search
Back to results

Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation (L-PRF)

Primary Purpose

Alveolar Ridge Enlargement

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Chile
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Premolar extraction and socked preservation with L-PRF
Premolar extraction and socked preservation with Xenogenic bone and collagen membrane.
Sponsored by
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alveolar Ridge Enlargement focused on measuring tooth extraction, socket graft, L-PRF, xenogenic bone, dental implant

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Periodontally healthy individuals with at least 18 years of age
  2. Good oral hygiene (BOP & Pl ≤ 20%)
  3. Patients with a single failing premolar in the maxilla and mandible.
  4. With or without buccal plate after tooth extraction (similar cases in both groups)
  5. Surrounded by a mesial and distal natural tooth
  6. Capability to comply with the study procedures
  7. Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women
  2. Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
  3. Smokers (>10 cigarettes/day)
  4. Systemic or local conditions presenting a contraindication to implant treatment
  5. Currently taking drugs that influence bone metabolism
  6. Use of bisphosphonates in the last 4 years
  7. History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignancy in the past 5 years

Sites / Locations

  • Centro de Salud, Universidad de los AndesRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

L-PRF preservation (test)

Xenogenic bone plus collagen membrane (control)

Arm Description

Using L-PRF membranes inside the socket, covering with L-PRF membranes, (test group).

Bio-Oss® Collagen at the bone level and application of a collagen matrix (Combi-Kit). Both materials will be used for socket preservation (control).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Bone socket horizontal and vertical changes evaluated using cbct ((cone beam computed tomography)
Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging will be used to assess the primary outcome (horizontal radiographic changes at -1 mm below the alveolar crest) in both groups between baseline 1 (immediately post socket preservation), visit 4 (4 months after socket preservation), and 12 months after implant rehabilitation. Linear measurements will be performed. The most apical point of the extraction socket will be defined, and two reference lines will be subsequently drawn. The vertical reference line will be drawn in the center of the extraction socket crossing the apical reference point. A horizontal reference line will be drawn perpendicular to the vertical line crossing the apical reference point. Based on these reference lines, the horizontal ridge width will then be measured at -1 mm below the alveolar crest (HW-1). The same procedure will be applied for assessing the horizontal ridge width changes will then be measured at -3 mm (HW-3) and 5- mm (HW-5) below the alveolar crest.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mucosal height
Mucosa height measured in millimeters from the implant platform until the mucosal margin using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa
keratinized mucosal height measured in millimeters from the implant mucosal vestibular margin until the mucogingival junction using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Bleeding on probing
The presence or absence (dichotomic) of bleeding around the peri-implant sulcus after a gentle probing using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Probing depth
Probing depth of the peri-implant sulcus measured in millimeters at six points around de implant (3 points on the vestibular and 3 points on the lingual side) using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Profilometric Changes
Profilometric changes, measured by the digitalization of stone cast obtained from de patient. The measurements will be at 1 and 3 mm below the preoperative mucosa margin.
Phenotype
Phenotype will be assessed by using a periodontal probe. If the probe results still visible after its insertion in the keratinized mucosa, the phenotype will be considered thin; if not, the phenotype will be classified as thick.
Pink esthetic score (PES)
measured at 7 sites (mesial, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, bone contour, color and texture of the soft tissue) under visual examination, using 3 scores per site (0: absence, 1: partial presence, 2: full presence) with a maximum of 14 points
White esthetic score (WES)
based on tooth form, contour, color, texture, and translucence, under visual examination, using 3 scores per site (0: absence, 1: partial presence, 2: full presence) with a maximum of 14 points
Visual analog scale for pain assessment (VAS)
Ten degrees of pain are used, 0 no pain, 10 the worst pain imaginable. The patient will select a degree under his perception
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)
self-filled questionnaire that focuses on seven dimensions of impact (functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap). Patients will be asked to respond according to frequency of impact on a 5-point Likert scale coded never (score 0), hardly ever (score 1), occasionally (score2), fairly often (score 3) and very often (score 4) using a twelve-months recall period. The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better Oral Health Related Quality of Life.
Radiographic evaluation
Intraoral calibrated X-rays images will be taken. The digitally obtained x-rays will be transferred into a software program and the pitch distance between two implant threads will be used for calibration. The marginal bone levels (MBL) will be then assessed at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant by measuring the distance between the implant shoulder and the bone crest. Thereafter, mean values will be calculated for all implants and for both groups.

Full Information

First Posted
May 3, 2022
Last Updated
January 3, 2023
Sponsor
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Collaborators
Geistlich Pharma AG, BioHorizons, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05572242
Brief Title
Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Acronym
L-PRF
Official Title
Autologous Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) Versus a Xenogeneic Bone Substitute Combined With a Collagen Matrix for Alveolar Ridge Preservation. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Collaborators
Geistlich Pharma AG, BioHorizons, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
After tooth extraction, there is a subsequent bone loss as a part of the natural healing of the tissue. Up to 50% of bone loss occurs during the first three months after extraction, jeopardizing a possible implant treatment. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques reduce bone loss, allowing a future implant treatment. Different bone filling materials have been used with good clinical results. The second-generation platelet concentrates (L-PRF) have recently been shown to induce bone regeneration when filling the socket after extraction, with significant biological and economic advantages. The hypothesis of this study is to test whether or not the use of L-PRF in alveolar ridge preservation results in a non-inferior horizontal radiographic change compared with the combination of a xenogeneic bone substitute with a collagen matrix.
Detailed Description
This study is a non inferiority clinical controlled trial of parallel groups. Study Intervention and Indication After single premolar extractions in the maxilla or mandible area, patients will be randomly allocated to either one of the two treatment modalities: Alveolar ridge preservation using L-PRF (test) Alveolar ridge preservation using xenogeneic bone covered with a collagen matrix (control) Study objectives Primary Objective The present study aims to test whether or not the use of L-PRF in alveolar ridge preservation results in non-inferior horizontal ridge width changes measured at - 1 mm below the most coronal aspect of the alveolar crest compared to the combination of a xenogeneic bone substitute material with a collagen matrix, 4 months after tooth extraction. Clinical procedures Extraction surgery Partially edentulous patients in need of a single-tooth extraction in the premolar region (maxilla or mandible), with two neighboring natural teeth, will be included. All surgical procedures will be performed under local anesthesia. After disinfection of the surgical site with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution (PerioAid® Treatment, Barcelona, Spain), local anesthetics (Lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000; XXX) will be administered by infiltration at the respective buccal and lingual sites at maxilla or inferior alveolar nerve block technique on the mandible. The tooth will be luxated first with straight and angled elevators and then carefully extracted with forceps without raising a flap. After that, patients will be randomly assigned to either one of the two treatment modalities: Alveolar ridge preservation with leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) (test) Alveolar ridge preservation using xenogeneic bone covered with a collagen matrix (DBBM+CM) (control) Clinical procedures A venepuncture will be performed before any surgery (irrespective of the later randomization). Six plastic sterile 9 mL tubes without anticoagulant will be drawn with venous blood from the median basilica vein, median cubital vein, or median cephalic vein. Preparation of the L-PRF clots and membranes will be performed as previously described. In brief, within 60 seconds after the blood draws, the tubes will be centrifuged at 408 g RCF for 12 min using a tabletop centrifuge (IntraSpinTM, IntraLock®, Florida, USA). Following centrifugation, L-PRF clots will be removed from the tube, separated from the remaining red thrombus at the base with tweezers, and gently compressed into membranes using a metal rack and a metal plate. Extraction surgery Partially edentulous patients needing a single-tooth extraction in the premolar region (maxilla or mandible), with two neighboring natural teeth, will be included in the study. All surgical procedures will be performed under local anesthesia. After disinfection of the surgical site with 0.2% chlorhexidine solution (PerioAid® Treatment, Barcelona, Spain), local anesthetics (Lidocaine HCl 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000; XXX) will be administered by infiltration at the respective buccal and lingual sites at maxilla or inferior alveolar nerve block technique on the mandible. The tooth will be luxated first with straight and angled elevators and then carefully extracted with forceps without raising a flap. After that, patients will be randomly assigned to either one of the two treatment modalities: Alveolar ridge preservation with leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF) (test) Alveolar ridge preservation using xenogeneic bone covered with a collagen matrix (DBBM+CM) (control) In group L-PRF group, 2-5 PRF clots, depending on the size of the socket, will be inserted and compressed with a large plunger until they reach the alveolar crest as previously described (Temmerman et al., 2016). The site will thereafter be covered with 2-3 L-PRF membranes. Then, crossed horizontal mattress suture will be placed, followed by single interrupted sutures for better stabilization (Vicryl 4.0 EthiconTM, Johnsson & Johnsson, New Jersey, New York, USA). No efforts will be undertaken to obtain primary wound closure. The grafted socket will be left to heal for 4 months. In group DBBM+CM, the socket will be grafted with xenogeneic bone substitute material (up to the palatal/lingual bone crest) and covered with a collagen matrix. Single interrupted sutures (Vicryl 4.0 EthiconTM, Johnsson & Johnsson, New Jersey, New York, USA) will be placed to stabilize the collagen matrix. Sutures will be removed within 7-10 days. The grafted socket will then be left to heal for 4 months. The xenogenic material DBBM will be Bio-Oss Collagen®, and collagen matrix Bio-Gide® both delivered as the Combi-Kit Collagen (Geistlich Pharma AG - Switzerland). Immediately after surgery, despite the treatment group, the patient will be scanned using a CBCT (cone beam computed tomography) Implant surgery At 4 months, patients from both groups will be recalled for implant placement. Before the surgery, a CBCT and an impression will be taken. Moreover, clinical data will be recorded. Upon local anesthesia, a full flap will be raised, and a biopsy will be taken in the center of the implant site using a trephine drill (inner diameter 2mm). Thereafter, the implant will be placed according to the manufacturer's recommendation. A submerged healing protocol will be allowed. Final reconstructions will be inserted 4 months later. Type of implants: Biohorizons 3.8 * 10.5 mm as a standard implant, inserted at bone level. Healing mode: Submerged No provisional reconstruction Type of final reconstruction: Cad-cam screw-retained and axis screw, depending on the case. Follow-up examinations Follow-up examinations will be performed at baseline 2 (10 days after crown insertion), 6 months, and 1 year after final restoration.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alveolar Ridge Enlargement
Keywords
tooth extraction, socket graft, L-PRF, xenogenic bone, dental implant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This study is a non-inferiority clinical controlled trial of parallel groups
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants: During the socket preservation surgery, the type of intervention will be disclosure to the surgeon. The patient will not have access to this information. Also, during the controls and following interventions (implant placement and rehabilitation), the intervention group will be masked (test or control). Investigator: The investigators will be always masked to the intervention group. (Only the surgeon will be able to know the treatment sequence, during the surgery) Outcomes assessor: The outcome reviewers will be blinded to the intervention. The measures of initial cbct, 4 months cbct control, and the following measurements will be always blind with respect to the intervention group.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
L-PRF preservation (test)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Using L-PRF membranes inside the socket, covering with L-PRF membranes, (test group).
Arm Title
Xenogenic bone plus collagen membrane (control)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Bio-Oss® Collagen at the bone level and application of a collagen matrix (Combi-Kit). Both materials will be used for socket preservation (control).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Premolar extraction and socked preservation with L-PRF
Intervention Description
Partially edentulous patients in need of a single-tooth extraction in the premolar region[ (maxilla or mandible), with two neighboring natural teeth, will be included in the study. The tooth will be luxated first with elevators and then carefully extracted with forceps without raising a flap. L-PRF group will use 2-5 PRF clots, depending on the size of the socket, which will be inserted and compressed with a large plunger until they reach the alveolar crest. The site will thereafter be covered with L-PRF membranes. Then, crossed horizontal mattress suture will be placed followed by single interrupted sutures for stabilization. No efforts will be undertaken to obtain primary wound closure. The grafted socket will be left to heal for 4 months. After 4 months of socket preservation, a dental implant will be inserted into the socket. After 4 months of implant healing, a cad cam final restoration will be delivered. The follow-up will be up to 12 months after the final restoration.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Premolar extraction and socked preservation with Xenogenic bone and collagen membrane.
Intervention Description
Partially edentulous patients in need of a single-tooth extraction in the premolar region (maxilla or mandible), with two neighboring natural teeth, will be included in the study. The tooth will be luxated first with straight and angled elevators and then carefully extracted with forceps without raising a flap. In the control group, the socket will be grafted with xenogeneic bone substitute material (up to the palatal/lingual bone crest) and covered with a collagen matrix. Single interrupted sutures will be placed to stabilize the collagen matrix. Sutures will be removed at 7-10 days. The grafted socket will then be left to heal for a period of 4 months. The xenogenic material will be Bio-Oss Collagen® and collagen matrix Bio-Gide® . After 4 months of socket preservation, a dental implant will be placed. After 4 months of implant healing, a cad cam final restoration will be delivered. The follow-up will be up to 12 months after the final restoration.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bone socket horizontal and vertical changes evaluated using cbct ((cone beam computed tomography)
Description
Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging will be used to assess the primary outcome (horizontal radiographic changes at -1 mm below the alveolar crest) in both groups between baseline 1 (immediately post socket preservation), visit 4 (4 months after socket preservation), and 12 months after implant rehabilitation. Linear measurements will be performed. The most apical point of the extraction socket will be defined, and two reference lines will be subsequently drawn. The vertical reference line will be drawn in the center of the extraction socket crossing the apical reference point. A horizontal reference line will be drawn perpendicular to the vertical line crossing the apical reference point. Based on these reference lines, the horizontal ridge width will then be measured at -1 mm below the alveolar crest (HW-1). The same procedure will be applied for assessing the horizontal ridge width changes will then be measured at -3 mm (HW-3) and 5- mm (HW-5) below the alveolar crest.
Time Frame
first cbct immediately after socket preservation surgery, second cbct 4 months after surgery, 12 months after the final restoration of the implant.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mucosal height
Description
Mucosa height measured in millimeters from the implant platform until the mucosal margin using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Time Frame
4 months after implant insertion, at the final restoration delivery
Title
Peri-implant Keratinized Mucosa
Description
keratinized mucosal height measured in millimeters from the implant mucosal vestibular margin until the mucogingival junction using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Bleeding on probing
Description
The presence or absence (dichotomic) of bleeding around the peri-implant sulcus after a gentle probing using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Probing depth
Description
Probing depth of the peri-implant sulcus measured in millimeters at six points around de implant (3 points on the vestibular and 3 points on the lingual side) using a North Carolina periodontal probe
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Profilometric Changes
Description
Profilometric changes, measured by the digitalization of stone cast obtained from de patient. The measurements will be at 1 and 3 mm below the preoperative mucosa margin.
Time Frame
at baseline (socket preservation), 4 months (implant insertion), 10 days and 12 months after final restoration delivery
Title
Phenotype
Description
Phenotype will be assessed by using a periodontal probe. If the probe results still visible after its insertion in the keratinized mucosa, the phenotype will be considered thin; if not, the phenotype will be classified as thick.
Time Frame
10 days, 6 and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Pink esthetic score (PES)
Description
measured at 7 sites (mesial, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, bone contour, color and texture of the soft tissue) under visual examination, using 3 scores per site (0: absence, 1: partial presence, 2: full presence) with a maximum of 14 points
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration
Title
White esthetic score (WES)
Description
based on tooth form, contour, color, texture, and translucence, under visual examination, using 3 scores per site (0: absence, 1: partial presence, 2: full presence) with a maximum of 14 points
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Visual analog scale for pain assessment (VAS)
Description
Ten degrees of pain are used, 0 no pain, 10 the worst pain imaginable. The patient will select a degree under his perception
Time Frame
Pain perceived, 24 hrs after socket preservation and implant insertion (4 months).
Title
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14)
Description
self-filled questionnaire that focuses on seven dimensions of impact (functional limitation, pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability and handicap). Patients will be asked to respond according to frequency of impact on a 5-point Likert scale coded never (score 0), hardly ever (score 1), occasionally (score2), fairly often (score 3) and very often (score 4) using a twelve-months recall period. The OHIP-14 scores can range from 0 to 56 and are calculated by summing the ordinal values for the 14 items. Higher OHIP-14 scores indicate worse and lower scores indicate better Oral Health Related Quality of Life.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months after final restoration
Title
Radiographic evaluation
Description
Intraoral calibrated X-rays images will be taken. The digitally obtained x-rays will be transferred into a software program and the pitch distance between two implant threads will be used for calibration. The marginal bone levels (MBL) will be then assessed at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant by measuring the distance between the implant shoulder and the bone crest. Thereafter, mean values will be calculated for all implants and for both groups.
Time Frame
10 days, 6, and 12 months after final restoration

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Periodontally healthy individuals with at least 18 years of age Good oral hygiene (BOP & Pl ≤ 20%) Patients with a single failing premolar in the maxilla and mandible. With or without buccal plate after tooth extraction (similar cases in both groups) Surrounded by a mesial and distal natural tooth Capability to comply with the study procedures Informed Consent as documented by signature Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or lactating women Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse Smokers (>10 cigarettes/day) Systemic or local conditions presenting a contraindication to implant treatment Currently taking drugs that influence bone metabolism Use of bisphosphonates in the last 4 years History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy for malignancy in the past 5 years
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Antonio Sanz, DDS
Phone
56226181372
Email
asanz@clinicasanz.cl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Felipe Cáceres, DDS, MSc
Phone
56995097177
Email
felipec.merino@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonio Sanz, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
Professor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centro de Salud, Universidad de los Andes
City
Santiago
State/Province
Region Metropolitana
ZIP/Postal Code
8050000
Country
Chile
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillermo Salgado, DDS, PhD
Phone
56225891171
Email
gsalgado@uandes.cl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Leukocyte-platelet Rich Fibrin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs