search
Back to results

Investigating Bone Cement With or Without Inossia™ Cement Softener for Vertebral Compression Fractures (SOFTBONE)

Primary Purpose

Vertebral Compression Fracture

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
V-Flex
V-Steady
Sponsored by
Inossia AB
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Vertebral Compression Fracture focused on measuring vertebral compression fracture, bone cement, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, osteoporosis, softener

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities (study-related activities are any procedures that would not have been performed during normal management of the patient, i.e. standard of care); Symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture without prior or not responding to medical treatment within 6 months; Maximum of 1 level of vertebral compression fractures eligible for treatment localized at level Th5 to L5 and verified by MRI or bone scan; Height reduction of the affected vertebra(e) with an anterior wall compression of not exceeding 60% compared to the nearest normal vertebral body determined by X-ray; Have pain correlating to the fractured levels requiring regular analgesic intake and/or causing substantial disability of daily life; Pain score ≥ 40 mm measured by VAS correlating to at least one of the fracture levels (scale 0 - 100 mm) at the screening visit; Oswestry Disability Index > 20 (0 - 100 scale); SF-12PCS Index < 80 (0 - 100 scale); Patient with a communicative ability to understand the procedure and participate in the study and comply with the follow up program. Exclusion Criteria: Patients below 18 years; Any burst fracture; Unstable fractures defined by neurological deficit or interspinous process widening as evaluated by the Investigator, as well as kyphosis > 30°, translation > 4 mm; Established or suspected malignancy of the fractured vertebra. Hemangioma of the fractured vertebra; High energy trauma or clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis as suggested by progressive weakness; Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the fractured vertebrae; Patients with extremely high BMI, i.e. BMI ≥ 40; Previously treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty; Patients with concomitant diseases which may be worsened by invasive treatment of the fracture such as e.g. severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (including aortic aneurysm), as judged by the Investigator Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on Coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re- initiation of anticoagulants; Active systemic infection or local skin infection at the puncture site; Pregnancy or breast-feeding; Patients with known chemical dependency or drugs or with a medical history of drug abuse; Patients who are serving prison sentence; Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion Pacemaker Previous or active radiotherapy affecting the spine

Sites / Locations

  • Beam Radiology
  • Mannheim University HospitalRecruiting
  • Hospital in MechernichRecruiting
  • Lodz University HospitalRecruiting
  • Clínico San CarlosRecruiting
  • Puerta de HierroRecruiting
  • University Hospital in ValladolidRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

V-Flex

V-Steady

Arm Description

Bone cement including Inossia Cement Softener

Bone Cement alone

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

New fractures
Assess the effectiveness after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by change of new fractures.
Location of fractures
Assess the location of new fractures: adjacent or non-adjacent to the treated vertebral or re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.
Timing of fractures
Assess the timing of adjacent, non-adjacent and re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain measured by VAS
Assess the change in back pain at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): scale 0-100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst pain imaginable
Function by ODI
Assess the change in function at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): scale 0-100% where a higher score means a worse outcome
Health related quality of life by SF-12
Assess the change in health related quality of life at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by SF-12: scale 0-100 where a higher score means a better outcome
Safety measured by adverse events
Asses the safety of Inossia™ Cement Softener as measured by adverse events
Hospital Beds
Record the number of hospital bed days (within hospital, nursing home, etc.) during the first week
The vertebral height
The vertebral height at 12 months compared to baseline by X-ray (Average Mild Vertebral Body Height)
Analgesic use
Record the analgesic use and compare to the WHO analgestic ladder
Osteoporotic treatment regimen checklist
Record the osteoporotic treatment regimen

Full Information

First Posted
December 14, 2022
Last Updated
January 6, 2023
Sponsor
Inossia AB
Collaborators
EIT Health, Uppsala University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05676320
Brief Title
Investigating Bone Cement With or Without Inossia™ Cement Softener for Vertebral Compression Fractures
Acronym
SOFTBONE
Official Title
A Multicentre, Single-blind, RCT to Document the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of a Bone Cement With or Without Inossia™ Cement Softener for Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 11, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Inossia AB
Collaborators
EIT Health, Uppsala University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall purpose of conducting this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of V-Flex and V-Steady for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that adding a cement softener into a PMMA bone cement is comparable to a PMMA bone cement alone (V-Steady).
Detailed Description
The clinical investigation is a prospective, single-blind, controlled multi-center study of vertebral compression fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty with PMMA alone (V-Steady) or PMMA mixed with Inossia™ Cement Softener (V-Flex). The overall purpose of conducting this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of Inossia™ Cement Softener mixed with PMMA for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that the V-Flex is, at least, comparable (non-inferior) to the PMMA products used today. All eligible patients will be invited to participate in the study. A total of 150 patients will be enrolled in the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Vertebral Compression Fracture
Keywords
vertebral compression fracture, bone cement, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, osteoporosis, softener

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
V-Flex
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Bone cement including Inossia Cement Softener
Arm Title
V-Steady
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Bone Cement alone
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
V-Flex
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kyphoplasty
Intervention Description
Bone cement including Inossia Cement Softener. Treatment for vertebral compression fracture
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
V-Steady
Intervention Description
Bone Cement alone
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
New fractures
Description
Assess the effectiveness after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by change of new fractures.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Location of fractures
Description
Assess the location of new fractures: adjacent or non-adjacent to the treated vertebral or re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Timing of fractures
Description
Assess the timing of adjacent, non-adjacent and re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain measured by VAS
Description
Assess the change in back pain at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): scale 0-100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst pain imaginable
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Function by ODI
Description
Assess the change in function at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): scale 0-100% where a higher score means a worse outcome
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Health related quality of life by SF-12
Description
Assess the change in health related quality of life at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by SF-12: scale 0-100 where a higher score means a better outcome
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Safety measured by adverse events
Description
Asses the safety of Inossia™ Cement Softener as measured by adverse events
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Hospital Beds
Description
Record the number of hospital bed days (within hospital, nursing home, etc.) during the first week
Time Frame
1 week
Title
The vertebral height
Description
The vertebral height at 12 months compared to baseline by X-ray (Average Mild Vertebral Body Height)
Time Frame
12 month
Title
Analgesic use
Description
Record the analgesic use and compare to the WHO analgestic ladder
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Osteoporotic treatment regimen checklist
Description
Record the osteoporotic treatment regimen
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities (study-related activities are any procedures that would not have been performed during normal management of the patient, i.e. standard of care); Symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture without prior or not responding to medical treatment within 6 months; Maximum of 1 level of vertebral compression fractures eligible for treatment localized at level Th5 to L5 and verified by MRI or bone scan; Height reduction of the affected vertebra(e) with an anterior wall compression of not exceeding 60% compared to the nearest normal vertebral body determined by X-ray; Have pain correlating to the fractured levels requiring regular analgesic intake and/or causing substantial disability of daily life; Pain score ≥ 40 mm measured by VAS correlating to at least one of the fracture levels (scale 0 - 100 mm) at the screening visit; Oswestry Disability Index > 20 (0 - 100 scale); SF-12PCS Index < 80 (0 - 100 scale); Patient with a communicative ability to understand the procedure and participate in the study and comply with the follow up program. Exclusion Criteria: Patients below 18 years; Any burst fracture; Unstable fractures defined by neurological deficit or interspinous process widening as evaluated by the Investigator, as well as kyphosis > 30°, translation > 4 mm; Established or suspected malignancy of the fractured vertebra. Hemangioma of the fractured vertebra; High energy trauma or clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis as suggested by progressive weakness; Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the fractured vertebrae; Patients with extremely high BMI, i.e. BMI ≥ 40; Previously treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty; Patients with concomitant diseases which may be worsened by invasive treatment of the fracture such as e.g. severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (including aortic aneurysm), as judged by the Investigator Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on Coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re- initiation of anticoagulants; Active systemic infection or local skin infection at the puncture site; Pregnancy or breast-feeding; Patients with known chemical dependency or drugs or with a medical history of drug abuse; Patients who are serving prison sentence; Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion Pacemaker Previous or active radiotherapy affecting the spine
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Malin K Nilsson, PhD
Phone
+46702688674
Email
malin.nilsson@inossia.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anna Gibernau
Phone
+34 936 690 575
Email
anna.gibernau@clementine.globa
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Noriega
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital in Valladolid
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Beam Radiology
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Clerk-Lamalice
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier Clerk-Lamalice
Facility Name
Mannheim University Hospital
City
Mannheim
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregor Reisig
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Eschmann
Facility Name
Hospital in Mechernich
City
Mechernich
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Pflugmacher
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Pfugmacher
Facility Name
Lodz University Hospital
City
Łódź
Country
Poland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maciej Radek
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakub Janowski
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maciej Radek
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jakub Janowski
Facility Name
Clínico San Carlos
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rafael Luque Perez
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rafael Luque Perez
Facility Name
Puerta de Hierro
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raquel Gutierrez Gonzalez
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raquel Gutierrez Gonzalez
Facility Name
University Hospital in Valladolid
City
Valladolid
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Noriega
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Noriega

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
1570766
Citation
Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Feb;7(2):221-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650070214.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2322694
Citation
Leidig G, Minne HW, Sauer P, Wuster C, Wuster J, Lojen M, Raue F, Ziegler R. A study of complaints and their relation to vertebral destruction in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner. 1990 Mar;8(3):217-29. doi: 10.1016/0169-6009(90)90107-q.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8995096
Citation
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):309-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360422. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Citation
International Conference on Harmonisation. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Good Clinical Practice. 1-5-1996.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Volume 8. Part 812, Investigational Device Exemptions, Revised 2006.
Results Reference
background
Citation
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 52nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000. Last amended with Note of Clarification of Paragraph 29 by the WMA General Assembly, Washington 2002 and Note of Clarification on Paragraph 30 by the WMA General assembly, Tokyo 2004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7910248
Citation
de Bruin TW. Iodide-induced hyperthyroidism with computed tomography contrast fluids. Lancet. 1994 May 7;343(8906):1160-1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90265-8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10532877
Citation
ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Statistical principles for clinical trials. International Conference on Harmonisation E9 Expert Working Group. Stat Med. 1999 Aug 15;18(15):1905-42. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12427615
Citation
Lane JI, Maus TP, Wald JT, Thielen KR, Bobra S, Luetmer PH. Intravertebral clefts opacified during vertebroplasty: pathogenesis, technical implications, and prognostic significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Nov-Dec;23(10):1642-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16286418
Citation
Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Gray LA, Goodnature BA, Everson SL, Comstock BA, Jarvik JG. Evaluation of vertebroplasty with a validated outcome measure: the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Nov-Dec;26(10):2652-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16091505
Citation
Trout AT, Gray LA, Kallmes DF. Vertebroplasty in the inpatient population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Aug;26(7):1629-33.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17416821
Citation
Layton KF, Thielen KR, Koch CA, Luetmer PH, Lane JI, Wald JT, Kallmes DF. Vertebroplasty, first 1000 levels of a single center: evaluation of the outcomes and complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):683-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16908585
Citation
Voormolen MH, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, van der Graaf Y, Lampmann LE, Lohle PN, Juttmann JR. Pain response in the first trimester after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with or without bone marrow edema. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Aug;27(7):1579-85.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15931511
Citation
Palussiere J, Berge J, Gangi A, Cotten A, Pasco A, Bertagnoli R, Jaksche H, Carpeggiani P, Deramond H. Clinical results of an open prospective study of a bis-GMA composite in percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):982-91. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0664-2. Epub 2005 Jun 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10529144
Citation
Cortet B, Cotten A, Boutry N, Flipo RM, Duquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Delcambre B. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an open prospective study. J Rheumatol. 1999 Oct;26(10):2222-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16452745
Citation
Prather H, Van Dillen L, Metzler JP, Riew KD, Gilula LA. Prospective measurement of function and pain in patients with non-neoplastic compression fractures treated with vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Feb;88(2):334-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02670.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16333624
Citation
Vogl TJ, Proschek D, Schwarz W, Mack M, Hochmuth K. CT-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty in the therapy of vertebral compression fractures. Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0021-4. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12427813
Citation
Gaughen JR Jr, Jensen ME, Schweickert PA, Kaufmann TJ, Marx WF, Kallmes DF. Lack of preoperative spinous process tenderness does not affect clinical success of percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002 Nov;13(11):1135-8. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61955-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16091504
Citation
Do HM, Kim BS, Marcellus ML, Curtis L, Marks MP. Prospective analysis of clinical outcomes after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Aug;26(7):1623-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11074683
Citation
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8628042
Citation
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17353335
Citation
Voormolen MH, Mali WP, Lohle PN, Fransen H, Lampmann LE, van der Graaf Y, Juttmann JR, Jansssens X, Verhaar HJ. Percutaneous vertebroplasty compared with optimal pain medication treatment: short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The VERTOS study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):555-60.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Guidance Document for the Preparation of IDEs for Spinal Systems, January 13, 2000.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Clinical Trial Considerations:Vertebral Augmentation Devices to Treat Spinal lnsufficiency Fractures, October 24, 2004.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Clauss W. How big is the risk of an examination with x-ray contrast media of patients with known hypersensitivity to CM and for allergic patients? In Dawson P and Clauss W (eds.): Contrast media in practice, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 1999:98-99.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2343107
Citation
Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990 Jun;175(3):621-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.175.3.2343107.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Wijn D and Mullen V. Biocompatibility of Acrylic lmplants. In Biocompatibility of Clinical lmplant Materials. Edited,CRC Press, 1981.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16418388
Citation
Trout AT, Kallmes DF, Kaufmann TJ. New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Jan;27(1):217-23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12511679
Citation
Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, Pfiefer BA, Pazianos AG, Choi IS. Occurrence of new vertebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):119-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2261011911.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11136886
Citation
Grados F, Depriester C, Cayrolle G, Hardy N, Deramond H, Fardellone P. Long-term observations of vertebral osteoporotic fractures treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000 Dec;39(12):1410-4. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1410.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15597484
Citation
Kim CW, Minocha J, Wahl CE, Garfin SR. Response of fractured osteoporotic bone to polymethylacrylate after vertebroplasty: case report. Spine J. 2004 Nov-Dec;4(6):709-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15590842
Citation
McKiernan F, Faciszewski T, Jensen R. Quality of life following vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec;86(12):2600-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200412000-00003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17660858
Citation
Gill JB, Kuper M, Chin PC, Zhang Y, Schutt R Jr. Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician. 2007 Jul;10(4):583-90.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17588820
Citation
Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Spine J. 2008 May-Jun;8(3):488-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10371229
Citation
Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Cummings SR. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Jun 14;159(11):1215-20. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.11.1215.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8317445
Citation
Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, Jacobsen SJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd. Population-based study of survival after osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 May 1;137(9):1001-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116756.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11710717
Citation
Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S; Health-Related Quality of Life Subgroup of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Nov;44(11):2611-9. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200111)44:113.0.co;2-n.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9599190
Citation
Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR. The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1998 May 15;128(10):793-800. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00001.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Investigating Bone Cement With or Without Inossia™ Cement Softener for Vertebral Compression Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs