search
Back to results

Acute Stroke: Prehospital Versus In-HospitAL Initiation of Recanalization Therapy- ASPHALT (ASPHALT)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Acute

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mobile Stroke Unit deployment
Sponsored by
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke, Acute focused on measuring Mobile Stroke Unit, MSU, Intravenous thrombolysis, Emergency Medical Service, Mechanical thrombectomy, Cost-utility, Cost-effectiveness

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Emergency call to one of the two following emergency medical service (EMS) dispatch centers : SAMU (Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente) or BSPP (Brigade des Sapeurs Pompiers de Paris), between 08:00 and 18:00, 5 days a week (Monday to Friday). Suspected acute stroke according to a dispatcher stroke identification algorithm, adapted from the ROSIER scale Symptom onset-to-randomization time ≤ 6h Patient located within the predefined catchment area of the MSU MSU available at the time of the EMS call Informed consent (as approved by the ethics committee, informed consent will be obtained after randomization: at the arrival of the MSU (intervention group), or at hospital arrival (control group)) Exclusion Criteria: Patient confined to be more than 50% of waking hours Unknown or uncertain onset time (e.g. wake-up stroke) Medical history of epilepsy Recent epileptic seizure (<12 hrs) Suspicion of pregnancy Parturient or breastfeeding woman Patient already participating in another interventional study, which could influence the mRS at 3 months. Patient under guardianship or curatorship Patient not affiliated to French Social Security

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital Kremlin-Bicêtre
  • Lariboisière
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière
  • GHU Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences
  • SAMU 75 de Paris
  • BSPP, Brigade des Sapeurs-Pompiers de Paris
  • Hôpital Bichat
  • Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild
  • Hôpital Saint Joseph
  • Hôpital Foch

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention (MSU)

Control (usual care)

Arm Description

Deployment of MSU + conventional ambulance

Deployment of conventional ambulance

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR)
ICUR in the lifetime horizon, based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
Key secondary outcome: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months
Modified Rankin scale, assessed in a blinded fashion (range, 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 3 indicating moderate disability, and 6 indicating death)

Secondary Outcome Measures

ICUR at 3 months
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
ICUR at 5 years
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
Time from symptom onset to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
Time from symptom onset to IVT bolus
Time from symptom onset to mechanical thrombectomy (MT)
Time from symptom onset to arterial puncture
Time from alarm to IVT
Time from ambulance dispatch to IVT bolus
Time from alarm to MT
Time from ambulance dispatch to arterial puncture
Death within 3 months after randomization
All-cause mortality
Death within 7 days after randomization
All-cause mortality
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT
Proportion of patient treated with IVT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients with MT
Proportion of patient treated with MT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Golden hour thrombolysis
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
ECASS-2 definition

Full Information

First Posted
December 2, 2022
Last Updated
December 12, 2022
Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Collaborators
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Ministry of Health, France
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05649670
Brief Title
Acute Stroke: Prehospital Versus In-HospitAL Initiation of Recanalization Therapy- ASPHALT
Acronym
ASPHALT
Official Title
Prehospital Initiation of Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Randomized Medico-economic Evaluation of a Mobile Stroke Unit.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
January 2, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
January 2, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier St Anne
Collaborators
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Ministry of Health, France

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
ASPHALT is an academic-driven open-label randomized controlled trial of Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) deployment versus standard care in France, with blinded assessment of efficacy endpoints. 450 patients with confirmed acute ischemic stroke will be recruited over a 3-year period, with 3-month follow-up.
Detailed Description
Instead of the traditional approach of waiting until the patient arrives at the hospital to perform brain imaging and start reperfusion therapies, mobile stroke units (MSUs; ambulances equipped with a CT scanner) now allow pre-hospital initiation of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Two large non-randomized clinical trials (B_PROUD & BEST-MSU) have recently shown that MSU use leads to improved functional outcomes at 3 months in specific settings. However, MSUs have been criticized because of their cost and a lack of evidence of a significant reduction in the time between symptom onset and mechanical thrombectomy, which is the cornerstone of treatment of patients with large vessel occlusion. We hypothesized that compared to usual care, the deployment of a MSU would result in an incremental cost-utility ratio ≤50,000 euros per QALY in the lifetime horizon, even in an area with many thrombectomy-capable centers.. Academic-driven open-label randomized controlled trial of Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) deployment versus standard care in France, with blinded assessment of efficacy endpoints. Randomization will be performed on an individual patient basis (randomization of MSU deployment at dispatch). 450 patients with confirmed acute ischemic stroke (emergency call ≤6 hours after onset) will be recruited over a 3-year period, with 3-month follow-up. Costs and clinical outcomes will be collected prospectively during the study period and used to extrapolate the incremental cost-utility ratio over a lifetime horizon.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Acute
Keywords
Mobile Stroke Unit, MSU, Intravenous thrombolysis, Emergency Medical Service, Mechanical thrombectomy, Cost-utility, Cost-effectiveness

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial, PROBE design
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Blinded assessment of 3-month mRS (via telephone interview)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
450 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention (MSU)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Deployment of MSU + conventional ambulance
Arm Title
Control (usual care)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Deployment of conventional ambulance
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Mobile Stroke Unit deployment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mobile Stroke Unit management
Intervention Description
Deployment of an MSU + conventional ambulance, allowing prehospital CT-scan imaging with intracranial CT angiography. This will allow prehospital intravenous thrombolysis and optimal triage (i.e. accurate identification of patients with large vessel occlusion, who are eligible for mechanical thrombectomy).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio (ICUR)
Description
ICUR in the lifetime horizon, based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Key secondary outcome: Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months
Description
Modified Rankin scale, assessed in a blinded fashion (range, 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 3 indicating moderate disability, and 6 indicating death)
Time Frame
90 +/- 14 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ICUR at 3 months
Description
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
Time Frame
90 +/- 14 days
Title
ICUR at 5 years
Description
Incremental Cost-Utility Ratio based on extrapolated results of the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months and incremental costs prospectively collected during the first 3 months
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Time from symptom onset to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)
Description
Time from symptom onset to IVT bolus
Time Frame
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Title
Time from symptom onset to mechanical thrombectomy (MT)
Description
Time from symptom onset to arterial puncture
Time Frame
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Title
Time from alarm to IVT
Description
Time from ambulance dispatch to IVT bolus
Time Frame
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Title
Time from alarm to MT
Description
Time from ambulance dispatch to arterial puncture
Time Frame
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Title
Death within 3 months after randomization
Description
All-cause mortality
Time Frame
Within 90 days after randomization
Title
Death within 7 days after randomization
Description
All-cause mortality
Time Frame
Within 7 days after randomization
Title
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT
Description
Proportion of patient treated with IVT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
Time Frame
up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset
Title
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients with MT
Description
Proportion of patient treated with MT among those with confirmed ischemic stroke
Time Frame
up to 24 hours from symptom onset
Title
Proportion of ischemic stroke patients treated with IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Description
Golden hour thrombolysis
Time Frame
within 60 minutes of symptom onset
Title
Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage
Description
ECASS-2 definition
Time Frame
Within 36 hours from randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Emergency call to one of the two following emergency medical service (EMS) dispatch centers : SAMU (Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente) or BSPP (Brigade des Sapeurs Pompiers de Paris), between 08:00 and 18:00, 5 days a week (Monday to Friday). Suspected acute stroke according to a dispatcher stroke identification algorithm, adapted from the ROSIER scale Symptom onset-to-randomization time ≤ 6h Patient located within the predefined catchment area of the MSU MSU available at the time of the EMS call Informed consent (as approved by the ethics committee, informed consent will be obtained after randomization: at the arrival of the MSU (intervention group), or at hospital arrival (control group)) Exclusion Criteria: Patient confined to be more than 50% of waking hours Unknown or uncertain onset time (e.g. wake-up stroke) Medical history of epilepsy Recent epileptic seizure (<12 hrs) Suspicion of pregnancy Parturient or breastfeeding woman Patient already participating in another interventional study, which could influence the mRS at 3 months. Patient under guardianship or curatorship Patient not affiliated to French Social Security
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Khaoussou SYLLA, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (01) 45 65 76 78
Email
k.sylla@ghu-paris.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Malha BERRAH, MSc
Phone
+33 (0)1 56 09 58 22
Email
malha.berrah@aphp.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume TURC, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benoît VIVIEN, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
APHP - Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Necker
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital Kremlin-Bicêtre
City
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre
ZIP/Postal Code
94275
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian DENIER, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0) 145 21 24 03
Email
christian.denier@aphp.fr
Facility Name
Lariboisière
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mikaël MAZIGHI, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)1 49 95 25 97
Email
mmazighi@for.paris
Facility Name
Pitié-Salpêtrière
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sonia ALAMOWITCH, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)1 71 97 06 51
Email
sonia.alamowitch@aphp.fr
Facility Name
GHU Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75014
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guillaume TURC, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)1 45 65 85 65
Email
g.turc@ghu-paris.fr
Facility Name
SAMU 75 de Paris
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Benoît VIVIEN, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)1 44 49 24 75
Email
benoit.vivien@aphp.fr
Facility Name
BSPP, Brigade des Sapeurs-Pompiers de Paris
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75017
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Caterina ZAMPIERI, MD
Phone
+33 (0)6 51 15 13 42
Email
zampiericaterina@gmail.com
Facility Name
Hôpital Bichat
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75018
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pierre AMARENCO, MD
Phone
+33 (0) 140 25 60 23
Email
pierre.amarenco@aphp.fr
Facility Name
Fondation Ophtalmologique Rothschild
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75019
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michaël OBADIA, MD
Phone
+33 (0)1 48 03 68 52
Email
mobadia@for.paris
Facility Name
Hôpital Saint Joseph
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75674
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mathieu ZUBER, MD, PhD
Phone
+33 (0)1 44 12 34 09
Email
mzuber@gfpsj.fr
Facility Name
Hôpital Foch
City
Suresnes
ZIP/Postal Code
92151
Country
France
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bertrand LAPERGUE, MD
Phone
+33 (1) 46 25 59 73
Email
b.lapergue@hopital-foch.org

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data (IPD) could be available to other researcher aiming to conduct an IPD-meta analysis of studies of MSU vs. usual care (please see access criteria below).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Two years after the last publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered. Data sharing must respect the agreements made with funders. Teams wishing to obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and PI team to present scientific (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and time frame. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractual agreement. Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35129584
Citation
Turc G, Hadziahmetovic M, Walter S, Churilov L, Larsen K, Grotta JC, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Katsanos AH, Zhao H, Donnan G, Davis SM, Hussain MS, Uchino K, Helwig SA, Johns H, Weber JE, Nolte CH, Kunz A, Steiner T, Sacco S, Ebinger M, Tsivgoulis G, Fassbender K, Audebert HJ. Comparison of Mobile Stroke Unit With Usual Care for Acute Ischemic Stroke Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2022 Mar 1;79(3):281-290. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5321.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Acute Stroke: Prehospital Versus In-HospitAL Initiation of Recanalization Therapy- ASPHALT

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs