search
Back to results

Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs (ClessTKA)

Primary Purpose

Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TKA
Sponsored by
Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Knee Osteoarthritis focused on measuring CT based micromotion analysis, CTMA, Cementless TKA, Uncemented TKA, Total knee replacement, Total knee arthroplasty, TKR, GMK Sphere, Tritanium

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: • Patients referred to Kristiansund Hospital for primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis with Kellgren & Lawrence grade 3 or 4 Exclusion Criteria: Preoperative severe deformity (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle of >5 (valgus) or <-15 degrees (varus) on a full-length leg image at weight bearing Preoperative flexion contracture more than 15° Less than 50 and more than 75 years of age at the time of surgery Use of walking aids because of other musculoskeletal and neuromuscular problems Preoperative diagnosis other than osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, tumours) Revision arthroplasty Obesity with BMI>35 g/m2 Lateral collateral ligament deficient knee Previous knee joint infection Cognitive dysfunction or severe psychiatric disorders.

Sites / Locations

  • Kristiansund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital TrustRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Control group

Study group

Arm Description

Cementless Triathlon Tritanium 3D printed TKA

GMK Sphere cementless 3D printed TKA

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

CTMA Maximum Total Translation
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point
CTMA Maximum Total Translation
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point

Secondary Outcome Measures

CTMA Total rotation
Center of mass and peripheral points (degrees)
CTMA Total rotation
Center of mass and peripheral points (degrees)
CTMA Total translation
Center of mass and peripheral points (millimeters)
CTMA Total translation
Center of mass and peripheral points (millimeters)
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure PROMs). 12 item likert scale with scores from 0-4 (0=never, 4= allways). Mean value is multiplied with 25 and the subtracted from 100. Maximum score i 100 (excellent), minimum score is 0 (worse).
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure PROMs). 12 item likert scale with scores from 0-4 (0=never, 4= allways). Mean value is multiplied with 25 and the subtracted from 100. Maximum score i 100 (excellent), minimum score is 0 (worse).
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROMs). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activites of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROMs). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activites of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale
Range of motion
From full extension to full flexion (degrees)
Range of motion
From full extension to full flexion (degrees)
HKA
Hip knee ankle angle measured on X-ray (degrees). Deviation from 0 is either varus (-) or valgus (+)
HKA
Hip knee ankle angle measured on X-ray (degrees). Deviation from 0 is either varus (-) or valgus (+)

Full Information

First Posted
November 23, 2022
Last Updated
December 6, 2022
Sponsor
Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
Collaborators
Oslo University Hospital, Medacta International SA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05651009
Brief Title
Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs
Acronym
ClessTKA
Official Title
Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs Using CT Micromotion Analysis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 6, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2033 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Helse Møre og Romsdal HF
Collaborators
Oslo University Hospital, Medacta International SA

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to analyze the stability of a cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) over time and compare it to a well-documented implant in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The main aim is to answer if there is a difference in stability over time as a measure of long time survivorship in these 2 implants. 50 participants will be randomly allocated to receive either the Triathlon Tritanium (Stryker) or the Global Medacta Knee Sphere (GMK Sphere, Medacta) 3D printed cementless TKAs.
Detailed Description
Total joint replacement is an efficacious treatment for osteoarthritis of hips and knees. Both TKA and Total Hip Artrhoplasties (THA) have excellent implant survivorship. However, patients' satisfaction is lower in TKA than THA. A possible cause of the discrepancy is the unnatural knee kinematics after TKA. Various implants designs have been developed to solve the problem. The most common fixation mode is cemented TKA with good survival up to 15 years. However, newer series in younger patients also have shown lasting survival with cementless implants (Nilsson KG, Prudhon JL). Among various different designs, the medially stabilized total knee, which are designed to reproduce natural knee kinematics with a medial ball-in-socked design, is a promising implant design (No authors listed). Dynamically the medial pivot knee performs more naturally (Bragonzoni L,Petersen ET) compared to other designs. Most data for this design is available only for the cemented version. Up to now there is no safety study performed that confirms the stability over time for this implant with cementless fixation. In this study, the investigators will therefore analyze the in vivo stability of an uncemented TKA with a medially stabilized design, and compare it with a well-documented comparable implant. In order to do this, the investigators will use the CT based micromotion analysis (Broden C, Broden C). This study will contribute to the understanding of fixation and lead to safety to the patient.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthritis
Keywords
CT based micromotion analysis, CTMA, Cementless TKA, Uncemented TKA, Total knee replacement, Total knee arthroplasty, TKR, GMK Sphere, Tritanium

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Double blinded study (patient and research nurse)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Cementless Triathlon Tritanium 3D printed TKA
Arm Title
Study group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
GMK Sphere cementless 3D printed TKA
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TKA
Intervention Description
Total knee artroplasty with medial parapatellar incision and mechanical alignment without navigation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
CTMA Maximum Total Translation
Description
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
CTMA Maximum Total Translation
Description
The highest total translation on the implant at each time point
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
CTMA Total rotation
Description
Center of mass and peripheral points (degrees)
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
CTMA Total rotation
Description
Center of mass and peripheral points (degrees)
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
CTMA Total translation
Description
Center of mass and peripheral points (millimeters)
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
CTMA Total translation
Description
Center of mass and peripheral points (millimeters)
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measure PROMs). 12 item likert scale with scores from 0-4 (0=never, 4= allways). Mean value is multiplied with 25 and the subtracted from 100. Maximum score i 100 (excellent), minimum score is 0 (worse).
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measure PROMs). 12 item likert scale with scores from 0-4 (0=never, 4= allways). Mean value is multiplied with 25 and the subtracted from 100. Maximum score i 100 (excellent), minimum score is 0 (worse).
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROMs). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activites of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Description
Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROMs). KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Activites of Daily Living (ADL), Sport and Recreation Function (Sport/Rec) and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Range of motion
Description
From full extension to full flexion (degrees)
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
Range of motion
Description
From full extension to full flexion (degrees)
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
HKA
Description
Hip knee ankle angle measured on X-ray (degrees). Deviation from 0 is either varus (-) or valgus (+)
Time Frame
Up to 2 years
Title
HKA
Description
Hip knee ankle angle measured on X-ray (degrees). Deviation from 0 is either varus (-) or valgus (+)
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
BMI
Description
Body mass index (kg/m2)
Time Frame
Preoperative
Title
Operation time
Description
Time used in minutes from skin incision to wound closure.
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Axial alignment of the tibia
Description
Measured by Bergers method (degrees internal or extarnal rotation)
Time Frame
Up to 1 week postoperative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: • Patients referred to Kristiansund Hospital for primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis with Kellgren & Lawrence grade 3 or 4 Exclusion Criteria: Preoperative severe deformity (Hip-Knee-Ankle angle of >5 (valgus) or <-15 degrees (varus) on a full-length leg image at weight bearing Preoperative flexion contracture more than 15° Less than 50 and more than 75 years of age at the time of surgery Use of walking aids because of other musculoskeletal and neuromuscular problems Preoperative diagnosis other than osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, tumours) Revision arthroplasty Obesity with BMI>35 g/m2 Lateral collateral ligament deficient knee Previous knee joint infection Cognitive dysfunction or severe psychiatric disorders.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Frank-David Øhrn, MD, PhD
Phone
71120000
Ext
0047
Email
frank-david.ohrn@helse-mr.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Myrthle Hoel Slettvåg, Nurse
Phone
71120000
Ext
0047
Email
Myrthle.Slettvag.Hoel@helse-mr.no
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frank-David Øhrn, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephan M Röhrl, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Oslo University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kristiansund Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust
City
Kristiansund
State/Province
Møre And Romsdal
ZIP/Postal Code
6508
Country
Norway
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Frank-David Øhrn, PhD
Phone
71120000
Ext
0047
Email
frank-david.ohrn@helse-mr.no
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Myrthle Slettvåg Hoel, Nurse
Phone
71120000
Ext
0047
Email
myrthle.slettvag.hoel@helse-mr.no

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Immediately following publication and 5 years
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers that want access to data
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16826107
Citation
Nilsson KG, Henricson A, Norgren B, Dalen T. Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jul;448:129-39. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224003.33260.74.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29232186
Citation
Prudhon JL, Verdier R. Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years. SICOT J. 2017;3:70. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017046. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
Results Reference
background
Citation
No authors listed. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 Annual Report, Adelaide; AOA, 2021: https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/712282/Hip%2C+Knee+%26+Shoulder+Arthroplasty/bb011aed-ca6c-2c5e-f1e1-39b4150bc693 (date assessed October 29 2022).
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30368560
Citation
Bragonzoni L, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Bontempi M, Roberti di Sarsina T, Cardinale U, Alesi D, Iacono F, Neri MP, Zaffagnini S. New design total knee arthroplasty shows medial pivoting movement under weight-bearing conditions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1049-1056. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5243-5. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35809105
Citation
Petersen ET, Rytter S, Koppens D, Dalsgaard J, Hansen TB, Andersen MS, Stilling M. Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):933-945. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07036-w. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33821746
Citation
Broden C, Sandberg O, Olivecrona H, Emery R, Skoldenberg O. Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups. Acta Orthop. 2021 Aug;92(4):419-423. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1906082. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27478832
Citation
Broden C, Olivecrona H, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Skoldenberg O. Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5909741. doi: 10.1155/2016/5909741. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of the in Vivo Stability of 2 Cementless TKA Designs

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs