search
Back to results

Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation (Exo4UL)

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injuries

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Experimental: Device Intervention
Sponsored by
University of Liverpool
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Spinal Cord Injuries

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age 18+ years. The levels of C5 C6 Asia C/D would provide individuals with elbow and hand impairment and potentially functional shoulder movements. C7, C8 individuals could also benefit from the hand component of the device. Some gross shoulder movement at start of the trial to enable changes at the elbow/hand, to have the greatest potential for functional change. Preservation of hand sensation as base for motor restoration. Some sitting balance would give the best opportunity for the arm to be released for functional upper limb activity. EMG (muscle activity) evidence of active finger flexion, extension and elbow flexion extension Grade 1-2. Minimal or No community functional use of upper limb at start of trial. Spasticity MAS 1-3/5.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Device Intervention

    Control

    Arm Description

    The intervention group who will be undergoing rehabilitation using the robotic exoskeleton in addition to the assigned traditional rehabilitation programme on their dominant arm only.

    the matched control group will be the same subjects undergoing traditional rehabilitation only on their non-dominant arm.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
    assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury
    Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
    assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP).
    The GRASSP is a clinical impairment measure for the upper limb for use after tetraplegia. The measure includes three domains which are important in describing hand function.
    The modified Ashworth scale
    Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical spasticity assessment tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone.
    Range of Motion
    to assess the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements
    Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
    COPM assesses the patient's perceived occupational performance in the areas of selfcare, productivity, and leisure

    Full Information

    First Posted
    November 2, 2022
    Last Updated
    November 7, 2022
    Sponsor
    University of Liverpool
    Collaborators
    Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust, The Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Scotland, Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05615766
    Brief Title
    Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation
    Acronym
    Exo4UL
    Official Title
    EXO4UL- Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Spinal Cord Injured Patients
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    March 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 2025 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Liverpool
    Collaborators
    Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust, The Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit, Scotland, Stoke Mandeville Spinal Research

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Rehabilitation robotics has the potential to facilitate rehabilitation at home and empower people with spinal injuries to self-manage increasing their independence and improving their quality of life. The objective of this study is to assess for the first time in the NHS the efficacy of a commercial robotic orthosis for upper limb rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury. The device is produced by Myomo (myomo.com) which is an American company. We will be assessing the wearable robotic orthosis also known as robotic exoskeleton in two different neuro-rehabilitation centres: National Spinal injuries Unit in Glasgow (Scotland) and The Robert Jones and Agnus Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital in Oswestry (England). The study will involve nine spinal cord injured tetraplegic inpatients in total. Patients will follow a twelve-week rehabilitation programme with three to four sessions per week in addition to their usual care and rehabilitation. Each session lasts for approximately 45 minutes. Participants arm function, range of motion, spasticity level will be measured before, half-way and at the end of the programme to assess change in these and other parameters. Training will focus on the dominant arm of the patient and compared to the other arm at every assessment stage. We shall evaluate therapists' and patients' satisfaction with the commercial device in addition to assessing various clinical measures to evaluate the efficacy of using the robotic orthosis in rehabilitation and recovery of arm function.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Spinal Cord Injuries

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Device Feasibility
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    Investigator
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    9 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Device Intervention
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The intervention group who will be undergoing rehabilitation using the robotic exoskeleton in addition to the assigned traditional rehabilitation programme on their dominant arm only.
    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    the matched control group will be the same subjects undergoing traditional rehabilitation only on their non-dominant arm.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Experimental: Device Intervention
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Robotic Rehabilitation
    Intervention Description
    The robotic rehabilitation programme using the MARK from Myomo (myomo.com) for the intervention group will last for 12 weeks with up to four sessions of rehabilitation per week, i.e. total of 48 sessions. Spinal cord injured inpatients in the study will have this intervention on their dominant arm in addition to the traditional rehabilitation programme assigned and standard care.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
    Description
    assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks
    Title
    Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (SCIM III)
    Description
    assesses performance in activities of daily living and mobility for individuals with spinal cord injury
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 12 weeks
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation and Prehension (GRASSP).
    Description
    The GRASSP is a clinical impairment measure for the upper limb for use after tetraplegia. The measure includes three domains which are important in describing hand function.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
    Title
    The modified Ashworth scale
    Description
    Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical spasticity assessment tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
    Title
    Range of Motion
    Description
    to assess the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
    Title
    Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)
    Description
    COPM assesses the patient's perceived occupational performance in the areas of selfcare, productivity, and leisure
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)
    Description
    The QUEST 2.0 evaluates a patient's satisfaction with various assistive technologies.
    Time Frame
    Change from baseline (week 1) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Age 18+ years. The levels of C5 C6 Asia C/D would provide individuals with elbow and hand impairment and potentially functional shoulder movements. C7, C8 individuals could also benefit from the hand component of the device. Some gross shoulder movement at start of the trial to enable changes at the elbow/hand, to have the greatest potential for functional change. Preservation of hand sensation as base for motor restoration. Some sitting balance would give the best opportunity for the arm to be released for functional upper limb activity. EMG (muscle activity) evidence of active finger flexion, extension and elbow flexion extension Grade 1-2. Minimal or No community functional use of upper limb at start of trial. Spasticity MAS 1-3/5.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Heba Lakany, PhD
    Phone
    +447737353181
    Email
    heba.lakany@liverpool.ac.uk
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Karen Wilding
    Phone
    +447717 863747
    Email
    sponsor@liverpool.ac.uk
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Heba Lakany, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Liverpool
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Simon J Pickard
    Organizational Affiliation
    Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Assessment of a Robotic Exoskeleton for Upper Limb Rehabilitation

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs