search
Back to results

Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth

Primary Purpose

Dental Caries in Children

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dental restoration
Sponsored by
Hacinlioglu, Nadya Marie
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries in Children focused on measuring nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer, sub-micron hybrid resin composite, permanent molar teeth

Eligibility Criteria

7 Years - 15 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with two comparable occlusal carious lesions on both mandibular first permanent molars.
  2. Neutral occlusion with a natural antagonist tooth
  3. Patients that are able to come to recalls
  4. Patients with a good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients suffering systemic diseases or allergies
  2. Patients with gastrointestinal problems
  3. Mandibular first molar teeth with restorations
  4. Patients with oral habits
  5. Patients receiving orthodontic treatment
  6. Hypomineralized or Hypoplastic first molars

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restoration

    Sub-micron hybrid resin composite

    Arm Description

    One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material (Ketac N 100/3M ESPE, USA)

    One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative material (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Caulk, USA)

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Color Match
    Color match of dental restorations were observed with a Vita Scale visually by two calibrated examiners. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. ( Alfa: Imperceptible in room light in one-second glance, Bravo: Perceptible mismatch with the Vita scale but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Esthetically unacceptable)
    Marginal Discoloration
    Marginal discoloration of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No existing marginal discoloration, Bravo:Presence of discoloration at margins between restoration and tooth structure; discoloration does not penetrate towards the pulp, Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margins of the restoration in a pulpal direction.
    Anatomic Form
    Anatomic form of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: The restoration is not under-contoured, Bravo: The restoration is under-contoured, but there is no dentin or base exposed, Charlie: Sufficient restorative material is missing so that dentin or base is exposed.
    Marginal Integrity
    Marginal integrity of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin into which an explorer will catch, Bravo: The explorer catches a crevice along the margin but there is no exposure of dentin or base, Charlie: Visible evidence of a crevice with exposure of dentin or base.)
    Recurrent Decay
    Recurrent decay of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No evidence of recurrent caries along the margin of the restoration, Charlie: Evidence of caries along the margin of the restoration.)
    Fracture
    Fracture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection with explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No fracture, Bravo: Small chip, but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Failure due to bulk restoration fracture.)
    Surface Texture
    Surface texture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: Enamel like surface, Bravo: Surface rougher then enamel, clinically acceptable, Charlie: Surface unacceptable rough.)
    Postoperative Sensitivity
    Postoperative sensitivity of patients were assessed by two calibrated examiners by cold thermal test. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No sensitivity, Charlie: Sensitivity present.)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 12, 2022
    Last Updated
    October 12, 2022
    Sponsor
    Hacinlioglu, Nadya Marie
    Collaborators
    Yeditepe University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05583682
    Brief Title
    Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
    Official Title
    Clinical Performance of Nano-filled Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Sub-micron Hybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Permanent Molar Teeth:18-month Randomised Clinical Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    May 1, 2008 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 1, 2009 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    November 1, 2009 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hacinlioglu, Nadya Marie
    Collaborators
    Yeditepe University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The aim of this randomised controlled double-blinded, split mouth, single-center clinical trial was to evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer and sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorations in lower first permanent teeth of pediatric patients.
    Detailed Description
    Occlusal carious lesions on the left and right mandibular first molar teeth of 96 pediatric patients (54 female, 42 male) were restored in a split-mouth study design. Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer (Nano-RMGIC) (Ketac N 100, 3M/ESPE, USA) was used to restore the carious lesions for patients in the treatment group while a sub-micron hybrid resin composite (SpectrumTPH3, Dentsply, USA) was used for patients in the control group. Clinical evaluation of restorations were performed at the 1st week, 6th, 12th and 18th month recalls by two calibrated examiners according to the Modified-USPHS criteria.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Dental Caries in Children
    Keywords
    nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer, sub-micron hybrid resin composite, permanent molar teeth

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    One of the Nano-filled glass ionomer or sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative materials were applied to carious mandibular first molar teeth
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    96 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restoration
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material (Ketac N 100/3M ESPE, USA)
    Arm Title
    Sub-micron hybrid resin composite
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    One of the carious mandibular first molar teeth will be restored according to randomisation with sub-micron hybrid resin composite restorative material (Spectrum TPH3, Dentsply Caulk, USA)
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Dental restoration
    Intervention Description
    Restoration of carious mandibular first molar teeth are restored either with nano-filled resin modified glass ionomer or sub-micron resin composite restorative material
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Color Match
    Description
    Color match of dental restorations were observed with a Vita Scale visually by two calibrated examiners. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. ( Alfa: Imperceptible in room light in one-second glance, Bravo: Perceptible mismatch with the Vita scale but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Esthetically unacceptable)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Marginal Discoloration
    Description
    Marginal discoloration of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No existing marginal discoloration, Bravo:Presence of discoloration at margins between restoration and tooth structure; discoloration does not penetrate towards the pulp, Charlie: The discoloration penetrated along the margins of the restoration in a pulpal direction.
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Anatomic Form
    Description
    Anatomic form of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: The restoration is not under-contoured, Bravo: The restoration is under-contoured, but there is no dentin or base exposed, Charlie: Sufficient restorative material is missing so that dentin or base is exposed.
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Marginal Integrity
    Description
    Marginal integrity of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No visible evidence of a crevice along the margin into which an explorer will catch, Bravo: The explorer catches a crevice along the margin but there is no exposure of dentin or base, Charlie: Visible evidence of a crevice with exposure of dentin or base.)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Recurrent Decay
    Description
    Recurrent decay of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners with visual inspection. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No evidence of recurrent caries along the margin of the restoration, Charlie: Evidence of caries along the margin of the restoration.)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Fracture
    Description
    Fracture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection with explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No fracture, Bravo: Small chip, but clinically acceptable, Charlie: Failure due to bulk restoration fracture.)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Surface Texture
    Description
    Surface texture of dental restorations were observed by two calibrated examiners by visual inspection and explorer. Restorations were scored Alfa, Bravo or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: Enamel like surface, Bravo: Surface rougher then enamel, clinically acceptable, Charlie: Surface unacceptable rough.)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.
    Title
    Postoperative Sensitivity
    Description
    Postoperative sensitivity of patients were assessed by two calibrated examiners by cold thermal test. Restorations were scored Alfa or Charlie according to Modified USPHS criteria. (Alfa: No sensitivity, Charlie: Sensitivity present.)
    Time Frame
    Changes of dental restorations regarding color match were observed at 1st week, 6th,12th and 18th month recalls.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    7 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    15 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients with two comparable occlusal carious lesions on both mandibular first permanent molars. Neutral occlusion with a natural antagonist tooth Patients that are able to come to recalls Patients with a good oral hygiene Exclusion Criteria: Patients suffering systemic diseases or allergies Patients with gastrointestinal problems Mandibular first molar teeth with restorations Patients with oral habits Patients receiving orthodontic treatment Hypomineralized or Hypoplastic first molars
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Nadya M Hacinlioglu-Ozpar, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs