search
Back to results

Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset, Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Decline

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
non-invasive hyperspectral retinoscopy
blood sample
Test of cognitive ability on tablet computer with CoGNIT software
Sponsored by
Mantis Photonics AB
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset focused on measuring Retinoscopy, Non-invasive, Accessible healthcare

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: subject age over 18 years old The subject has undergone a lumbar puncture an cerebrospinal fluid analysis as part of the standard care. The subject has at least one healthy eye. The subject is applicable for taking a blood sample for the blood analysis test. The informed consent is provided, explained and understood by the person. The person has consented to the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: There are contra-indications for lumbar puncture (eg: brain tumor with suspicion of raised intracranial pressure, coagulopathies or ongoing anticoagulant medications) will be excluded from the study. When the subject suffers from excessive visual or auditive impairment, the he/she will be excluded from the CoGNIT track.

Sites / Locations

  • Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
  • Blekinge Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Subjects

Arm Description

On all subjects included in the study (see inclusion / exclusion criteria and informed consent) both procedures will be performed. The result of these procedures (retinal scan, result from cognitive test and blood sample) will be used to build diagnostic classification models.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Accuracy (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: model accuracy [percent]
Area under the Curve (statistical metrics) retinal image classification model
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: Area under the Curve (AuC) [0 < AuC < 1]
Sensitivity (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Performance metrics of the retinal image classification model: Sensitivity [percent]
CoGNIT test diagnostic accuracy
Accuracy [percent] of diagnosis based on the CoGNIT test data

Secondary Outcome Measures

Accuracy: Metrics combination model
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: accuracy [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Area Under the Curve: Metrics combination model
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: Area Under the Curve [0<AUC<1] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Sensitivity: Metrics combination model
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: sensitivity [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Non invasive test variability compared to reference
The variability [relative and normalized: percent] between the first and the second hyperspectral retinoscopy result will be compared to the variability between the blood analysis at the first and the second appointment [relative and normalized: percent]. The blood test variability will be used as a reference in this study.

Full Information

First Posted
October 20, 2022
Last Updated
October 27, 2022
Sponsor
Mantis Photonics AB
Collaborators
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Blekinge County Council Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05604183
Brief Title
Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease
Official Title
Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 29, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 29, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Mantis Photonics AB
Collaborators
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Blekinge County Council Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Two devices will be tested in this research: Mantis Photonics' hyperspectral camera for non-invasive retinal examination (i.e., a hardware medical device under investigation). Blekinge CoGNIT cognitive ability test (i.e., an assessment).
Detailed Description
Worldwide, millions of people are affected by neurodegenerative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, dementia). Those diseases are having a tremendous socio-economic impact on our society. The cost associated with treating and caring for those diseases is enormous. Overwhelming evidence indicates how selective lifestyle changes (e.g., reducing exposure to known risk factors) can sometimes significantly decrease the probability of developing the disease or delay its onset. However, the diseases must be diagnosed early for them to be effective. There is a lack of accessible, inexpensive, and non-invasive practices that would allow for an early diagnosis of different diseases, even at the primary physician's office. Mantis Photonics and Blekinge Tekniska Högskola (Institustionen för Hälsa) aim to fill this urgent unmet medical need. Strong indications of the possibility of classifying Alzheimer's status based on hyperspectral scans of the retina have been published by different researchers. These results were obtained based on images taken with hyperspectral cameras with a different working principle than the Mantis Photonics camera. The working principle of the Mantis Photonics camera allows making a hyperspectral retinoscopy with the same spectral range and comparable or better spectral resolution with a machine that is more modular and lower in cost. There is thus reason to hypothesize retinal scans taken with the Mantis Photonics camera can be used for the same classification task. Previous studies on the automated tablet computer cognitive test CoGNIT have established validity, reliability and sensitivity for testing patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) . Recently feasibility of testing in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) was affirmed (Behrens, Berglund, & Anderberg, CoGNIT Automated Tablet Computer Cognitive Testing in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Feasibility Study, 2022). In NPH patients, CoGNIT was more sensitive to cognitive impairment at baseline and cognitive improvement after shunt surgery than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Blood tests for amyloid-β and other biomarkers related to Alzheimer's disease are being investigated for clinical practice, but the technique is not accepted as a standard test. Research has shown that renal function influences amyloid-β clearance from the body. Also, analytical errors influence test results. Therefore, one can question the influence of normal repeatability of the blood test result. The aim of this investigation is the evaluation, (further) development and comparison of non-invasive techniques for the evaluation of patients suffering mild cognitive impairment, in particular, the Mantis Photonics hyperspectral camera with classification machine learning model in combination with the CoGNIT test of Dr Behrens (Blekinge Tekniska Högskola). These techniques will be compared to the result of cerebrospinal fluid analysis (CSF), the reference biological diagnostic technique for Alzheimer's disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset, Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Decline
Keywords
Retinoscopy, Non-invasive, Accessible healthcare

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
The diagnosis of Amyloidosis (biomarker of Alzheimer's disease) is made based on the normal patient care consisting of the neurologist assessment and the Cerebro-Spinal Fluid analysis. This diagnosis is used as golden standard for the model based on retinal images and cognitive test results.
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Subjects
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
On all subjects included in the study (see inclusion / exclusion criteria and informed consent) both procedures will be performed. The result of these procedures (retinal scan, result from cognitive test and blood sample) will be used to build diagnostic classification models.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
non-invasive hyperspectral retinoscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
eye-scan, fundus image (of the eye)
Intervention Description
The Principal Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the principal investigator) will take an image of the retina of the patient with the Mantis Photonics hyperspectral retinoscopy camera.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
blood sample
Other Intervention Name(s)
draw blood
Intervention Description
The Principle Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the Principal Investigator) will draw a small blood sample according to the standard medical procedures for drawing blood samples.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Test of cognitive ability on tablet computer with CoGNIT software
Other Intervention Name(s)
CoGNIT test, Cognitive test, Mental ability test
Intervention Description
The Principle Investigator or a trained medical nurse (under the supervision of the Principal Investigator) will give the patient to perform the digital cognitive test on a commercial tablet computer. The Principal Investigator or the medical nurse will be available for the patient to ask questions while the test is ongoing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Accuracy (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Description
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: model accuracy [percent]
Time Frame
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Title
Area under the Curve (statistical metrics) retinal image classification model
Description
Performance metric of the retinal image classification model: Area under the Curve (AuC) [0 < AuC < 1]
Time Frame
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Title
Sensitivity (Statistical metric) retinal image classification model
Description
Performance metrics of the retinal image classification model: Sensitivity [percent]
Time Frame
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Title
CoGNIT test diagnostic accuracy
Description
Accuracy [percent] of diagnosis based on the CoGNIT test data
Time Frame
within 2 months after last patient procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Accuracy: Metrics combination model
Description
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: accuracy [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Time Frame
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Title
Area Under the Curve: Metrics combination model
Description
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: Area Under the Curve [0<AUC<1] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Time Frame
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Title
Sensitivity: Metrics combination model
Description
A combination model of both non-invasive techniques will be evaluated based on the same metrics as the single-technique model (see primary objectives) and evaluated based on the comparison of said metrics: sensitivity [percent] for the optimal choice of threshold.
Time Frame
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Title
Non invasive test variability compared to reference
Description
The variability [relative and normalized: percent] between the first and the second hyperspectral retinoscopy result will be compared to the variability between the blood analysis at the first and the second appointment [relative and normalized: percent]. The blood test variability will be used as a reference in this study.
Time Frame
within 3 months after last patient procedure
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Adverse effect
Description
Measurement: Percentage [percent] of patients who report adverse effects such as transient 'imprint' of the flash or other adverse effects.
Time Frame
Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure
Title
Serious adverse effect
Description
Occurence of serious adverse effects due to the procedure. Any patient who suffers serious harm due to the procedure is a study outcome and a study endpoint.
Time Frame
Immediately after the retinoscopy procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: subject age over 18 years old The subject has undergone a lumbar puncture an cerebrospinal fluid analysis as part of the standard care. The subject has at least one healthy eye. The subject is applicable for taking a blood sample for the blood analysis test. The informed consent is provided, explained and understood by the person. The person has consented to the informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: There are contra-indications for lumbar puncture (eg: brain tumor with suspicion of raised intracranial pressure, coagulopathies or ongoing anticoagulant medications) will be excluded from the study. When the subject suffers from excessive visual or auditive impairment, the he/she will be excluded from the CoGNIT track.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anders Behrens, MD, PhD
Phone
+460702034496
Email
anders.behrens@regionblekinge.se
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jan Alexander, Master
Phone
0478779156
Email
jan.alexander@mantis-photonics.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anders Behrens, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola
City
Karlskrona
State/Province
Blekine Län
ZIP/Postal Code
37141
Country
Sweden
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anders Behrens, MD, Phd
Phone
+460702034496
Email
anders.behrens@regionblekinge.se
Facility Name
Blekinge Hospital
City
Karlskrona
State/Province
Blekinge Län
ZIP/Postal Code
37141
Country
Sweden
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anders Behrens, MD, PhD
Phone
+460702034496
Email
anders.behrens@regionblekinge.se

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No Individual Participant Data (IPD) sharing to third parties. Data of individual participants will be used for this study only.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35275064
Citation
Behrens A, Berglund JS, Anderberg P. CoGNIT Automated Tablet Computer Cognitive Testing in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Feasibility Study. JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 11;6(3):e23589. doi: 10.2196/23589.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25279138
Citation
Behrens A, Eklund A, Elgh E, Smith C, Williams MA, Malm J. A computerized neuropsychological test battery designed for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2014 Sep 25;11:22. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-11-22. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30738407
Citation
Behrens A, Elgh E, Leijon G, Kristensen B, Eklund A, Malm J. The Computerized General Neuropsychological INPH Test revealed improvement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery. J Neurosurg. 2019 Feb 8;132(3):733-740. doi: 10.3171/2018.10.JNS18701.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31843944
Citation
Budelier MM, Bateman RJ. Biomarkers of Alzheimer Disease. J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Jan 1;5(1):194-208. doi: 10.1373/jalm.2019.030080.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31530809
Citation
Hadoux X, Hui F, Lim JKH, Masters CL, Pebay A, Chevalier S, Ha J, Loi S, Fowler CJ, Rowe C, Villemagne VL, Taylor EN, Fluke C, Soucy JP, Lesage F, Sylvestre JP, Rosa-Neto P, Mathotaarachchi S, Gauthier S, Nasreddine ZS, Arbour JD, Rheaume MA, Beaulieu S, Dirani M, Nguyen CTO, Bui BV, Williamson R, Crowston JG, van Wijngaarden P. Non-invasive in vivo hyperspectral imaging of the retina for potential biomarker use in Alzheimer's disease. Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 17;10(1):4227. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12242-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31920420
Citation
Rasmussen J, Langerman H. Alzheimer's Disease - Why We Need Early Diagnosis. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis. 2019 Dec 24;9:123-130. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S228939. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34838239
Citation
Teunissen CE, Verberk IMW, Thijssen EH, Vermunt L, Hansson O, Zetterberg H, van der Flier WM, Mielke MM, Del Campo M. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: towards clinical implementation. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Jan;21(1):66-77. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00361-6. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2022/
Description
World Alzheimer Report 2022 - Alzheimer's disease international

Learn more about this trial

Hyperspectral Retinal Observations for the Cross-sectional Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs