search
Back to results

IVIG vs SCIG in CIDP

Primary Purpose

CIDP, Immunoglobulin Deficiency, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intravenous immune globulin G
Subcutaneous immune globulin G
Sponsored by
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for CIDP focused on measuring immunoglobulin, pharmacokinetics, obesity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged >18 years with a current diagnosis of CIDP (based on European Federation of Neurological sciences / Peripheral Nerve Society CIDP diagnostic criteria).
  • 1:1 conversion of IVIG to SCIG (weekly dose conversion) must fall within 0.2-to-0.4 mg/kg dose for SCIG.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving IVIG for indications other than CIDP will be excluded.
  • Patients with liver impairment (elevations in liver enzymes of greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal) or reduced renal function (CrCl < 50 mL/min) will be excluded
  • Active malignancies
  • Diabetes
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Immunodeficiency
  • Autoimmune disease

Sites / Locations

  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Clinical Research CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Intravenous immune globulin G

Subcutaneous immune globulin G

Arm Description

Subjects will receive there current intravenous immune globulin dose.

The dosage will be converted from the subject's current intravenous immune globulin G dosage 1:1 (gm per gm).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Assessment of drug half-life
Calculation of drug half-life based on data obtained from serum samples
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after intravenous immune globulin G administration
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after subcutaneous immune globulin G administration
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of grip strength
Grip strength will be measured using the handheld Martin Vigorimeter just before each dose of IgG is administered during the study period. Subjects will be asked to squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible with each of his or her hands in a standing position.
Assessment of muscle function
The Medical Research Council (MRC) system for testing and grading of muscle function aims to provide a standardized and objective way to assess muscle function. It was originally introduced in 1943 and has a long history of use in neurology, rehabilitation and general medicine examinations. Assessments of muscles are done bilaterally, meaning that for each muscle tested, the same muscle on the opposite side of the body is also tested. The MRC sum score is finally calculated by adding the score of each individually assessed muscle. The MRC score ranges from 0 - 30 with 0 as the worst outcome.
Assessment of patient disability
The Rasch Overall Disability scale (I-RODS) and the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Sensory (INCAT) sum score disability scale will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The I-RODS score can range from 0 to 48 with 0 representing the greatest disability. The INCAT score ranges from 0 - 10 with 10 representing worse outcome.
Assessment of fatigue
Fatigue is a common patient concern in CIDP and the Rasch-built fatigue severity scale (R-FSS) will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The R-FSS ranges from 9 to 63 with 63 being the worst score

Full Information

First Posted
October 10, 2022
Last Updated
August 10, 2023
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05584631
Brief Title
IVIG vs SCIG in CIDP
Official Title
The Influence of Body Composition on Immunoglobulin Disposition After Intravenous and Subcutaneous Administration
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 11, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 18, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 18, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. The current study will evaluate the influence of body composition on intravenous and subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin G in patients.
Detailed Description
Current dosing practices for immunoglobulin G (IgG) may be inadequate in extreme body weight. Total (TBW), ideal (IBW), and adjusted (AdjBW) body weight-based dosing strategies are suggested, but these recommendations are based on expert opinion rather than high quality evidence. The adoption of a specific strategy is highly variable depending on the clinician and/or institutional setting. Recently, payors have also adopted strategies to reduce IgG therapy costs of by capping doses. These recommendations are often based on the presumption that IgG distribution is limited to the vascular space. While this assertion is logical, it does not account for changes adipose tissue may confer on target sites, nor does it account for the potential for adipose tissue to function serve as a metabolic sink or a source of inflammatory mediators. The later would be especially important in patients receiving SCIG. Several observational studies have evaluated IgG dosing in obese patients and have been the source of support for dosing strategies. Many of these studies were not representative of specific populations, contained a wide variety of patients with different IgG indications, and had inadequate serum sampling. More recently, the phase III randomized controlled PATH trial did not find a correlation with serum IgG concentrations and clinical endpoints. However, it is important to note that the study was not designed to evaluate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoints. There is also considerable interpatient variation in response; therefore, identification of patient characteristics that predict response or IgG change from baseline will be a useful tool to improve patient responses. Our study will evaluate the influence of body composition and other patient characteristics may have on IgG exposure when given intravenously or subcutaneously.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
CIDP, Immunoglobulin Deficiency, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy
Keywords
immunoglobulin, pharmacokinetics, obesity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intravenous immune globulin G
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will receive there current intravenous immune globulin dose.
Arm Title
Subcutaneous immune globulin G
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The dosage will be converted from the subject's current intravenous immune globulin G dosage 1:1 (gm per gm).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intravenous immune globulin G
Other Intervention Name(s)
Privigen, IVIG
Intervention Description
Intravenous immune globulin G dosed based on the subjects's current dose received for the treatment of CIDP.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Subcutaneous immune globulin G
Other Intervention Name(s)
Hizentra, SCIG
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous immune globulin G converted from the subject's current IVIG dose 1:1.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of drug half-life
Description
Calculation of drug half-life based on data obtained from serum samples
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 4 weeks
Title
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after intravenous immune globulin G administration
Description
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit
Time Frame
Just before drug administration, immediately after drug administration, approximately days 7 and 14 post drug administration
Title
Assessment of immune globulin G serum concentration after subcutaneous immune globulin G administration
Description
Serum IgG concentration (including subtype) will be measured using a human IgG ELISA kit
Time Frame
Just before drug administration, immediately after drug administration, approximately days 2, 4 and 7 post drug administration
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of grip strength
Description
Grip strength will be measured using the handheld Martin Vigorimeter just before each dose of IgG is administered during the study period. Subjects will be asked to squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible with each of his or her hands in a standing position.
Time Frame
Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Title
Assessment of muscle function
Description
The Medical Research Council (MRC) system for testing and grading of muscle function aims to provide a standardized and objective way to assess muscle function. It was originally introduced in 1943 and has a long history of use in neurology, rehabilitation and general medicine examinations. Assessments of muscles are done bilaterally, meaning that for each muscle tested, the same muscle on the opposite side of the body is also tested. The MRC sum score is finally calculated by adding the score of each individually assessed muscle. The MRC score ranges from 0 - 30 with 0 as the worst outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Title
Assessment of patient disability
Description
The Rasch Overall Disability scale (I-RODS) and the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment Sensory (INCAT) sum score disability scale will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The I-RODS score can range from 0 to 48 with 0 representing the greatest disability. The INCAT score ranges from 0 - 10 with 10 representing worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.
Title
Assessment of fatigue
Description
Fatigue is a common patient concern in CIDP and the Rasch-built fatigue severity scale (R-FSS) will be completed before the infusion of IgG. The R-FSS ranges from 9 to 63 with 63 being the worst score
Time Frame
Baseline and just before administration of next immune globulin dose.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients aged >18 years with a current diagnosis of CIDP (based on European Federation of Neurological sciences / Peripheral Nerve Society CIDP diagnostic criteria). 1:1 conversion of IVIG to SCIG (weekly dose conversion) must fall within 0.2-to-0.4 mg/kg dose for SCIG. Exclusion Criteria: Patients receiving IVIG for indications other than CIDP will be excluded. Patients with liver impairment (elevations in liver enzymes of greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal) or reduced renal function (CrCl < 50 mL/min) will be excluded Active malignancies Diabetes Myasthenia gravis Immunodeficiency Autoimmune disease
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Luigi Brunetti, PhD
Phone
2016385868
Email
brunetti@pharmacy.rutgers.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luigi Brunetti, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Clinical Research Center
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08901
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luigi Brunetti, PhD
Phone
908-595-2645
Email
luigi.brunetti@rutgers.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

IVIG vs SCIG in CIDP

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs