search
Back to results

Comparison of Esketamine/Propofol and Methohexital Anesthesia for ECT (Ketofol)

Primary Purpose

ECT, Depression

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Austria
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Methohexital
Ketofol
Sponsored by
Medical University of Vienna
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ECT focused on measuring electroconvulsive therapy, depression, esketamine, anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: male or female inpatients age ≥ 18 years ICD-11 diagnosis of severe uni- or bipolar depression (F32.2, F32.2, F33.2, F33.3, F31.4, F31.5) Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD17 ≥ 24 ability to understand and willingness to sign written informed consent document negative urine pregnancy test in women anesthesiological approval for ECT (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA ≤ 3) antidepressant and antipsychotic medication in steady state for at least 7 days prior to first ECT treatment Exclusion Criteria: severe somatic or neurological disease (esp. current or previous history of intracranial hypertension, uncontrolled severe hypertension, bleeds or aneurysm, recent myocardial infarction) current or past history of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder clinical relevant abnormalities on a general physical examination and routine laboratory screening pregnancy, breast feeding known allergy to the study drugs or compounds of the latter

Sites / Locations

  • Pia Baldinger-MelichRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Methohexital

Ketofol

Arm Description

Initial dose: methohexital 1 mg/kg (≙ 80 mg methohexital in a subject with 80 kg). If sufficient hypnosis is not achieved with the initial dose further doses of 10 mg methohexital will be administered until sufficient depth of anesthesia according to defined criteria is achieved. Criteria for sufficient depth of anesthesia will be comprised by a) the abolition of the eye-lash reflex b) absence of motor reaction upon inflation of the tourniquet. Maintenance dose: none (The drug combination is injected in order to initiate anesthesia) Route of administration: intravenous Duration: few seconds to initiate anesthesia. The procedure will be repeated for each ECT session.

Esketamine and propofol will be prepared shortly before injection by the nurse anesthetist as follows: 4 ml esketamine 25mg/ml, 6ml NaCl (0,9%), 10ml propofol (10mg/ml). The stability of ketamine-propofol mixtures (undiluted, 50:50 ratio) in one syringe has been documented for up to 3 hours. Initial dose: esketamine 0,5 mg/kg + propofol 0,5 mg/kg (≙ 40 mg esketamine + 40 mg propofol in a subject with 80 kg). If sufficient hypnosis is not achieved with the initial dose further doses of 5mg esketamine and 5 mg propofol will be administered until a sufficient depth of anesthesia is achieved. Maintenance dose: none (The drug combination is injected in order to initiate anesthesia) Route of administration: intravenous Duration: few seconds to initiate anesthesia. The procedure will be repeated for each ECT session

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

antidepressant effect
• HAMD17 change between baseline and post-ECT in both treatment arms over a series of 8 ECT sessions
recovery time
Mean recovery time over 8 ECT sessions in both treatment arms

Secondary Outcome Measures

adverse events
AEs during anesthesia/ECT
concomitant medication
use of concom. medication during intervention to treat AEs
cognition
MMSE, Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), multiple-choice word test (MWT-B), trail making test (TMT), reaction test (RT), cognitrone (COG), non-verbal learning test (NVLT), verbal learning test (VLT) (Vienna testing system, https://vts.schuhfried.com), compare cognitive outcomes before and after ECT in both treatment arms
time to reorientation
compare time to reorientation in both treatment arms
seizure quality
compare a function of seizure duration, concordance (seizure duration in the electromyogram/seizure duration in the electroencephalogram), midictal amplitude, peak heart rates and interhemispheric coherence in both treatment arms

Full Information

First Posted
December 6, 2022
Last Updated
December 16, 2022
Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05655754
Brief Title
Comparison of Esketamine/Propofol and Methohexital Anesthesia for ECT
Acronym
Ketofol
Official Title
A Prospective Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled, Safety and Non-inferiority Study of Esketamine Plus Propofol Compared to Methohexital Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The current anesthetic drug used as standard for ECT procedure at the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, is the barbiturate methohexital (Brevital®). As far as we know, methohexital is the most common anesthetic in the procedure of ECT. Only few heterogeneous randomized controlled trials to directly compare the use of (sole) ketamine and methohexital in ECT with relatively small sample sizes have been conducted so far, showing inconclusive findings: a retrospective comparison of methohexital and switch to ketamine anesthesia in 36 patients showed that ketamine prolonged seizure duration and accelerated posttreatment orientation. Others compared both drugs in terms of recovery and reorientation time showing that reorientation time was faster in the methohexital group (total N=9). Another study showed no difference in any outcome measure (depressive symptom improvement, cognition, adverse events) between both groups (total N=16, N=9 per group). Finally, a comparative investigation (total N=37, N=20 vs. N=17) detected no differences between both anesthetics but a higher systolic blood pressure posttreatment and longer motor seizure duration in the ketamine group. A favorable profile of ketamine in regards to seizure quality has been reported, however in terms of outcome measures methohexital and ketamine were similar (total N=50, N=23 vs. N=27). The present study is designed as a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial comparing esketamine plus propofol (ratio 1:1, for better readability from now on referred to as "ketofol") to methohexital, the latter being the current standard anesthetic applied for ECT procedure at our department. Patients eligible for ECT will be randomly assigned to receive anesthesia with either ketofol or methohexital for the whole course of the individual ECT series. Group differences will be investigated both in regards to outcomes related to anesthesia, treatment-outcome and seizure quality. Further, changes in cardiac enzyme levels before and after ECT-treatment and during the entire ECT series will be evaluated and possible group differences will be explored. As stated above the sole/adjunct administration of ketamine as anesthetic agent for ECT has been associated with better seizure quality, similar antidepressant outcomes and anesthesia-associated events, while there is some evidence suggesting that the use of ketamine might present some advantages to other anesthetics in terms of cognitive side-effects accompanying ECT. Therefore, the aim of the present study will be to establish ketofol as a new standard for anesthesia at our Department.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ECT, Depression
Keywords
electroconvulsive therapy, depression, esketamine, anesthesia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Depressive patients, that are eligible for ECT, will be randomized to receiving either ECT with esketamine plus propofol or methohexital anesthesia for the whole series (min. 8 treatments). Participants and treating psychiatrists will be unaware or the anesthetic used; anesthetists will know the substance that it aministered during ECT. Both drugs will be compared in terms of safety, recovery time and clinical outcome.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Randomization of the study drug will be done using the software www.meduniwien.ac.at/randomizer according to consecutive CRF numbers. Stratification according to baseline HAMD17 scores (3 groups: HAMD 23-30, HAMD 30-40, HAMD>40), age and previous ECT (yes/no) will be performed Participants and treating psychiatrists will be unaware or the anesthetic used; anesthetists will know the substance that it aministered during ECT
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Methohexital
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Initial dose: methohexital 1 mg/kg (≙ 80 mg methohexital in a subject with 80 kg). If sufficient hypnosis is not achieved with the initial dose further doses of 10 mg methohexital will be administered until sufficient depth of anesthesia according to defined criteria is achieved. Criteria for sufficient depth of anesthesia will be comprised by a) the abolition of the eye-lash reflex b) absence of motor reaction upon inflation of the tourniquet. Maintenance dose: none (The drug combination is injected in order to initiate anesthesia) Route of administration: intravenous Duration: few seconds to initiate anesthesia. The procedure will be repeated for each ECT session.
Arm Title
Ketofol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Esketamine and propofol will be prepared shortly before injection by the nurse anesthetist as follows: 4 ml esketamine 25mg/ml, 6ml NaCl (0,9%), 10ml propofol (10mg/ml). The stability of ketamine-propofol mixtures (undiluted, 50:50 ratio) in one syringe has been documented for up to 3 hours. Initial dose: esketamine 0,5 mg/kg + propofol 0,5 mg/kg (≙ 40 mg esketamine + 40 mg propofol in a subject with 80 kg). If sufficient hypnosis is not achieved with the initial dose further doses of 5mg esketamine and 5 mg propofol will be administered until a sufficient depth of anesthesia is achieved. Maintenance dose: none (The drug combination is injected in order to initiate anesthesia) Route of administration: intravenous Duration: few seconds to initiate anesthesia. The procedure will be repeated for each ECT session
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methohexital
Intervention Description
anesthesia during ECT
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketofol
Intervention Description
anesthesia during ECT
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
antidepressant effect
Description
• HAMD17 change between baseline and post-ECT in both treatment arms over a series of 8 ECT sessions
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
recovery time
Description
Mean recovery time over 8 ECT sessions in both treatment arms
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
adverse events
Description
AEs during anesthesia/ECT
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
concomitant medication
Description
use of concom. medication during intervention to treat AEs
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
cognition
Description
MMSE, Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI), multiple-choice word test (MWT-B), trail making test (TMT), reaction test (RT), cognitrone (COG), non-verbal learning test (NVLT), verbal learning test (VLT) (Vienna testing system, https://vts.schuhfried.com), compare cognitive outcomes before and after ECT in both treatment arms
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
time to reorientation
Description
compare time to reorientation in both treatment arms
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
seizure quality
Description
compare a function of seizure duration, concordance (seizure duration in the electromyogram/seizure duration in the electroencephalogram), midictal amplitude, peak heart rates and interhemispheric coherence in both treatment arms
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: male or female inpatients age ≥ 18 years ICD-11 diagnosis of severe uni- or bipolar depression (F32.2, F32.2, F33.2, F33.3, F31.4, F31.5) Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD17 ≥ 24 ability to understand and willingness to sign written informed consent document negative urine pregnancy test in women anesthesiological approval for ECT (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA ≤ 3) antidepressant and antipsychotic medication in steady state for at least 7 days prior to first ECT treatment Exclusion Criteria: severe somatic or neurological disease (esp. current or previous history of intracranial hypertension, uncontrolled severe hypertension, bleeds or aneurysm, recent myocardial infarction) current or past history of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder clinical relevant abnormalities on a general physical examination and routine laboratory screening pregnancy, breast feeding known allergy to the study drugs or compounds of the latter
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pia Baldinger-Melich
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pia Baldinger-Melich, Assoc.Prof.
Phone
+43 1 4040035350
Email
pia.baldinger-melich@meduniwien.ac.at

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Esketamine/Propofol and Methohexital Anesthesia for ECT

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs