversely, full participation in mutually supportive relationships confers protection against suicide. This suggests it may be able to offset risk by turning distressed relationships into protective partnerships. Unfortunately, the intensive formats of existing couple therapies result in couples discontinuing after 2-3 sessions or delaying treatment until they are close to breakup. This underscores the need for brief relationship support that is accessible through primary care mental health (PC-MHI). Relationship Checkup programs incorporates a combination of couple therapy and motivational interviewing techniques to encourage couples to make concrete commitments to improve their relationship. The Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC) is a three 30-minute session version initially designed to address relationship distress in primary care. BRC demonstrates efficacy in reducing suicide risk factors such as relationship dysfunction and depressed mood while promoting protective factors such as mutual responsiveness to one another's concerns, a core element of supportive relationships. Earlier Checkup programs have also been shown to increase individual and couple therapy engagement. In an open label pilot trial, the investigators found BRC was feasible and acceptable to Veterans screening positive on VA PC-MHI screens. The investigators also found its highly structured framework could be learned by trainees without prior couple therapy experience. RESEARCH PLAN: This study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of BRC administered to evaluate its ability to modify suicide risk/protective factors. Up to 360 participants will be enrolled and screened by phone to identify couples that are in distressed committed relationship where at least one partner is a Veteran who screens positive on a PC-MHI screen for common suicide risk factors including suicide ideation, depression, PTSD, or alcohol misuse (the "Screened Veteran"). The target is to randomize 72 couples (144 individuals) to BRC or to three sessions of the current PC-MHI Co-Located Collaborative Care model (CCC) for the Screened Veteran only. All participants will complete baseline, post-treatment, 3-month, and 6-month assessments. SPECIFIC AIMS: The study will provide the foundations for a larger clinical trial proposal through pursuit of the following research aims and hypotheses (H): AIM 1: Determine BRC's efficacy in improving relationship factors related to suicide for both partners. AIM 2: Determine BRC's efficacy in improving individual factors related to suicide for the Screened Veteran. AIM 3: Develop and validate a fidelity codebook to operationalize BRC adherence and clinician competency.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Relationship Distress, Mental Health
Keywords
Randomized Controlled Trial, Couple therapy, Primary Care, Partner Communication

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial design. Participants in both arms will receive active treatments that are matched for length (three, 30-minute sessions) over a 45 day period. After that couples will be assessed for 6 months.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The interviewer who evaluates clinical outcomes will not know the assigned condition of the participants.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
360 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Couples in the experimental condition will participate in three joint sessions of the Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC; Cordova 2014; Cigrang et al., 2016). This program has been tested in Air Force Primary Care but has not been explored in Veterans with ongoing mental health issues and has not been compared to an active treatment.
Arm Title
Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The comparison condition will be three sessions of Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC) offered to the Screened Veteran only. This reflects the current standard of care in VA Primary Care Mental Health.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Brief Relationship Checkup (BRC)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Marriage Checkup; Relationship Checkup
Intervention Description
The investigators are using the three 30-minute session protocol developed for Air Force Primary Care (Cigrang et al., 2016). Although it is simply referred to as the "Marriage Checkup" in that manuscript, the investigators use the name BRC to distinguish it from many other versions of Dr. James Cordova's Marriage Checkup (Cordova, 2014) adapted for different settings. Sessions in this version are briefer than other versions (30 mins vs. 60-90 mins) and this trial does not have any eligibility restrictions based on marital status.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Co-Located Collaborative Care (CCC)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral Health Consultation
Intervention Description
The investigators are using the Co-Located Collaborative Care model developed by the VA Center for Integrated Healthcare to deliver at all VAs. Although the CCC model is flexible and can range from 1-6 sessions, in this study the investigators standardize the model to three sessions for a clear comparison with BRC. Session 1 uses the CCC "Functional Assessment"/"Initial Assessment" protocol. Sessions 2 & 3 use the CCC Follow-up protocol. Session 1 (25-30 min)- Veteran completes a functional assessment of concerns (15 mins) and then develops a personalized action plan (10 minutes) Session 2 (25-30 min)- Veteran's progress addressing concerns is assessed (5 mins) and the remainder of the session is spend updating the action plan (20 minutes) Session 3 (25-30 min)- Veteran's progress addressing concerns is assessed (5 mins) and the remainder of the session is spend updating the action plan, including receiving referrals (20 minutes)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Relationship Functioning
Description
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI). The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed." The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies. Analyses will compare relationship functioning across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3). Treatment efficacy is defined as the gains in satisfaction being significantly greater in one arm than the other (p<.05).
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Relationship Functioning
Description
Relationship Functioning will be measured using the Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI). The self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 161 with higher scores representing more satisfying relationships and scores < 104.5 classified as "distressed." The CSI is widely used in couple therapy research and is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in evidence-based couple therapies. Analyses will compare relationship functioning across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3).
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Description
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80. The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/caring. Analyses will compare responsiveness across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3). Treatment efficacy is defined as the gains in intimacy being significantly greater in one arm than the other (p<.05).
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Emotional Intimacy/Mutual Responsiveness
Description
Emotional Intimacy will be measured using the Perceived Responsiveness & Insensitivity Scale (PRI). The PRI has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80. The PRI is an optimized measure of "Perceived Partner Responsiveness," a model of emotional intimacy that is widely used in the field to understand whether partners see one another as understanding/caring. Analyses will compare responsiveness across both Screened Veterans and their Partners using 3-level multilevel models with waves of assessment (Level 1) nested within individual partners (Level 2) nested within couples (Level 3).
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)
Title
Treatment Engagement in Mental Health Services
Description
Treatment engagement in mental health services will be assessed through a review of the electronic medical record over each of the following windows: 1) 180-day period prior to baseline session; 2) during the treatment period from baseline to post-treatment, 3) the 180-day period after the post-treatment assessment. Over each window, staff will review appointments (e.g., individual, group, assessments), consults placed (e.g., General Mental Health; MST coordinator); and new prescriptions. Analyses will compare treatment engagement using 2-level multilevel models with assessment periods (Level 1) nested within Screened Veterans (Level 2). Their partners may or may not have VA electronic medical records, but available partner data will be used as a covariate. Treatment efficacy is defined as the Screened Veterans' treatment engagement being significantly greater in one arm than the other after accounting for treatment utilization prior to baseline (p<.05).
Time Frame
180 day period after Post-Treatment session (1.5 months after randomization)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Depressive Symptoms
Description
Depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 27 with higher scores representing greater number and frequency of depression symptoms and scores of 10 or higher representing moderate depression. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Severity
Description
Posttraumatic symptom will be measured using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5). This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80 with higher scores representing more extreme symptoms and scores of 33 or higher representing probable PTSD. The PCL-5 is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in long-term PTSD treatment. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Depressive Symptoms
Description
Depression will be measured using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 27 with higher scores representing greater number and frequency of depression symptoms and scores of 10 or higher representing moderate depression. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)
Title
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptom Severity
Description
Posttraumatic symptom will be measured using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5). This self-report scale has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 80 with higher scores representing more extreme symptoms and scores of 33 or higher representing probable PTSD. The PCL-5 is used routinely in VA care to evaluate Veterans' progress in long-term PTSD treatment. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)
Title
Alcohol Use
Description
Alcohol use over the study will be monitored using a 30-day "Timeline Follow Back" protocol (TLFB). In this "semi-structured interview," the interviewer helps participants recollect on which days they drank and how many drinks they had each day. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Alcohol Use
Description
Alcohol use over the study will be monitored using a 30-day "Timeline Follow Back" protocol (TLFB). In this "semi-structured interview," the interviewer helps participants recollect on which days they drank and how many drinks they had each day. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)
Title
Suicide Ideation Severity
Description
Suicide ideation over the study will be monitored using the "Last Month" version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). This semi-structured interview has interviewers rate suicide ideation on a scale of 0 to 5, with scores of 3-5 placing individuals at high risk for attempt. VA hospitals use the C-SSRS across all clinics. In cases where participants miss an assessment, the investigators will review the chart to identify a C-SSRS close to the target date. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (First Assessment) to Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months after randomization)
Title
Suicide Ideation Severity
Description
Suicide ideation over the study will be monitored using the "Last Month" version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS). This semi-structured interview has interviewers rate suicide ideation on a scale of 0 to 5, with scores of 3-5 placing individuals at high risk for attempt. VA hospitals use the C-SSRS across all clinics. In cases where participants miss an assessment, the investigators will review the chart to identify a C-SSRS close to the target date. Exploratory analyses will calculate 95% confidence intervals to compare Screened Veteran trajectories across the two study arms.
Time Frame
Monthly Change over 6 Months Post-Treatment (approx. 1.5 months to 7.5 months after randomization)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: BOTH PARTNERS must be age 18 or over BOTH PARTNERS must demonstrate sufficient knowledge of English and cognitive capacity to understand the study through comprehension of consent questions BOTH PARTNERS must self-identify as "in a committed relationship" with their partner for at least 6-months. AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must report at least mild relationship distress on a relationship satisfaction screen (CSI-4). AT LEAST ONE PARTNER must be a VHA-enrolled Veteran who screens positive on a VA Primary Care Mental Health Screen for ONE OR MORE of the following conditions: Depressed Mood, Unsafe drinking, Posttraumatic stress, or Suicidal Ideation. Exclusion Criteria: EITHER PARTNER reports that they are already engaged in ongoing couple or family therapy. EITHER PARTNER reports severe intimate partner violence in the last year. EITHER PARTNER reports ongoing or upcoming legal conflicts between one another (e.g., custody dispute; restraining order; divorce proceedings) EITHER PARTNER reports experiencing suicidal intent requiring hospitalization. EITHER PARTNER experiences past-month psychosis or mania.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Janet M McCarten, PhD MS MSEd
Phone
(585) 393-7639
Email
Janet.McCarten@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Dev J Crasta
Phone
(585) 393-7537
Email
dev.crasta@va.gov
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dev J Crasta
Organizational Affiliation
Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Canandaigua, NY
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Canandaigua VA Medical Center, Canandaigua, NY
City
Canandaigua
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14424
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janet M McCarten, PhD MS MSEd
Phone
585-393-7639
Email
Janet.McCarten@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dev J Crasta
Phone
(585) 393-7537
Email
dev.crasta@va.gov
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dev J Crasta

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Relationship Checkups to Reduce Veteran Suicide Risk

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs