search
Back to results

A Social Media Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Heavy Drinking College Students (SMASH)

Primary Purpose

Alcohol Consumption

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alcohol personalized normative feedback (APNF)
Social media personalized normative feedback (SMPNF)
Sponsored by
Duquesne University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Alcohol Consumption focused on measuring social media

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 26 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: College students recruited across three universities: Duquesne University, Miami University, and University of Houston (DU, MU, UH) Undergraduate college students 18 to 26 years old Meet heavy drinking (4+ drinks in one sitting for individuals assigned female at birth, 5+ drinks in one sitting for individuals assigned male at birth in the past month) and ARC (alcohol-related content) posting criteria (2+ ARC posts in the last 30 days for individuals assigned female at birth, 1+ for individuals assigned male at birth, on either Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, or TikTok) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or of another protected population

Sites / Locations

  • Miami UniversityRecruiting
  • University of HoustonRecruiting
  • Duquesne UniversityRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Alcohol personalized normative feedback (APNF)

Social media personalized normative feedback (SMPNF)

Alcohol and social media personalized normative feedback (APNF + SMPNF)

Attention control

Arm Description

Participants will receive feedback about their consumption, what they think the average student at their university drinks, and actual drinking statistics at their university. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.

Participants will receive feedback about their consumption and alcohol related consumption posts, what they think the average student at their university drinks, and actual drinking statistics at their university. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.

Participants will go through the alcohol personalized normative feedback process and the social media personalized normative feedback. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.

Participants will receive feedback about their consumption of desserts, what they think their peers consume, and actual dessert consumption statistics are for individuals in their age group in the United States. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey/feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys and feedback interventions at 3-months and 6-months.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ) - change is being assessed
The B-YAACQ is a 24 item assessment which measures consequences in 8 domains over a given time frame. Subscales include: Social/Interpersonal, Academic/Occupational, Risky Behavior, Impaired Control, Poor Self-Care, Diminished Self-Perception, Blackout Drinking, and Physiological Dependence. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 24; Higher scores indicate more alcohol-related problems.
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) - change is being assessed
The AUDIT is a 10 item tool which assesses a participant's drinking habits and alcohol-related consequences. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 40; Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 15 or more indicates the likelihood of alcohol dependence.
Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index (RAPI) -change is being assessed
The RAPI is a 25-item questionnaire that measures problem drinking. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from none (0) to more than five times (4). Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 100; Higher scores indicate more alcohol-related problems.
Quantity/Frequency/Peak Index (QFI) -change is being assessed
The QFI consists of five items which assess participants' typical alcohol consumption patterns. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 24; Higher scores indicate more alcohol use.
Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ) -change is being assessed
The DDQ is a 9 item tool which assesses participants' drinking over the past 3 months. Participants report how much they drank on an average over the past 3 months by indicating the number of drinks they consumed on each day of the week. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 175 (windsorized to 25 drinks per day); Higher scores indicate more alcohol use.
Drinking Norms Rating Form (DNRF) -change is being assessed
The DNRF is a 5 item questionnaire that assesses an individual's view on the drinking habits of other individuals attending the same university. It was adapted from the Daily Drinking Questionnaire to assess perceptions of drinking norms on campus. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 175 (windsorized to 25 drinks per day); Higher scores indicate students perceive their peers to engage in more alcohol use.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2022
Last Updated
February 14, 2023
Sponsor
Duquesne University
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05608109
Brief Title
A Social Media Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Heavy Drinking College Students
Acronym
SMASH
Official Title
Project Smash (Social Media Alcohol Session for Health)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 9, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duquesne University
Collaborators
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study seeks to evaluate the unique and synergistic efficacy of social media-specific personalized normative feedback targeting the reduction of alcohol use among heavy-drinking college students who post alcohol-related content on social media. Hypothesis: Alcohol personalized normative feedback, social media-specific personalized normative feedback, and the Alcohol personalized normative feedback+ social media-specific personalized normative feedback conditions will be more effective in reducing drinking than the attention control condition.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alcohol Consumption
Keywords
social media

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
400 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Alcohol personalized normative feedback (APNF)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive feedback about their consumption, what they think the average student at their university drinks, and actual drinking statistics at their university. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.
Arm Title
Social media personalized normative feedback (SMPNF)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive feedback about their consumption and alcohol related consumption posts, what they think the average student at their university drinks, and actual drinking statistics at their university. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.
Arm Title
Alcohol and social media personalized normative feedback (APNF + SMPNF)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will go through the alcohol personalized normative feedback process and the social media personalized normative feedback. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey and afterwards will receive the feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys at 3-months and 6-months.
Arm Title
Attention control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants will receive feedback about their consumption of desserts, what they think their peers consume, and actual dessert consumption statistics are for individuals in their age group in the United States. Participants in this condition will participate in a baseline survey/feedback intervention. They will then complete follow-up surveys and feedback interventions at 3-months and 6-months.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Alcohol personalized normative feedback (APNF)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive individualized feedback based upon their survey responses. Feedback regarding participant's drinking compared to other same-university students will include: (a) drinking days per week, (b) average drinks per occasion, (c) drinks per week, and (d) drinking percentile rank.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Social media personalized normative feedback (SMPNF)
Intervention Description
Participants will receive individualized feedback based upon their survey responses. Feedback regarding participant's alcohol related content posts on social media and drinking compared to other same-university students will include: (a) alcohol related posting days per week, (b) average alcohol related posting per week, (c) posting percentile rank, (d) drinking days per week, (e) average drinks per week, and (f) drinking percentile rank.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (B-YAACQ) - change is being assessed
Description
The B-YAACQ is a 24 item assessment which measures consequences in 8 domains over a given time frame. Subscales include: Social/Interpersonal, Academic/Occupational, Risky Behavior, Impaired Control, Poor Self-Care, Diminished Self-Perception, Blackout Drinking, and Physiological Dependence. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 24; Higher scores indicate more alcohol-related problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up
Title
Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) - change is being assessed
Description
The AUDIT is a 10 item tool which assesses a participant's drinking habits and alcohol-related consequences. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 40; Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. A score of 15 or more indicates the likelihood of alcohol dependence.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up
Title
Rutgers Alcohol Problems Index (RAPI) -change is being assessed
Description
The RAPI is a 25-item questionnaire that measures problem drinking. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from none (0) to more than five times (4). Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 100; Higher scores indicate more alcohol-related problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up
Title
Quantity/Frequency/Peak Index (QFI) -change is being assessed
Description
The QFI consists of five items which assess participants' typical alcohol consumption patterns. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 24; Higher scores indicate more alcohol use.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up
Title
Daily Drinking Questionnaire (DDQ) -change is being assessed
Description
The DDQ is a 9 item tool which assesses participants' drinking over the past 3 months. Participants report how much they drank on an average over the past 3 months by indicating the number of drinks they consumed on each day of the week. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 175 (windsorized to 25 drinks per day); Higher scores indicate more alcohol use.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up
Title
Drinking Norms Rating Form (DNRF) -change is being assessed
Description
The DNRF is a 5 item questionnaire that assesses an individual's view on the drinking habits of other individuals attending the same university. It was adapted from the Daily Drinking Questionnaire to assess perceptions of drinking norms on campus. Minimum value: 0; Maximum Value: 175 (windsorized to 25 drinks per day); Higher scores indicate students perceive their peers to engage in more alcohol use.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 month follow-up, 6 month follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
26 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: College students recruited across three universities: Duquesne University, Miami University, and University of Houston (DU, MU, UH) Undergraduate college students 18 to 26 years old Meet heavy drinking (4+ drinks in one sitting for individuals assigned female at birth, 5+ drinks in one sitting for individuals assigned male at birth in the past month) and ARC (alcohol-related content) posting criteria (2+ ARC posts in the last 30 days for individuals assigned female at birth, 1+ for individuals assigned male at birth, on either Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter, or TikTok) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or of another protected population
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mai Ly Steers, PhD
Phone
412-396-4761
Email
steersm@duq.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Julie Christy
Phone
412-396-1886
Email
christy@duq.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mai-Ly N Steers, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duquesne University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Miami University
City
Oxford
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45056
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rose Marie Ward
Facility Name
University of Houston
City
Houston
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
77204
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mai Ly Steers
Phone
310-213-0667
Email
mnsteers@uh.central.edu
Facility Name
Duquesne University
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15282
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mai-Ly N Steers
Phone
310-213-0667

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12534428
Citation
Wallace JM Jr, Bachman JG, O'Malley PM, Schulenberg JE, Cooper SM, Johnston LD. Gender and ethnic differences in smoking, drinking and illicit drug use among American 8th, 10th and 12th grade students, 1976-2000. Addiction. 2003 Feb;98(2):225-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00282.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27325885
Citation
Rinker DV, Diamond PM, Walters ST, Wyatt TM, DeJong W. Distinct Classes of Negative Alcohol-Related Consequences in a National Sample of Incoming First-Year College Students: A Latent Class Analysis. Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Sep;51(5):602-8. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agw036. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29786874
Citation
Curtis BL, Lookatch SJ, Ramo DE, McKay JR, Feinn RS, Kranzler HR. Meta-Analysis of the Association of Alcohol-Related Social Media Use with Alcohol Consumption and Alcohol-Related Problems in Adolescents and Young Adults. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jun;42(6):978-986. doi: 10.1111/acer.13642. Epub 2018 May 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3998247
Citation
Collins RL, Parks GA, Marlatt GA. Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1985 Apr;53(2):189-200. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.53.2.189. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16536141
Citation
Read JP, Kahler CW, Strong DR, Colder CR. Development and preliminary validation of the young adult alcohol consequences questionnaire. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Jan;67(1):169-77. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.169.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8329970
Citation
Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17568966
Citation
Martens MP, Neighbors C, Dams-O'Connor K, Lee CM, Larimer ME. The factor structure of a dichotomously scored Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 Jul;68(4):597-606. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.597.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Dimeff, L. A. (Ed.). (1999). Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students (BASICS): A harm reduction approach. Guilford Press.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27505215
Citation
Lindgren KP, Neighbors C, Teachman BA, Baldwin SA, Norris J, Kaysen D, Gasser ML, Wiers RW. Implicit alcohol associations, especially drinking identity, predict drinking over time. Health Psychol. 2016 Aug;35(8):908-918. doi: 10.1037/hea0000396. Erratum In: Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;37(7):679.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: development and validation of a four-factor-model. Psychological Assessment. 1994; 6(2): 117-128.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Przybylski, AK, Murayama, K, DeHaan, CR, Gladwell, V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013; 29: 1814-1848.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31493637
Citation
Shensa A, Sidani JE, Escobar-Viera CG, Switzer GE, Primack BA, Choukas-Bradley S. Emotional support from social media and face-to-face relationships: Associations with depression risk among young adults. J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.092. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20685078
Citation
Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, Amtmann D, Bode R, Buysse D, Choi S, Cook K, Devellis R, DeWalt D, Fries JF, Gershon R, Hahn EA, Lai JS, Pilkonis P, Revicki D, Rose M, Weinfurt K, Hays R; PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Radloff, LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977; 1(3): 385-401.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21424189
Citation
Lang FR, John D, Ludtke O, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):548-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3572711
Citation
Hays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987 Spring;51(1):69-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16717171
Citation
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22662404
Citation
Andreassen CS, Torsheim T, Brunborg GS, Pallesen S. Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale. Psychol Rep. 2012 Apr;110(2):501-17. doi: 10.2466/02.09.18.PR0.110.2.501-517.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1758185
Citation
Baer JS, Stacy A, Larimer M. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. J Stud Alcohol. 1991 Nov;52(6):580-6. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1991.52.580.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Sobell LC, Sobell MB. 2012. Timeline Follow-Back. In: Litten R.Z., Allen J.P. (eds) Measuring Alcohol Consumption. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10735346
Citation
Zimmerman GL, Olsen CG, Bosworth MF. A 'stages of change' approach to helping patients change behavior. Am Fam Physician. 2000 Mar 1;61(5):1409-16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16562412
Citation
Neighbors C, Dillard AJ, Lewis MA, Bergstrom RL, Neil TA. Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2006 Mar;67(2):290-9. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2006.67.290.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18612578
Citation
Kahler CW, Hustad J, Barnett NP, Strong DR, Borsari B. Validation of the 30-day version of the Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire for use in longitudinal studies. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Jul;69(4):611-5. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.611.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19442281
Citation
Moussas G, Dadouti G, Douzenis A, Poulis E, Tzelembis A, Bratis D, Christodoulou C, Lykouras L. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): reliability and validity of the Greek version. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2009 May 14;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-8-11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18547738
Citation
Earleywine M, LaBrie JW, Pedersen ER. A brief Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index with less potential for bias. Addict Behav. 2008 Sep;33(9):1249-53. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 May 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1884665
Citation
Webb GR, Redman S, Gibberd RW, Sanson-Fisher RW. The reliability and stability of a quantity-frequency method and a diary method of measuring alcohol consumption. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1991 May;27(3):223-31. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(91)90005-j.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33997251
Citation
Mange J, Mauduy M, Senemeaud C, Bagneux V, Cabe N, Jacquet D, Leconte P, Margas N, Mauny N, Ritz L, Gierski F, Beaunieux H. What really matters in binge drinking: A dominance analysis of binge drinking psychological determinants among University students. Addict Behav Rep. 2021 Apr 8;13:100346. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2021.100346. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24696672
Citation
Arterberry BJ, Martens MP, Cadigan JM, Smith AE. Assessing the Dependability of Drinking Motives via Generalizability Theory. Addict Res Theory. 2012 Oct 1;45(4):292-302. doi: 10.1177/0748175612449744.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20307107
Citation
Osberg TM, Atkins L, Buchholz L, Shirshova V, Swiantek A, Whitley J, Hartman S, Oquendo N. Development and validation of the College Life Alcohol Salience Scale: a measure of beliefs about the role of alcohol in college life. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Mar;24(1):1-12. doi: 10.1037/a0018197.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30235699
Citation
Xu S, Qiu D, Hahne J, Zhao M, Hu M. Psychometric properties of the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among Chinese adolescents. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12373. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012373.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25915929
Citation
Zhong QY, Gelaye B, Zaslavsky AM, Fann JR, Rondon MB, Sanchez SE, Williams MA. Diagnostic Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7) among Pregnant Women. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0125096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125096. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15700516
Citation
Carey KB, Carey MP, Maisto SA, Henson JM. Temporal stability of the timeline followback interview for alcohol and drug use with psychiatric outpatients. J Stud Alcohol. 2004 Nov;65(6):774-81. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.774.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/Search/DataPage.aspx?Component=Dietary&Cycle=2009-2010.
Description
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire

Learn more about this trial

A Social Media Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention for Heavy Drinking College Students

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs