search
Back to results

Canakinumab for the Prevention of Progression to Cancer in Patients With Clonal Cytopenias of Unknown Significance, IMPACT Study

Primary Purpose

Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biospecimen Collection
Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy
Canakinumab
Chest Radiography
Echocardiography
Placebo Administration
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Sponsored by
Uma Borate
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with age >= 18 with high-risk CCUS Must meet ALL the following criteria: Unexplained, clinically meaningful cytopenias (greater than 4 months) in one or more of the following lineages: erythroid cells, neutrophils, platelets. Clinically meaningful cytopenia is institution specific and threshold may vary on age, sex, and race. Decision-making should depend upon lab values specific to the institution and supersede public works. Based upon published work, significant cytopenias are defined as the following: Erythroid Cells: Hemoglobin < 11 g/dL White Blood Cells: Absolute Neutrophil Count < 1800/microL and > 500/microL Platelets: Platelet Count < 150,000/microL and > 50,000/microL MDS criteria not fulfilled No other evidence of hematological malignancy No or only mild (< 10%) bone marrow dysplasia Blast cells < 5% detected via morphologic examination of blood and/or bone marrow smears which can also be supported by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemical studies Any of the following: Isolated somatic spliceosome mutation at any VAF (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, or ZRSR2) Isolated TP53 mutation greater than 5% VAF At least 1 mutation in TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 at any VAF coupled with at least 1 other known myeloid pathogenic somatic mutation or known pathogenic germline mutation that predisposes to myeloid malignancy as determined by next generation sequencing and bone marrow biopsy A TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 greater than 10% VAF coupled with another TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 greater than 10% VAF The presence of two or more known myeloid pathogenic somatic or germline mutations (other than TET2, ASXL1, DMNT3A, TP53, or spliceosome mutations) greater than 10% VAF Ability to understand and willingness to sign the written informed consent document Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2 Patients with a history of hypertension or active hypertension are strongly encouraged to optimize blood pressure control Creatinine clearance greater than 45 ml/min using Cockcroft-Gault Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x ULN Aspartate transaminase (AST) < 3 x ULN Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 3 x ULN Exclusion Criteria: Concurrent malignancy requiring active systemic therapy Diagnosis of MDS or any other myeloid malignancy in the patient's lifetime History of Hypersensitivity to canakinumab or drug of a similar class Active infection requiring prompt evaluation and treatment or history of recurrent infections Known active or recurrent hepatic disorder including cirrhosis, hepatitis B and C (via positive or indeterminate central laboratory [lab] results) Subjects with active tuberculosis. In subjects without active tuberculosis, if the results of the evaluation require treatment per local guidelines, then the treatment should be initiated before randomization (unless otherwise required by Health Authorities or Institutional Review Board (IRB) in which case curative treatment must be completed prior to screening) Subjects with suspected or proven immunocompromised state or infections. If the results of this screening per local treatment guidelines or clinical practice require treatment for said infection then the patient is not eligible. Suspected or proven immunocompromised states or infections include: Those with any other medical condition such as active infection, treated or untreated, which in the opinion of the investigator places the subject at an unacceptable risk for participation in immunomodulatory therapy Known history of testing positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. For countries where HIV status is mandatory: testing positive for HIV during screening using a local test. Allogeneic bone marrow or solid organ transplant (history of any or within a certain period of time?) Those requiring systemic or local treatment with any immune modulating agent in doses with systemic effects e.g.: Prednisone > 20 mg (or equivalent) oral or intravenous daily for > 14 days Prednisone > 5 mg and =< 20 mg (or equivalent) daily for > 30 days Equivalent dose of methotrexate > 15 mg weekly Note: Azathioprine is allowed. Daily glucocorticoid-replacement for conditions such as adrenal or pituitary insufficiency is allowed. Topical, inhaled or local steroid use in doses that are not considered to cause systemic effects are permitted. Steroids for pre-medication related to chemotherapy as per local standard of care are permitted. Live or attenuated vaccination within 3 months prior to first dose of study drug (e.g. Measles/Mumps/Rubella [MMR], Yellow Fever, Rotavirus, Smallpox, etc.) and after initiation of canakinumab treatment Use of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) or growth factors within four weeks prior to the start of the study Pregnant or nursing women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment and for up to 130 days after last dose of study drug. Basic contraception methods include: Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps). For UK: with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/ vaginal suppository Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate < 1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment. Prior to entry into this study, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which may be toxic to the fetus, may be given. The time between the end of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and the start canakinumab/placebo treatment is variable, resulting in a variable need for continuation of highly effective contraception. Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (i.e. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks prior to first dose of study drug. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential. If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the Informed Consent Form (ICF).

Sites / Locations

  • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

ARM I (canakinumab)

ARM II (placebo)

Arm Description

Patients receive canakinumab SC on study. All patients also undergo ECHO and chest x-ray during screening, collection of blood samples during screening and follow up, and bone marrow biopsy and aspiration throughout the trial.

Patients receive placebo SC on study. All patients also undergo ECHO and chest x-ray during screening, collection of blood samples during screening and follow up, and bone marrow biopsy and aspiration throughout the trial.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to overt myeloid malignancy
Will be estimated with the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method to compute the median time as well as the percentage of study participants with a diagnosed hematologic malignancy of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)/ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at landmark time points (e.g., 1-year, 2-years) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Since this method will censor patients who die without having developed MDS/MPN/CMML/AML, we will also compute the cumulative incidence of overt myeloid malignancy that accounts for the competing risk of death in the absence of a hematologic malignancy. All randomized patients will be included in the primary endpoint analysis in the arm to which they were randomized (ie, intent-to-treat population).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Hematological overall response rate
Number of patients that achieve response divided by the number or randomized patients. Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Complete hematological response rate
Number of patient that achieve complete response divided by the number of randomized patients. Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Duration of hematological response
Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Overall survival
Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and estimates at landmark time points (e.g., 1-year, 2-years) will be provided with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Changes in variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of somatic mutations
Will be assessed by bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) samples with next generation sequencing (NGS). VAFs will be analyzed as a continuous variable and as the proportion of patients with at least a 50% of reduction in VAFs of somatic mutations relative to baseline using an Ion Torrent platform.
Infection-related adverse event rates
The number of patients who have an adverse event of interest divided by the number of patients who have adverse events assessed.
Recovery of blood cell populations
Changes in the percentages of lymphocytes and specific sub-types (ie T-cells) as well as erythroid, platelet, and neutrophil response via 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) International Working Group (IWG) hematological improvement criteria before and after therapy as assessed in bone marrow (BM) and hematological samples.
Cardiovascular episodes
The number of patients who has a cardiovascular event of interest divided by the number of patients who have adverse events assessed.
Patient reported outcomes
Outcomes reported using EORTC QLQ-C30 and compared between the two arms.

Full Information

First Posted
November 29, 2022
Last Updated
March 23, 2023
Sponsor
Uma Borate
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05641831
Brief Title
Canakinumab for the Prevention of Progression to Cancer in Patients With Clonal Cytopenias of Unknown Significance, IMPACT Study
Official Title
A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Phase II Multi-Center Study of Inflammation Modification of Canakinumab to Prevent Leukemic Progression of Clonal Cytopenias of Unknown Significance (CCUS): IMPACT Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 6, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Uma Borate

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase II trial tests how well canakinumab works to prevent progression to cancer in patients with clonal cytopenias of unknown significance (CCUS). CCUS is a blood condition defined by a decrease in blood cells. Blood cells are composed of either red blood cells, white blood cells, or platelets. In patients with CCUS, blood counts have been low for a long period of time. Patients with CCUS also have a mutation in one of the genes that are responsible for helping blood cells develop. The combination of genetic mutations and low blood cell counts puts patients with CCUS at a higher risk to develop blood cancers in the future. This transformation from low blood cell counts to cancer may be caused by inflammation in the body. Canakinumab is a monoclonal antibody that may block inflammation in the body by targeting a specific antibody called the anti-human interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta).
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. To evaluate the length of time until development of a myeloid neoplasm (ie myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], myeloproliferative neoplasm [MPN], chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML], or acute myeloid leukemia [AML]) in high-risk clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) patients receiving canakinumab as therapeutic intervention compared to the control arm. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the effect of canakinumab on hematological overall response rate. II. To determine the effect of canakinumab on complete hematological response rate. III. To determine the effect of canakinumab on response duration. IV. To determine the effect of canakinumab on overall survival. V. To determine the effect of canakinumab on mutational burden. VI. To determine the effect of canakinumab on infection-related adverse events. VII. To determine the effect of canakinumab on recovery of blood cell populations. VIII. To determine the effect of canakinumab on cardiovascular episodes compared to a control arm. IX. Patient reported outcomes will be collected using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C3). EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. To quantify changes in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment according to immune cell constitution and cytokine levels over the course of canakinumab treatment compared to a control arm. II. To characterize the inflammatory milieu in peripheral blood (PB) and BM samples by serial measurement and characterization of key cytokines (IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF alpha and beta, and IFN-gamma), sensitivity of patient samples to these cytokines and relationships to various genes involved in clonal hematopoiesis. III. To determine the dynamics of change in clone size of various CH genes in serial patient treatment and control samples, during the study, by a variety of assays including single cell sequencing, copy number alterations, and variant allele frequency (VAF) measurement to characterize differences in disease evolution. IV. To collect serial measurement of immune cell populations in PB and BM of serial patient treatment and control samples, during the study, to characterize various immune cells involving both the innate and adaptive immune system including natural killer (NK) cell, T cell subsets namely effector, regulatory and memory T cells as well as various cell surface molecules such as checkpoint modulators (PD-1/PD-L1/TIM-3, LAG-3). V. To understand the effect of global effects on the BM microenvironment of CH status/post (s/p) canakinumab treatment compared to the control patients using ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequencing and global methylation assays to further characterize unique genomic signatures in these patients. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to one of two arms. ARM I: Patients receive canakinumab subcutaneously (SC) on study. ARM II: Patients receive placebo SC on study. All patients also undergo echocardiogram (ECHO) and chest x-ray during screening, collection of blood samples during screening and follow up, and bone marrow biopsy and aspiration throughout the trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Clonal Cytopenia of Undetermined Significance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ARM I (canakinumab)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients receive canakinumab SC on study. All patients also undergo ECHO and chest x-ray during screening, collection of blood samples during screening and follow up, and bone marrow biopsy and aspiration throughout the trial.
Arm Title
ARM II (placebo)
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients receive placebo SC on study. All patients also undergo ECHO and chest x-ray during screening, collection of blood samples during screening and follow up, and bone marrow biopsy and aspiration throughout the trial.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Biospecimen Collection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biological Sample Collection, Biospecimen Collected, Specimen Collection
Intervention Description
Undergo peripheral blood collection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy
Intervention Description
Undergo bone marrow biopsy and aspiration
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Canakinumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
ACZ885, Ilaris
Intervention Description
Given SC
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chest Radiography
Other Intervention Name(s)
Chest X-ray
Intervention Description
Undergo chest x-ray
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Echocardiography
Other Intervention Name(s)
EC
Intervention Description
Undergo ECHO
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo Administration
Intervention Description
Given SC
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to overt myeloid malignancy
Description
Will be estimated with the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method to compute the median time as well as the percentage of study participants with a diagnosed hematologic malignancy of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)/ acute myeloid leukemia (AML) at landmark time points (e.g., 1-year, 2-years) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Since this method will censor patients who die without having developed MDS/MPN/CMML/AML, we will also compute the cumulative incidence of overt myeloid malignancy that accounts for the competing risk of death in the absence of a hematologic malignancy. All randomized patients will be included in the primary endpoint analysis in the arm to which they were randomized (ie, intent-to-treat population).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until the first date of overt myeloid malignancy diagnosis, assessed up to 6 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hematological overall response rate
Description
Number of patients that achieve response divided by the number or randomized patients. Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Time Frame
6 month assessment
Title
Complete hematological response rate
Description
Number of patient that achieve complete response divided by the number of randomized patients. Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Time Frame
6 month assessment
Title
Duration of hematological response
Description
Will be summarized using the method of Kaplan-Meier but also using the cumulative incidence function which would treat death in the absence of documented relapse as a completing risk.
Time Frame
From the date of first documented hematological response until the date of documented diagnosis of MDS, MPN, CMML, or AML, assessed up to 6 years
Title
Overall survival
Description
Will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier and estimates at landmark time points (e.g., 1-year, 2-years) will be provided with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time Frame
From the date of registration until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 6 years
Title
Changes in variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of somatic mutations
Description
Will be assessed by bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) samples with next generation sequencing (NGS). VAFs will be analyzed as a continuous variable and as the proportion of patients with at least a 50% of reduction in VAFs of somatic mutations relative to baseline using an Ion Torrent platform.
Time Frame
Up to 6 years
Title
Infection-related adverse event rates
Description
The number of patients who have an adverse event of interest divided by the number of patients who have adverse events assessed.
Time Frame
Up to 6 years
Title
Recovery of blood cell populations
Description
Changes in the percentages of lymphocytes and specific sub-types (ie T-cells) as well as erythroid, platelet, and neutrophil response via 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) International Working Group (IWG) hematological improvement criteria before and after therapy as assessed in bone marrow (BM) and hematological samples.
Time Frame
Up to 6 years
Title
Cardiovascular episodes
Description
The number of patients who has a cardiovascular event of interest divided by the number of patients who have adverse events assessed.
Time Frame
Up to 6 years
Title
Patient reported outcomes
Description
Outcomes reported using EORTC QLQ-C30 and compared between the two arms.
Time Frame
Up to 6 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with age >= 18 with high-risk CCUS Must meet ALL the following criteria: Unexplained, clinically meaningful cytopenias (greater than 4 months) in one or more of the following lineages: erythroid cells, neutrophils, platelets. Clinically meaningful cytopenia is institution specific and threshold may vary on age, sex, and race. Decision-making should depend upon lab values specific to the institution and supersede public works. Based upon published work, significant cytopenias are defined as the following: Erythroid Cells: Hemoglobin < 11 g/dL White Blood Cells: Absolute Neutrophil Count < 1800/microL and > 500/microL Platelets: Platelet Count < 150,000/microL and > 50,000/microL MDS criteria not fulfilled No other evidence of hematological malignancy No or only mild (< 10%) bone marrow dysplasia Blast cells < 5% detected via morphologic examination of blood and/or bone marrow smears which can also be supported by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemical studies Any of the following: Isolated somatic spliceosome mutation at any VAF (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, or ZRSR2) Isolated TP53 mutation greater than 5% VAF At least 1 mutation in TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 at any VAF coupled with at least 1 other known myeloid pathogenic somatic mutation or known pathogenic germline mutation that predisposes to myeloid malignancy as determined by next generation sequencing and bone marrow biopsy A TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 greater than 10% VAF coupled with another TET2, DMNT3A, or ASXL1 greater than 10% VAF The presence of two or more known myeloid pathogenic somatic or germline mutations (other than TET2, ASXL1, DMNT3A, TP53, or spliceosome mutations) greater than 10% VAF Ability to understand and willingness to sign the written informed consent document Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2 Patients with a history of hypertension or active hypertension are strongly encouraged to optimize blood pressure control Creatinine clearance greater than 45 ml/min using Cockcroft-Gault Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x ULN Aspartate transaminase (AST) < 3 x ULN Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 3 x ULN Exclusion Criteria: Concurrent malignancy requiring active systemic therapy Diagnosis of MDS or any other myeloid malignancy in the patient's lifetime History of Hypersensitivity to canakinumab or drug of a similar class Active infection requiring prompt evaluation and treatment or history of recurrent infections Known active or recurrent hepatic disorder including cirrhosis, hepatitis B and C (via positive or indeterminate central laboratory [lab] results) Subjects with active tuberculosis. In subjects without active tuberculosis, if the results of the evaluation require treatment per local guidelines, then the treatment should be initiated before randomization (unless otherwise required by Health Authorities or Institutional Review Board (IRB) in which case curative treatment must be completed prior to screening) Subjects with suspected or proven immunocompromised state or infections. If the results of this screening per local treatment guidelines or clinical practice require treatment for said infection then the patient is not eligible. Suspected or proven immunocompromised states or infections include: Those with any other medical condition such as active infection, treated or untreated, which in the opinion of the investigator places the subject at an unacceptable risk for participation in immunomodulatory therapy Known history of testing positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. For countries where HIV status is mandatory: testing positive for HIV during screening using a local test. Allogeneic bone marrow or solid organ transplant (history of any or within a certain period of time?) Those requiring systemic or local treatment with any immune modulating agent in doses with systemic effects e.g.: Prednisone > 20 mg (or equivalent) oral or intravenous daily for > 14 days Prednisone > 5 mg and =< 20 mg (or equivalent) daily for > 30 days Equivalent dose of methotrexate > 15 mg weekly Note: Azathioprine is allowed. Daily glucocorticoid-replacement for conditions such as adrenal or pituitary insufficiency is allowed. Topical, inhaled or local steroid use in doses that are not considered to cause systemic effects are permitted. Steroids for pre-medication related to chemotherapy as per local standard of care are permitted. Live or attenuated vaccination within 3 months prior to first dose of study drug (e.g. Measles/Mumps/Rubella [MMR], Yellow Fever, Rotavirus, Smallpox, etc.) and after initiation of canakinumab treatment Use of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) or growth factors within four weeks prior to the start of the study Pregnant or nursing women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female after conception and until the termination of gestation, confirmed by a positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) laboratory test. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using basic methods of contraception during dosing of study treatment and for up to 130 days after last dose of study drug. Basic contraception methods include: Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation at least 6 weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female subjects on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that subject Barrier methods of contraception: Condom or Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps). For UK: with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/ vaginal suppository Use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate < 1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment. Prior to entry into this study, cisplatin-based chemotherapy, which may be toxic to the fetus, may be given. The time between the end of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and the start canakinumab/placebo treatment is variable, resulting in a variable need for continuation of highly effective contraception. Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (i.e. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation at least six weeks prior to first dose of study drug. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential. If local regulations deviate from the contraception methods listed above to prevent pregnancy, local regulations apply and will be described in the Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Phone
800-293-5066
Email
OSUCCCClinicaltrials@osumc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Uma M Borate, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Uma M. Borate, MD, MS
Phone
614-293-3316
Email
borate.2@osu.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Uma M. Borate, MD, MS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Links:
URL
http://cancer.osu.edu
Description
The Jamesline

Learn more about this trial

Canakinumab for the Prevention of Progression to Cancer in Patients With Clonal Cytopenias of Unknown Significance, IMPACT Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs