search
Back to results

Is ESWT Better in Plantar Fasciitis Treatment?

Primary Purpose

Plantar Fascitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
extracorporeal Shock wave therapy
Corticosteroid injection
Kinesiotaping
Sponsored by
Harran University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Plantar Fascitis focused on measuring ESWT, Kinesiotaping, corticosteroid injection

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: previously diagnosed with PF, did not benefit from conservative treatment for at least six months, did not use anticoagulants, did not have bleeding disorders, did not have a psychiatric disease Exclusion Criteria: previous ESWT or CI treatment obesity, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, tarsal tunnel syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, foot-ankle deformity (pes cavus, pes planus, etc.), history of mass around foot and ankle, previous foot or ankle surgery degenerative arthritis around this region

Sites / Locations

  • Harran University Medicine Faculty
  • Sanliurfa Regional Training and Research Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

extracorporeal Shock wave therapy (ESWT)

Kinesiotaping

Corticosteroid injection

Arm Description

ESWT was performed by the same physician. The applicator was placed at the point of maximum sensitivity. Two thousand pulses with a frequency of 6 Hz and a pressure of 3 bar were applied to patients with an Auto Wave 695 (Mettler electronics, USA) brand device. Patients underwent two sessions of ESWT per week for two weeks, adding up to a total of 4 sessions. Local or regional anesthesia was not administered to any patient during ESWT.

Kinesio tape (KinesioTex, KinesioTaping, US) was applied to the relevant extremity of the patient by the physical therapy and rehabilitation physician once a week, three times in total. During KT, the patient was positioned with the knee and ankle joints in the neutral position. The first strip was adhered along the plantar fascia from the calcaneus to the toes using maximum stretch. The other four strips of tape were attached medially and laterally to support the medial longitudinal arch with a 45° inclination. While maximum stretching was applied to the middle 1/3 of all bands, no stretching was applied to the ends.

In the CI group, 40mg/1ml methylprednisolone was applied from the inferior-medial side of the heel to the most sensitive area of the calcaneus medial tubercle of the plantar fascia. The same physician performed a total of two sessions once a week.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at six weeks in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six weeks in the corticosteroid injection group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six weeks. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months in the corticosteroid injection group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at six months in the corticosteroid injection group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six weeks in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at three months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six weeks in the corticosteroid injection group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score at three months in the corticosteroid injection group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score at six months in the corticosteroid injection group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six weeks in the kinesiotherapy group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain at week six. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at three months in the kinesiotherapy group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six months in the kinesiotherapy group.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at six weeks in the kinesiotherapy group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at three months in the kinesiotherapy group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at six months in the kinesiotherapy group.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison of visual analog scale results of sixth-week extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Comparison of visual analog scale results of third months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Comparison of visual analog scale results of sixth months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of sixth weeks extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at sixth weeks. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of three months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of sixth months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.

Full Information

First Posted
November 23, 2022
Last Updated
December 14, 2022
Sponsor
Harran University
Collaborators
Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05647291
Brief Title
Is ESWT Better in Plantar Fasciitis Treatment?
Official Title
Pain Relief and Functional Improvement Provided by ESWT in Plantar Fasciitis is Better Than Corticosteroid Injection and Kinesiotherapy: A Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 15, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 17, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 28, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Harran University
Collaborators
Sanliurfa Education and Research Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
It was aimed to compare the pain and functional results of ESWT, kinesiotherapy and corticosteroid injection in patients with treatment-resistant plantar fasciitis.
Detailed Description
The groups were randomized in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis who did not benefit from conservative treatment. A questionnaire study was conducted at the first visit, sixth week, third month, and sixth month. Visual analog scale (VAS) and The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score were applied as a questionnaire at each control visit of the patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Plantar Fascitis
Keywords
ESWT, Kinesiotaping, corticosteroid injection

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
90 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
extracorporeal Shock wave therapy (ESWT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ESWT was performed by the same physician. The applicator was placed at the point of maximum sensitivity. Two thousand pulses with a frequency of 6 Hz and a pressure of 3 bar were applied to patients with an Auto Wave 695 (Mettler electronics, USA) brand device. Patients underwent two sessions of ESWT per week for two weeks, adding up to a total of 4 sessions. Local or regional anesthesia was not administered to any patient during ESWT.
Arm Title
Kinesiotaping
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Kinesio tape (KinesioTex, KinesioTaping, US) was applied to the relevant extremity of the patient by the physical therapy and rehabilitation physician once a week, three times in total. During KT, the patient was positioned with the knee and ankle joints in the neutral position. The first strip was adhered along the plantar fascia from the calcaneus to the toes using maximum stretch. The other four strips of tape were attached medially and laterally to support the medial longitudinal arch with a 45° inclination. While maximum stretching was applied to the middle 1/3 of all bands, no stretching was applied to the ends.
Arm Title
Corticosteroid injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In the CI group, 40mg/1ml methylprednisolone was applied from the inferior-medial side of the heel to the most sensitive area of the calcaneus medial tubercle of the plantar fascia. The same physician performed a total of two sessions once a week.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
extracorporeal Shock wave therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
an Auto Wave 695 (Mettler electronics, USA) brand device
Intervention Description
Two thousand pulses with a frequency of 6 Hz and a pressure of 3 bar were applied to patients with an Auto Wave 695 (Mettler electronics, USA) brand device. Patients underwent two sessions of ESWT per week, for two weeks, adding up to a total of 4 sessions.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Corticosteroid injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
methylprednisolone
Intervention Description
40mg/1ml methylprednisolone, two sessions once a week
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Kinesiotaping
Other Intervention Name(s)
KinesioTex, KinesioTaping, US
Intervention Description
The first strip was adhered along the plantar fascia from the calcaneus to the toes using maximum stretch. The other four strips of tape were attached medially and laterally to support the medial longitudinal arch with a 45° inclination. While maximum stretching was applied to the middle 1/3 of all bands, no stretching was applied to the ends. Once a week, three times
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at six weeks in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six weeks in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six weeks. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at three months in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores at six months in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six weeks in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at three months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six months in the extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) score at six weeks in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score at three months in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score at six months in the corticosteroid injection group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Title
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six weeks in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain at week six. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline pain in visual analog scale (VAS) score at three months in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline pain outcomes in visual analog scale (VAS) score at six months in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at six weeks in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at week six. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six weeks
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at three months in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and three months
Title
Change from baseline functional outcomes in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) at six months in the kinesiotherapy group.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free.
Time Frame
Baseline and six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of visual analog scale results of sixth-week extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
sixth week
Title
Comparison of visual analog scale results of third months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
third month
Title
Comparison of visual analog scale results of sixth months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The visual analog scale (VAS) score is validated, the self-reported tool that assesses the intensity of mean pain outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The VAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the VAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
sixth month
Title
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of sixth weeks extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at sixth weeks. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
sixth weeks
Title
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of three months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at three months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
three month
Title
Comparison of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores results of sixth months extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), kinesiotherapy, and corticosteroid injection therapy.
Description
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) scores are validated, self-reported tools that assess the intensity of mean functional outcomes at six months. Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points. The AOFAS score is obtained online for free. We compared the AOFAS scores of three different treatment modalities.
Time Frame
sixth month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: previously diagnosed with PF, did not benefit from conservative treatment for at least six months, did not use anticoagulants, did not have bleeding disorders, did not have a psychiatric disease Exclusion Criteria: previous ESWT or CI treatment obesity, seronegative spondyloarthropathy, tarsal tunnel syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, foot-ankle deformity (pes cavus, pes planus, etc.), history of mass around foot and ankle, previous foot or ankle surgery degenerative arthritis around this region
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Özlem Orhan
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Harran University Medicine Faculty, Şanlıurfa, Turkey
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Harran University Medicine Faculty
City
Şanlıurfa
State/Province
Outside Of The US
Country
Turkey
Facility Name
Sanliurfa Regional Training and Research Hospital
City
Şanlıurfa
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
all IPD that underlie results in a publication
IPD Sharing Time Frame
for a period of six months, starting three months after publication.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Information can be obtained by medical doctors by contacting the principal investigator via e-mail.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34214104
Citation
Tang M, Wang L, You Y, Li J, Hu X. Effects of taping techniques on arch deformation in adults with pes planus: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0253567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253567. eCollection 2021.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22421623
Citation
Chang KV, Chen SY, Chen WS, Tu YK, Chien KL. Comparative effectiveness of focused shock wave therapy of different intensity levels and radial shock wave therapy for treating plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1259-68. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.023. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30828215
Citation
Mishra BN, Poudel RR, Banskota B, Shrestha BK, Banskota AK. Effectiveness of extra-corporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) vs methylprednisolone injections in plantar fasciitis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):401-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Is ESWT Better in Plantar Fasciitis Treatment?

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs