search
Back to results

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Regimen for patIents With Favorable Risk breaSt cancEr (APBI RISE)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IMRT/VMAT-Based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Sponsored by
Sanford Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation, External Beam Radiation Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide informed written consent.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 3 or a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 30%.
  • Willingness to return to Sanford Cancer Center for follow-up.
  • Radiation therapy is planned as part of routine care.
  • On histological examination, the tumor must be either ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) or an invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.
  • Patients must be ≥ 50 years old.
  • Presence of unifocal tumor.
  • Surgical treatment of the breast must have been a lumpectomy. Placement of surgical clips to delineate the lumpectomy bed is highly recommended, though not required.
  • The final margins of the resected specimen must be histologically free of tumor (≥ 2 mm for invasive adenocarcinoma and ≥ 3 mm for DCIS). Re-excision of surgical margins is permitted. Gross disease must be unifocal with a pathologic invasive tumor size tumor size ≤ 2.0 cm or pathologic DCIS size ≤ 2.5 cm.
  • Patients with invasive breast cancer are required to have axillary staging consisting of a sentinel lymph node biopsy. The sentinel lymph node(s) must be negative for regionally metastatic disease, both on routine H&E evaluation and immunohistochemical staining. Axillary staging is not required for patients with DCIS.
  • Absence of lymphovascular space invasion.
  • The tumor must be positive for either the presence of the estrogen or progesterone receptor, and either 0 or +1 for the HER-2/neu receptor on immunohistochemical staining.
  • The target lumpectomy cavity must be clearly delineated and the target lumpectomy cavity to the whole breast reference volume ratio must be ≤ 30% based on the CT-simulation scan.
  • Life expectancy of 5 years or longer excluding breast cancer diagnosis(co-morbid conditions taken into considerations by the PI)
  • Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before their CT simulation, and must agree to use an effective method of birth control during their radiation therapy treatment course.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women, or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception.
  • Nuclear grade 3 DCIS or Nottingham grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma.
  • Invasive lobular carcinoma, any grade.
  • Male sex.
  • Any treatment with radiation therapy, and/or hormonal therapy administered for the currently diagnosed breast cancer prior to study enrollment
  • Prior breast or thoracic radiation treatment for any reason.
  • History of prior invasive breast cancer or DCIS. (Patients with a history of LCIS treated by surgery alone are eligible.)
  • Paget's disease of the nipple.
  • Palpable or radiographically suspicious ipsilateral or contralateral axillary, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes, unless there is histologic confirmation that these nodes are negative for tumor.
  • Patients with a collagen vascular disease; specifically, SLE or scleroderma.
  • Breast implants. (Patients who have had implants removed are eligible.)
  • Psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements.
  • Women with a known or suspected predisposition to developing breast cancer (i.e., BRCA1/2 mutations, p53 mutation, etc...)
  • Women who are pregnant, or women of child-bearing potential who refuse to use an effective method of birth control

Sites / Locations

  • Sanford HealthRecruiting
  • Sanford HealthRecruiting
  • Sanford HealthRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

IMRT/VMAT-Based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Arm Description

Patients will be treated with a novel IMRT/VMAT-based accelerated partial breast irradiation regimen.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Physician-Assessed Adverse Breast Cosmesis
To evaluate the incidence of physician-assessed adverse breast cosmesis by utilizing the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey. The survey scores breast cosmesis from 1 to 4, with 1 representing "excellent" cosmesis, 2 representing "good" cosmesis, 3 representing "fair" cosmesis, and 4 representing "poor" cosmesis. Adverse breast cosmesis is defined as a score of either 3 or 4 on the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recurrence Rate
To evaluate the cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, regional nodal recurrence, and distant recurrence by following participants after treatment with yearly mammograms and breast exams performed during routine clinic appointments.
Disease Free Survival Rate
To evaluate disease free survival and overall survival by following participants after treatment with yearly mammograms and breast exams performed during routine clinic appointments.
Acute Adverse Events
To evaluate the incidence and severity of acute adverse events associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 grading system. The CTCAE Version 5.0 grading system scores adverse events from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing more severe adverse events.
Late Adverse Events
To evaluate the incidence and severity of late adverse events associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 grading system. The CTCAE Version 5.0 grading system scores adverse events from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing more severe adverse events.
Patient Quality of Life
To evaluate patient quality of life associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen by using the breast cancer treatment outcome scale (BCTOS). The BCTOS contains 22 items, which are assigned to three internally consistent subscales: 1) Functional Status, 2) Aesthetic Status, and 3) Breast Sensitivity Status. Patients are instructed to rate each item of the BCTOS on a four-point scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1 = no difference, 4 = large difference). The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that subscale. A higher score reflects a poorer status (i.e. a larger difference between the treated and the untreated breast). The survey also allows patients to address their satisfaction with their breast cancer treatment and results.
Patient-Assessed Adverse Breast Cosmesis
To evaluate the incidence of patient-assessed adverse breast cosmesis by utilizing the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey. The survey scores breast cosmesis from 1 to 4, with 1 representing "excellent" cosmesis, 2 representing "good" cosmesis, 3 representing "fair" cosmesis, and 4 representing "poor" cosmesis. Adverse breast cosmesis is defined as a score of either 3 or 4 on the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey.

Full Information

First Posted
October 5, 2022
Last Updated
November 11, 2022
Sponsor
Sanford Health
Collaborators
University of North Dakota
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05591547
Brief Title
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Regimen for patIents With Favorable Risk breaSt cancEr
Acronym
APBI RISE
Official Title
SH APBI RISE: Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel IMRT/VMAT-based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Regimen for patIents With Favorable Risk breaSt cancEr
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sanford Health
Collaborators
University of North Dakota

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will use an adjuvant radiation therapy regimen called APBI (accelerated partial breast irradiation). APBI is a treatment option available to women considered to have an early stage, low-risk breast cancer. The standard external beam-based APBI treatment delivers treatments every other day for five treatments, over ten calendar days. The APBI in this study is modified and will deliver five once daily treatments over consecutive treatment days, with a slightly lower dose of radiation each day as compared to the standard external beam-based APBI treatment.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective interventional cohort study in breast cancer participants. The purpose of this study is to track physician-assessed cosmetic outcomes as the primary study endpoint, and compare these results to historical trials in which women with favorable risk early stage breast cancer underwent a course of adjuvant WBI.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma, Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation, External Beam Radiation Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Single group non-randomized interventional prospective cohort study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
91 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
IMRT/VMAT-Based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be treated with a novel IMRT/VMAT-based accelerated partial breast irradiation regimen.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
IMRT/VMAT-Based Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation
Intervention Description
The lumpectomy bed will receive a total of 26 Gy in 5 fractions, with 1 fraction delivered per day. Ideally, the course of radiation therapy would be completed over 5 consecutive treatment days. Treatment must begin within 12 weeks of lumpectomy or re-excision of surgical margins and must be completed within 10 calendar days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Physician-Assessed Adverse Breast Cosmesis
Description
To evaluate the incidence of physician-assessed adverse breast cosmesis by utilizing the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey. The survey scores breast cosmesis from 1 to 4, with 1 representing "excellent" cosmesis, 2 representing "good" cosmesis, 3 representing "fair" cosmesis, and 4 representing "poor" cosmesis. Adverse breast cosmesis is defined as a score of either 3 or 4 on the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey.
Time Frame
3 Years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence Rate
Description
To evaluate the cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, regional nodal recurrence, and distant recurrence by following participants after treatment with yearly mammograms and breast exams performed during routine clinic appointments.
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Disease Free Survival Rate
Description
To evaluate disease free survival and overall survival by following participants after treatment with yearly mammograms and breast exams performed during routine clinic appointments.
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Acute Adverse Events
Description
To evaluate the incidence and severity of acute adverse events associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 grading system. The CTCAE Version 5.0 grading system scores adverse events from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing more severe adverse events.
Time Frame
12 Weeks
Title
Late Adverse Events
Description
To evaluate the incidence and severity of late adverse events associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen, using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 grading system. The CTCAE Version 5.0 grading system scores adverse events from 1 to 5, with higher scores representing more severe adverse events.
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Patient Quality of Life
Description
To evaluate patient quality of life associated with our novel IMRT/VMAT-based APBI regimen by using the breast cancer treatment outcome scale (BCTOS). The BCTOS contains 22 items, which are assigned to three internally consistent subscales: 1) Functional Status, 2) Aesthetic Status, and 3) Breast Sensitivity Status. Patients are instructed to rate each item of the BCTOS on a four-point scale evaluating the differences between the treated and the untreated breast (1 = no difference, 4 = large difference). The score for each subscale is the mean of the ratings over all items belonging to that subscale. A higher score reflects a poorer status (i.e. a larger difference between the treated and the untreated breast). The survey also allows patients to address their satisfaction with their breast cancer treatment and results.
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Patient-Assessed Adverse Breast Cosmesis
Description
To evaluate the incidence of patient-assessed adverse breast cosmesis by utilizing the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey. The survey scores breast cosmesis from 1 to 4, with 1 representing "excellent" cosmesis, 2 representing "good" cosmesis, 3 representing "fair" cosmesis, and 4 representing "poor" cosmesis. Adverse breast cosmesis is defined as a score of either 3 or 4 on the Harvard Breast Cosmesis survey.
Time Frame
3 Years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Women
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ability to provide informed written consent. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≤ 3 or a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 30%. Willingness to return to Sanford Cancer Center for follow-up. Radiation therapy is planned as part of routine care. On histological examination, the tumor must be either ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) or an invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Patients must be ≥ 50 years old. Presence of unifocal tumor. Surgical treatment of the breast must have been a lumpectomy. Placement of surgical clips to delineate the lumpectomy bed is highly recommended, though not required. The final margins of the resected specimen must be histologically free of tumor (≥ 2 mm for invasive adenocarcinoma and ≥ 3 mm for DCIS). Re-excision of surgical margins is permitted. Gross disease must be unifocal with a pathologic invasive tumor size tumor size ≤ 2.0 cm or pathologic DCIS size ≤ 2.5 cm. Patients with invasive breast cancer are required to have axillary staging consisting of a sentinel lymph node biopsy. The sentinel lymph node(s) must be negative for regionally metastatic disease, both on routine H&E evaluation and immunohistochemical staining. Axillary staging is not required for patients with DCIS. Absence of lymphovascular space invasion. The tumor must be positive for either the presence of the estrogen or progesterone receptor, and either 0 or +1 for the HER-2/neu receptor on immunohistochemical staining. The target lumpectomy cavity must be clearly delineated and the target lumpectomy cavity to the whole breast reference volume ratio must be ≤ 30% based on the CT-simulation scan. Life expectancy of 5 years or longer excluding breast cancer diagnosis(co-morbid conditions taken into considerations by the PI) Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before their CT simulation, and must agree to use an effective method of birth control during their radiation therapy treatment course. Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant women, or women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception. Nuclear grade 3 DCIS or Nottingham grade 3 invasive ductal carcinoma. Invasive lobular carcinoma, any grade. Male sex. Any treatment with radiation therapy, and/or hormonal therapy administered for the currently diagnosed breast cancer prior to study enrollment Prior breast or thoracic radiation treatment for any reason. History of prior invasive breast cancer or DCIS. (Patients with a history of LCIS treated by surgery alone are eligible.) Paget's disease of the nipple. Palpable or radiographically suspicious ipsilateral or contralateral axillary, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary nodes, unless there is histologic confirmation that these nodes are negative for tumor. Patients with a collagen vascular disease; specifically, SLE or scleroderma. Breast implants. (Patients who have had implants removed are eligible.) Psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements. Women with a known or suspected predisposition to developing breast cancer (i.e., BRCA1/2 mutations, p53 mutation, etc...) Women who are pregnant, or women of child-bearing potential who refuse to use an effective method of birth control
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ryan Nowak, MD
Phone
605-328-6000
Email
Ryan.Nowak@sanfordhealth.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jan Wernisch
Phone
605-312-6025
Email
Janet.Wernisch@sanfordhealth.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ryan Nowak, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sanford Health
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sanford Health
City
Worthington
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
56187
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Wernisch
Phone
605-312-6025
Email
janet.wernisch@sanfordhealth.org
Facility Name
Sanford Health
City
Fargo
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58122
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Wernisch
Phone
605-312-6025
Email
janet.wernisch@sanfordhealth.org
Facility Name
Sanford Health
City
Sioux Falls
State/Province
South Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
57104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Wernisch
Phone
605-312-6025
Email
janet.wernisch@sanfordhealth.org

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No plan to share IPD with other researchers
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12393820
Citation
Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002 Oct 17;347(16):1233-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022152.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16360786
Citation
Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, Davies C, Elphinstone P, Evans V, Godwin J, Gray R, Hicks C, James S, MacKinnon E, McGale P, McHugh T, Peto R, Taylor C, Wang Y; Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 Dec 17;366(9503):2087-106. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67887-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11535710
Citation
Nattinger AB, Kneusel RT, Hoffmann RG, Gilligan MA. Relationship of distance from a radiotherapy facility and initial breast cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001 Sep 5;93(17):1344-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.17.1344. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24317177
Citation
Pan IW, Smith BD, Shih YC. Factors contributing to underuse of radiation among younger women with breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jan;106(1):djt340. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt340. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30083949
Citation
Parekh A, Fu W, Hu C, Shen CJ, Alcorn S, Rao AD, Asrari F, Camp MS, Wright JL. Impact of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors on receipt of radiation after breast conservation surgery: analysis of the national cancer database. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Nov;172(1):201-208. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4881-0. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26009548
Citation
Lam J, Cook T, Foster S, Poon R, Milross C, Sundaresan P. Examining Determinants of Radiotherapy Access: Do Cost and Radiotherapy Inconvenience Affect Uptake of Breast-conserving Treatment for Early Breast Cancer? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 Aug;27(8):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.04.034. Epub 2015 May 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21277106
Citation
Hoopes DJ, Kaziska D, Chapin P, Weed D, Smith BD, Hale ER, Johnstone PA. Patient preferences and physician practice patterns regarding breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Feb 1;82(2):674-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.077. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26976434
Citation
Bonin K, McGuffin M, Presutti R, Harth T, Mesci A, Feldman-Stewart D, Chow E, Di Prospero L, Vesprini D, Rakovitch E, Lee J, Paszat L, Doherty M, Soliman H, Ackerman I, Cao X, Kiss A, Szumacher E. Breast Cancer Patients' Preferences for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Post Lumpectomy: Whole Breast Irradiation vs. Partial Breast Irradiation-Single Institutional Study. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Feb;33(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s13187-016-1016-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24456967
Citation
Rippy EE, Ainsworth R, Sathananthan D, Kollias J, Bochner M, Whitfield R. Influences on decision for mastectomy in patients eligible for breast conserving surgery. Breast. 2014 Jun;23(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24055415
Citation
Haviland JS, Owen JR, Dewar JA, Agrawal RK, Barrett J, Barrett-Lee PJ, Dobbs HJ, Hopwood P, Lawton PA, Magee BJ, Mills J, Simmons S, Sydenham MA, Venables K, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR; START Trialists' Group. The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: 10-year follow-up results of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1086-1094. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70386-3. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20147717
Citation
Whelan TJ, Pignol JP, Levine MN, Julian JA, MacKenzie R, Parpia S, Shelley W, Grimard L, Bowen J, Lukka H, Perera F, Fyles A, Schneider K, Gulavita S, Freeman C. Long-term results of hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 11;362(6):513-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906260.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23690420
Citation
Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, Cirrincione CT, Berry DA, McCormick B, Muss HB, Smith BL, Hudis CA, Winer EP, Wood WC. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 1;31(19):2382-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2615. Epub 2013 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25637340
Citation
Kunkler IH, Williams LJ, Jack WJ, Cameron DA, Dixon JM; PRIME II investigators. Breast-conserving surgery with or without irradiation in women aged 65 years or older with early breast cancer (PRIME II): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):266-73. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71221-5. Epub 2015 Jan 28. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):e105.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1496226
Citation
Fisher B, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Anderson S, Redmond C, Fisher ER. Breast tumor recurrence following lumpectomy with and without breast irradiation: an overview of recent NSABP findings. Semin Surg Oncol. 1992 May-Jun;8(3):153-60.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32448706
Citation
Hepel JT, Wazer DE. Update on Partial Breast Irradiation. Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Apr;21(2):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31813635
Citation
Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS, Kim DH, Germain I, Nichol AM, Akra M, Lavertu S, Germain F, Fyles A, Trotter T, Perera FE, Balkwill S, Chafe S, McGowan T, Muanza T, Beckham WA, Chua BH, Gu CS, Levine MN, Olivotto IA; RAPID Trial Investigators. External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2165-2172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32515-2. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23742961
Citation
Polgar C, Fodor J, Major T, Sulyok Z, Kasler M. Breast-conserving therapy with partial or whole breast irradiation: ten-year results of the Budapest randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Aug;108(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26494415
Citation
Strnad V, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G, Kauer-Dorner D, Knauerhase H, Major T, Lyczek J, Guinot JL, Dunst J, Gutierrez Miguelez C, Slampa P, Allgauer M, Lossl K, Polat B, Kovacs G, Fischedick AR, Wendt TG, Fietkau R, Hindemith M, Resch A, Kulik A, Arribas L, Niehoff P, Guedea F, Schlamann A, Potter R, Gall C, Malzer M, Uter W, Polgar C; Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO). 5-year results of accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation with boost after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Jan 16;387(10015):229-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00471-7. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24161420
Citation
Rodriguez N, Sanz X, Dengra J, Foro P, Membrive I, Reig A, Quera J, Fernandez-Velilla E, Pera O, Lio J, Lozano J, Algara M. Five-year outcomes, cosmesis, and toxicity with 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.046. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28779963
Citation
Coles CE, Griffin CL, Kirby AM, Titley J, Agrawal RK, Alhasso A, Bhattacharya IS, Brunt AM, Ciurlionis L, Chan C, Donovan EM, Emson MA, Harnett AN, Haviland JS, Hopwood P, Jefford ML, Kaggwa R, Sawyer EJ, Syndikus I, Tsang YM, Wheatley DA, Wilcox M, Yarnold JR, Bliss JM; IMPORT Trialists. Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW trial): 5-year results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-1060. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31145-5. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31813636
Citation
Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Arthur DW, Julian TB, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Ganz PA, Parda DS, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, McCormick B, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germain I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran WJ Jr, Bryant JL, Wolmark N. Long-term primary results of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer: a randomised, phase 3, equivalence trial. Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2155-2164. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32514-0. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32840419
Citation
Meattini I, Marrazzo L, Saieva C, Desideri I, Scotti V, Simontacchi G, Bonomo P, Greto D, Mangoni M, Scoccianti S, Lucidi S, Paoletti L, Fambrini M, Bernini M, Sanchez L, Orzalesi L, Nori J, Bianchi S, Pallotta S, Livi L. Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Compared With Whole-Breast Irradiation for Early Breast Cancer: Long-Term Results of the Randomized Phase III APBI-IMRT-Florence Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4175-4183. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00650. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28094198
Citation
Polgar C, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G, Kauer-Dorner D, Knauerhase H, Major T, Lyczek J, Guinot JL, Dunst J, Miguelez CG, Slampa P, Allgauer M, Lossl K, Polat B, Kovacs G, Fischedick AR, Fietkau R, Resch A, Kulik A, Arribas L, Niehoff P, Guedea F, Schlamann A, Potter R, Gall C, Uter W, Strnad V; Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO). Late side-effects and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: 5-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):259-268. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30011-6. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
Results Reference
background
Citation
White JR, Winter K, Cecchini RS, Vicini FA, Arthur DW, Kuske RR, Rabinovitch RA, Sehkon A, Khan AJ, Chmura SJ, Shaitelman SF, McCormick B, Julian TB, Rogers CL, Bear HD, Petersen IA, Gustafson GS, Grossheim Jr. LD, Mamounas E, Ganz PA. Cosmetic outcome from post lumpectomy whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) on the NRG Oncology/NSABP B39-RTOG 0413 phase III clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep;105(1):S3-S4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23835717
Citation
Olivotto IA, Whelan TJ, Parpia S, Kim DH, Berrang T, Truong PT, Kong I, Cochrane B, Nichol A, Roy I, Germain I, Akra M, Reed M, Fyles A, Trotter T, Perera F, Beckham W, Levine MN, Julian JA. Interim cosmetic and toxicity results from RAPID: a randomized trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 10;31(32):4038-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.5511. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27866865
Citation
Correa C, Harris EE, Leonardi MC, Smith BD, Taghian AG, Thompson AM, White J, Harris JR. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Executive summary for the update of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Consensus Statement. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Mar-Apr;7(2):73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31087640
Citation
Jung KYK, Shadbolt B, Rezo A. Temporal impact of the publication of guidelines and randomised evidence on the adoption of hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Aug;63(4):530-537. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12897. Epub 2019 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29545124
Citation
Smith BD, Bellon JR, Blitzblau R, Freedman G, Haffty B, Hahn C, Halberg F, Hoffman K, Horst K, Moran J, Patton C, Perlmutter J, Warren L, Whelan T, Wright JL, Jagsi R. Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32580883
Citation
Murray Brunt A, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, Sydenham MA, Alhasso A, Bloomfield DJ, Chan C, Churn M, Cleator S, Coles CE, Goodman A, Harnett A, Hopwood P, Kirby AM, Kirwan CC, Morris C, Nabi Z, Sawyer E, Somaiah N, Stones L, Syndikus I, Bliss JM, Yarnold JR; FAST-Forward Trial Management Group. Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5-year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):1613-1626. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30932-6. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25605582
Citation
Livi L, Meattini I, Marrazzo L, Simontacchi G, Pallotta S, Saieva C, Paiar F, Scotti V, De Luca Cardillo C, Bastiani P, Orzalesi L, Casella D, Sanchez L, Nori J, Fambrini M, Bianchi S. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus whole breast irradiation: 5-year survival analysis of a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(4):451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.013. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30978468
Citation
Grendarova P, Roumeliotis M, Quirk S, Lesiuk M, Craighead P, Liu HW, Pinilla J, Wilson J, Bignell K, Phan T, Olivotto IA. One-Year Cosmesis and Fibrosis From ACCEL: Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) Using 27 Gy in 5 Daily Fractions. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep-Oct;9(5):e457-e464. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32946965
Citation
Pasalic D, Strom EA, Allen PK, Williamson TD, Poenisch F, Amos RA, Woodward WA, Stauder MC, Shaitelman SF, Smith BD, Perkins GH, Tereffe W, Hoffman KE. Proton Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Clinical Outcomes at a Planned Interim Analysis of a Prospective Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Feb 1;109(2):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12165639
Citation
Whelan T, MacKenzie R, Julian J, Levine M, Shelley W, Grimard L, Lada B, Lukka H, Perera F, Fyles A, Laukkanen E, Gulavita S, Benk V, Szechtman B. Randomized trial of breast irradiation schedules after lumpectomy for women with lymph node-negative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Aug 7;94(15):1143-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.15.1143.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Regimen for patIents With Favorable Risk breaSt cancEr

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs