Comparative Evaluation of Giomer Varnish vs Fluoride Varnish as Desensitizing Agents in Teeth With MIH
Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Children :
- Patients aged between 8 and 10 years old with MIH affected teeth according to European Academy of Pediatric Dentistry diagnostic criteria (Lygidakis et al., 2022)
- Systemically healthy.
- Cooperative patients who will comply with follow-up visits.
Teeth:
- At least one first molar or one incisor erupted in the oral cavity exhibiting molar incisor hypomineralization.
Teeth representing molar incisor hypomineralization are sensitive.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
- • Children:
- Undergoing desensitizing treatments in the last 3 months
- Occlusal problems such as bruxism.
- Cognition problems.
- Who used any type of analgesics before treatment.
- Undergoing orthodontic treatment.
Teeth:
- Enamel defects as enamel hypoplasia, amelogenesis imperfecta, and dental fluorosis.
- Carious teeth.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Giomer varnish
Fluoroide varnish
PRG coat barrier by SHOFU is varnish based on a new technology named Giomer by incorporating pre-reacted glass ionomer particles, so varnish contains GI particles embedded in a resin matrix, it should be applied once per year since it is the only varnish in the market that is light cured so it is more durable than others.
Bifluorid 10 by VOCO is a varnish containing 5% sodium fluoride and 5 % calcium fluoride, it should be applied once each 6 months by a professional dentist and it tends to decrease the hypersensitivity of the teeth as well as decrease the risk of caries.