search
Back to results

Feasibility of Utilising Brushing Cytology and Dermoscopy for Diagnosing Penile Lesions (BRUCY)

Primary Purpose

Penile Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cytological Brushing
Sponsored by
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Penile Cancer focused on measuring Penile cancer, HPV, Cytology testing

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: All patients requiring either diagnostic biopsy or WLE (wide local excision) of a lesion of the penis Age > 18 years Written informed consent provided by the patient Subject has been scheduled for surgical intervention, with a biopsy procedure being a part of the surgical plan Exclusion Criteria: Subject is unfit for surgery upon surgeon's assessment. Unable to provide consent Those with terminal disease Those with palpable lymph nodes Other coincident cancers Previous radiotherapy treatment to the penis, bladder, prostate, anus Subject is deprived of liberty or under guardianship Subject is not able to follow and understand the procedures of the study due to mental state or other reasons

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Research Arm

    Arm Description

    Each group will undergo the same study procedures; Dermoscope Cytological brushing Complete questionnaire on experience of the cytological brushing SoC treatment

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Does cytology results compare equally with standard histological biopsy for detecting cancer
    Concordance of cytology vs Histopathology i.e. is the cytology assessment equal to histopathology results when detecting cancer
    Does the use of dermoscopy photography enable us to identify abnormal cellular changes that compare equally to the results obtained with standard histological biopsy.
    Concordance of dermoscopy vs Histopathology in detecting cancer i.e. does the use of dermoscopy photographs enable us to identify cancer and compare equally to results obtained by histopathology

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Patient satisfaction with cytological brushing diagnostic method being tested
    All patients on study will be asked their views on the cytology brushing technique being used to gauge their satisfaction and experience of the new diagnostic method being tested

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 3, 2022
    Last Updated
    December 20, 2022
    Sponsor
    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05662839
    Brief Title
    Feasibility of Utilising Brushing Cytology and Dermoscopy for Diagnosing Penile Lesions
    Acronym
    BRUCY
    Official Title
    Feasibility of Utilising Brushing Cytology and Dermoscopy for Diagnosing Penile Lesions
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    December 2022
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    January 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    January 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    The Christie NHS Foundation Trust

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    In an attempt to reduce patient flow into the hospital we are going to assess the use of penile cytological brushings and dermoscopy in diagnosing cancer or non-cancer conditions of the penis.
    Detailed Description
    Currently the standard of care pathway for all patients suspected of having penile cancer involves the need for a penile biopsy under local (LA) or general anaesthetic (GA). We hope to assess the feasibility of cytololgical brushings and the patient experience of the use of such a technique. Additionally, we will make initial comparison on the concordance between cytological brushing and dermoscope photo vs actual biopsy only. Importantly for this study, all patients will be offered standard of care: a biopsy under LA or GA. The additional procedures of the cytological brushing and dermoscope photo will be done in an out-patient clinic setting (with no anaesthetic). If it can be shown that the inclusion of the cytological brushing and dermoscope photo have comparative results over current standard of care histological biopsy, this will provide sufficient evidence to expand this study to acquire more data.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Penile Cancer
    Keywords
    Penile cancer, HPV, Cytology testing

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Model Description
    Patients will be assigned to one of two groups. Each group will receive standard of care and the additional procedures being investigated.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    50 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Research Arm
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Each group will undergo the same study procedures; Dermoscope Cytological brushing Complete questionnaire on experience of the cytological brushing SoC treatment
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Cytological Brushing
    Intervention Description
    All participants will undergo cytological brushing to collect cell samples for analysis
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Does cytology results compare equally with standard histological biopsy for detecting cancer
    Description
    Concordance of cytology vs Histopathology i.e. is the cytology assessment equal to histopathology results when detecting cancer
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, expected to be 12 months
    Title
    Does the use of dermoscopy photography enable us to identify abnormal cellular changes that compare equally to the results obtained with standard histological biopsy.
    Description
    Concordance of dermoscopy vs Histopathology in detecting cancer i.e. does the use of dermoscopy photographs enable us to identify cancer and compare equally to results obtained by histopathology
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, expected to be 12 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Patient satisfaction with cytological brushing diagnostic method being tested
    Description
    All patients on study will be asked their views on the cytology brushing technique being used to gauge their satisfaction and experience of the new diagnostic method being tested
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, expected to be 12 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Male
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: All patients requiring either diagnostic biopsy or WLE (wide local excision) of a lesion of the penis Age > 18 years Written informed consent provided by the patient Subject has been scheduled for surgical intervention, with a biopsy procedure being a part of the surgical plan Exclusion Criteria: Subject is unfit for surgery upon surgeon's assessment. Unable to provide consent Those with terminal disease Those with palpable lymph nodes Other coincident cancers Previous radiotherapy treatment to the penis, bladder, prostate, anus Subject is deprived of liberty or under guardianship Subject is not able to follow and understand the procedures of the study due to mental state or other reasons
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    shira Baram
    Phone
    07970271667
    Email
    shira.baram@nhs.net
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Vijay Sangar
    Organizational Affiliation
    The Christie NHS FT
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    no intention to share individual participant data with other researchers outside of the BRUCY research study.

    Learn more about this trial

    Feasibility of Utilising Brushing Cytology and Dermoscopy for Diagnosing Penile Lesions

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs