search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (NESICH)

Primary Purpose

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Basal Ganglia (Diagnosis)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic surgery
Medical management
Sponsored by
Southwest Hospital, China
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Basal Ganglia (Diagnosis) focused on measuring Intracerebral hemorrhage, NeuroEndoscopic Surgery

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80.
  2. Symptoms less than 24 hours prior to diagnostic CT scan. For an unknown time of onset, use the time the patient was last known to be well.
  3. Spontaneous supratentorial deep ICH ≥25 ml (deep location involving the basal ganglia, thalamus, internal capsule, or deep periventricular white matter).
  4. The stability of the hematoma was determined by CT angiogram (CTA) examination. If the spot sign is positive, repeat CT scan at least 6 hours after diagnostic CT (dCT) showing clot stability (growth <5 ml). (If the clot volume measured on this stability CT scan increases by 5 ml or more, a second stability determination is allowed by repeat CT scan at least 6 hours later, until the randomization time window is closed )
  5. Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) ≥ 5 and ≤ 14, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) ≥ 6.
  6. Historical Rankin score of 0 or 1.
  7. Systolic blood pressure(SBP) <180 mmHg sustained for six hours recorded closest to the time of randomisation.
  8. Randomization must be done within 24 hours after dCT.
  9. Written informed consent must be obtained from patients or their relatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Ruptured aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), vascular anomaly, Moyamoya disease, mass or tumor, trauma, haemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic infarct, diagnosed with radiographic imaging.
  2. Infratentorial hemorrhage, primary thalamic ICH, lobar ICH, primary Intraventricular hemorrhage.
  3. Hematoma with apparent midbrain extension with third nerve palsy or dilated and non-reactive pupils. Other (supranuclear) gaze abnormalities are not exclusions.
  4. Patients with life-threatening mass effect caused by hematoma (e.g., CT showed midline deviation of more than 1cm, cisterna ambient compression disappeared), or patients whose condition was considered to be unstable and not suitable for inclusion.
  5. Multiple hemorrhages. Defined as 2 or more separate hematomas in multiple location (lobar, deep, brain stem, cerebellum, subdural hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage).
  6. Intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH) is visually estimated to involve >50% of either of the lateral ventricles.
  7. Subjects requiring long-term anti-coagulation are excluded.
  8. Use of dabigatran, apixaban, and/or rivaroxaban (or a similar medication from the similar medication class) prior to symptom onset.
  9. Any irreversible coagulopathy or known clotting disorder.
  10. Platelet count <1,000,000;International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.4.
  11. Inability to sustain INR ≤1.4 using short- and long-acting procoagulants (such as but not limited to NovoSeven, Fresh frozen plasma(FFP), and/or vitamin K).
  12. Irreversible impaired brain stem function (bilateral fixed, dilated pupils and extensor motor posturing).
  13. Recurrence of a recent (<1 year) hemorrhage.
  14. History of surgery or any parenchymal or other intracranial arachnoid hemorrhage, subdural or extradural hemorrhage within the past 30 days.
  15. There was a history of uncompleted haemorrhage in the past, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, urogenital bleeding and respiratory bleeding.
  16. History of myocardial infarction within the past 30 days.
  17. Known risk for embolisation, including history of left heart thrombus, mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, acute pericarditis, or subacute bacterial endocarditis. Atrial fibrillation without mitral stenosis is permitted.
  18. Patients with severe hepatic impairment, such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels exceed 3 times upper limit of normal.
  19. Patients with severe renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate <=30ml / min/1.73 m2) or patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis.
  20. Before randomization, Systolic blood pressure(SBP) could not be effectively controlled below 180 mmHg after active antihypertensive therapy.
  21. patients with mental illness or cognitive impairment limiting their ability to complete follow-up plan.
  22. Any concurrent serious illness that would interfere with the outcome assessments including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine, immunologic, and hematologic disease.
  23. Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, or poor compliance due to other reasons, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
  24. Allergy/sensitivity to surgery-related drugs (anesthesia, antibiotic), surgical instruments, contrast agent.
  25. Pregnant or nursing mothers and female expecting to become pregnant within one year.
  26. End-stage any disease or known life-expectancy of less than 6 months.
  27. Any other conditions that the investigator believes it would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated.
  28. Participation in a concurrent interventional medical investigation or clinical trial. Patients in observational, natural history, and/or epidemiological studies not involving an intervention are eligible

Sites / Locations

  • chongqing Emergency Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Xiang Yang NO.1 Peoples HospitalRecruiting
  • Dazhu County People's HospitalRecruiting
  • Ganzhou city people's HospitaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental Arm

Control Arm

Arm Description

Endoscopic surgery

Medical management

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3
Functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the control), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months.The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Safety outcome
All cause mortality from onset to 180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Survival rate
comparing the intervention group to the control
Survival rate
comparing the intervention group to the control
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Length of ICU
Duration of stay in the ICU
Length of hospitalization
Duration of stay in the hospital
In-hospital cost
all medical cost during the in-hospital period
Evacuation rate of hematoma and residual hematoma volume after surgery, as well as their relationships with functional outcome.
This parameter will be monitored by CT scan immediately after the surgery

Full Information

First Posted
September 4, 2022
Last Updated
March 28, 2023
Sponsor
Southwest Hospital, China
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05539859
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for IntraCerebral Hemorrhage
Acronym
NESICH
Official Title
Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for IntraCerebral Hemorrhage: a Randomised, Controlled, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 18, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Southwest Hospital, China

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic hematoma removal and standard conservative treatment for patients with spontaneous supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage.
Detailed Description
Neuroendoscopic treatment of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is more and more widely used, but multi-center clinical study on the efficacy and safety of neuroendoscopic treatment of ICH is relatively small. Based on the lack of sufficient clinical evidence, the investigators plan to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of neuroendoscopy in the treatment of spontaneous cerebral parenchymal hemorrhage, so as to provide evidence-based medical evidence for endoscopic minimally invasive treatment of cerebral hemorrhage and its application.The aim of trial was to determine whether the endoscopic surgery could achieve the benefits of clot evacuation and improve functional outcome at 180 days after ICH without procedure-related safety events or additional brain injury beyond the risks associated with standard care

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intracerebral Hemorrhage Basal Ganglia (Diagnosis)
Keywords
Intracerebral hemorrhage, NeuroEndoscopic Surgery

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
560 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Endoscopic surgery
Arm Title
Control Arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Medical management
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic surgery
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive surgical hematoma evacuation using neuroendoscope, followed by medical management
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Medical management
Intervention Description
Subjects will initially receive the standard medical therapies for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage, according to the latest available guideline.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3
Description
Functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the control), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months.The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Time Frame
180 days
Title
Safety outcome
Description
All cause mortality from onset to 180 days
Time Frame
180 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
Description
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
Description
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Time Frame
90 days.
Title
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
Description
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
Time Frame
180 days.
Title
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
Description
The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
Description
The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
Time Frame
90 days .
Title
Survival rate
Description
comparing the intervention group to the control
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Survival rate
Description
comparing the intervention group to the control
Time Frame
90 days.
Title
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Description
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Description
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Time Frame
90 days.
Title
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Description
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Time Frame
180 days.
Title
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Time Frame
30 days.
Title
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Time Frame
90 days.
Title
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
Time Frame
180 days.
Title
Length of ICU
Description
Duration of stay in the ICU
Time Frame
Number of days from admission, up to 180 days
Title
Length of hospitalization
Description
Duration of stay in the hospital
Time Frame
Number of days from admission to discharge, up to 180 days
Title
In-hospital cost
Description
all medical cost during the in-hospital period
Time Frame
Number of days from admission to discharge, up to 180 days
Title
Evacuation rate of hematoma and residual hematoma volume after surgery, as well as their relationships with functional outcome.
Description
This parameter will be monitored by CT scan immediately after the surgery
Time Frame
7 days.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80. Symptoms less than 24 hours prior to diagnostic CT scan. For an unknown time of onset, use the time the patient was last known to be well. Spontaneous supratentorial deep ICH ≥25 ml (deep location involving the basal ganglia, thalamus, internal capsule, or deep periventricular white matter). The stability of the hematoma was determined by CT angiogram (CTA) examination. If the spot sign is positive, repeat CT scan at least 6 hours after diagnostic CT (dCT) showing clot stability (growth <5 ml). (If the clot volume measured on this stability CT scan increases by 5 ml or more, a second stability determination is allowed by repeat CT scan at least 6 hours later, until the randomization time window is closed ) Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) ≥ 5 and ≤ 14, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) ≥ 6. Historical Rankin score of 0 or 1. Systolic blood pressure(SBP) <180 mmHg sustained for six hours recorded closest to the time of randomisation. Randomization must be done within 24 hours after dCT. Written informed consent must be obtained from patients or their relatives. Exclusion Criteria: Ruptured aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), vascular anomaly, Moyamoya disease, mass or tumor, trauma, haemorrhagic conversion of an ischemic infarct, diagnosed with radiographic imaging. Infratentorial hemorrhage, primary thalamic ICH, lobar ICH, primary Intraventricular hemorrhage. Hematoma with apparent midbrain extension with third nerve palsy or dilated and non-reactive pupils. Other (supranuclear) gaze abnormalities are not exclusions. Patients with life-threatening mass effect caused by hematoma (e.g., CT showed midline deviation of more than 1cm, cisterna ambient compression disappeared), or patients whose condition was considered to be unstable and not suitable for inclusion. Multiple hemorrhages. Defined as 2 or more separate hematomas in multiple location (lobar, deep, brain stem, cerebellum, subdural hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage). Intraventricular hemorrhage(IVH) is visually estimated to involve >50% of either of the lateral ventricles. Subjects requiring long-term anti-coagulation are excluded. Use of dabigatran, apixaban, and/or rivaroxaban (or a similar medication from the similar medication class) prior to symptom onset. Any irreversible coagulopathy or known clotting disorder. Platelet count <1,000,000;International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.4. Inability to sustain INR ≤1.4 using short- and long-acting procoagulants (such as but not limited to NovoSeven, Fresh frozen plasma(FFP), and/or vitamin K). Irreversible impaired brain stem function (bilateral fixed, dilated pupils and extensor motor posturing). Recurrence of a recent (<1 year) hemorrhage. History of surgery or any parenchymal or other intracranial arachnoid hemorrhage, subdural or extradural hemorrhage within the past 30 days. There was a history of uncompleted haemorrhage in the past, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, urogenital bleeding and respiratory bleeding. History of myocardial infarction within the past 30 days. Known risk for embolisation, including history of left heart thrombus, mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, acute pericarditis, or subacute bacterial endocarditis. Atrial fibrillation without mitral stenosis is permitted. Patients with severe hepatic impairment, such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels exceed 3 times upper limit of normal. Patients with severe renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate <=30ml / min/1.73 m2) or patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis. Before randomization, Systolic blood pressure(SBP) could not be effectively controlled below 180 mmHg after active antihypertensive therapy. patients with mental illness or cognitive impairment limiting their ability to complete follow-up plan. Any concurrent serious illness that would interfere with the outcome assessments including hepatic, renal, gastroenterologic, respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine, immunologic, and hematologic disease. Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, or poor compliance due to other reasons, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements. Allergy/sensitivity to surgery-related drugs (anesthesia, antibiotic), surgical instruments, contrast agent. Pregnant or nursing mothers and female expecting to become pregnant within one year. End-stage any disease or known life-expectancy of less than 6 months. Any other conditions that the investigator believes it would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated. Participation in a concurrent interventional medical investigation or clinical trial. Patients in observational, natural history, and/or epidemiological studies not involving an intervention are eligible
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rong Hu, MD
Phone
8615123917123
Email
huchrong@aliyun.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hua Feng, MD
Phone
8613708321681
Email
fenghua201818@aliyun.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rong Hu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PLA Army Medical University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
chongqing Emergency Medical Center
City
Chongqing
State/Province
Chongqing
ZIP/Postal Code
400014
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bing y Deng, MD
Facility Name
Xiang Yang NO.1 Peoples Hospital
City
Hubei
State/Province
Hubei
ZIP/Postal Code
441000
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hua Cu Fu, MD
Phone
15172552710
Email
nianbeifch@163.com
Facility Name
Dazhu County People's Hospital
City
Sichuan
State/Province
Sichuan
ZIP/Postal Code
635100
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
sheng zhu, MD
Phone
+8615882911301
Email
371773434@qq.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
sheng zhu, MD PHD
Facility Name
Ganzhou city people's Hospita
City
Ganzhou
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yun X Ye, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32026447
Citation
Hansen BM, Ullman N, Muschelli J, Norrving B, Dlugash R, Avadhani R, Awad I, Zuccarello M, Ziai WC, Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Lindgren A; MISTIE and CLEAR Investigators. Relationship of White Matter Lesions with Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion and Functional Outcome: MISTIE II and CLEAR III. Neurocrit Care. 2020 Oct;33(2):516-524. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00916-4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32033578
Citation
de Oliveira Manoel AL. Surgery for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care. 2020 Feb 7;24(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2749-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29728523
Citation
Anderson CD, James ML. Survival and independence after intracerebral hemorrhage: Trends and opportunities. Neurology. 2018 Jun 5;90(23):1043-1044. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005625. Epub 2018 May 4. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21456936
Citation
Kuo LT, Chen CM, Li CH, Tsai JC, Chiu HC, Liu LC, Tu YK, Huang AP. Early endoscope-assisted hematoma evacuation in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: case selection, surgical technique, and long-term results. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E9. doi: 10.3171/2011.2.FOCUS10313.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31915207
Citation
Kellner CP, Song R, Pan J, Nistal DA, Scaggiante J, Chartrain AG, Rumsey J, Hom D, Dangayach N, Swarup R, Tuhrim S, Ghatan S, Bederson JB, Mocco J. Long-term functional outcome following minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 May;12(5):489-494. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015528. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28753114
Citation
Xu X, Chen X, Li F, Zheng X, Wang Q, Sun G, Zhang J, Xu B. Erratum. Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery for supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparison with craniotomy. J Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;128(2):649. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.JNS161589a. Epub 2017 Jul 28. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for IntraCerebral Hemorrhage

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs