search
Back to results

Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Necrosis, Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy
Step-up Approach
Sponsored by
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pancreatic Necrosis focused on measuring Walled-off necrosis, Walled-off pancreatic necrosis, Endoscopic necrosectomy, Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: All criteria must be fulfilled Patients with acute, necrotizing pancreatitis and WON exceeding a diameter of 15 cm. Imaging test(s) must be done within 1 week before the index drainage procedure. Debut of pancreatitis must be within 3 months before the index drainage procedure. One or more indication(s) for endoscopic, transmural drainage must be established: Confirmed or suspected infection. Severe intraabdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. Persisting abdominal pain, early satiety, or general discomfort. Obstruction of the GI or biliary tract. Leakage of pancreatic juice, e.g. pancreatic ascites or pleural effusion. Preoperatively, the WON must be considered eligible for endoscopic, transgastric drainage. Distance between the gastric wall and WON must not exceed one cm and there must be no major interposed vessels. Exclusion Criteria: Patients under the age of 18. Pregnancy. Known or suspected malignant disease. Pancreatitis secondary to trauma or surgical intervention. Chronic pancreatitis. Previous surgical or endoscopic drainage or necrosectomy.

Sites / Locations

  • Copenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Step-up Approach

Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy

Arm Description

Standard procedure where necrosectomy is only performed in the absence of clinical improvement 72 hours after placements of lumen-apposing metal stent.

Necrosectomy will be performed in the same procedure as the placement of the lumen-apposing metal stent.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

A composite of major complications, death, or length of stay exceeding 58 days
If patients either die, encounter a major complication, or stay in hospital for longer than 58 days, it will be registered as an event. Major complications are defined as new onset (i.e. not present 24 hours before randomization) organ failure (cardiovascular, pulmonary or renal), bleeding requiring intervention, perforation of a visceral organ requiring intervention, enterocutaneous fistula requiring intervention and incisional hernia (including burst abdomen).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Length of hospital stay from the index drainage procedure
Total number of debridement procedures
Number of endoscopic necrosectomies and video-assisted retroperitoneal debridements needed throughout the disease course.
Total number of endoscopic procedures
Total number of drainage and debridement procedures (radiological, endoscopic, and surgical)
Number of days from index drainage procedure until removal of naso-cystic catheter
Duration of drainage and debridement procedures (index and cumulated) measured in minutes
Days at the hospital during a 6-month follow up
Length of ICU stay
Days in the ICU during hospitalization
Number of days until resolution of pre-interventional systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Number of days from randomization to restoration of normal blood pressure, temperature, heart rate, inspiratory rate, and white blood cell count
New onset episodes of culture verified bacteremia
Occurrence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (portal-, splenic-, or superior mesenteric vein)
Portal-, splenic-, or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis
Need for tube feeding (naso-gastric or naso-jejunal) or parenteral nutrition
CRP-area under curve
AUC from the index drainage procedure until discharge from hospital
Number of adverse events
according to the ASGE lexicon and Clavien-Dindo
Mortality
The rate mortality compared between the two study groups
Unset of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency
The unset of diabetes and/or steatorrhea
Total treatment costs.
In euros and dollars

Full Information

First Posted
October 21, 2022
Last Updated
February 7, 2023
Sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05601687
Brief Title
Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis
Official Title
Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis - A Single-center, Open-label, Randomized, Superiority Trial (ACCELERATE)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare a conventional endoscopic step-up approach with an accelerated treatment algorithm using direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis and walled of necroses exceeding a diameter of 15 cm. It will be investigated whether an aggressive treatment algorithm instead of a classical step-up approach will shorten the length of stay in the hospital and also reduce the mortality in patients treated for large walled off necroses.
Detailed Description
INTRODUCTION While most patients with acute pancreatitis suffer a mild and uncomplicated course of disease, up to 20% develop a more severe course with development of pancreatic and/or peripancreatic necroses. With time, these necroses become encapsulated with a well-defined inflammatory wall, so called walled-off necroses (WONs). Up to 30% of WONs become infected, which prolongs the length of hospital stay (LOS), increases morbidity and mortality significantly, and generally requires some kind of invasive intervention. During the last two decades, a minimally invasive step-up approach consisting of percutaneous and/or endoscopic, transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by percutaneous, video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) or endoscopic necrosectomy (EN), have replaced open surgery as the standard treatment resulting in improved patient outcomes. Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre have for nearly two decades treated more than 400 WON patients with an actual annual number of 40-50 patients. This center serves as a tertiary referral center, the only in East-Denmark, with a background population of 2.6 million. In line with international guidelines, endoscopic step-up approach has been practiced as standard care for infected WONs. This approach follows international recommendations of delaying index procedures until at least four weeks after debut of pancreatitis (to ensure encapsulation) and then only applying the least invasive intervention needed. The decision to step-up is triggered by absence of biochemical and/or clinical improvement or clinical deterioration. Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been introduced for the transluminal treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. The stent is fully-covered and shaped with two bilateral anchor flanges with a saddle in between. A dedicated through-the-scope delivery system, where the tip serves as an electrocautery device enables extra-luminal access and deployment of the stent. Conventionally, transmural drainage with installation of two double pigtail plastic stents (DPS) has been the method of choice. Although drainage with plastic stents seems non-inferior to LAMS, the DPS method implies a need for repetitive dilatation of the drainage tract because of spontaneous closure of the tract and thereby probably a higher number of endoscopic procedures. By keeping the transmural tract patent, LAMS may improve drainage and facilitate endoscopic necrosectomy, which may even be performed during the index procedure (direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN)). The LOS is considerable for patients treated for infected WON, especially those with complex and large fluid collections. Copenhagen University Hvidovre Hospital has one of the largest prospective single center databases registering all patients treated with WON. The median LOS for patients with large WONs exceeding 15 cm in diameter treated with the step-up approach, is 58 days. During the hospital stay, patients undergo weekly endoscopic or surgical procedures, and many patients additionally need treatment in the intensive care unit. Together, the treatment of patients with WON carries a substantial economic burden for the health care system. Furthermore, even in a tertiary care setting, the mortality is still up to 15% in complex cases with large fluid collections. The mortality in patient needing treatment in intensive care unit (ICU) is much higher, nearly 40%. Unprotocolized cases with urgent needs for an augmented course of treatment (e.g. cases with malignancy demanding surgery or oncological therapy) have been successfully treated with an accelerated treatment algorithm. Likewise, an international multicenter study found that an aggressive treatment was safe with promising results. The invastegators hypothesize, that a general alteration in the treatment algorithm instigating an aggressive treatment algorithm instead of a classical step-up approach might not only shorten LOS, but also reduce the mortality in patients treated for large WONs. AIM To compare a conventional endoscopic step-up approach with an accelerated treatment algorithm using DEN. STUDY DESIGN A single-center open-label, randomized, controlled 2 armed superiority study. Patients with acute, necrotizing pancreatitis and WON exceeding a diameter of 15 cm will be randomized to either the endoscopic step-up approach or direct endoscopic necrosectomy. The primary endpoint is a composite of death, major complications occurring within 6 months following randomization, or length of stay exceeding 58 days. From results previously published by Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, it is shown that the risk of death for eligible patients is estimated to 5%, the risk of major complications is 5%, while the risk of exceeding a LOS of above 58 days is 50%. The investigators assume that the risk of death and major complications will remain at 5% and 5%, respectively, while the rate of patients exceeding a LOS of 58 days will be reduced by 75% to 12.5%. Based on these estimates, 48 patients are required to have an 80% change (5% significant level) of detecting an increase in success rate in the primary outcome measure from 40% in the control group to 77.5% in the interventional group. The investigators will after inclusion of 25 patients conduct an interim analysis to assess whether one of the study groups are superior to an extent that will ethically call for an early termination of the study. Likewise, safety will continually be assessed in conjunction with the ethics committee.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Necrosis, Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing
Keywords
Walled-off necrosis, Walled-off pancreatic necrosis, Endoscopic necrosectomy, Video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients shall be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the step-up or the accelerated approach. Block randomization shall be performed with a concealed, fixed block size using a web-based randomization program. Random block sizes of 4 or 6 shall be used for preparation of the randomization sequence. The computer-generated block randomization assignments shall be placed in opaque sealed envelopes. Randomization shall be performed by a study coordinator when patients meet the inclusion criteria.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
48 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Step-up Approach
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard procedure where necrosectomy is only performed in the absence of clinical improvement 72 hours after placements of lumen-apposing metal stent.
Arm Title
Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Necrosectomy will be performed in the same procedure as the placement of the lumen-apposing metal stent.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy
Intervention Description
Endosonography-guided, transmural drainage of the WONs shall be performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS).After placement of the LAMS, EN shall be performed during the same procedure (Direct EN). After DEN, a 7-Fr/4cm double pigtail and a 7-Fr nasocystic irrigation catheter shall be placed through the LAMS. Endoscopic necrosectomy and VARD shall be repeated as often as clinically indicated and logistically possible with a minimum of one day between procedures
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Step-up Approach
Intervention Description
Endosonography-guided, transmural drainage of the WONs shall be performed using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). After placement of the LAMS, a 7-Fr/4cm double pigtail stent and a 7-Fr nasocystic catheter shall be placed through the LAMS. The effect of the index drainage procedure shall be evaluated every 72 hours and next treatment step will depend on whether the patient's condition improves. If clinical improvement is observed, the drainage regime continues, and no further therapeutic action shall be taken. In absence of clinical improvement after 72 hours and if supplementary drainage is impossible, the patient shall proceed to endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) or video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD). Absence of clinical improvement due to causes not related to the WON treatment, e.g., urinary tract or pulmonary infection or iv catheter sepsis, shall not influence the treatment algorithm of the WON.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
A composite of major complications, death, or length of stay exceeding 58 days
Description
If patients either die, encounter a major complication, or stay in hospital for longer than 58 days, it will be registered as an event. Major complications are defined as new onset (i.e. not present 24 hours before randomization) organ failure (cardiovascular, pulmonary or renal), bleeding requiring intervention, perforation of a visceral organ requiring intervention, enterocutaneous fistula requiring intervention and incisional hernia (including burst abdomen).
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Length of hospital stay from the index drainage procedure
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Total number of debridement procedures
Description
Number of endoscopic necrosectomies and video-assisted retroperitoneal debridements needed throughout the disease course.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Total number of endoscopic procedures
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Total number of drainage and debridement procedures (radiological, endoscopic, and surgical)
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Number of days from index drainage procedure until removal of naso-cystic catheter
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Duration of drainage and debridement procedures (index and cumulated) measured in minutes
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Days at the hospital during a 6-month follow up
Time Frame
Assessed up to 12 months following randomization
Title
Length of ICU stay
Description
Days in the ICU during hospitalization
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Number of days until resolution of pre-interventional systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
Description
Number of days from randomization to restoration of normal blood pressure, temperature, heart rate, inspiratory rate, and white blood cell count
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
New onset episodes of culture verified bacteremia
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Occurrence of splanchnic vein thrombosis (portal-, splenic-, or superior mesenteric vein)
Description
Portal-, splenic-, or superior mesenteric vein thrombosis
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Need for tube feeding (naso-gastric or naso-jejunal) or parenteral nutrition
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
CRP-area under curve
Description
AUC from the index drainage procedure until discharge from hospital
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Number of adverse events
Description
according to the ASGE lexicon and Clavien-Dindo
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Mortality
Description
The rate mortality compared between the two study groups
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Unset of exocrine and endocrine insufficiency
Description
The unset of diabetes and/or steatorrhea
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months
Title
Total treatment costs.
Description
In euros and dollars
Time Frame
From date of randomization until discharge, assessed up to 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All criteria must be fulfilled Patients with acute, necrotizing pancreatitis and WON exceeding a diameter of 15 cm. Imaging test(s) must be done within 1 week before the index drainage procedure. Debut of pancreatitis must be within 3 months before the index drainage procedure. One or more indication(s) for endoscopic, transmural drainage must be established: Confirmed or suspected infection. Severe intraabdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. Persisting abdominal pain, early satiety, or general discomfort. Obstruction of the GI or biliary tract. Leakage of pancreatic juice, e.g. pancreatic ascites or pleural effusion. Preoperatively, the WON must be considered eligible for endoscopic, transgastric drainage. Distance between the gastric wall and WON must not exceed one cm and there must be no major interposed vessels. Exclusion Criteria: Patients under the age of 18. Pregnancy. Known or suspected malignant disease. Pancreatitis secondary to trauma or surgical intervention. Chronic pancreatitis. Previous surgical or endoscopic drainage or necrosectomy.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
John G Karstensen, MD Ph.d.
Phone
0045 3862 3862
Email
john.gasdal.karstensen@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gitte Aa Olsen, MD
Phone
0045 3862 3862
Email
gitte.aabye.olsen@regionh.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John G Karstensen, MD Ph.d.
Organizational Affiliation
Pancreatitis Centre East (PACE), Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
City
Hvidovre
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gitte Aa Olsen, MD
Email
gitte.aabye.olsen@regionh.dk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Sharing upon reasonable request
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Sharing upon reasonable request
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17032204
Citation
Banks PA, Freeman ML; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;101(10):2379-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00856.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24274589
Citation
van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, Voermans RP, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Cappendijk VC, Consten EC, Dejong CH, Dijkgraaf MG, van Eijck CH, Erkelens GW, van Goor H, Hadithi M, Haveman JW, Hofker SH, Jansen JJ, Lameris JS, van Lienden KP, Manusama ER, Meijssen MA, Mulder CJ, Nieuwenhuis VB, Poley JW, de Ridder RJ, Rosman C, Schaapherder AF, Scheepers JJ, Schoon EJ, Seerden T, Spanier BW, Straathof JW, Timmer R, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG, van Santvoort HC, Fockens P; Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group. Transluminal endoscopic step-up approach versus minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis (TENSION trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN09186711]. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 25;13:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-161.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15990825
Citation
Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Imazu H, Seitz U, de Weerth A, Soetikno R, Zhong Y, Sriram PV, Ponnudurai R, Sikka S, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: a new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):92-100. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00541-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35258123
Citation
Ebrahim M, Werge MP, Hadi A, Lahchich M, Nagras ZG, Lauritsen ML, Schmidt PN, Hansen EF, Novovic S, Karstensen JG. Clinical outcomes following endoscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal management of acute pancreatitis with large (>15 cm) walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Retrospective, single tertiary center cohort study. Dig Endosc. 2022 Sep;34(6):1245-1252. doi: 10.1111/den.14295. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://www.hvidovrehospital.dk/Research/pace/Pages/default.aspx
Description
Related Info

Learn more about this trial

Endoscopic Step-up Approach vs Aggressive Debridement of Large Pancreatic Walled-off Necrosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs