Cortical Excitability and Treatment Response in People With Epilepsy (eCORTA)
Primary Purpose
Epilepsy
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Eyes-closed rest-EEG registration
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during EEG and EMG registrations
Photic stimulation during eyes-closes EEG registration
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Epilepsy focused on measuring Epilepsy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Electroencephalography, Anticonvulsants, Seizures
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- In agreement with their own neurologist to initiate adjuvant treatment with cenobamate
- Diagnosed with refractory focal epilepsy, which means two ASMs failed to cause seizure freedom.
- Age of 18 years or older
- Having kept a seizure diary for the past 12 weeks
- At least one seizure in the past 12 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Photosensitive epilepsy
- Any device or structure in the skull or in close proximity of the head area containing metal, including cochlear implants, implanted neurostimulators, cardiac pacemakers and intracardiac lines.
- Previous skull opening or trauma
- Evidence (clinical or radiological) of major structural abnormality of the motor cortex or pyramidal tracts
- Any major psychiatric condition such as a psychotic disorder
- Pregnancy
- Learning disabilities preventing the comprehension of oral and/or written instructions
Sites / Locations
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN)Recruiting
- Erasmus Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
rest-EEG, TMS-EEG/TMS-electromyography(EMG) and photic stimulation
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the resting motor threshold (rMT) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the rMT in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using TEP amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Influence of cenobamate initiation on phase clustering and the neural network excitability index (NNEI) between visual evoked potential (VEP) trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using VEP parameters (i.e. phase clustering and directly-related NNEI) in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the mean functional connectivity (MFC) and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) in resting-state (rs-)EEG data when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability using rs-EEG parameters (i.e. MFC and PAC values in the 0-120 Hz EEG frequency range) in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-EMG and EEG, intermittent photic stimulation (IPS)-EEG and resting state (rs-)EEG parameters when comparing long-term responders and non-responders
TMS-EMG/-EEG parameters, IPS-EEG parameters, and rs-EEG parameters at T0, T1 and T2, incorporated as factors in a single multivariate statistical model alongside a factor for cenobamate response; i.e. responder or non-responder. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 12 months post-cenobamate initiation to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Correlation between the pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in the resting motor threshold (rMT) and change in the seizure frequency when comparing short-term responders and non-responders to cenobamate
Classification of subjects into responders and non-responders to cenobamate is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced EEG oscillations (TIO) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using TIO in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on phase clustering between TEP trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using phase clustering between TEP trials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the neural network excitability index (NNEI) between TEP trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the NNEI between TMS-evoked EEG potential trials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using SICI of motor evoked potential amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using LICI of motor evoked potential amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the cortical silent period (CSP) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the CSP after motor evoked potentials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05551403
First Posted
June 22, 2022
Last Updated
March 20, 2023
Sponsor
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland
Collaborators
Erasmus Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05551403
Brief Title
Cortical Excitability and Treatment Response in People With Epilepsy
Acronym
eCORTA
Official Title
Electrophysiological Markers of Cortical Excitability to Predict Response to Treatment With Anti-seizure Medication - The eCORTA Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 16, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 16, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland
Collaborators
Erasmus Medical Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Epilepsy is a medical condition marked by the occurrence of unpredictable, recurrent seizures. One-third of people with epilepsy continue to experience seizures, despite having attempted multiple forms of anti-seizure medication (ASM). Currently, response to ASM is assessed on a trial-and-error basis as their efficacy can only be determined in hindsight. This causes delays in finding the proper treatment per individual. Responsiveness of the outer brain layer to external stimuli, termed cortical excitability (CE), may be used as additional means of treatment evaluation.
In this study, the investigators aim to measure CE before and after starting with ASM, so as to determine whether indicators of CE can be used to predict favorable response to the medication. Participants in this study are adult individuals with uncontrolled seizures that will start with the novel anti-seizure medicine cenobamate. The investigators hypothesize that, after starting with ASM, the CE will decrease in people with epilepsy who show a favorable response to the medication. Conversely, the investigators anticipate that the CE will not decrease in those that do not react to the mediation.
The investigators will address this hypothesis by evaluating both brain activity (electroencephalography, EEG) during rest and during different types of stimulation (magnetic, light flashes). Besides, the investigators will measure the subjective experiences of participants by using questionnaires on the quality of life and feelings of anxiety or depression. These measurements are performed at a baseline instance, just before starting with ASM, and at two instances after start with the ASM. Participants in the study will track the occurrence of seizures - using a diary - from 12 weeks before ASM start up till 12 months after ASM start. The investigators will compare seizure frequency with both changes in brain activity and subjective experiences by the participants.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Epilepsy
Keywords
Epilepsy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Electroencephalography, Anticonvulsants, Seizures
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
rest-EEG, TMS-EEG/TMS-electromyography(EMG) and photic stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Eyes-closed rest-EEG registration
Intervention Description
Recording of spontaneous brain activity while eyes are shut for the duration of 7 minutes using a tablet with instructions
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during EEG and EMG registrations
Intervention Description
Recording of TMS-evoked EEG and EMG responses according to various stimulation protocols
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Photic stimulation during eyes-closes EEG registration
Intervention Description
Recording of visual evoked potentials in the EEG during flash stimulation by light-emitting diode (LED) goggles (while eyes are closed)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the resting motor threshold (rMT) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the rMT in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked EEG potentials (TEP) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using TEP amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on phase clustering and the neural network excitability index (NNEI) between visual evoked potential (VEP) trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using VEP parameters (i.e. phase clustering and directly-related NNEI) in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the mean functional connectivity (MFC) and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) in resting-state (rs-)EEG data when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability using rs-EEG parameters (i.e. MFC and PAC values in the 0-120 Hz EEG frequency range) in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-EMG and EEG, intermittent photic stimulation (IPS)-EEG and resting state (rs-)EEG parameters when comparing long-term responders and non-responders
Description
TMS-EMG/-EEG parameters, IPS-EEG parameters, and rs-EEG parameters at T0, T1 and T2, incorporated as factors in a single multivariate statistical model alongside a factor for cenobamate response; i.e. responder or non-responder. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 12 months post-cenobamate initiation to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2).
Title
Correlation between the pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in the resting motor threshold (rMT) and change in the seizure frequency when comparing short-term responders and non-responders to cenobamate
Description
Classification of subjects into responders and non-responders to cenobamate is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced EEG oscillations (TIO) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using TIO in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on phase clustering between TEP trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using phase clustering between TEP trials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the neural network excitability index (NNEI) between TEP trials when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the NNEI between TMS-evoked EEG potential trials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using SICI of motor evoked potential amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using LICI of motor evoked potential amplitudes in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
Title
Influence of cenobamate initiation on the cortical silent period (CSP) when comparing short-term responders and non-responders
Description
Pre- to post-cenobamate initiation change in cortical excitability assessed using the CSP after motor evoked potentials in responders vs. non-responders. Classification into the latter is determined by comparing the seizure frequency in the 3 months post-target dose interval to the seizure frequency in the 3 months baseline interval (responder determined by a significant seizure reduction according to Poisson distribution statistics).
Time Frame
At cenobamate initiation (T0), 7-8 weeks after cenobamate initiation (T1), and optionally at the maximum dose reached after individual treatment durations up to 1 year after cenobamate initiation (T2)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
In agreement with their own neurologist to initiate adjuvant treatment with cenobamate
Diagnosed with refractory focal epilepsy, which means two ASMs failed to cause seizure freedom.
Age of 18 years or older
Having kept a seizure diary for the past 12 weeks
At least one seizure in the past 12 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
Photosensitive epilepsy
Any device or structure in the skull or in close proximity of the head area containing metal, including cochlear implants, implanted neurostimulators, cardiac pacemakers and intracardiac lines.
Persistent skull opening following trauma or surgery
Evidence (clinical or radiological) of major structural abnormality of the motor cortex or pyramidal tracts
Any major psychiatric condition such as a psychotic disorder
Pregnancy
Learning disabilities preventing the comprehension of oral and/or written instructions
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Roland D. Thijs, MD, PhD
Phone
+31 (0)23 55 88 940
Email
rthijs@sein.nl
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN)
City
Heemstede
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
2103 SW
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roland D. Thijs, MD, PhD
Phone
+31 (0)23 55 88 940
Email
rthijs@sein.nl
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
Zuid-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CN
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert van den Berg, MD, PhD
Phone
+31 (0)10 7030892
Email
r.vandenberg@erasmusmc.nl
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Cortical Excitability and Treatment Response in People With Epilepsy
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs